User talk:Fr.Latreille

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Image Tagging Image:Veynes-Gap29.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Veynes-Gap29.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. --Filnik 13:36, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Voies-Estaque11.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand 15:36, 13 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

Image:Tubaire02.JPG[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which information may be missing. Thank you. Siebrand 16:09, 2 November 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.


Image:Marseille-Pagnol81.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:12, 19 April 2008 (UTC)

Image:Marseille-StJeanduDésert18.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 16:51, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

✓ Done -- Fr.Latreille 21:29, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Polski | Português | Русский | Türkçe | +/−


Bonjour, et merci pour vos contributions. Votre image ou autre fichier multimédia a récemment été supprimé, en accord avec nos procédures et notre politique, car il ne rentrait pas dans le cadre du projet. Je vous invite à consulter la page des critères d'inclusion. En quelques mots, Commons est conçu pour héberger des fichiers : des photographies, des diagrammes, des animations, de la musique, du texte lu et des séquences vidéo. Wikimedia Commons ne contient pas d'écrits comme des articles encyclopédiques, des livres, des actualités, des définitions de mots, etc. Chacun de ces types de contenus est hébergé par un projet spécifique : Wikipédia, Wikibooks, Wikisource, Wikinews, Wiktionary et Wikiquote.

Si votre contribution vous semble entrer dans le cadre de l'un de ces autres projets, n'hésitez pas à y contribuer pour l'y ajouter. Si vous pensez que la suppression de votre fichier ici était une erreur, car votre contribution respectait les critères d'inclusion, vous pouvez demander sa restauration sur la page Commons:Demandes de restauration, en indiquant la raison pour laquelle votre fichier entre dans le cadre du projet et pour aider les autres à évaluer la pertinence de votre requête. Merci pour votre compréhension.

abf /talk to me/ 22:24, 18 December 2008 (UTC)


File:Marseilleveyre-panneau22.JPG[edit]

File deletion warning File:Marseilleveyre-panneau22.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

82.229.4.29 17:08, 30 December 2008 (UTC)

Copyright[edit]

De nombreuses images ajoutées ici sont des copyvio flagrants. Merci de faire attention au droit de copyright et d'auteur. Dionysostom (talk) 22:43, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

Exemple : File:Marseille-Mazargues95d.JPG File:Marseille-St-Pierre-plan.jpg File:Marseille-Buzine61.jpgFile:Marseille-Buzine64.jpg File:Marseille-Buzine62.jpg File:Marseille-Buzine63.jpg ainsi que la plupart des panneaux de quartiers de marseille (pas de fop et droit d'auteur applicable car réelle création ) Dionysostom (talk) 22:57, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


File:Marseille-Mazargues95d.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Marseille-Mazargues95d.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dionysostom (talk) 22:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


File:Marseille-St-Pierre-plan.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Marseille-St-Pierre-plan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dionysostom (talk) 22:58, 24 February 2009 (UTC)

File:Université-Saint-Charles20.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Université-Saint-Charles20.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Grcampbell (talk) 00:11, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Speedy deletion of mistakes[edit]

You nominated Category:Churches_in_Muro_(Haute_Corse) for deletion (it has already been deleted), saying: "empty; created by mistake (a convenient category exists: Churches in Muro (Haute-Corse)." Just for future reference, when you've mistakenly created a category like that, you can use {{speedydelete|reason}}, which is much easier to use than the regular deletion process. - dcljr (talk)

Thanks very much. I'll try to do so in the future. - Fr.Latreille (talk) 19:21, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Fr.Latreille!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:34, 19 September 2011 (UTC)


Désolé : toutes ces images avaient été catégorisées le 18 septembre dans la demi-heure qui a suivi leur création. Il aurait été préférable de le vérifier avant de m'envoyer ce rappel à l'ordre... le lendemain ! Clin - Fr.Latreille (talk) 15:35, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
+ 1 ✓OK --Fr.Latreille (talk) 21:45, 18 December 2011 (UTC)

Re: Églises Saint-Claude par départements[edit]

Bonjour,

Avantages de la création des catégories pour les églises par patron saint et par département sont nombreuses:

1. Facilité pour voir comment les églises sont réparties sur le territoire Français pour un patron saint
2. Pour un département facilité de voir quels sont les patrons saints représentés
3. Repartir le gros volume des églises en France pour les patrons fréquemment utilisés (Saint Jean, Saint Pierre, Saint Martin etc.)

