User talk:Atcovi

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Goldenburg111)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

User talk:Atcovi/Archive 1

Copyright status: File:Salmon1.JPEG[edit]

bahasa melayu  català  čeština  dansk  deutsch (Sie-Form)  deutsch  english  español  français  galego  hrvatski  italiano  magyar  nederlands  norsk  norsk bokmål  norsk nynorsk  português  polski  português do Brasil  română  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  türkçe  беларуская  беларуская (тарашкевіца)  български  македонски  русский  українська  ಕನ್ನಡ  ತುಳು  മലയാളം  한국어  日本語  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  עברית  العربيَّة  فارسی  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Salmon1.JPEG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the VRT system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. If you have any questions about licenses please ask at Commons:Village pump/Copyright or see our help pages. Thank you.

Martin H. (talk) 20:40, 15 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:155x360.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

EugeneZelenko (talk) 14:22, 17 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Autopatrol given[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically marked as "reviewed". This has no effect on your editing, it is simply intended to make it easier for users that are monitoring Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones like yours. In addition, the Flickr upload feature and an increased number of batch-uploads in UploadWizard, uploading of freely licensed MP3 files, overwriting files uploaded by others and an increased limit for page renames per minute are now available to you. Thank you. Green Giant (talk) 11:57, 9 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Quran recitation files[edit]

Are you both Murattal and Mujawwad? If not, then why are you uploading recitations by those people as if they were your own (the "own work" section of the file summaries)? Just because the Quran is in the public domain does not mean that all recordings of it automatically are. Mahir256 (talk) 04:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Mahir256: Hey Mahir! Thanks for the question. That is my voice. Murattal & Mujawwad are two styles of recitations that recitors of the Qur'an use. See this link for more information. If you listen to the audio clips, there is a clear difference between my Murattal & Mujawwad audio clips. I mention either style in the file name so that the file name can be as specific as it can get. Thanks. -Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 14:07, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Oh ok, carry on then. Mahir256 (talk) 19:53, 23 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Please fix the name of Surah which is Al Takasur not At Takathur.[edit]

The pronunciation should match the spelling of the any thing about Qura’n. I hope you understand my point.Thanks 2001:8F8:1DB6:47AB:3DD1:ED78:8A79:1E17 02:51, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The surah is "التكاثر", which showcases the letter ث - not سَ. I fail to understand how it would be "Takasur", when it is pronounced to "Takathur". Even listening to the recitation, it is pronounced with a "thaa", not "siin". Lastly, and least importantly, Wikipedia's page spells it as "At-Takathur", and not "Al-Takasur". -Atcovi (Talk - Contribs) 02:56, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, —‍Mdaniels5757 (talk • contribs) 23:47, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]