User talk:Gilbertus

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Template:Boîte déroulante

Destruction massive[edit]

Bonjour Bati

Peux-tu détruire les fichiers placés en double suivants :

Avec mes remerciements. --gilbertus (talk) 23:42, 14 February 2010 (UTC)

Salut Gilbertus,
C'est fait, mais pourrais-tu stp me donner un lien vers la demande de l'uploader la prochaine fois. Ces fichiers ne sont pas exactement des doublons (il s'agit de versions plus larges d'images rognées sous un autre titre). Merci d'avance.--Bapti 16:36, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Merci! Les photos étaient du même auteur qui m’en avait fait la demande sur ma page de discussion WP. fr:Discussion utilisateur:Gilbertus
J'avais vu, mais il fallait bien chercher ;)--Bapti 17:40, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
Comment indique-t-on un lien dans un texte de Wikipédia vers une «category» de Commons? --gilbertus (talk) 17:34, 15 February 2010 (UTC)
On ne l'indique pas ! Il est possible de faire un lien du type [[:commons:Le nom de la page sur Commons]] sur une page de discussion par exemple, mais ce genre de liens n'a pas sa place dans l'article. En revanche, tu peux ajouter le fr:modèle:Autres projets en bas de l'article. Cordialement.--Bapti 17:40, 15 February 2010 (UTC)

Traductions[edit]

Bonjour. Sorry for the delay -

   * Category:Logos du Gouvernement du Québec - Logos of the provincial government of Quebec
   * Category:Logos municipaux (Quebec) - Logos of municipal governments in Quebec
   * Category:Logos des sports et des loisirs (Quebec) - Logos of sports and leisure organizations in Quebec
   * Category:Logos commerciaux et privés (Quebec) - Logos of companies in Quebec

--Skeezix1000 (talk) 11:26, 4 March 2010 (UTC)

Montreal 1992[edit]

Fashion ?
Fashion in 2008 (?)
Fashion in 2007 (?)

[1] Pardon: Je ne comprends pas ceci. Merci, -- Infrogmation (talk) 05:45, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Moi non plus. Vous avez écrit "not skyline, personnal photo" -- c'est une photo d'une personne et d'un "skyline". De plus, je ne comprends pas pouquoi la catégorie "1992 in Montreal" a été supprimé - c'est une image d'une femme à Montréal en 1992.

Comme toujours, Gilbertus, je m'excuse pour tous les erreurs dans mon français écrit. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 12:53, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour à vous. Le sujet principal est un portrait de femme et non le paysage (skyline). L’année (1992) n’est pas importante dans le sujet. Ce n’est pas une personnalité (people ?), c’est une image privée. Ce n’est pas une photo de mode (fashion), il n’y a pas d’information sur le designer (?). Cette photo ne représente pas d’intérêt encyclopédique, elle a sa place dans l'album personnel de l'auteur uniquement. Category:Women of Canada (?) --gilbertus (talk) 15:51, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

L' "skyline" de Montréal est-il les mêmes aujourd'hui qu'en 1992? -- Infrogmation (talk) 15:59, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Le skyline n'est pas le sujet principal de l'image. On ne peut pas utiliser cette image pour illuster un skyline de Montréal dans un article, il faudrait la cadrer (crop) --gilbertus (talk) 16:08, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Qui est Linda?--gilbertus (talk) 16:10, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

(Svp pardonnez-moi pour toutes les erreurs dans mon Français, merci.) Elle est une amie à Montréal. La moitié de la photo est un bon skyline de Montréal, je pensent.
Les photos peuvent montrer un moment et un endroit. La personne n'a pas besoin d'être célèbre. File:Robert Simpson Limited Store Window Montreal 1936.jpg Infrogmation (talk) 16:26, 6 March 2010 (UTC)
Le monteur fait partie du sujet principal : montage de lignes électriques. Votre amie Linda ne fait pas partie du sujet : skyline. « Category :1992 in Montreal » est correct. (Merci, je comprends bien votre français). Bye!--gilbertus (talk) 16:38, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Parler de fashion est excessif, on ne voit qu’un petit morceau de ses vêtements, sans style particulier. On pourrait ainsi classer toutes les photos des personnes de Commons dans « Category :Fashion ». --gilbertus (talk) 18:06, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

File:AutiTTMTS.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 04:55, 14 March 2010 (UTC)

Pál Sarkozy[edit]

