User talk:H005

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Fairytale Trash Questionmark No.svg

This user was nominated for deletion on 18 March 2011 but was kept.
The deletion debate is here. Please consider that decision before you re-nominate it.


العربية | বাংলা | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lëtzebuergesch | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | +/−

Contents

About nominations[edit]

I have read your comment in QI, and i respect your opinion. I have uploaded more than 450 photos, but nominate only tiny part of my contributions.

With best regards, George Chernilevsky (talk) 10:51, 9 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi George, don't get me wrong, this is great work and very valuable for Wikipedia! I've browsed through your photos and most of them are of great educational value, I really appreciate that. -- H005 (talk) 20:31, 9 July 2009 (UTC)


Hello!


I always assume a good faith, and don't get You wrong. Each Wiki-user actually the friend for other users. The critic and to decline do not offend me in any case. Usually self-maded (own) photos are more difficult for estimating really, objectively. For me the criticism and the declined my images - only a lesson, training and a way for the best result in the future.


Concerning co-ordinates. The Google Earth very inexact for Vinnitsa, indistinct and blurred. Lot of a streets are non-visible. Exact co-ordinates happens difficultly to take. I do not wish to mislead peoples, therefore i long time specify camera position.


Excuse, if my English language is not so good.


With best regards, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 05:38, 10 July 2009 (UTC)

May I please ask you to take one more look at the FP nomination ?[edit]

Hi, H005, by suggestion of user Maedin I added the original image to that nomination. May I please ask to review the image? Thank you for your time.--Mbz1 (talk) 00:05, 11 July 2009 (UTC)


Bromine[edit]

Hello,

kannst Du bitte hier: Bromine noch einmal vorbeischauen? Danke und Gruss, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:53, 12 July 2009 (UTC)

Bufo Bufo portrait editing[edit]

Guten Tag, H005!

I have considered Your variant of the file File:Bufo bufo 2009 G1.jpg. Yes, the left bottom edge is better, but quality and colour balance as a whole is worse for me. If You prefer Yours variant, then:

  1. Keep Yours variant on the Yours computer.
  2. Return my file original.
  3. Upload Yours variant with diffirent file name.

Absolutely free licence allows to do it. The order of operations procedure matters.

I too try to editing this file, but original IMHO better.

With best regards, -- George Chernilevsky (talk) 13:15, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi, George, this surprises me, if I compare the two versions the colors are absolutely the same, it's just lighter on the left side.
You can always restore any previous version by pressing the "reset" link left of the version in the table at the end of the page. But before you do so, please check again, load your version http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/archive/3/3c/20090709224857!Bufo_bufo_2009_G1.jpg and my version http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/3/3c/Bufo_bufo_2009_G1.jpg in two separate browser tabs and change forth and back between the two tabs: do you really see any other difference than the light? Even on a close-up view I can't see any difference. in colour balance or quality. -- H005 (talk) 14:59, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
Also, it is common practice to add new versions that are meant to be an improvement to supersede the original, this is what this function was made for. -- H005 (talk) 15:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)


For me my self variant more preferably. However, I do not wish to spoil Your work. I know, that itself I can return the old version. At first I should be assured that Your version is not spoilt.


Example:



With best regards, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 20:47, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Hi George, thanks, understand your point, I would like to continue the discussion on the image's talk page and have mived it there, if you don't mind. -- H005 (talk) 21:19, 13 July 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Graugans Anser Anser.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Graugans Anser Anser.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Nordpark Düsseldorf Springbrunnen.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordpark Düsseldorf Springbrunnen.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Verzasca Hut.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Verzasca Hut.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

fix[edit]

Hello,


You left a note here saying you opposed because it was tilted, I have fixed it now. Is it good enough to change your vote?

Best regards, Huib talk 04:08, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

Me again, I fixed the church do you think its beter now? Huib talk 20:55, 8 August 2009 (UTC)
Hmm, better, but still not symmetric enough IMHO. I've uploaded a new version with my proposal which I'd support, please reset if you dislike it, but if you find it ok I'll be happy to promote it. :-) -- H005 (talk) 21:03, 9 August 2009 (UTC) Btw, very confusing that your displayed name is so different from the original username ... ;-o
Thank you, I like this version more than my own version, its kind of strange how different people can have a different look on something :)
my name... I know, but when you know it you will get used to it. Huib talk 21:16, 9 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Wieża montparnasse.JPG[edit]

Thank you very much for paying attention and correction. You are right. Yours. Albertus teolog (talk) 18:17, 10 August 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Castelgrande Bellinzona.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Castelgrande in Bellinzona.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

File:Ernesto Cardenal a la Chascona.jpg[edit]

Perhaps you can have a look at that QI-candidat, I reduced the noise --Mbdortmund (talk) 09:10, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2Heißluftballons.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2Heißluftballons.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sonnenuntergang in der Reichstagskuppel.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Abra Ride on 15 March 2008.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Abras.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality image promotion[edit]

Potsdamer Platz vom Reichstag aus 2005.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdamer Platz vom Reichstag aus 2005.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

(it finished in my talk page, I don't know why :)) --Marcok (talk) 14:09, 18 August 2009 (UTC)

QI nomination File:Metro Helsinki.JPG[edit]

Hi, H005!

