User talk:HCPUNXKID

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, HCPUNXKID!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, HCPUNXKID!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 20 June 2010 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 01:55, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Flickrwashing[edit]

Regarding your question: The files from the flickr account Saharauiak appear to be gathered from various sources: Aminetu2005.jpg comes from www.arso.org/aminatoucamp.htm , http://farm1.static.flickr.com/39/88940167_7a4cb688b4.jpg also appears on other blogs (for example http://cotarelo.blogspot.com/2009/11/aminatu-haidar.html ). --DieBuche (talk) 19:03, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Ok, I agree that ones could be washed, but I dont think the same happens about the Bir Lehlou.jpg. I can't find that photo in any other site.--HCPUNXKID (talk) 12:52, 16 September 2010 (UTC)
Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, HCPUNXKID. You have new messages at DieBuche's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

Lo que pasa es que en el origen tiene una licencia "noncommercial", que quiere decir que no se permite el uso comercial de la imagen. Belgrano (talk) 17:13, 25 September 2010 (UTC)

Files you uploaded may be deleted[edit]

The files listed below, which you uploaded, have been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have not sent the permission, please send it to "permissions-commons@wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. If you have, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard, quoting the file name, so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. Please note that this message is being left by an automated bot, whose operator is not an OTRS volunteer, therefore please do not send this information to me, as it will not save your images from deletion. Thanks for your time! Please help translate this message! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 05:13, 14 December 2010 (UTC)

The editions I made are according to the official positions. Some states are changing their opinion frequently or give separate announcements of support for both Morocco and Polisario Front/SADR.[edit]

Some states are changing their opinion frequently or give separate announcements of support for both Morocco and Polisario Front/SADR (Paraguay, Belgium, Benin, Botswana, Burundi, Chile, Dominican Republic, Guatemala, Guinea-Bissau, Malawi, Peru, Russia, Sierra Leone, Swaziland). What is certain that the status of Western Sahara is not determined by the United Nations due to the support (veto powers) by UN Member states France and the USA for Morocco, but nor is Morocco's claim recognized by the United Nations as well, unlike the still non-independent "State of Palestine" which has a UN seat as a "non-voting" member.

The editions I made are according to the official (current) positions of countries on this issue and not on the frequently changing statements by them which either are for or against.

Personally I do not care about Western Sahara or Morocco and unlike you I am not a partisan on issues (E.g. Your support of secessionist claims even within internationally recognized borders such as Catalonia, Basque Country in Spain, Scotland in the UK, Kurdistan in various Middle Eastern Countries etc..)

Saguamundi

Embassy in Timor-Leste?[edit]

Hello HCPUNXKID! Can you give me a source, that SADR has an embassy in Timor-Leste? I know, that Timor-Leste is supporting interests of SADR, but couldn't find any informations about an SADR-embassy in Dili. There is maybe only an ambassador, who has his seat in Jakarta, like several other countries? Greetings, --Patrick (talk) 08:36, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Aminetou Mandela.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Aminetou Mandela.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

VernoWhitney (talk) 17:16, 11 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello, It seems that the image was copied from [1]. Flickr is probably not the original source. Regards, Yann (talk) 17:05, 12 July 2012 (UTC)


File:Laredocasapueblavieja.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Laredocasapueblavieja.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found it available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Commons. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedy deleted if it hasn't been already. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again, or ask an administrator to restore the file if it has been deleted. Túrelio (talk) 07:33, 5 March 2013 (UTC)


File:MercadoLaredo.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:MercadoLaredo.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found it available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Commons. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedy deleted if it hasn't been already. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again, or ask an administrator to restore the file if it has been deleted. Túrelio (talk) 07:35, 5 March 2013 (UTC)


File:Columbrete Grande Columbretes.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Columbrete Grande Columbretes.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found it available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Commons. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedy deleted if it hasn't been already. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again, or ask an administrator to restore the file if it has been deleted. Túrelio (talk) 12:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


File:Faro Columbrete Grande 2.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Faro Columbrete Grande 2.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found it available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Commons. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedy deleted if it hasn't been already. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again, or ask an administrator to restore the file if it has been deleted. Túrelio (talk) 12:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


