User talk:Flow2

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Useless rename requests[edit]

Please stop doing useless rename requests like this one. Multichill (talk) 21:24, 7 January 2009 (UTC)

Why shoud this be useless? For your information - it is a german coat of arms and in german it is named WAPPEN. Another reason is the alphabetical categorization. --Flow2 (talk) 10:35, 8 January 2009 (UTC)
That's not a reason for rename. We have naming conventions over here and English is just as good as German (or Dutch!). Please take a look at Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Useless media rename requests and please don't move stuff to my talk page, i have a watchlist and i use it. Multichill (talk) 10:43, 8 January 2009 (UTC)

File:Oberschwaebische Barockstrasse.svg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 13:18, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

erledigt. --Flow2 (talk) 12:14, 23 July 2009 (UTC)


File tagging File:Coat_of_arms_of_Opatovce_nad_Nitrou.svg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Coat_of_arms_of_Opatovce_nad_Nitrou.svg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Coat_of_arms_of_Opatovce_nad_Nitrou.svg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Multichill (talk) 20:03, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi Multichill. My upload is a national emblem. Why do I need a permission therefore? Is the licence not enough? --Flow2 (talk) 11:27, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
You copied the image of some site and tagged it with {{GFDL}}. The source site doesn't appear to be GFDL-licensed so you'll need permission. If you think it's somehow public domain you should tag it with the right license template and not {{GFDL}}. If you're not sure what do use, ask a question at Commons talk:Licensing. Multichill (talk) 12:42, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
The licence what i meant is {{SlovakCityCOA}}. The problem is, this Coat of arms needs a further licence. --Flow2 (talk) 12:45, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
That's not a license. Someone made this image and that someone has the copyright and has to release it. Multichill (talk) 13:09, 6 September 2009 (UTC)
I sent the author an email (on 06.09.09), but i don't get an answer. --Flow2 (talk) 14:06, 9 September 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Flow2!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 13:13, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Lizenzprobleme[edit]

Hallo Flow2, jemand hat die Lizenzangabe für File:Wappen des Herzogs in Bayern (Haus Wittelsbach).png als nicht zutreffend entfernt. Ohne Lizenz kann das Bild aber nicht bleiben, ich habe es deshalb als solches gekennzeichnet. Viele Grüße! --Konrad Lackerbeck (talk) 09:26, 28 November 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Konrad, das Problem ist für diese Art von Wappen gibt es keine Lizenz. Was soll ich jetzt machen? --Flow2 (talk) 21:15, 30 November 2009 (UTC)


Zum Wappen der Gemeinde Hörselberg-Hainich[edit]

Hallo Flow2, habe gerade das (neue) Ortswappen von Hörselberg-Hainich auf Commons hochgeladen. Leider ist die Vorlage noch sehr pixelig aber man kann was draus machen. Ich hatte versucht, die Grafik von der Gemeinde anzufordern aber die stellen sich taub-blind-stumm. Das Wappen ist redend: Der Amonit symbolisiert den Hörselberg, wo es viele derartige Fossilien zu finden gibt, das Buchenblatt steht für den Hainich, an dem mehrere Ortsteile Anteil haben - und die beiden Hs stehen nochmal für Hörselberg und Hainich. Falls Du mal Zeit hast, die Grafik etwas aufzuarbeiten wäre ich sehr dankbar. Gruß --Metilsteiner (talk) 12:11, 29 January 2010 (UTC) Hallo - ich bins noch mal und habe nun doch noch ein feedback von der Gemeinde bekommen, demnach ist dieses Wappen noch in Prüfung - also irgendwo in einem Büro beim Thr. Landesverwaltungsamt. Wenn die Zulassung erfolgt, wird dieses Wappen auch im Amtsblatt und auf der WEB-Seite Verwendung findenOrtswappen Hörselberg-Hainich.--Metilsteiner (talk) 20:33, 29 January 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Flow2 - vielen Dank für die Mühe, gefällt mir sehr gut, so kann man das Wappen auch verwenden. Gruß --Metilsteiner (talk) 07:54, 31 January 2010 (UTC)

Superseded[edit]

Hi,

(in order to avoid WWIII) we dont delete superseded image like File:Grossrudestedtwappen.jpg, see some explanations here : Commons:Superseded images policy. Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 16:25, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

And for your information, it is illegal to change the license of someone else, like here. I hope you have a good reason. Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 16:32, 3 February 2010 (UTC)

Not illegal, the licence is wrong! The author of this coat of arms is not the user! --Flow2 (talk) 23:20, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

You have to use a right licence otherwise it would be deleted like here http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Wappen_des_Herzogs_in_Bayern_%28Haus_Wittelsbach%29.png&action=edit&redlink=1. Or did i misunderstood the rules? --Flow2 (talk) 23:25, 4 February 2010 (UTC) Currently I see no licece which could be used for african coa. Can you please make one. --Flow2 (talk) 23:36, 4 February 2010 (UTC)