About nomination Metro Helsinki.JPG as QI. Your opinion is vote or the comment only? Please, use Symbol support vote.svg Support or Symbol oppose vote.svg Oppose templates in future for discussion.

With best regards, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 09:52, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi George, it was meant as a comment, as you had already declined, and one vote is enough if there are no others. But for a matter of clarity I have now added an explicit oppose. -- H005 (talk) 09:58, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Foggy morning on Stow Lake.jpg[edit]

Hi The tilt is fixed. If you believe it is still present please tell me what side and how many degrees I should turn it. Thanks--Two+two=4 (talk) 15:55, 19 August 2009 (UTC)

Fucus stacking software[edit]

please look here: en:Focus_stacking. In the table the third one. Best regards, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 14:29, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

File:Carcasse d'âne.JPG[edit]

Hi Ymaup, it's an interesting image, could you please add to the description where the photo was taken, and ideally also its geolocation? -- H005 (talk) 22:33, 26 August 2009 (UTC)
Hi H005! The geolocalisation is already available for this image! I will add a short description of its localisation! Thanks for promotion -- Ymaup (talk) 11:04, 27 August 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion[edit]

Graugans Anser Anser.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Graugans Anser Anser.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Graugans Anser Anser.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

"Object location"[edit]

Hallo, danke für die Verfeinerung der Geo-Angaben bei File:St_Nikolaus,_Bensberg_(2004).jpg. Das Spannende für mich an der Änderung ist, dass ich so von der Möglichkeit der Einfügung der "Object Location" erfuhr. Klasse, sehr nützlich! Auf COM:GC konnte ich noch nichts darüber finden, wird dieses Feature irgendwo diskutiert? Danke! Jochen --Iotatau (talk) 09:20, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi, freut mich, dass es dir nützt. :-) Ich weiß leider auch nichts viel über die Vorlage, ich habe sie genauso entdeckt wie du und verwende sie seither wo immer sinnvoll. -- H005 (talk) 20:10, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Geocode[edit]

Guten Tag, H005!

Die Geoortung ist sehr nützliche Information. Jedoch ist meine Meinung: man muss unbedingt es in den Nominierungen QI nicht fordern. Sie teilen Sie einfach dem Benutzer über solche Möglichkeit auf seiner Seite der Diskussionen mit.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, --George Chernilevsky (talk) 12:35, 4 September 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Cukrowicz nachbaur Kapelle 1.JPG[edit]

I've cropped 36 pixels of either side to remove the distortion, and rebalance the image. Might I ask that you re-examine it? Sarcastic ShockwaveLover (talk) 12:38, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Uno HQ Langer Eugen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Uno HQ Langer Eugen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

BayArena neu 2009.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BayArena neu 2009.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

VI candidate[edit]

Guten Tag, H005!

Please, read rules:

"If you find one or more other images/sets which in your opinion are equally or more valued images within essentially the same scope, you should nominate these images as well and move all the candidates to an MVR."

MfG --George Chernilevsky (talk) 07:07, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Hi George, that makes sense, I just haven't been aware of that rule. I have done as requested. (I hope I got it all right.) -- H005 (talk) 16:20, 10 September 2009 (UTC)
Ja. Die Nominierung ist jetzt richtig gemacht. --George Chernilevsky (talk) 16:28, 10 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Piaggio Douglas PD.808 Lucca.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piaggio Douglas PD.808 Lucca.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

VI[edit]

Guten Tag, H005!

I have changed my mote.

MfG --George Chernilevsky (talk) 18:18, 13 September 2009 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Uno HQ Langer Eugen.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Langer Eugen.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

BayArena neu 2009.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
BayArena (exterior).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Beach chair.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Strandkorb.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Images by Cayambe[edit]

Hello,
Your comments are much appreciated (cf. my user page). I am currently making some tests and come back to them. --Cayambe (talk) 16:42, 18 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Torre Palazzo Pubblico Siena.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre Palazzo Pubblico Siena.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

sorry, mistake[edit]

I did not understand the new system. I was not only FAIL but a LIAF. Thank you for supporting my picture :-) --Paddy (talk) 12:46, 19 September 2009 (UTC)

A note[edit]

I don't disagree with your crop comment - one of those "I wish I had framed it better" ones, although I still think it is a quality image of an important building. However at the time it was built (1681) all bricks would have been of local manufacture & so dependent of local rock. The area of Devon is largely sandstone & so the colouring may be quite pronounced - this isn't bad but is probably undersaturated in practice. Regards --Herby talk thyme 10:55, 22 September 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Landschaftspark DU-Nord Windrad.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landschaftspark DU-Nord Windrad.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

