User talk:Frank-m

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Wappen Ibersheim[edit]

Hallo Frank-m, Dein Wappen zu Ibersheim ist das der Stadtverwaltung von Worms und im Vergeich zu dem der früheren Ortsgemeinde schlecht. Die Bilder der Mannheimer Christuskirche bitte ich zu überprüfen. Nach meiner Meinung gehören nicht alle Figuren mit dieser Bezeichnung zu dieser Kirche. ~~Edmund Ritscher~~

Hallo Edmund, schau bei Ibersheim mal auf das Hochladedatum :-) Es gab hier Zeiten, da wurde jedes noch so erdenklich schlechte Wappen hochgeladen, weil es es besser als nichts war; bessere Wappen sind natürlich jederzeit gerne willkommen. Deinen Hinweis zur Christuskirche verstehe ich nicht, welche Figur gehört nicht zur Kirche (bitte mit Link)? Grüße --Frank (talk) 22:35, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

File:Ziegenskulptur in Ladenburg.JPG[edit]

Zunächst mal herzlichen Dank fürs korrigieren und ergänzen. Weißt Du zufällig, ob die Ziege auch von Karl Ulrich Nuss ist? Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 20:36, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Hallo 4028mdk09, nein, das weiß ich leider nicht. Mein Führer zu Ladenburg schweigt sich über die Ziege aus. Grüße --Frank (talk) 20:47, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Danke. Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 20:54, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Nachtrag: lt. Stadtinformation stammt die Ziege von Eckard Schembs / Worms. Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 09:24, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Datumsangabe[edit]

Hallo Frank!

Erstmal danke für deine Beiträge!

Ein wichtige Anregung: Bitte verwende als Datumsformat bitte YYY-MM-DD (Beispiel: 2011-04-23) statt die ausgeschriebene Variante in Worten. Hier habe ich das Aufnahmedatum entsprechend geändert.

Danke für deine Unterstützung!

Viel Spaß bei deinen weiteren (sehr guten) Beiträgen!

Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 14:38, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Hallo High Contrast, kein Problem, kann ich machen. Grüße --Frank (talk) 14:46, 29 October 2011 (UTC)

Danke[edit]

hier- und hierfür. Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 22:14, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Keine Ursache und den Dank gebe ich gerne zurück: ich plane gerade einen Artikel zu der Kirche und es ist toll, dass es schon so viele Bilder dazu gibt. Grüße --Frank (talk) 21:28, 12 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Wappen Brühl(Baden).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen Brühl(Baden).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Perhelion (talk) 15:46, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Wappen Brühl(Baden).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen Brühl(Baden).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Perhelion (talk) 18:31, 10 June 2012 (UTC)

Deletion[edit]

Commons:Deletion requests/File:File:Luguelín Santos.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Commons:Deletion requests/File:File:Luguelín Santos.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this project page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Osplace (talk) 14:18, 23 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:Auxiliary_bishops_of_Freiburg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Auxiliary_bishops_of_Freiburg has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Schubbay (talk) 12:55, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Ev. Kirche Gauangelloch 1832[edit]

Hallo Frank-m,

handelt es sich bei den von Ihnen hochgeladenen Bildern mit den Plänen zur ev. Kirche Gauangelloch 1832 tatsächlich -wie angegeben- um diese und nicht eher um die katholische Kirche? Ist Ihnen hier eine Prüfung möglich? In jedem Fall Danke für den Upload!

Hallo, es ist schon die evangelische Kirche. Wichtig ist aber der Zusatz "Entwurf", die Kirche wurde nie in dieser Form ausgeführt. Grüße --Frank (talk) 13:05, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Jules-Rimet-Pokal.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jules-Rimet-Pokal.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lymantria (talk) 10:51, 12 April 2013 (UTC)

Category:Culture_of_Ludwigshafen[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Culture_of_Ludwigshafen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

PanchoS (talk) 12:23, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Coats_of_arms_from_Ludwigshafen[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Coats_of_arms_from_Ludwigshafen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

PanchoS (talk) 12:26, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Buses_in_Ludwigshafen[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Buses_in_Ludwigshafen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

PanchoS (talk) 12:28, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Category:Trams_in_Ludwigshafen[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Trams_in_Ludwigshafen has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

PanchoS (talk) 12:28, 26 August 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:07, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Wappen Neustadt.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wappen Neustadt.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fränsmer (talk) 11:50, 25 March 2014 (UTC)

Category:51. Maimarkt-Turnier[edit]

Noue kommt. :)) Zwiadowca 21 17:57, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Altlussheim-Evangelische-Kirche-1827-02.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Altlussheim-Evangelische-Kirche-1827-02.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Altlussheim-Evangelische-Kirche-1827-02.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:35, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Altlussheim-Evangelische-Kirche-1827.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Altlussheim-Evangelische-Kirche-1827.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Altlussheim-Evangelische-Kirche-1827.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ellin Beltz (talk) 03:36, 10 June 2014 (UTC)