User talk:Gouwenaar/Archive 2011

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Thanks …[edit]

… for the larger version :-) --:bdk: 17:41, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

You're welcome. Gouwenaar 19:29, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Johannes Kerkhoven.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Johannes Kerkhoven.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Hyins 12:27, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Parregaastermeer.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 17:58, 31 July 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Gouwenaar!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:03, 2 September 2011 (UTC)

Stolpersteine[edit]

Dag Jan, bedankt voor je foto's van de Stolpersteine in Gouda. Zie jij kans de categorienaam van "Stolpersteine Gouda" te wijzigen in "Stolpersteine in Gouda" in lijn met de overige steden in Nederland en elders? Bedankt vast. Het nieuws bij ons thuis is dat de auto nu verboden is. Ik kom nu helemaal niet meer weg. Groet. Gerard.--Gerardus (talk) 08:03, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Dag Gerard. Categorie gewijzigd. Ik zag dat je bijdragen leverde in de afgelopen dagen zowel hier als op Wikipedia.nl. Ik vroeg me af of dat een goed teken was. Niet dus. Met vr. groet, Gouwenaar (talk) 10:58, 18 September 2011 (UTC)

Oerd en Monnik[edit]

Ik heb de category Monnik weer weggehaald bij de Oerd. De koppeling is goed te volgen via de IMO categorie, die daar voor bedoeld is. Het schip kreeg pas in 2003 die nieuwe naam. Het komt veel voor dat schepen ondere meerdere namen zijn opgenomen. Het IMO nummer blijft altijd hetzelfde. Dus daar hangen we ze dan onder op naam. --Stunteltje (talk) 17:49, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

Dat was nu net voor mij de reden om beide categorieën te gebruiken, zowel Oerd als Monnik. Gouwenaar (talk) 18:12, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Er zijn een aantal mensen bezig met het categoriseren van de hele database van schepen op Commons. Die hanteren de stelregel dat voor het schip de category wordt gebruikt, die hoort bij de datum (het tijdsbestek) van de foto. Anders kan het tot hele onwenselijke resultaten leiden. Dan moet je namelijk als gebruiker maar opnieuw uitvinden wat op dat moment de naam van het schip was. Dat werk hebben we nu al gedaan en het kost soms erg veel onderzoek. Dat gooi je weg door alle namen van het schip als category aan een foto toe te voegen. Het is niet nodig, omdat die via het IMO nummer zijn te vinden. Vandaar ook bij veruit de meeste schepen een verwijzing naar dat IMO nummer is opgenomen. --Stunteltje (talk) 19:11, 3 October 2011 (UTC)
Dat is klinklare nonsens, zoals aangegeven als beide categorieën gebruikt worden kan dat nooit tot dit soort problemen leiden. Maar dit is weer typisch zo'n redenering, die niet uitgaat van de gewone gebruiker van Wikipedia, maar het systeem heilig verklaart. Gouwenaar (talk) 20:47, 3 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Haventje van Echten Tjeukemeer.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:21, 25 October 2011 (UTC)


File:Echtenerbrug met Pier Christiaansloot.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:22, 25 October 2011 (UTC)