Bonjour,

Je viens de voir que vous avez recadré l'une de mes photos. Effectivement, c'est une bonne idée de proposer une version recadrée, utile pour l'illustration d'articles. Je vois que vous avez également travaillé à l'effacement d'une main. Jusque-là, tout va bien, et je vous en remercie :) Par contre, j'aurai préféré que l'image originale ne soit pas écrasée, et que la version recadrée soit sauvegardée sous un nom différent. De même, en tentant de faire un cadrage similaire de mon côté, j'obtiens une image de 2498x3078 pixels, pour un poids de 3.4 Mo. ok, ça peut paraitre comme étant du chipotage, mais je préfère proposer la plus grosse résolution possible. Si l'effacement de la main ne prend pas trop de temps et que ça ne vous dérange pas de le refaire, je peux vous envoyer le fichier raw d'origine (fichier Canon .cr2). Par contre, si vous n'avez pas le temps, il faudrait au moins ré-importer votre version sous un nom différent. Et oui, je sais, j'suis chiant :) Okki (talk) 02:10, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Daudelin-Embâcle-Paris.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Daudelin-Embâcle-Paris.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Coyau (talk) 20:17, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

File:C.Daudelin-Embâcle-Paris.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:C.Daudelin-Embâcle-Paris.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Coyau (talk) 20:19, 17 August 2010 (UTC)

Warning for repeated vandalism[edit]

বাংলা | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | 日本語 | македонски | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | svenska | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | +/−
Stop hand nuvola.svg
 Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, you will be blocked from editing Wikimedia Commons.

Eusebius (talk) 06:46, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

^What he said. I honestly don't care what your problem with Peter Klashorst is, but leave it at the door. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:00, 11 October 2010 (UTC)

Merci[edit]

Juste merci pour la création de catégorie

Please do not delete categories[edit]

Tout simplement parce que l'image est classé par arrondissement ne signifie pas que les autres catégories doivent être supprimés. S'il vous plaît arrêter. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 23:31, 6 February 2011 (UTC)

"C'est le monument le plus photographié à Québec, il faut le trouver facilement."[edit]

Salut. Sad to say, that's not how categories work. Category trees cease to function if people start ignoring COM:OVERCAT to highlight and showcase what they think is important. You will note that Category:Eiffel Tower is not in the parent Category:Paris, Category:White House is not in the parent Category:Washington, D.C., etc.

If you are concerned, create a category called Category:Landmarks in Quebec City for Category:Château Frontenac, and anything else you think people who are not familiar with Quebec City or the names of local landmarks might be trying to find. Anyone who doesn't know the name of the Château Frontenac or its function will look in a landmarks category (just don't overpopulate the category, otherwise it will be hard to use). Hope that helps. --Skeezix1000 (talk) 22:20, 7 February 2011 (UTC)

Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean[edit]

Bonjour Bapti. Je te prie de renommer « Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean » en « Saguenay–Lac-Saint-Jean ». Merci! --gilbertus (talk) 02:19, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Salut,
Si tu parles de la page, tu es normalement en mesure de le faire toi-même. Ceci dit, je doute que ce soit vraiment utile pour un petit tiret de travers ;)
Bonne continuation.--Bapti 19:42, 7 April 2011 (UTC)
Bonjour. C’est la toponymie officielle : le trait d’union long sépare les deux entités, soit le « Saguenay » et le « Lac-Saint-Jean ». Je ne trouve pas le moyen de modifier le nom de la page de Category:Saguenay-Lac-Saint-Jean. Salutations.--gilbertus (talk) 23:22, 8 April 2011 (UTC)
Je comprends bien ta démarche, mais ce genre de fautes de typo est légion sur Commons malheureusement. Personnellement j'ai renoncé à renommer les fichiers et les catégories dont le nom n'est pas parfait mais ne pique pas les yeux !
Pour les catégories, il faut en créer une nouvelle et recatégoriser tout ce qui se trouve dans l'ancienne. Tu peux lire Commons:Rename a category à ce sujet.--Bapti 10:05, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Citelis_Lignes_d'azur.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Citelis_Lignes_d'azur.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Grand-Duc (talk) 16:57, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:RobertineBarry.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:RobertineBarry.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

shizhao (talk) 12:31, 29 June 2011 (UTC)

File:A_NOUS_PARIS_458.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:A_NOUS_PARIS_458.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hr. Satz 12:14, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Changement de photo non conforme à la licence[edit]

Bonjour,

Tu as recadré ma photo (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:20100520MichelOnfrayTheatreRondPoint.jpg) et je trouve qu'elle est très moche cadrée comme ça, ça tombe dans le vide, il n'y a aucun équilibre, ni en vision, ni en couleurs.

