User talk:Gorupdebesanez

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Gorupdebesanez!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 19:25, 9 October 2013 (UTC)

A "how-to" for files categorization[edit]

Hi and welcome to Wikimedia Commons. Thanks for the pictures you uploaded, most of them really considerable. But, just to avoid technical problems of file categorization, I left to you a brief technical "how-to".

Well, that's all for the "how-to". Thanks again for the pictures and for their quality. Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 00:37, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Dodge 1500[edit]

Any closeups on the little sedan that I placed a note on in this picture? Would love to see more of the Dodge 1500 (and to find out if I id'd it correctly). Cheers, mr.choppers (talk)-en- 05:06, 27 January 2014 (UTC)


Hi Gorupdebesanez, Dэя-Бøяg already teached you how to categorize. Please respect the rules of Commons and do what you have been teached! -- Ies (talk) 16:25, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Ok. I've seen and fixed the categorization... Well: thanks for the pictures, most of them are really remarkable, and IMHO some of them could be candidated as featured pictures. I've seen that you have tried to fix the categorization, after the notice of Ies. Ok, but:
  • 1- Even if "Cuba" and "Havana" exist as categories, it's redundat to categorize the files in that way: (see COM:OVERCAT). And also... due to the fact that national categories as "Cuba" are well structured in thousands of subcategories, there is practically no need to categorize any file directly into the Category:Cuba.
Thanks for attention. --Dэя-Бøяg 17:21, 31 January 2014 (UTC)

Well done[edit]

Well, I appreciate you are learning the "how-to" for categorization. I've just done some fixes for eventual depper categories. Btw, if some categories (as Valle de los Ingenios or Plaza Mayor de Trinidad) have been still categorized as World Heritage Sites in Cuba, it is not necessary to add the heritage site (Unesco) category in each file. Anyway, good work :-) --Dэя-Бøяg 00:22, 5 February 2014 (UTC)

Just another suggestion: Categorizing some pictures, it is sufficient "their own" category. I explain: The files about Dario Fo are well categorized in the category Dario Fo, but not in the category "Nobel Prize", because, as Nobel Prize Winner, the Category:Dario Fo is still categorized into the Category:Nobel laureates from Italy. A similar example could be done for the files about Valle de los Ingenios. The Category:Valle de los Ingenios is still categorized within the Category:World Heritage Sites in Cuba. Another example are the singular images of Rolling Stones: If they depict (ex.) Mick Jagger, the Category:Mick Jagger (categorized into the Category:Rolling Stones) is sufficient. A different speech is for other categories: Category:Venice Film Festival is appropriate for Dario Fo, Glenn Close and/or others, because it is not "OVERCAT" and they are depicted in the Venice Film Festival. Thanx for attention and good work again :-) --Dэя-Бøяg 19:14, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

I continue not to understand this problem of category... In your exemple a picture of Mick Jagger appears in the category 'Mick Jagger' but not in the category 'Rolling Stones' (where a lot of pictures of Jagger appears). Why? User:Gorupdebesanez-User talk:Gorupdebesanez' 21:41, 12 February 2014 (UTC)

To answer: A picture of Mick Jagger showing only him is sufficient to categorize it as "Mick Jagger", per "overcat", because this category is (obviously) a direct subcat of "Rolling Stones". I know that other pictures of him (and of Keith Richards etc) appear in the general cateogry about the Stones. The reason is simple: Commons, of course, is not perfectly standardized :-) ... Anyway, this one of Mick Jagger is a really little little little issue, beacuse you've learned the "how-to" so... Don't worry and good work :-) Regards. --Dэя-Бøяg 01:56, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Aulenti03.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Aulenti03.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Alinea (talk) 11:20, 28 June 2014 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Grazie per le foto delle edizioni della Mostra del Cinema di Venezia! SunOfErat (talk) 06:22, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

File tagging File:Troisi.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Troisi.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS ( This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Troisi.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Dman41689 (talk) 07:55, 20 February 2015 (UTC)