User talk:Handcuffed/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Archive 1

Wikimedia Commons is not an amateur porn site

العربية | čeština | Deutsch | English | español | français | 한국어 | македонски | norsk bokmål | norsk | polski | português |slovenčina | slovenščina | Türkçe | 简体中文 | 繁體中文‎ | +/−
float 
Thank you for your interest in contributing to Wikimedia Commons, a non-profit media repository with the primary scope of providing educational and informative images and media. Submissions that are low quality or do not fall into Commons' scope may be subject to deletion.

One or more of your recent contributions has been identified by another Commons user as a possible image not in Commons' scope. Commons has guidelines on nudity, as a result of already having a large number of photos of genitalia, specifically the male reproductive system and the penis.

If you have objections to the proposed deletion of your image(s), please see the links to the relevant deletion discussion(s) (listed above or below this message box). This message is not intended to be taken personally. Thank you for your understanding.

.

FAP (talk) 20:33, 11 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Quick Grip nipple clamp.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Quick Grip nipple clamp.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

BarkingFish (talk) 22:29, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cock_and_ball_torture_and_butt_plug.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Martin H. (talk) 09:22, 16 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Added info to image description page; left your earlier description unaltered at the bottom... AnonMoos (talk) 15:12, 8 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

P.S. If Heinrich Wirrich died in 1572, then he probably didn't do this version (though he might have done a different earlier version). AnonMoos (talk) 06:53, 10 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the added information, it's fantastic! I found conflicting data on Heinrich Wirrich's birth and death dates, and I can't verify which is correct. According to the British Museum, he was active from 1571 to 1600,[1] but the Web Gallery of Art places his death at 1572.[2] Do you have any more information on this? Handcuffed (talk) 06:56, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Now that I look at it, I'm inclined to believe the British Museum, since it seems unlikely that the two images at the Web Gallery of Art, dated to 1571, were made a year before his death. Handcuffed (talk) 06:58, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
This image, [3], was signed by him in 1588, meaning he definitely did no die in 1572. I will do some further research. Handcuffed (talk) 07:02, 28 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I only know what's in Dingwall's Girdle of Chastity, and he doesn't mention Wirrich at all, but prints a reproduction of an earlier version of the Dutch caricature, and gives a fairly detailed description of a version which seems to be the same as File:Chastity belt satire.jpg (or very close) and assigns it the date ca. 1590... AnonMoos (talk) 16:51, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I changed the date to c. 1590. Handcuffed (talk) 00:34, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Strap-on_pegging.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

82.55.162.179 23:16, 15 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It seems like it's not possible to go to the URLs indicated [4], [5] unless you specifically register an account at the DeviantArt site, which makes it difficult to verify the claimed CC-BY-3.0 status. That's why File:The Gor Project 1 by mjranum stock.jpg ultimately went through OTRS. It's not a big problem, but it might be an issue for some... AnonMoos (talk) 17:00, 29 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I added Template:LicenseReview, so hopefully someone has an account and reviews it. Handcuffed (talk) 00:35, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't think it's really necessary to go through a whole bureaucratic rigamarole in light of the OTRS on the first one (unless you're strongly insistent); I was just pointing out a potential issue... AnonMoos (talk) 01:31, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Feel free to re-add the templates if you really want, I removed them partly because I thought they were missing necessary parameters, but I guess that's actually not the case... AnonMoos (talk) 01:35, 31 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Handcuffed, I have some doubt about your licensing of the Ostra images. The PD-Old tag is for images of a photographer who has died >70 years ago (for countries where 70 years pma is the PD-deadline). However, these image were likely created 76 years ago. I don't see evidence that the photographer died already 5 years later. Do you have? --Túrelio (talk) 09:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the Jacques and Charles Biederer were unfortunately killed in the Holocaust; see [6]. Handcuffed (talk) 09:17, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
And these two were identical to or represented the "Ostra studio" that you cited as author? If yes, I would recommend to put that into the author entry (if only to avoid initial doubts as mine). Is their exact deportation date (year) known? --Túrelio (talk) 09:25, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, Ostra Studio was owned by the Biederer brothers. Maybe I should make a Creator template for them? I don't know when they were deported. Handcuffed (talk) 09:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Strap-on_pegging_2.jpg.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Gegensystem (talk) 16:22, 18 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Carrara back standing.jpg

