User talk:HéctorTabaré

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, HéctorTabaré!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

--Kimse (talk) 03:59, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

flickr image uploads[edit]

Hi - when you upload flickr images, please try to always grab the "biggest" size available. Thanks! :) rootology (T) 04:21, 21 August 2008 (UTC)

I reiterate this re this image. Unless it is technically impracticable on your end, upload the largest size they've got. Server space is not an issue, and it helps us accommodate future display devices. Daniel Case (talk) 19:52, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

moving titles[edit]

Hi there,

I am using the traditional Chinese script as has been used for thousands of years, which is also understood in Hongkong, Taiwan, Korea, Japan and Vietnam. For a historic place like Tiananmen I think the traditional script is better suited than the modern which only exists since the 1960's. Gryffindor (talk) 19:50, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Well precisely that, I am using Chinese, albeit a form that has been in use much longer and is still in use. Articles have to be in native tongue per Commons policy on languages. Gryffindor (talk) 20:05, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
Obviously new buildings like Olympic Stadium or Great Hall of the People can be in the new Chinese, but for old traditional places that were always referred to in the old script I think it should be fine. Gryffindor (talk) 20:27, 29 September 2008 (UTC)

Uploading Art Photos[edit]

I sure will, as soon as I have more time in my busy schedule. It's very time consuming to upload so many pictures at once.--PericlesofAthens (talk) 13:50, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token fd8bf82e40a721046408259c06013023[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Aoqun 1.jpg[edit]

You tagged the above image, and some others, as missing permission, but they are the uploader's own work. Can you clarify how you expect him to send in a permission from someone to let him use his own work? Stifle (talk) 09:29, 1 May 2009 (UTC)

Res[edit]

I don't agree your opinion. First, those images are not made by the uploader. The uploader just uploaded the images which were found on the internet. Thus there is not any problems called "disrespectful". Second, Hi-res is better than low-res is a common truth, but the brightness depends on users' preferences. Some users can think the brighter is better and some users can not. Even some users can think the darker is closer to the originals. If you don't like the brightness, you could adjust the brightness and upload them again. --百楽兎 (talk) 01:46, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Better or not is not an undebatable fact. It is just "you think", a completely personal perference.--百楽兎 (talk) 13:53, 23 May 2009 (UTC)
It's your personal opinion not WIKICOMMONS rule.--百楽兎 01:02, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Don't lie to me.--百楽兎 (talk) 01:06, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Prove what you said is a truth.--百楽兎 (talk) 01:13, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
Prove that's not your personal opinion but the Commons rule.--百楽兎 (talk) 01:19, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
It is easy to revise the source, right? Don't intend to make any new reasons to support your personal preference.--百楽兎 (talk) 02:24, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Regarding the issue of copyright, Along the River 7-119-3.jpg is a good example for reference. The image is completely copied from the website of NPM, and NPM doesn't allow any usage of their website materials without permission, but the image is accepted and even become a featured picture on Commons.--百楽兎 (talk) 09:47, 28 May 2009 (UTC)

Stupid french[edit]

Hello, I know you maybe a french with great contributions on anicent china-related image, you might even been doing it because this maybe your little "hobby". But how is these two edits [1] [2] consider as vandalism? Just because you're ugly and stink doesn't mean that I was making vandalism. Now, would someone del my comment? I had said something I wanted to say.

About one thangka.[edit]

Do you like unnatural bright colors? Do you like bad scans? Don't you like professional photo? Then what you do in Wikipedia? [[3]] Eugene a.

No the version you uploaded has several problems. The extraneous "dark" frame around the corner, is not part of the painting. The color is also very dark and the details are barely noticeable.--HéctorTabaré (talk) 05:47, 21 December 2010 (UTC)
  • Please adjust your monitor or buy new pc. Eugene a.

Category:Trip at the Forbidden City?[edit]

Hello. I'm curious as to why you re-categorized a large number of my uploads to Category:Trip at the Great Wall of China at Badaling and Category:Trip at the Forbidden City. While I don't necessarily agree with these changes, I am interested in hearing your reasoning lest I mass revert your edits. Regards, FASTILY (TALK) 08:25, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

Re:Forbidden City and Great Wall at Badaling[edit]

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, HéctorTabaré. You have new messages at Fastily's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

-FASTILY (TALK) 19:23, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

File:10_Peking_University.jpg Chinese law requires that the architect's attribution[edit]

Do you know the name of the architect that constructed this building? MorganKevinJ(talk) 03:30, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Its a photograph of a university campus found at Flickr. It was taken by this Flickr user who released it under Creative Commons license. I did not take the picture. The person who took the photo is attributed; the name of the author and the title of the work are listed.--HéctorTabaré (talk) 04:11, 22 March 2011 (UTC)

Re[edit]

Hi there, when I notice that, I revert my edit, but also mistakingly run the script again. Sorry about that :-) --Mys 721tx (talk) 10:08, 25 March 2011 (UTC)