File:Faro Columbrete Grande.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:Faro Columbrete Grande.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found it available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Commons. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedy deleted if it hasn't been already. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again, or ask an administrator to restore the file if it has been deleted. Túrelio (talk) 12:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


File:La Herrera island.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:La Herrera island.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found it available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Commons. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedy deleted if it hasn't been already. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again, or ask an administrator to restore the file if it has been deleted. Túrelio (talk) 12:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)


File:La Horadada island.jpg[edit]

This media may be deleted. Deutsch | English | español | فارسی | français | italiano | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Tiếng Việt | +/−


Dialog-warning.svg

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons from Flickr, File:La Horadada island.jpg, has been reviewed by an administrator or reviewer and found it available on Flickr under the license Noncommercial (NC), No derivative works (ND), or All Rights Reserved (Copyright), which isn't compatible with Commons. Unless the Flickr user changes the license to one that Wikimedia Commons accepts, the file will be speedy deleted if it hasn't been already. Commons:Flickr files/Appeal for license change has information about sending the Flickr user an appeal asking for the license to be changed. Only Flickr images tagged as BY (CC BY) or BY SA (CC BY-SA) are allowed on Commons. Once the license on Flickr is changed, you may replace the {{Unfree Flickr file}} tag with {{flickrreview}} so that an administrator or reviewer can review the image again, or ask an administrator to restore the file if it has been deleted. Túrelio (talk) 12:26, 18 April 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Morcilla-burgos 1.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Morcilla-burgos 1.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 12:48, 5 May 2013 (UTC)


Re:[edit]

¡Hola! Aquí está el escudo: Escudo de Villamontán de la Valduerna.svg
La bandera también la he hecho, pero no sé por qué la subida de imágenes a commons la tengo «caída» desde hace unas horas. La subiré cuando pueda. No soy lego en la materia precisamente pero espero que te guste. Detalles de ambos:

  • He puesto para el escudo como referencia principal el blasón aprobado. He anotado el problemilla del blasón oficial (si son 7 pendones es matemáticamente imposible que sean 3+1+2 y he puesto como corrección en faja de 4 (4+1+2) como indica la fuente web que me ofreces.
  • Con respecto a la bandera (que ya te avisaré cuando la suba), el orden de las barras externas que se señala (rojo-verde y verde-rojo), indica, al ser (entiendo) una enumeración de arriba hacia abajo, la simetría de colores respecto al eje de la recta horizontal que une el centro del asta con el del batiente (por lo que sería rojo-verde-blanco-rojo-blanco-verde-rojo en vez del rojo-verde-blanco-rojo-blanco-rojo-verde del diseño representado en vexilo-león).

¡Recibe un cordial saludo! Asqueladd (talk) 20:39, 15 May 2013 (UTC)

✓ Aquí tienes la bandera: Bandera de Villamontán de la Valduerna.svg. Saludos.-- Asqueladd (talk) 22:27, 15 May 2013 (UTC)


✓ Done Escudo de Carrizo de la Ribera (León).svg ¿Escudos heráldicos? ¡El escudo de Carrizo es un escudo heráldico! ¿Te refieres a heráldica nobiliaria o de linajes? Hasta ahora sólo me ha motivado la heráldica cívica, pero dime qué tienes en mente. Un saludo.--Asqueladd (talk) 18:21, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Cascajares-de-Bureba-escudo.gif[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Cascajares-de-Bureba-escudo.gif. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 18:38, 26 May 2013 (UTC)

Re:[edit]

¡Hola HCPUNXKID! Por partes:

  • Si el logo no es libre no puede estar en commons. En cuanto a vectorizarlo para la wikipedia en inglés, pues mi interpretación es que tampoco. No creo que sea conveniente subir bajo el amparo del fair use un archivo vectorial (se suele considerarse fair use un archivo de baja resolución).
  • Respecto a los apellidos, un problema esencial es que no existe una relación biunívoca entre escudo y apellido. Sí entre linajes de un apellido y tal, tengo entendido.
  • Respecto al escudo de Laredo, le he realizado Escudo de Laredo.svg, pero ¿tienes una fuente mejor para el blasón?. Quicir, sería deseable que no fuera un blog aunque coincida con el escudo oficial.

