User talk:Freddo

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Thank you...[edit]

...for your work with categorization! Leo Johannes 20:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

But...[edit]

Why this and similar moves? This is an image of an entire carousel, not of a carousel horse. - Jmabel ! talk 16:35, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

You're right! sorry. I paid no attention to the shade because in French "carousel horse" can be translated by the type of carousel (with horses) and horses only. I fix all that! Freddo (talk) 17:21, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Category:The_Three_Soldiers[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:The_Three_Soldiers has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

h-stt !? 15:16, 11 May 2011 (UTC)

Shadow play[edit]

Please, stop with this edit. They were painted models used as puppets, not for shadow playing. --Superchilum(talk to me!) 10:57, 29 September 2011 (UTC)

  • Hello, no problem. But I think it's the right categorization. In this picture, for example, we see that this is the same type of puppet. Shadow plays does not mean it has no color. If you find a better categorization, you can do. thanks Freddo (talk) 11:31, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
    • I agree with Freddo that this certainly looks pretty much exactly like a Javanese shadow puppet (except for the low quality of the amateur painting). Even though they are used for shadow plays, they are traditionally painted. - Jmabel ! talk 00:39, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Category:Legoland_Florida[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Legoland_Florida has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

84.61.131.15 18:26, 14 January 2012 (UTC)

Wicked Witch[edit]

Is there any particular basis for saying that the costume in this photo references the musical Wicked rather than simply the character from the Oz books (and/or the classic 1930s film)? - Jmabel ! talk 00:37, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

You're right! I correct that. Thanks Freddo (talk) 15:12, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Fantasyland-haricot magique.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fantasyland-haricot magique.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 14:58, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Category:Enterprise[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Enterprise has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Mjrmtg (talk) 02:20, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 10:55, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Southern Star (Testing)[edit]

Hello Freddo, juste un mot pour m'expliquer. Southern Star est un modèle Looping Starship et donc pas exactement un Pirate ship. A bientôt. Eliedion (talk) 21:02, 27 june 2013 (UTC)

Bien vu, j'avais pas fait attention à la nuance ! Désolé, c'est réparé. Freddo (talk) 12:45, 29 June 2013 (UTC)

Road Runner Express[edit]

Hi Freddo,

Today i have seen your picture from the Road Runner Express at Six Flags Magic Mountain. Do you have taken more from this ride, but did not upload more?

I am looking for more pictures from the coaster, and i was hoping that you could help me :)

Regards, Mezelf14 (talk) 16:54, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

Thanks for your help in the categorization of amusement rides, I really appreciate it :) --Mjrmtg (talk) 13:27, 16 November 2013 (UTC)

I've searched before, but do you know if there is a category for mobile food vendors like those shown in File:North Florida Fair 2013 30.JPG? --Mjrmtg (talk) 13:39, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
No problems, it's a pleasure ! For the category about food vendors, I searched and I found this : Category:Food booths. Freddo (talk) 15:31, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Great find :) I saw two similar rides that don't have categories, any idea if a specific ride category could be added to these two File:North Florida Fair 2013 46.JPG and File:Kite Flyer.jpg? --Mjrmtg (talk) 16:32, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Great ! For the other pictures, I think that there is yet no category, but we can create it ! This ride was create by Zamperla, on their catalog, they have two models and two names (Kite Flyer and Giant Sky Chaser). The category Kite flyers already exist ! So we can create Category:Giant Sky Chaser or Category Kite Flyer (ride) for categorized the pictures. I have found another : File:Wild Adventures Kite Flyer.JPG ! Freddo (talk) 23:32, 16 November 2013 (UTC)
Thanks for the advice, I created Category:Kite Flyer (ride) and put the category on the 3 photos. --Mjrmtg (talk) 01:18, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Perfect ! If I can help you again, dont hesistate ! Freddo (talk) 11:44, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Category:Bumper boats, Category:Shoot-the-Chutes and several others are sub-categories of Category:Water rides and Category:Amusement rides. Category:Water rides is already a sub-category of Category:Amusement rides, so I'm going to remove the Category:Amusement rides from the ride types that are already categorized as Category:Water rides because of redundancy. I hope that all made sense. Can you think of other sub-categories of Amusement rides that can be created, like Category:Pendulum rides? Like maybe making a Category:Swing rides category? --Mjrmtg (talk) 13:59, 17 November 2013 (UTC)
Yes, you can remove the Cat:Amusement rides if you find something more exact. For create other Cat, I'm not really sure because, I have not the good vocabulary (I'm french :p). I have found on wikipedia(en) some ideas for create new Cat > https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Amusement_rides_by_type (like Carousels, Simulator rides, Transport rides, Dark rides ... Freddo (talk) 19:37, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
I created Category:Upside-down amusement rides and put everything it as per the wikipedia article. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Upside-down_amusement_rides --Mjrmtg (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 02:34, 7 December 2013 (UTC)

Category:Miniland_(Legoland_Deutschland)[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Miniland_(Legoland_Deutschland) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Dinosaur918 (talk) 15:26, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:24, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Freddo,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

My unidentified amusement rides[edit]

I was wondering if you could help some of my photos with categories. They're all categorized with amusement rides in Georgia, but they don't have what type of amusement ride they are. I'd appreciate your help since you are very knowledgeable in ride types. They are the photos listed at the bottom of my user page here User:Mjrmtg. Thanks again. --Mjrmtg (talk) 16:34, 18 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello, I'll try to help you find the right categories ! --Freddo (talk) 13:13, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much :) --Mjrmtg (talk) 14:43, 20 April 2014 (UTC)
You're welcome Freddo (talk) 17:34, 20 April 2014 (UTC)