Hallo Handcuffed, @File:Carrara back standing.jpg: how do you know that Benhur is the photographer? There is no source/author given at the source. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 03:05, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I don't, but I'm assuming either he is the photographer or the owner of the image, because he licensed it under GDFL. I have looked with Google Search by Image to confirm it does not come from another source. Handcuffed (talk) 03:10, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks but.. Hmmm! Maybe you know, I really do not have a problem with sexual content here but: If he licensed it under GFDL is not clear - maybe he just didn't know what he does - even a parameter {1} is missing. We so not accept photos without author and source statement here. So there must be some evidence that he is the photographer if we want to keep these photos here. (at least this is how I think - based on policies - it should be). Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 03:40, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, so are the ones where the parameter is not missing acceptable? Thanks! Handcuffed (talk) 04:07, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Interesting: According to File:Carrara_front.jpg and File:Carrara_klein_frontaal.jpg the person depcited is identical. Is the photographer despicte the completely different nickname, too? File:Slave_in_Carrara.jpg is even another "author" - but maybe the same person (I think I can recognize the small nevus/birth mark right/top of the navel).
Ah - here he made something like a source comment: File:Carrara_back_standing_2.jpg ("my pic"). Not really meaningful however... I do not have the time now to look at all source pages. Do you find more comments like these? What about the user's other uploads in the wiki? Do they have the same camera? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 04:23, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
I don't know if this is enough evidence, but I am pretty sure that Chastityslave22 and BenHur are the same person, considering the overlap with [7] and [8]; [9] and [10]; [11] and [12]; and [13]. Furthermore, I think he is the creator of these belts, considering the commercial tone of [14], the fact that he has pictures of many different models, and the fact that he has images that are seemingly not available elsewhere on the internet. I did not think that the licenses provided on Wipipedia would be a problem, because he seems honest with his licensing (he admits this is under a commercial license, for example: [15]). It just seems like everything points to him being the owner of the photos. Handcuffed (talk) 04:48, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. Okay - looks okay then. Can you find more occurrences of statements like "my pic"? I will review the license then and add a perm link to our discussion here. --Saibo (Δ) 16:14, 1 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]
File:Carrara locking mechanism.jpg, File:Carrara side.jpg, File:Carrara belt for men front.jpg, File:Carrara female.jpg, File:Carrara for men back.jpg, and File:Carrara front 2.jpg do not explicitly say that BenHur is the author. Is it safe to assume?
Thank you! Handcuffed (talk) 05:16, 10 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Hi. Some great contributions you're making to wikipedia, so wanted to say thanks!. Heh.. I think I notice that padlock in File:Woman wearing leash 2.jpg - very much like the one that comes with a CB6000! :) --Rebroad (talk) 18:34, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! I enjoy it very much. Handcuffed (talk) 08:56, 27 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Why do you think you know more than Dingwall? In any case, without some such brief explanatory header, many people who come across the category will have the vague idea that they were used by knights going off on Crusades... AnonMoos (talk) 14:00, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

That wasn't really established as a BDSM category, but for all images meeting the criteria, whether they can be considered to have a significant element of BDSM or not. You can set up a BDSM sub-category... AnonMoos (talk) 03:06, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Okay. Wasn't really sure what to do. Handcuffed (talk) 23:59, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

History!

.. is worth to look in sometimes: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Butt_plug_insertion.jpg&action=history ;-) I think I would agree with mattbuck. Don'T you? Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 02:36, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I didn't see he had reverted it. I removed "Sexual penetrative use of objects" because the category "Butt plugs" is already in that category, per COM:OVERCAT. Handcuffed (talk) 05:50, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Regarding the history: I know - therefore I left you a note. Easy not to look in (and would take too much time) when categorizing.
Do you know the "multi mode" of HotCot? Just click on ++ in the footer to activate - it enables you to: change more than one category in one edit and to leave a notice in the edit summary. Those OVERCAT removals are not always obvious (even to experienced users).
However, I do not see OVERCAT here - as I understand it Category:Sexual penetrative use of objects focusses on the use - and exactly that happens in this photo. Not all files related with Butt_plugs show the use. Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 14:46, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just for info / future improvement (upload of images from external sources)

