User talk:Fralambert

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

file:Quebec MRC L'Amiante location map.svg[edit]

Bonjour Sémhur! J'aimerais te faire noter que la MRC de l'Amiante à changer son mom pour MRC des Appalaches le 15 novembre 2008. Je me demandais si un renomage de file:Quebec MRC L'Amiante location map.svg vers file:Quebec MRC Les Appalaches location map.svg serait souhaitable ou créerait trop de problème. --Fralambert (talk)

Bonjour Fralambert,
J'ai entamé la démarche de renommage.
Sémhur (talk) 18:26, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token f28c3eee84fe61b613aac4baf17a9df9[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

TUSC token 7db284c24f74a5c8e0346b43ed4b25f0[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Maskinongé 19910827 Église.jpeg[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai annulé la mise de la catégorie de Maskinongé (MRC) sur cette photo que tu avais effectué. À la place j'ai mis cette catégorie dans Category:Tornade de Maskinongé. Je pense que c'est plus global. J'espère que c'est OK pour toi?

Pierre cb (talk) 04:38, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

En fait j'ai mis la catégorie de la MRC car la catastrophe touchait aussi Notre-Dame-de-Pierreville de l'autre côté du fleuve. Et la photo de l'église est la seule à toucher réellement le village--Fralambert (talk) 05:01, 13 March 2011 (UTC)
Je vois que tu as ajouté une catégorie pour la municipalité elle-même pour la catégorie MRC et pour l'image. Je crois que c'est parfait. Pierre cb (talk) 19:56, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Fralambert!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:54, 1 September 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments[edit]

Salut, Fralambert! Would you be interested in helping organize a potential Canadian component of the 2012 edition of Wiki Loves Monuments? I am compiling a list of people that have varying degrees of interest in pursuing this. Cheers, --Skeezix1000 (talk) 19:07, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Fantastique! We'll talk first thing in the new year. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 21:08, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

File:Bellevue House.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bellevue House.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Skeezix1000 (talk) 13:51, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. INeverCry 01:17, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Category:Cultural heritage monuments in Canada[edit]

Bonsoir Fralambert, merci pour l'information, je vais me contenter d'ajouter seulement mes descriptions sans trop toucher aux catégories...certaines choses m'échappent de ce côté je pense. Et merci pour l'encouragement, j'ai passé beaucoup d'heures depuis quelques jours à en safari photo pour le projet, content de voir qu'on l'apprécie !! --Hadrianopolis (talk) 04:05, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Merci[edit]

Merci, je l'avais manqué celle-là. - Simon Villeneuve 13:12, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Filemover[edit]

Welcome, Dear Filemover![edit]

Commons File mover.svg

Hi Fralambert, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one. Or, if there was no rename-request, please use the Move & Replace-tab.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, including those using InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Deutsch | English | 한국어 | മലയാളം | Русский | +/−

  • Hi Fralambert, I decided to give you the filemover right after seeing numerous valid rename requests from you. I did this so that you would have the option of moving files on your own, but if you would rather continue to use rename requests, that's perfectly ok too. Take care. INeverCry 02:06, 13 October 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Fralambert,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 05:11, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Bâtiments historiques qui ne le sont plus[edit]

Salut,

Est-ce que tu saurais si on doit utiliser une catégorie pour des images de bâtiments qui avaient déjà été désignés immeubles historiques (sous une désignation ou une autre) à une époque mais qui ne le sont plus, soit parce qu'ils ont été déclassés, soit parce qu'ils ont été détruits, ou les deux ? Ou si tout simplement il n'y a pas lieu de tenir compte de ces anciennes désignations lorsqu'elles ont cessé de s'appliquer ? Par exemple, je cherchais à catégoriser cette image. Merci à l'avance de ton aide. -- Asclepias (talk) 20:22, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Tien, des balles de golfe. ;) Présentement, il y aurait Category:Demolished cultural heritage monuments in Canada. Il faudrait peu être créer Category:Former cultural heritage monuments in Canada pour les bien déclassés. Au plaisir de t'aider. --Fralambert (talk) 22:02, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

J'étais humble...[edit]

Bonjour Fralambert,

J'ai ajouté (et ajouterai encore) des photos de monuments historiques. Mes photos sont correctes, sans plus, la plupart du temps. Après avoir comparé ce que j'ai mis dans Commons et ce que Lieux patrimoniaux Canada met en ligne, j'ai cessé d'être humble. Je me demande si Lieux patrimoniaux Canada va commencer à piger dans Commons.