FalkirkWheelSide 2004 SeanMcClean (jha).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FalkirkWheelSide 2004 SeanMcClean (jha).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Hard disk head crash.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Head crash.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Olympiazentrum Schilksee.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Olympiazentrum Schilksee.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Torre Palazzo Pubblico Siena.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Torre del Mangia.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Campanile di Duomo di Lucca.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Campanile di Duomo di Lucca.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Torre Guinigi from Torre Torre dell'Orologio.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torre Guinigi from Torre Torre dell'Orologio.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Stellklappläden.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stellklappläden.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

superior mirage[edit]

Hi H005, I responded your comment on QI page, but in case you miss it here it is :Please see this image File:Two frames image of superior mirage.jpg and compare the hills in two frames. Do you see how different they look? It is what superior mirage does with lanscape. (The most prominent mirage is seen on the right hand side of the Bridge). Thanks.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:05, 5 October 2009 (UTC)

QI[edit]

Guten Tag, H005!

Meine Abstimmung ist meine aufrichtige Lösung. Ich wollte persönlich Sie nicht kränken. Ich wünsche Ihnen die schöpferischen Erfolge und die neuen guten Fotografien.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen, -- George Chernilevsky talk 10:07, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Hallo George, das weiß ich, ich nehme das sicher nicht persönlich. Ich achte die kritischen User hier sehr, denn es erfordert etwas Courage, sich gegen die Ernennung von Bildern zu wehren. Und ich habe auch kein Problem damit, wenn meine Bilder abgelehnt werden, weil es offensichtliche Mängel gibt.
Nur in diesem Falle fühle ich mich missverstanden. Ich mag das Bild, weil es in der Tiefe unscharf ist, weil die Stimmung so trostlos und grau ist, und ich habe es absichtlich unten abgeschnitten, weil es so besser dazu passt. Aber das ist meine Meinung, es ist OK, wenn andere da anderer Ansicht sind. Also, sei ruhig weiter so kritisch!
PS: In deutschen Internetforen ist das "du" üblich. :-) -- H005 Sexy Mouth transparent.png 10:19, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

Kommentar zur QI-Nominierung von File:Mesa Verde National Park Cliff Palace Right Part 2006 09 12.jpg[edit]

Hallo H005, vielen Dank für Deinen Kommentar zur Nominierung. Könntest Du mir bitte erklären, wofür die Abkürzung „CA“ steht? Das Bild ist übrigens nicht nachträglich geschnitten worden. Ich erachtete es damals als sinnvoll, nicht nur die Totale zu fotografieren (wie etwa hier, das bereits QI-Status hat), sondern auch Teilansichten. Mehrere Wikipedia-Projekte, darunter auch en-wp, haben jeweils dieses Bild ohne mein Zutun als Hauptbild für den Artikel ausgewählt. Deswegen war ich mal so mutig, es zu nominieren. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 21:02, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Hallo Andreas, CA = de:Chromatische Aberration. Mit den richtigen Tools und den RAW-Dateien der Kamera kann man das meist beheben oder wenigstens stark reduzieren.
Zum Ausschnitt: Hmm, ok, verstehe ich, aber auf mich wirkt das so zunächst einmal so, als hätte der Fotograf versehentlich daneben gezielt ... :-) -- H005 Sexy Mouth transparent.png 21:08, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Vielen Dank für die Erklärung. Leider habe ich für dieses Bild keine RAW-Datei. Ich bin erst vor kurzem dazu übergegangen, RAW-Dateien zu erzeugen. Vorher fehlte es mir an der passenden Software und dem nötigen Speicherplatz. Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 21:39, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Inzwischen gibt es dank Mbz1 eine neue Fassung des Bilds, bei dem die CA-Effekte entfernt sind. Viele Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 22:23, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Na wunderbar! Man braucht nicht unbedingt die RAW-Datei, damit geht es aber meist besser. Der Ausschnitt hält mich trotzdem davon ab, das Bild zu befördern, sorry. Aber ich werd's auch nicht ablehnen.
Habe übrigens selbst noch ein paar Bilder von der Anlage, aber das sind 15 Jahre alte eingescannte Dias, die werden niemals QI. ;-) -- H005 Sexy Mouth transparent.png 22:46, 7 October 2009 (UTC)
Mit der Nichtbeförderung habe ich absolut kein Problem; ich kann auch mit Gegenstimmen sehr gut leben, wenn sie sinnvoll begründet sind. Und Deine Begründungen sind fundiert und nachvollziehbar. Grüße, AFBorchert (talk) 23:07, 7 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Piazza Anfiteatro Lucca 360.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piazza Anfiteatro Lucca 360.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Paper recycling in Ponte a Serraglio.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paper recycling in Ponte a Serraglio.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Serchio Ponte a Serraglio.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Serchio Ponte a Serraglio.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Ponte della Maddalena side view.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte della Maddalena side view.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Ponte della Maddalena daylight.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte della Maddalena daylight.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Ponte della Maddalena by night.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte della Maddalena by night.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pelargonien in Ponte di Serraglio.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pelargonien in Ponte di Serraglio.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Duomo di Barga from NW.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo di Barga from NW.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Strandkörbe Eckernförde höher.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strandkörbe Eckernförde höher.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Duomo di Barga from SW.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo di Barga from SW.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Brachypelma smithi 2009 G09.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Brachypelma auratum.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
VaticanMuseumStaircase.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Spiral staircase in the Vatican Museums.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Macarons 001.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Macaron.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Guten Tag, H005!

