|(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)|
Your recent edits
Hi, I notice you have tagged a lot of images of penises such as Image:Glande.jpg for speedy deletion as "obscene content". However Commons is not censored see Commons:Project scope. That means "obscene content" is not a speedy deletion reason, though if the images are redundant it is a valid reason.--Nilfanion 23:50, 15 September 2006 (UTC)
- Take in mind that the commons are available for kids and underaged! --golffan 12:01, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
|Image deletion warning||Image:Wall1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
Pmgpmg 21:16, 4 May 2007 (UTC)