Cantons-de-l'Est (talk) 13:03, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Peut-être dans le futur, qui sait, le principal emprunteur gouvernemental que je connais reste la commission de toponymie. Je verrais plus le répertoire du patrimoine culturel du Québec utiliser des photos. Pour la qualité de tes photos, tu ne peux quant même pas faire pire que cela cela (Un LHN qui se résume à un monument avec une plaque, mais sans plaque.) --Fralambert (talk) 02:31, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

le petit pouvoir[edit]

Is it more proper to call it Category:Le Petit Pouvoir or would Ancienne centrale hydroélectrique des Cèdres be better? Je ne sais pas. Fungus Guy (talk) 01:25, 27 August 2013 (UTC)

The problem is there is also a Hydro-Québec Generating Station (File:HQ - Centrale des Cèdres.jpg), I used the nickname of the prower station since it is more the Soulanges Canal Generating Station. --Fralambert (talk) 02:02, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

pont tiffault/pont ducharme[edit]

Your images of Pont Tiffault in La Tuque, Québec, look an awful lot like Pont Ducharme. Are they the same bridge, or just similar-looking bridges in the same area? Fungus Guy (talk) 22:53, 24 September 2013 (UTC)

Pont Thiffault and Pont Ducharme are two different bridge, built on the same river the same year. It's normal they look alike, the departement of Colonization used the same model for all there bridges.The description is here. --Fralambert (talk) 01:53, 25 September 2013 (UTC)

العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Fralambert,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:07, 6 December 2013 (UTC)



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Fralambert,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

L'Enfilade-de-Maisons-en-Brique-Rouge-de-Yamachiche[edit]

I think the category Category:L'Enfilade-de-Maisons-en-Brique-Rouge-de-Yamachiche should be renamed Category:L'enfilade de maisons en brique rouge de Yamachiche, as it is a stand-alone noun in this sense. Thoughts? Fungus Guy (talk) 02:00, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

It's not really make sence, but it is the official name of the historic site [1]. But thinking of it, it sound mo logical in the Category:L'enfilade de maisons en brique rouge de Yamachiche form. --Fralambert (talk) 13:02, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Ah bin tiens ?[edit]

Meuh ? Tu as la possibilité de renommer sur Commons ? Ah bin mince, je ne savais pas ! Bon bin je le saurais à l'avenir, j'ai dérangé Salix pour rien... Bzoo, VonTasha (talk) 16:53, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

@VonTasha: Bin oui, j'ai trop fait de demande accepté qu'un admin m'a donné les clés. --Fralambert (talk) 00:31, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Ton intervention sur l'image File:Lieu historique national de la Bataille-de-Trois-Rivières.JPG[edit]

Bsr,

J'ai vu que tu as réverté le fichier que j'avais téléchargé. Le sujet principal de la photo est le monument et sa plaque commémorative. Quand on le vois dans un article, en l'état, l'intérêt est moindre car la plaque est très petite. De plus, il y a un panneau de signalisation en avant-plan de la photo.

C'est pour ces raisons que j'avais recadré cette image pour mettre en valeur le monument et donc l'intérêt de la photo. Je ne vais pas partir dans une guerre d'édition, mais je souhaite juste savoir ce qui te déplaît dans le recadrage effectué pour les raisons que je t'ai exposé.--medium69 (talk) 01:03, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Je me répond à moi-même : j'ai vu ton commentaire me demandant de téléchargé une nouvelle version. Je n'y avais pas pensé au premier abord, mais j'avoue que cette solution est plus judicieuse.--medium69 (talk) 01:09, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
@Medium69: Personnellement, il est préférable de créer une nouvelle image quant on recadre. P.S. j'ai rajouter l'auteur original et la date que la photo a été prise. --Fralambert (talk) 02:59, 23 November 2014 (UTC)
Sur l'instant, j'avoue que j'ai pas compris, mais à la réflexion et après ma nuit de sommeil, j'admet que cela est préférable. Le contexte des deux photos peut être différent selon son utilisation dans un article. Pour parler de la plaque commémorative, la photo recadrée est plus appropprié ; pour le lieux en lui même, l'originale. Merci pour tes interventions qui ont mis en valeur mes erreurs et m'enseigne pour l'avenir. Pour l'auteur, c'était un oubli, mais la date, je supposais que celle de la retouche était appropriée. J'ai bien indiqué la source de la photo bien entendu. Merci encore, car c'est dans la critique que l'on peut avancer.--medium69 (talk) 10:21, 23 November 2014 (UTC)