Der gute Scherz Smile:

Diese drei Belohnungen sind ein Friedhof der fremden Nominationen. Es ist das ausgezeichnete Ergebnis Du findest die wirklich beste Variante in der Kategorie.

Mit freundlichen Grüßen -- George Chernilevsky talk 07:19, 14 October 2009 (UTC)

Pics on QIC[edit]

Hmm... I probably should check my monitor calbiration (recently had to do a clean reinstall) of Windows. Either that or I need to recalibrate my *eyes*. At least overexposure (without blown highlights) is easier to fix in post-processing. Uploaded new version of File:Roos Tor.jpg].--Nilfanion (talk) 21:07, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

Pics on QIC[edit]

Hmm... I probably should check my monitor calbiration (recently had to do a clean reinstall) of Windows. Either that or I need to recalibrate my *eyes*. At least overexposure (without blown highlights) is easier to fix in post-processing. Uploaded new version of File:Roos Tor.jpg]. Any other feedback/thoughts would be handy - don't like getting something so basic messed up!--Nilfanion (talk) 21:08, 24 October 2009 (UTC)

QI[edit]

Guten Tag, H005!

Ich danke dich für die Übersicht meiner QI Nominationen.

1) Kannst du die Beschreibung dieser Fotografie auf dem Deutsch ergänzen? Es ist das Tal des Todes. Das Denkmal ist ins Gedächtnis über diese: de:Schlacht von Balaklawa.

2) Du kannst das Denkmal den überschwemmten Schiffen ablehnen, wenn es ungenügend gut ist. Ich werde andere Fotografie später beladen. Andere Fotografie ähnlich nach der Komposition, jedoch sie fordert die Korrektur auch.

MfG -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:28, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Sure, it's a pleasure. Ich bin aber etwas verwirrt über die Kategorie: "Category:Monument to Feel British in Crimea" Was soll das bedeuten?
Das Bild mit den Schiffen will ich nicht ablehnen, es ist ein gutes Bild, ich denke nur, diesen Punkt sollte man noch verbessern. Und ich würde es anders (symmetrisch) schneiden. -- H005 Sexy Mouth transparent.png 20:49, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
Vielen dank!
Kannst Du ander Titel der Kategorie anbieten? Ich werde dann korrigieren und ich werde die Dateien verlegen.
Ich habe noch eine Fotografie beladen. Es ist mehr Bearbeitung und es ist die Komposition ein bißchen besser. Ich konnte symmetrisch nicht abschneiden. Der russische Ponton (die Schwimmbrücke) war sehr schön mit den Fahnen, er hatte den häßlichen Rand rechts jedoch. Ich wollte nicht sehr enge Fotografie machen.
MfG -- George Chernilevsky talk 12:16, 28 October 2009 (UTC)
I've tagged the category with a new proposal -- H005 Sexy Mouth transparent.png 20:38, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

:File:Gehry Medienhafen 7th floor.jpg[edit]

Hallo, in dem Fall (Aufnahme nicht von einem öffentlichen Platz aus gemacht) gilt die Panoramafreiheit nicht! Vielleicht kommt jemand und läßt es löschen. --Berthold Werner (talk) 08:55, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Hmmm, ich kenne das Hundertwasser-Urteil, aber ich hatte angenommen, dass es nur darum geht, dass man sich dadurch nicht den Blick auf etwas erschleicht, das man vom öffentlichen Raum aus (wegen einer Mauer oder eines Zaunes o. ä.) nicht sehen könnte. Und bei meinem Bild sieht man ja eigentlich nichts, das man nicht auch von der Straße aus sehen könnte, ist nur ein anderer Blickwinkel. Aber möglicherweise hast du Recht. -- H005 Sexy Mouth transparent.png 20:19, 28 October 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Inclined conveyor DU-Nord.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inclined conveyor DU-Nord.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Pfannenwagen DU-Nord.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pfannenwagen DU-Nord.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Torpedowagen DU-Nord.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torpedowagen DU-Nord.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gehry Medienhafen 7th floor.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gehry Medienhafen 7th floor.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Abgasrohr DU-Nord.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abgasrohr DU-Nord.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wirbler und Staubsack.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wirbler und Staubsack.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Manganelli Siena.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manganelli Siena.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Hochofen 5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochofen 5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Duomo di Siena Campanile top.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo di Siena Campanile top.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Duomo Siena, window over main portal.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo Siena, window over main portal.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Commons:Deletion requests/Images of Kowloon Walled City[edit]