Un saludo.--Asqueladd (talk) 18:55, 27 May 2013 (UTC)

¡Hola, HCPUNXKID! Muchas gracias. Ya conocía la web. Está muy bien para dar cobertura heráldica a la provincia, aunque en algunos casos echo en falta algunos blasones de los escudos. Recibe un atento saludo.--Asqueladd (talk) 23:45, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Hola, me pondré más tarde a la filigrana de las cruces. Te agradeceré sin embargo que no subas una versión que contradice claramente el blasón, y que además incumple gratuitamente las leyes de la heráldica (dice plata, y plata sobre ondas de azur va fetén). En la heráldica europea no existe el celeste, sino 5 esmaltes básicos (4 colores: gules, azur, sable y sinople, y 2 metales: oro y plata), y después ya casos especiales. No sé qué haré con casos como el de escudo de Aranda de Duero, que está por hacer y tiene dos tonos de azur, pero en este caso, Laredo, me parece altamente innecesario y gratuitamente antiheráldico cuando hay una solución óptima que se ha aplicado (además de por supuesto de no venir en el blasón). Un saludo.--Asqueladd (talk) 14:57, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Como ya te dije en principio no existen dos esmaltes de azur en la heráldica europea. Sí existe sin embargo en Sudamérica el color cielo para el celeste. Ese dilema también está en el blasón de Aranda de Duero (que sin embargo, como podrías ver en la página de la diputación de Burgos dice que en cualquier caso es azul, no plata). Y por favor, no soy ningún experto en heráldica. Lo poco que sé lo he aprendido observando los armoriales del wikiproyecto de heráldica de es:wiki y siguiendo sus reglas. Un saludo.--Asqueladd (talk) 15:27, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Abbas al-Musawi.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Abbas al-Musawi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 04:44, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:La aguilera02.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:La aguilera02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 11:51, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Imam Ali Khamenei receives Hizbullah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Imam Ali Khamenei receives Hizbullah Secretary General Hassan Nasrallah.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 23:41, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Hassan Nasrallah poster.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Hassan Nasrallah poster.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Leoboudv (talk) 19:03, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Young Khadafi.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Young Khadafi.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 23:46, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Pierre & Marie Curie graffiti.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pierre & Marie Curie graffiti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leoboudv (talk) 21:24, 4 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Edward Snowden graffiti.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Edward Snowden graffiti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ecce Ralgis (háblame) 17:22, 5 July 2013 (UTC)

File tagging File:Edward Snowden graffiti.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Edward Snowden graffiti.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Edward Snowden graffiti.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Mono 17:38, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Kim Jong Un graffiti.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Kim Jong Un graffiti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Taichi (talk) 02:43, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Bradley Manning graffiti.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bradley Manning graffiti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 08:26, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Sargentes de la lora05.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Sargentes de la lora05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 18:55, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Re:[edit]

Hola, HCPUNXKID. No creo que realice la propuesta que me has realizado de la bandera de Aguas Cándidas por una mezcla de dos razones: que no sea una página web particularmente fiable (lo mejor es siempre la descripción en el BOE o en el BOCYL) unido a que la descripción ofrecida no parece coincidir siquiera con la fotografía que ellos mismos enseñan. Un saludo. Sobre lo de Laredo, ya veré, aunque no es una prioridad. Recibe un atento saludo.--Asqueladd (talk) 12:30, 15 November 2013 (UTC)

PD: He visto por notificación de la mención a User:Asqueladd que has dejado un mensaje al usuario SanchoPanzaXXI. Este usuario está inactivo en commons desde hace más de año y medio.