J'avais passé beaucoup de temps moi-même à cadrer la photo, dont je suis l'auteure.

Merci donc de refaire ta version et ton recadrage comme la licence t'y autorise, mais en aucun cas de supprimer la mienne, comme la licence ne t'y autorise pas.

Merci.

Perline

Canada[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Canada_Building_at_World%27s_Fair,_1962.jpg&diff=59881440&oldid=59879434: so why on earth wouldn't the Canadian pavilion at an an international exposition belong somewhere under Category:Canada? I can see refining the category, but why would you remove it? - Jmabel ! talk 05:54, 23 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Brassens TNP 1966.jpg, votre recradrage d'une œuvre de Roger Pic.[edit]

17:40, 30 September 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Vous venez de modifier une photographie de monsieur Roger Pic en la recadrant et en supprimant le micro.

Bien sûr, le droit vous en est acquis par les licences sur Wikimedia Commons.

Je pense que le cadrage d’une image déposée par un auteur mérite tous les égards. Par exemple, vous ne scieriez pas le support bois de la Joconde en trouvant que Léonard a donné trop d’importance au fond (paysage). Le travail d'un photographe est d'abord le cadre. Il a jugé, en auteur, que son œuvre avait besoin de tous ces éléments. Je pense qu’il faut respecter sa volonté ainsi exprimée.

Très cordialement,

Βερναρδ [✍]-

Bonjour. J’ai modifié la photo pour une raison pratique : elle est trop haute et prend trop de place dans l’encadré. Ma modification ne dégrade pas le travail du photographe. Cordialement.--gilbertus (talk) 17:59, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
18:05, 30 September 2011 (UTC),
Bonjour,
Je n’ai pas dû être suffisamment clair… C’est un peu regrettable.
Très cordialement,
Βερναρδ [✍]-
P.-S. : Vous avez dégradé l’œuvre de Roger Pic. Relisez aussi le message de Perline du 16 août 2011 sur cette page…[19:14, 30 September 2011 (UTC)]

File:Jeanne_d'Arc.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jeanne_d'Arc.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

HenrikKbh (talk) 19:01, 18 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Somunanacio6.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Somunanacio6.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saibo (Δ) 22:46, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

File:François Hollande (Journées de Nantes 2012).jpg[edit]

Bonjour,

j'ai annulé votre recadrage sur cette photo, car sur certains articles la photo d'Hollande apparaissait comme difforme (notamment fr:Moi président de la République). Il serait préférable d'importer une nouvelle image si ce cadrage ne vous convient pas, plutôt que d'écraser la version précédente de la photo. Cordialement. --Jack Rabbit Slim's (talk) 15:35, 23 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Enseignes La Rochelle.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Enseignes La Rochelle.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 19:50, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Ejaculation educational seq 4.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Ejaculation educational seq 4.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Lektordoc (talk) 10:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Étienne Lalonde Bruxelles 2006.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Étienne Lalonde Bruxelles 2006.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wilfredor (talk) 03:29, 17 November 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, JuTa 13:26, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

File:Pauline Marois-2013.jpg[edit]

Bonjour,

Dans la page de description du fichier File:Pauline Marois-2013.jpg, vous avez inclus le bandeau de licence à l'intérieur du modèle «self», ce qui résulte en l'affichage d'une affirmation que vous êtes le propriétaire des droits d'auteur sur cette image. Je voulais vérifier si c'est volontaire et que vous considérez que le fait d'avoir enlevé des parties de l'image originale vous donne des droits d'auteur sur l'image qui reste ou s'il s'agit d'une erreur. Si c'est une erreur, pourriez-vous s.v.p. retirer le «self» ? Merci. -- Asclepias (talk) 19:10, 9 June 2014 (UTC) Bonjour C'est une erreur. Merci de me l'indiquer. Cordialement. --gilbertus (talk) 20:38, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Boutique Poîlane-Paris 15.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Boutique Poîlane-Paris 15.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:23, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

File:GeorgesBrassens-gb.jpg[edit]

Bonjour,

Quelle est la source de cette photo ? A quelle date et où a-t-elle été prise ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 21:15, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

File:GeorgesBrassens-gb.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GeorgesBrassens-gb.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 19:59, 21 December 2014 (UTC)