Just to let you know, you inadvertently used the {{delete}} template instead of the {{vd}} template when making this edit. I fixed it for you. Cheers! --Captain-tucker (talk) 21:24, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Ooops, where did I have my mind, of course, thanks! -- H005 Sexy Mouth transparent.png 21:34, 5 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Odysseum Köln Eingang.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Odysseum Köln Eingang.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Odysseum Köln Fassade.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Odysseum Köln Fassade.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:Odysseum_Köln_Fassade_Detail.jpg[edit]

Hallo H005, ich kenn LR nicht, da ich mit Adobe Camera RAW und Photoshop arbeite. Meines Wissens nutzt LR aber auch ACR und dort kann man Kissenverzug korrigieren (Reiter "Lens corrections"). Alternativ kann man mit Hugin entzerren oder mit PtGui. Gruss --Ikiwaner (talk) 19:38, 8 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Metal Ladle.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Metal Ladle.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gussmetallschmelze.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gussmetallschmelze.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Garfagnana - Tal von Fornovolasco.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Garfagnana - Tal von Fornovolasco.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Ponte delle Catene (Fornoli).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte delle Catene (Fornoli).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Grotta del Vento 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grotta del Vento 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rotierende Kaminhüte.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rotierende Kaminhüte.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Drehbarer Kaminhut.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Drehbarer Kaminhut.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

QI review[edit]

Hello,
You gave a look at my picture, and found it nice, but tilted. I have corrected it one more time. Does it feel traight for you now? Many thanks for reviewing.
--Berru (talk) 21:12, 15 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kap am Südkai.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kap am Südkai.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Parkscheinautomat Skidata.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parkscheinautomat Skidata.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Parkhaus Rheinauhafen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Parkhaus Rheinauhafen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

T-Mobile HQ Video Screen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! T-Mobile HQ Video Screen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hafenkran Rheinauhafen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hafenkran Rheinauhafen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

FF[edit]

Hallo, FF ist FixFoto, guckst du hier: http://www.j-k-s.com/ --Berthold Werner (talk) 06:53, 24 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Odysseum Köln Fassade Detail.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Odysseum Köln Fassade Detail.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Frankfurt am Main[edit]

Hello H005, If you know Frankfurt am Main, it would be nice to have your opinion on this VIC. Regards, --Myrabella (talk) 14:43, 30 November 2009 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sternstunden Oberhausen Sonne.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sternstunden Oberhausen Sonne.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

:)[edit]

Merry Christmas and Happy New Year! --George Chernilevsky talk

Thanks[edit]

Hi,

Thanks for the fix to Sydney_Opera_House_with_Tall_Ship.jpg: [1].

Regards, Ben Aveling 06:05, 9 January 2010 (UTC)

VI[edit]

Guten Tag, H005!
VI candidate not geocoded.
Mit freundlichen Grüßen --George Chernilevsky talk 10:22, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

The location is in the description, it's a zoo animal. -- H005 Sexy Mouth transparent.png 16:07, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Lophophorus impejanus Zoo DU 2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Lophophorus impejanus (male).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Your signature[edit]

Information.svg Hello, H005. It has been noticed that your signature contains an image. Images are discouraged for use in signatures. You can change your preferences by clicking on "My preferences" at the top, or go to Special:Preferences. Thank you. -NerdyScienceDude :) (✉ click to talkmy edits) 21:59, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Haus zum Haus Winter 2009.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haus zum Haus Winter 2009.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Torre Guinigi from Torre Torre dell'Orologio.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Torre Guinigi.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Biodiversity Photo - route[edit]

Hello John Mosesso

My name is Rita Neves.

I work in Câmara Municipal de Lisboa, that is a Public Organism in Portugal.

Actually, we are working on a road book of Biodiversity of Lisbon, for which we are going to produce a panel and a brochure. We found your photos on Wikimedia Commons and liked specially one of them very much, so we would like to know if you could allow us to use your photos, for free, to publish on this project, knowing that the brochure of will be for free distribution to everyone.

The photo we would like to use are the following:

Bufo bufo http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Bufo_bufo_2009_G1.jpg

The brochure will have four brackets. - Broochura a pocket to take the route

- A brochure to present the day of inauguration
- Schedules for species identification 

- Panels that will be fixed in the Land

As i said the Free Access will be everything :)

Being Public Domain and if provide us that photo, we will refer your name in the bibliografy and need to know what´s the name you want on the bibliography? George Chernilevsky?