Antiguo escudo de Laredo[edit]

Perdona el retraso en la respuesta he estado muy liado y no he podido contestar antes. Tengo en mente hacer, como en Madrid, los escudos de las capitales de CC.AA y provincias y los de las grandes ciudades y poblaciones históricas, como es el caso de Laredo. He visto tu enlace y es muy interesante, voy a hacer seguro mi versión del escudo actual e intentaré hacer también lo que me has pedido aunque no puedo garantizarlo por falta de tiempo ya que los escudos provinciales y locales me van a llevar mucho tiempo, pero lo intentaré. Saludos--Heralder (talk) 20:21, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

File:André Malraux graffiti.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:André Malraux graffiti.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

I'd like to be wrong, but... Yann (talk) 08:37, 24 December 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Paul Bocuse graffiti.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Paul Bocuse graffiti.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Aga (d) 13:09, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear HCPUNXKID,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:58, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Re : BRN Flags[edit]

✓ Done. Here I have create the SVG version of all the flags except for the flags of the State of Greater Pattani and Pattani United Liberation Organisation which already available in the commons. Cheers! :) — ᴀʟʀᴇᴀᴅʏ ʙᴏʀᴇᴅ ʜᴜʜ? 19:19, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Situation in East Ukraine[edit]

Zhdanivka --- army withdrew from the city --- also rebels and Russian army controled the village Sofiivka In area of the city Lugansk, the Ukrainian troops almost left the city and its surroundings, moving away from his main forces to the north. In fact today they hold only a small bridgehead on the right bank of the Seversky Donets (Vesela Hora - Shyshkove - Dovhe).
town Hlybokyi --- under control by rebels --- Also near Vesela Hora - Shchastia were intense battles, as well as near the Stanytsia Luhanska. Thus the rebels, with the support of the Russian army, acting in the direction of Krasnodon - Lugansk still managed to push the Ukrainian troops across the river Seversky Donets (except as noted above springboard). So that now both banks of the river are under control by Ukrainian troops only in area Katerinovka - Nyzhnie UA PressOdessa Daily
Talakivka, Shyrokyne, Sakhanka, Zemliane --- taken by rebels --- Mig NewsMig News112 UA--
Schastia --- The Russian military now are very close to the city of Schastia the front line between the Ukrainian army and the armed forces of Russia lies in area of ​​the bridge over the river of Seversky Donets --- Source
Krasnoarmiisk --- Ukrainian army left the city --- PodrobnostiIBRA UAMelitopol NewsDialog Inform--Hanibal911 (talk) 17:08, 7 September 2014 (UTC)
city Sartana and village Kominternove--- under control by pro Russian rebels --- UNIAN--Hanibal911 (talk) 06:37, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Debaltseve --- The Russian troops or the rebels now start surround the Ukrainian troops in city Debaltseve now they are 300 meters away from position the Ukrainian army --- UNIAN--Hanibal911 (talk) 12:15, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Zhdanivka source--Hanibal911 (talk) 14:15, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
VorovskeKrasnopilliaTelmanove --- taken by pro Russian rebels --- 112 UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 18:04, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Ukraine's armed forces left the settlements Pryvitne, Pankovo​​, Stukalova Balka, Svitle, Obozne and Khrystove. Army also withdraw its troops from the liberated settlements Markivka, Novopskov, Belovodsk, Novojdar, Severodonetsk Starobilsk and Svatovo This is due to a truce, which was signed in Minsk between militants and Ukraine. source--Hanibal911 (talk) 21:27, 8 September 2014 (UTC)
Debalcevo --- Half of the city Debalcevo controlled by insurgents --- Ukrainian military are now located under Debalcevo on a narrow strip of land on both sides surrounded by gunmen. Them all the time shell terrorists.Gordon UALB UAsource--Hanibal911 (talk) 12:27, 10 September 2014 (UTC)
Army today left the several cities including Zhdanivka, Yunokomunarivsk, Rozivka, Vuhlehirsk.24TV UALB UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 07:11, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
Dokuchaevsk --- under control by pro Russian rebels --- Dialog UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 18:53, 21 September 2014 (UTC)
New data:
  • The area around the city Debalcevo under the control of militants and in this area Ukrainian troops in besiege with the four side inside the cities Debalcevo and Chornukhyne. So that we need left in orange color the city of Debalcevo and the city Chornukhyne but the other cities and villages in this area need put in red color.Dialog UA
  • Also pro-Russian rebels launched offensive in toward the city Mariupol. Violent clashes in the area of ​​the 13 and 14 checkpoints.InfoResist
  • Avdiivka --- under control by insurgents --- Ukrainian troops retreated from the city.
  • Marinka and Krasnogorovka --- Ukrainian military began to retreat from the cities --- source--Hanibal911 (talk) 11:42, 22 September 2014 (UTC)
This pro government source confirmed that rebels inside Donetsk airport.here--Hanibal911 (talk) 12:05, 27 September 2014 (UTC)
Vuhlehirs'k and Chornukhyne under control the insurgents and of these settlements they shell the city Debaltseve.Gazeta UATSNFakty UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 07:35, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
According to pro government source the village Starohnativka now in besieged by pro-Russian fighters and they shelled her from heavy artillery.Also the city Debaltseve in besieged with three side and also under fire.112 UA--Hanibal911 (talk) 18:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)
According these pro-Ukrainian maps herehere these settlements (Maloorlivka,Orlovo-Ivanivka, Ol'khovatka, Bulavyns'k, Olenivka and Oleksandrivs'ke) near on souths city Vuhlehirsk now under control by pro-Russian insurgents.--Hanibal911 (talk) 07:44, 7 October 2014 (UTC)
Kostyantynivka and Chornukhyne under control by pro-Russian rebels.Military maps Hanibal911 (talk) 06:47, 13 October 2014 (UTC)