Hallo Handcuffed, please copy the original source and log if possible from the external sites: I have done so now. Oh, and the cc-by-sa license version was wrong (it should be 2.5). Nearly all our license tags are at COM:CT in case you don't find it by trial and error (edit, preview). Nice illustration and the uploader "looks" legitimate (he is even the founder of the wiki as he claims on his user page). :-) Cheers --Saibo (Δ) 16:20, 23 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

The Photographer's Barnstar
Thank you for your valuable contributions to this project. :) -- Cirt (talk) 09:25, 27 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Thank you! Handcuffed (talk) 05:17, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
You're most welcome! :) -- Cirt (talk) 05:41, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I can't really take credit as a photographer though, since I've uploaded very few pictures I took myself (although I expect to start uploading more). Handcuffed (talk) 05:51, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nudity and sexuality deletion requests

Hi. When adding the nudity/sexuality category to deletion requests, it's usually best to use {{subst:nsdr}} - this is not only shorter, it adds a date-stamp to the page to sort correctly. Thanks! -mattbuck (Talk) 10:49, 4 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Showing my helmet - Flickr - stnu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

– JBarta (talk) 03:55, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scanner ass - Flickr - stnu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

– JBarta (talk) 04:05, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:This is me - Flickr - stnu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

– JBarta (talk) 04:06, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:My dick in 2007 - Flickr - stnu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

– JBarta (talk) 04:09, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Morning Wood - Flickr - stnu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

– JBarta (talk) 04:13, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source is not properly indicated: File:Push. It. In. - Flickr - stnu.jpg

العربية  asturianu  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  italiano  日本語  한국어  македонски  മലയാളം  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk nynorsk  norsk  polski  português  português do Brasil  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Push. It. In. - Flickr - stnu.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{Own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Warning: Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ralgis 21:57, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:STUFFED by ropemarks.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Ralgis 22:56, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:38, 13 May 2012 (UTC)


dansk  italiano  sicilianu  Deutsch  català  magyar  čeština  português do Brasil  Esperanto  español  português  English  hrvatski  français  Nederlands  Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎  norsk nynorsk  polski  galego  íslenska  slovenščina  suomi  svenska  Türkçe  Ελληνικά  беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎  български  македонски  русский  українська  മലയാളം  日本語  中文(简体)‎  中文(繁體)‎  فارسی  +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 07:39, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Handcuffed (talk) 22:57, 19 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]


Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

– JBarta (talk) 05:08, 23 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you left a 600x image undeleted, was that intentional? -mattbuck (Talk) 00:32, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't delete them (I'm not an admin), it was User:Denniss. Handcuffed (talk) 04:19, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]


File:Devoirs de vacances.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Túrelio (talk) 10:23, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Yoshiko tale chastity belt 1.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ww2censor (talk) 17:33, 16 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sissy maid.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Delicious carbuncle (talk) 15:25, 17 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Sorority and fraternity paddles.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

GrapedApe (talk) 00:38, 6 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikibirthday

Thanks for noticing it, though I did very little during the first two weeks of my account here, except upload a cropped version of an image which later was deleted. (No images that I uploaded the first version of have ever been deleted, but some existing images that I reuploaded an edited version of were deleted.) -- AnonMoos (talk) 01:39, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Jeans chastity.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sarah (talk) 19:59, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alexander Ahimsa - Silly Kids in Toronto - 14 Fucking in the Stairwell.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 00:56, 15 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Max Rebo Band

Hi, have you previously uploaded images to Commons under the name User:Max Rebo Band?--Ianmacm (talk) 17:06, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No, I am not him. Handcuffed (talk) 21:16, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Freedomporn.org

Please read my close at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Alexander Ahimsa - Silly Kids in Toronto - 14 Fucking in the Stairwell.jpeg. You are obviously aware of the issues surrounding what I have not gone into on the DR? Please be extra careful in uploading media in future, and remember COM:PRP. russavia (talk) 22:09, 24 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Flickr is not ideal and all amateur porn sites should be regarded as definitely unsuitable. The chances of images found on these sites having rock solid copyright and COM:PEOPLE status are practically zero. Unless you, as the uploader, have some first hand knowledge of the image in question, the precautionary principle should apply.--Ianmacm (talk) 06:25, 25 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, I'll be more careful in the future. I think the copyright was quite clear, but COM:PEOPLE might have been a problem. Handcuffed (talk) 21:18, 28 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've restored this to Category:Erotic electrostimulation devices and added a little to the description. L had already moved 2 images from the higher category to this lower one (one of the images was of the bare unit with a description saying it was for sexual use). What the units are used for (at any particular time!) is very much up to their users. Categories are there to help users find useful media. I have also added Category:Violet wand machines to Category:Electrotherapy as this was their original purpose. --Simonxag (talk) 10:04, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License of a few pictures