Il est vrai, que l'inconvénient pour les patrons peu fréquents, est d'avoir peu d'églises réparties dans des nombreuses sous-catégories comme s'est le cas pour Saint-Claude. Mais, qui peut dire combien existe-t-il d'églises Saint-Claude en France sur 100 000 églises en tout? Une dizaine me paraît peu probable. La tâche difficile est de répartir à posteriori les églises par département comme la catégorie in France deviendra trop importante. Qui se chargera de la faire après?

J'ai privilégié une démarche homogène pour touts les patrons saints et en plus on peut toujours utiliser la template scan catégorie pour afficher l'ensemble des item de la catégorie mère. Pour l'instant j'ai décidé de ne plus remonter l'information sur les patrons saints des églises, plutôt que de le mettre sous la catégorie in France. --Moonik (talk) 15:46, 2 October 2012 (UTC)

J'avoue, ce n'est pas un sujet simple. Initialement l'idée d'utiliser le patron saint pour les églises d'un département devrais servir tout simplement à répartir un millier des églises mis en vrac dans une catégorie (pour moi indigeste), par une cinquantaine voir même centaine des patrons. J'ai réglé le problème des églises dont on ne connait pas le patron saint en ajoutant la catégorie Unidentified patron saint churches in ... et le problème des patron saint locaux ou exotiques en introduisant la catégorie Other patron saint churches in ... qui les regroupe sans distinction. Mais le problème des multiples saints du même nom n'est pas résolu et il est vraiment difficile à traiter par manque d'information. Les églises aux multiples patrons saints posent également le problème. Faut-il faire les intersections des patrons ou de les classer sous les patrons individuellement? Il sera bien de trouver un autre critère que les patrons saints pour classer les églises dans les départements. Personnellement, je suis à court d'idées sur ce sujet. Le critère architectural est encore bien plus complexe à mettre en ouvre (la même église représente souvent plusieurs styles architecturaux), mais certainement peut-être plus intéressent pour les lecteurs que les patrons saint. Pour l'instant le sujet reste en suspend. --Moonik (talk) 07:09, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Vierge de la Salette avec enfants (statuette).JPG[edit]

Hi Fr.Latreille, where is this statue located (country, inside/outside of a building)? Who is the sculptor? When was it installed (year)? --Túrelio (talk) 09:04, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Ambel-église-statue-17.JPG[edit]

Hi Fr.Latreille, where is this statue located (country)? Who is the sculptor? When was it installed (year/century)? --Túrelio (talk) 09:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Corps-médiathèque-91.JPG[edit]

Hi Fr.Latreille, where is this statue located (country)? Who is the sculptor/artist? When was it installed (year)? --Túrelio (talk) 09:07, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

File:La Fare05-Taix-57.JPG[edit]

Hi Fr.Latreille, who is the sculptor of this statue? When was it installed (year)? --Túrelio (talk) 09:05, 16 December 2012 (UTC)

Barrage de Castillon (La Mongie)[edit]

Bonjour Latreille, un remerciement pour votre excellente remarque. J'ai corrigé et amélioré en créant la page wikipédia du barrage de Castillon à la Mongie. Voir en ligne :[1] Serge Ottaviani (User talk:Serge Ottaviani) 09:05, 29 Octobre 2013 (UTC)

File:Entre Volx et Forcalquier70.JPG[edit]

Bravo pour cette photo : désormais, il y a une route de rocade de Volx qui passe sur ce chemin. Elle est historique maintenant. (user:Azoee de fr:)

Image Berger 7 - NEUVILLE-SUR-SAONE - Terminus du Tramway[edit]

Bonsoir,

Cette image est intéressante, mais son copyright me semble douteux. En effet le tram a été inauguré en 1932, donc la photo est au mieux de cette année-là (au pire de 1952), et rien ne permet d'affirmer que son auteur (connu ou inconnu) serait décédé avant 1944. Par défaut, la règle des 70 ans s'applique.

Cordialement, Fr.Latreille (talk) 22:34, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Bonjour,
Merci de votre alerte.
Je me suis pose la question également, mais j'ai estimé que la technique d'impression de cette carte postale était bien des années 1930, et pas de l'après-guerre, où on a des cartes postales en impression quadrichromique généralement brillantes et sans marge blanche.
Je pense qu'on peut attendre l'éventuelle protestation d'un ayant-droit pour supprimer immédiatement le cliché.
Qu'en pensez-vous ? Cordialement --Claude villetaneuse (talk) 06:41, 24 February 2014 (UTC)