The author of the file is the user. So he can put his own licence in addition to the classic PD license (it's a *little* weird but laws are like that).
So you have the right to add PD to the CoA but it's illegal to change the license of other users (to remove the license is even worse !).
If you want, I can restore File:Wappen des Herzogs in Bayern (Haus Wittelsbach).png.
Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 10:21, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Please do that. --Flow2 (talk) 12:54, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
✓ Done, please add a license (and maybe an other source). Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 18:47, 7 February 2010 (UTC)
Thanx for the licence.
Deutsch: Mein Deustch is nicht sehr gut aber es gibt ein Problem mit dem Titel, ne? Ich kann den Titel verschieben, ob/wenn Sie wollen.
Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 14:05, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
  • Why is there a problem with the name? It is a German coat of arms so why should the name not be in German. --Flow2 (talk) 23:37, 9 February 2010 (UTC)
    The problem was not the langage ! I am agree the name must be in German (or better internationalized but the software is not ready yet).
    Mea culpa, it's my fault, I was wrong and I reversed the description and source (I believed that was the CoA of Stefan Josef Bittel, but this is obvioulsy not !).
    Sorry, VIGNERON * discut. 13:13, 11 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Wappen_Hambach_(bei_Dietz).svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen_Hambach_(bei_Dietz).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Maxtrab (talk) 19:24, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Franziska van Almsick 2011.jpg[edit]

Good evening,

I deleted this picture, as the Flickr file license doesn't allow redistribution.

Notice Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC-BY) or BY SA (CC-BY-SA), or as "No known copyright restrictions", are allowed on Commons.
Copyright (Copyright), ND (CC-ND) and NC (CC-NC) are not allowed on Commons (also not in combination with BY or SA).
If in doubt, please use the Flinfo tool or ask on the talk page.
Some more advanced information can be found at Commons:Flickr files/Guide.

By the way, a glitch occurred during the picture deletion: the deletion rationale is Not CC-BY or CC-BY-SA licensed Flickr picture (and not The user ..., which is applicable to another picture from another user I deleted previously). --Dereckson (talk) 18:37, 17 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Wappen Hambach (bei Diez).svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen Hambach (bei Diez).svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

109.43.0.57 22:21, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Wappen Wilthen.svg[edit]

Hallo Flow, das Wappen sieht ganz gut aus, jedoch sind mir 2 Sachen aufgefallen: 1. der Knauf der Waage könnte ruhig so aussehen wie der vom Schwert. 2. Beim Schwert ist unten die obere Kontur wesentlich zu breit geraten. Und schön das man dich wieder hier sieht auch wenn ich ab und zu nicht deiner Ansicht war (was man ja ändern kann...). Grüße -- Perhelion (talk) 18:29, 16 May 2014 (UTC)


Noch ein Hinweis, wenn du Mängel beseitigst kannst du natürlich den Mängelbaustein entfernen, siehe File:Wappen Rot-Haslach.svg, wobei du nun 2 verschiedene Goldtöne eingebracht hast. -- Perhelion 12:14, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Wappen Landkreis Regensburg.svg[edit]

Hallo. 1. Ich habe das bayerische Blau nach de:Staatsflagge Bayerns verwendet. 2. Das Kreuz ist gemäß Blasonierung ein Tatzenkreuz. 3. Sehe ich keinen Grund, warum die Schildform von den meisten anderen bayerischen Landkreiswappen abweichen sollte. Kannst Du bitte Deine Revertierung begründen? AxeEffect (talk) 18:02, 26 November 2014 (UTC)

Hallo, bitte seh dir die Quelle an. Ich habe an der Schildform nichts verändert. Wenn du das Bild ersetzt, dann solltest du auch bitte die Quellenangabe ändern. Du weißt bestimmt wie es de:Karl-Theodor zu Guttenberg ergangen ist ;) Bitte schau dir auch folgendes pdf an. Im Dokument siehst du auch, dass es für Bayern unterschiedliche Blautöne geben kann. Grüße --Flow2 (talk) 12:35, 27 November 2014 (UTC)

O.K. Ich habe das dunklere Blau nach dieser Empfehlung verwendet, Quellen angegeben und den toten Quellenlink enfernt. Kannst Du damit jetzt leben? AxeEffect (talk) 08:30, 30 November 2014 (UTC)


New level {{User VG-4}}[edit]

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?

VG-4

--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 14:43, 11 December 2014 (UTC)


File:Wappen Landkreis Dingolfing-Landau.svg[edit]

Thank you for your submission of File:Wappen Landkreis Dingolfing-Landau.svg and File:Wappen Landkreis Weilheim-Schongau.svg. While most submissions are useful, do you think you might be able to supply a better quality version of the same, or similar content? ↔ User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 14:10, 3 February 2015 (UTC)

File:Wappen Uri.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen Uri.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?) 15:37, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Deine Wappenzeichnungen[edit]

Hollo Flow, hiermit möchte ich dir mal die Gelegenheit geben deine (wohl ersten Zeichnungen und sozusagen Jugendsünden) zu korrigieren:

Ich denke mittlerweile weißt du hier die Grundlagen der Heraldik. Bei all dem Eifer von dir sind sich auch einige gute Zeichnungen dabei. Bevor du jedoch evtl. neue Zeichnen möchtest, würde ich dich bitten deine alten dahingehend zu korrigieren (bei all den gut Gelungenen und der Masse sind mir auch noch mehr unschöne aufgefallen, dass man meinen könnte hier sind 2 Personen). User: Perhelion (Commons: = crap?)  23:20, 24 February 2015 (UTC)