If it´s possible please respond to rita.neves@cm-lisboa.pt

Thank you very much

Our best regards

sorry, George Chernilevsky, not John Mosessso

Hi Rita!
I sent an email to you.
With best regards, --George Chernilevsky talk 07:57, 20 August 2010 (UTC)

err, what is this about? Seems you're on the wrong page here. -- H005 Sexy Mouth transparent.png 17:52, 22 August 2010 (UTC)

File:Emirates_Towers_Hotel_Interior.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Emirates_Towers_Hotel_Interior.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.61.131.141 15:17, 13 October 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kuppel Kleine Hagia Sophia.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuppel Kleine Hagia Sophia.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Commons:Signatures[edit]

Hello H005. Your current signature is not in accordance with the new guideline at Commons:Signatures because it contains an image. Please change it so that it doesn't contain it. alternative methods are described on that page. Thank you, ZooFari 23:26, 23 December 2010 (UTC)

* * * :) * * *[edit]

Ich wünsche Dir fröhliche Weihnachtsfeiertage und alles Gute und ganz best im Neuen Jahr!
--George Chernilevsky talk 12:29, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi George, vielen Dank, and all the same to you! :-) -- H005 13:07, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Ivanhoe Christmas Lights.jpg[edit]

Hi H005, Thanks for your message in QI review page for my image Ivanhoe Christmas Lights.jpg. Could you give me your further guideline of how to improve the image? I am not sure what your comments exactly mean that I can have the material to accomplish the image. Thanks in advance Donaldytong (talk) 13:19, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Hi Donaldytong, this really depends. Ideally, you'd have several images shot from a tripod with different exposures. You can then combine them to a single image with a "compressed" exposure range. See e.g. en:High dynamic range imaging for details. You usually would need some special software.
If you do not have such images but such a single one, it might still be you have the RAW file, which usually covers a wider range of exposure. You can then light up the dark areas and darken the bright areas with almost any image processing software that can handle your RAW file.
If you're unsure what I mean, you can mail me that RAW file and I'll show you how it can look like. -- H005 13:26, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Hi H005, Thanks again for your response. I can understand what you mean now, but I only have one single file of this image. How I can email my original digital file to you? Do you mean I need to upload the original file to Wikimedia Commons and than attahed it to your Discussion page or you have an email address that I can sent the file direcrly to you? Donaldytong (talk) 14:11, 24 December 2010 (UTC)
Have a look in your inbox. -- H005 14:16, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2010-01-18 Seebenalp.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2010-01-18 Seebenalp.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Radfahrer Winterberg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Radfahrer Winterberg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

QIC-Frage[edit]

Hallo H005, könntest du mir kurz erklären, was genau ich an diesem Bild nachkorrigieren soll. - Danke, A.S. 17:20, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Hi, das Bild zeigt sichtbares Rauschen; während das Helligkeitsrauschen noch geht, vor allem weil es durch die strukturierten Materialen überdeckt wird, ist das Farbrauschen gut sichtbar. Mehr Infos findest du unter de:Bildrauschen. Mit welcher Software du das machst, hängt davon ab, was du zur Verfügung hast; das kostenlose Programm mit den m. E. besten Ergebnissen ist Neat Image. -- H005 20:27, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Ich weiß schon was Rauschen ist, ist auch klar, eine höhere ISO ist bei Kunstlicht halt immer drin, damit das Bild nicht verwackelt - ich stehe nur aufm Schlauch, wo genau im Bild das "Farbrauschen" ist. Wäre nett wenn das Entfernen mit Photoshop Elements ginge. A.S. 21:34, 15 January 2011 (UTC)
Mmmh, eigentlich überall. Am deutlichsten sichtbar ist es m. E. im dunkelgrauen Bereich rechts von den Gleisen sowie die Decke im Bereich der Oberleitung. Dort ist sind die Wände nicht grau, sondern bunt gesprenkelt. Zoom mal stärker heran, wenn du es nicht gleich siehst. Ich finde das aber schon sehr auffällig. Mit PS Elements sollte man das problemlos loswerden können. -- H005 21:39, 15 January 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Central Fresco Duoma di Pisa.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Fresco Duoma di Pisa.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Landschaftspark DU-Nord XXX.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landschaftspark DU-Nord XXX.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hundestation Dornum 2010.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hundestation Dornum 2010.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Aquädukt Lorenzo Nottolini 2009-07-21.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aquädukt Lorenzo Nottolini 2009-07-21.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tafel Neßmersiel 2010.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tafel Neßmersiel 2010.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

British American Tobacco Headquarters.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! British American Tobacco Headquarters.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Lichtinstallation DU-Nord tagsüber.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lichtinstallation DU-Nord tagsüber.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:Torpedopfanne.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Torpedopfanne.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