Map of East Ukraine conflict[edit]

You can fix this map East Ukraine conflict to according of this map.here--Hanibal911 (talk) 09:16, 24 September 2014 (UTC)

Hola![edit]

Si lo prefieres, quando quieras, puedes conversar conmigo en español, que yo soy portugués, y lo hablo bien. Mondolkiri1 (talk) 17:53, 25 September 2014 (UTC)

no corregi Smile antes, porque creí que no te iba gustar el "calderón".Mondolkiri1 (talk) 23:26, 26 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Houthi control Map.png[edit]

Done :)

Escudo de Quemada[edit]

Buenas tardes.

En general, las llamas pueden ser de oro, gules o <al natural> (gules con detalles en oro), debiéndose especificarlo. Existe otra figura heráldica que se denomina “ardiente” y es un atributo del mueble que está ardiendo que, si no se especifica otra cosa, iría con las llamas al natural, simulando un fuego real.

En el caso del escudo de Quemada, efectivamente está descrito con llamas de gules. Sin embargo, debido a la cantidad de blasones con deficiencias o errores en la descripción, es conveniente apoyarse también en la imagen del escudo que realmente usa el ayto. Si hay pequeñas diferencias, mi opinión es la de respetar la imagen. Si la diferencia es tal que estamos ante dos escudos diferentes, pues realizar los dos.

El modelo que usa el ayuntamiento de Quemada de forma oficial trae un mueble ardiente con llamas de gules y oro (puedes verlo aquí) y es el que he tomado como base. No obstante, también es válida la versión con las llamas solo de gules que has elegido, puesto que se ajusta al blasón oficial.

Lo ideal sería respetar el modelo que efectivamente usa el ayto. y hacer un inciso en su descripción haciendo constar esa diferencia.

Si te puedo ayudar en algo más, no dudes en comunicármelo.

Un saludo.--Erlenmeyer (talk) 14:28, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Safia Farkash on a plane.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Safia Farkash on a plane.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 15:20, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Safia Farkash.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Safia Farkash.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Vera (talk) 15:20, 2 October 2014 (UTC)

Escudo de Laredo[edit]

Le echaré un vistazo. Primero voy a ver si encuentro algún modelo más detallado. Si subo alguna versión, te lo haré saber. Un saludo.--Erlenmeyer (talk) 21:25, 8 October 2014 (UTC)

He subido una versión basada en el escudo que me mandaste.
A tener en cuenta: La ballena es manifiestamente mejorable, el problema es que las ballenas heráldicas suelen disponerse "adiestradas" y no "afrontadas" como en esta versión y no hay ningún modelo de referencia. Los esmaltes están deducidos del original pero cumple con la regla heráldica, es posible que difiera del original.

Cualquier duda me la comentas. Un saludo.--Erlenmeyer (talk) 15:53, 10 October 2014 (UTC)