80.187.106.166 17:35, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schweiz Karte Baedeker, 1913.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schweiz Karte Baedeker, 1913.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

FP Promotion[edit]

Schweiz Karte Baedeker, 1913.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Schweiz Karte Baedeker, 1913.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Schweiz Karte Baedeker, 1913.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 21:02, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Deine Cat-a-lot-Änderungen vom 25. Mai 2011[edit]

Moin! Da scheint gestern Abend kräftig was schief gegangen zu sein. Du hast Bilder in nicht existente Kategorien und mindestens ungewöhnlich benannte verschoben. Machst Du's bitte rückgängig? Danke! --Hagar66 (talk) 06:04, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi, welche meinst du? Ich habe ziemlich viel rekategorisiert und kann auf Anhieb keine nicht existenten oder ungewöhnlich benannten finden. -- H005 06:10, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
hmm, sorry, ich dachte das wäre offensichtlich. Nehmen wir als Beispiel mal das hier. Eine Kat "People of HemerCategory" oder "Location not applicableCategory" wolltest Du sicher nicht vergeben, oder? Das ist bei einigen von gestern Abend so passiert, ich habe mir allerdings auch keine Überblick verschafft bei wievielen genau, denn -wie Du schon sagst - Du hast ja 'ne Menge recats gemacht. Und ich habe auch keinen Überblick, ob das die einzigen komischen Kats sind. :-) --Hagar66 (talk) 06:19, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Oh, ja, jetzt sehe ich's. Da muss aber ein Fehler im Cat-a-lot vorliegen, diese Kategorien habe ich so nicht eingegeben, und die automatisch erzeugten Änderungskommentare zeigen ja auch die eigentlich gewollten Änderungen richtig an. Ich werde mal den Autor des Tools anschrieben. -- H005 06:45, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Yepp! Dank Dir! --Hagar66 (talk) 06:49, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Bug wurde gefunden und gefixt: MediaWiki_talk:Gadget-Cat-a-lot.js#Bug_report. Ich habe die kaputten Kategorien repariert (hoffe, dass ich alle gefunden habe). -- H005 15:21, 26 May 2011 (UTC)
Perfekt! Danke fürs Bescheid sagen! --Hagar66 (talk) 18:45, 26 May 2011 (UTC)

Frage[edit]

Hi H005,

kannst du zu Deiner Begutachtung [2] noch eine Erklärung abgeben? Was fehlt dir an der Beschreibung und wieso soll der Ausschnitt zu knapp sein? Der Geotag ist nachgetragen. Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 13:43, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Leider ist deine Antwort nicht wirklich erhellend. Bitte äußere Dich, was Du genau möchtest. Mir ist nicht bekannt, dass eine in der Beschreibung des Bildes mehr zu stehen hat als die Beschreibung des Objektes. Wo sich der Turm befindet geht aus den unzweideutig Geokoordinaten hervor. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:14, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Hi, tut mir Leid, aber ich verstehe dein Problem nicht. Ich schrieb doch, dass sich das Problem dank der Hinzufügung der Geokoordinaten (danke dafür!) erledigt hat. Haben wir vielleicht ein Sprachproblem (englisch)? -- H005 20:28, 1 June 2011 (UTC)
Okay, offensichtlich war es das. Für mich ist mit "Beschreibung"/ "description" nur die Zeile gemeint, wo auch die (verbale) Beschreibung steht; für dich ist es das ganze Konglomerat mit Lizenz, Geotag, etc. Nichts für ungut, ist nun geklärt. --Wladyslaw (talk) 20:35, 1 June 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gustav Dürr.png
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gustav Dürr.png, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Herrenhaus Cromford Brügelmann.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herrenhaus Cromford Brügelmann.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Date format[edit]

Thank you for the tip. I fixed all images from this batch. I'll look at my older images later as well to make sure they are all format-compliant. Fred Hsu (talk) 03:40, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Great, many thanks for your consideration! -- H005 20:43, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Blick vom Torre Guinigi nach NW.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blick vom Torre Guinigi nach NW.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Duomo di Lucca vom Torre Guinigi 2009-07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo di Lucca vom Torre Guinigi 2009-07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Duomo di Lucca von vorne 2009-07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Duomo di Lucca von vorne 2009-07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Aquila nipalensis - 20100905.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aquila nipalensis - 20100905.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

QI Fernsehturm Münster[edit]

Hi H005,

besser? Grüße --Wladyslaw (talk) 09:15, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

File:H-ludmila-sber-8959.jpg[edit]

"Blown lights". Could you please explain me the correct way to make those evening photos so to keep the light parts visible? Thank you.--PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:44, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Well, I see several ways. First is not to choose an evening on a cloudy day. Second is to adjust the s-curve using the raw image - I am somewhat confident that the dynamic range of the sensor can cover the range found here. And the third option would be a tone-compressed HDRI. Do you have the raw image? The send me an e-mail. Depending on how good it is I believe I could avoid those bright areas. -- H005 20:30, 20 July 2011 (UTC)
I will check the HDRI possibility, thanks for an advice. Evening is evening, any evening will have this blown-out lights...--PereslavlFoto (talk) 21:16, 20 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hendrick's Gin 1l.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hendrick's Gin 1l.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Post Tower Bonn sunset.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Post Tower Bonn sunset.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Roger Chapman Ratingen 2011-07-09 252.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roger Chapman Ratingen 2011-07-09 252.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fischer-Zunft sign Würzburg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fischer-Zunft sign Würzburg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Roger Chapman Ratingen 2011-07-09 260.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roger Chapman Ratingen 2011-07-09 260.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Hendrick's Gin 1l with cup.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hendrick's Gin 1l with cup.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Yeni Camii Istanbul Dome.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yeni Camii Istanbul Dome.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Blaue Moschee Kuppel schräg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blaue Moschee Kuppel schräg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Roger Chapman Ratingen 2011-07-09 248.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roger Chapman Ratingen 2011-07-09 248.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Yeni Camii Istanbul interior view.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yeni Camii Istanbul interior view.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Post Tower X-Mas yellow-red.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Post Tower X-Mas yellow-red.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Post Tower X-Mas yellow-red edit.jpg[edit]

Just thought I should let you know that I have nominated the edited version. --Jovian Eye storm 19:45, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! -- H005 05:56, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wappen Duisburg Leder.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wappen Duisburg Leder.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Blaue Moschee Seitenkuppel.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blaue Moschee Seitenkuppel.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

FP Promotion[edit]

Post Tower Bonn sunset.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Post Tower Bonn sunset.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Post Tower Bonn sunset.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 05:04, 8 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Klabund - Dichtungen aus dem Osten (im Regal).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klabund - Dichtungen aus dem Osten (im Regal).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Post Tower Bonn 2009-06-25.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Post Tower Bonn 2009-06-25.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Ratingen[edit]

Photos must be under the locality where they were taken, or a subcategory thereof. So, if a category is too full, do not remove content you think is inappropriate. Instead, create the appropriate subcategory.

So.... can you please put all the content you uncategorized in Ratingen into Category:Nature of Ratingen etc (same goes for any other such content you uncategorized). For a list of what goes into "Nature of...", see e.g. Category:Nature of Germany

Thanks! Dysmorodrepanis (talk) 17:36, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Dysmorodrepanis, meinst du die Insektenbilder wie dieses hier? Die habe ich nicht entfernt, weil die Kategorie "Ratingen" zu voll war, sondern weil sie keinerlei Bezug zu Ratingen haben. Diese Tiere gibt es ja überall in vergleichbaren Breitengraden in Europa und nicht nur in Ratingen. -- H005 21:55, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Buch Geschichte der Stadt Duisburg 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buch Geschichte der Stadt Duisburg 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

AW: File:Estambul-Turquia9494.JPG[edit]

Hallo, ich habe deine Nachricht nicht ganz verstanden. Soweit ich in der Historie sehe kann, hast du doch bestätigt, dass es sich doch um die richtige Mosche handelte. Sorry fûr die späte Antwort, ich habe bis jetzt deine Nachricht nicht wahrgenommen. VG, --Poco a poco (talk) 11:36, 12 November 2011 (UTC)

Dummy Image Generator[edit]

hi h005,

i wanted to inform you (and say a big thank you) that we use one of your images on http://dummy-image-generator.com/

the credits list you find here:

http://dummy-image-generator.com/credits

best regards immo

Thanks for letting me know! -- H005 22:45, 2 February 2012 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Romania[edit]

Flag map of Romania.svg
Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 22:48, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely Lophotrochozoa (talk) 13:25, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Puertoba.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Puertoba.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Puertoba.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Cambalachero (talk) 00:08, 26 March 2012 (UTC)

Name change[edit]

Hello! First of all, sorry for my bad english, but I'll try to write the better I can. That building called El Porteño was also owned by Molinos Rio de la Plata, but there exists another building of the same company, which is called Los Molinos. I think the author of that image thought that it was Los Molinos, and it's a mistake. Saludos!--Elsapucai (talk) 23:00, 1 May 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Pyramiden panorama july2011.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Pyramiden (Svalbard).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Turkish plates.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turkish plates.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, A.Savin 15:30, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, LGA talkedits 02:40, 15 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:12, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Triumph Tiger 800 MY 2012 side view.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Triumph Tiger 800 MY 2012 side view.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Image QI candidate[edit]

Äs you suggested (thanks) I lightened up the face. Could you please give an other comment?

Thanks --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 09:39, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Triumph Tiger 800 MY 2012.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Triumph Tiger 800 MY 2012.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.