Hey. I just found a few pictures you uploaded a while ago, namely File:Bettie Page Klaw 20.jpeg, File:Bettie Page Klaw 2.jpg and all the others in the series. The pictures are marked as public domain, yet the source given seems to be a private homepage with no information on the copyright status of the images. At first glance, it does not seem clear at all that these images are indeed free. Could you clarify, and ideally add more licensing information to those pictures? Thanks! --Conti| 23:46, 12 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think it's a reasonable assumption, considering the photos were created between 1923 and 1963, and published in the US (probably not officially; IIRC they were sent out by mail to customers, being illegal). I couldn't find any copyright renewal record, which would be required to keep them from entering the public domain. Handcuffed (talk) 08:55, 15 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
If those were taken by Irving Klaw, the copyright would belong to his company Movie Star News, which is still operating. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 19:34, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Only if the copyright was renewed, of which I couldn't find a record when I uploaded the images. I'm not positive though. Handcuffed (talk) 21:21, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]
How did you try to establish that copyright was or was not renewed? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 04:49, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

[[:File:Cruel_Mrs._Tyrant%27s_Bondage_School_01.jpg]

This is being considered for inclusion at Wikisource, It would be appreciated if you could confirm the copyright status of this work definitively. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:25, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bettie Page Klaw 20.jpeg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:26, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bettie Page Klaw 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:28, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bizarre Honeymoon 16.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:30, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bizarre Honeymoon 15.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:31, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bizarre Honeymoon 14.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:32, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bizarre Honeymoon 13.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:32, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bizarre Honeymoon 12.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:34, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bizarre Honeymoon 11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:34, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bizarre Honeymoon 10.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:35, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bizarre Honeymoon 09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:36, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bizarre Honeymoon 08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:37, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bizarre Honeymoon 07.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:38, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bizarre Honeymoon 06.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:39, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bizarre Honeymoon 05.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:39, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bizarre Honeymoon 04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:41, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bizarre Honeymoon 03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:42, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bizarre Honeymoon 02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:44, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Bizarre Honeymoon 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:45, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Hogtie suspension bondage.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:47, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Guile The Detention Room.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:49, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Chastity Belt Offering.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Chastity Belt Offering.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:49, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fleshlight - Lupe Fuentes - Flickr - stnu (2).jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Fleshlight - Lupe Fuentes - Flickr - stnu (2).jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:52, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Fleshlight - Lupe Fuentes - Flickr - stnu (1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:52, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Showing my helmet - Flickr - stnu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:53, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File tagging File:Can-Can.jpg

العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Can-Can.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:54, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Archives d'Éros Marconi 29.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:56, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Kinky Hollywood by ropemarks.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:57, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:STUFFED by ropemarks.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:58, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Alsana Sin by ropemarks.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:58, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Under the Bridge by ropemarks.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:59, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Cruel Mrs. Tyrant's Bondage School 32.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 21:00, 21 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red pubic hair 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:14, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File:Scanner ass - Flickr - stnu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Ubcule (talk) 14:38, 25 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

You have helped to preserve important historical works... even one 85 years old! I am impressed! BTW why not archive your 2011 and 2012 talk stuff? I always move mine to sub-pages. Etym (talk) 06:04, 28 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! That's one of the things that I like about Commons, that it can serve as a historical archive. Some of the works I've uploaded are certainly older; for example, photographs by Gaudezio Marconi are at least 128 years old!
And you're right, my talk page was getting too long. I have set up archiving. Handcuffed (talk) 01:46, 2 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

BDSM photos

Hi and thanks for the coffee. I was prompted to come here and upload some pictures related to sex and specifically BDSM. Do you have any information about what kind of photos the Wikimedia team desire? The ideal would be a "wishlist" of sorts so that I can clearly see what is wanted. Are there, perhaps, some specific members who are working on this topic? I would be glad for any help you could offer in finding out. --VilHaMer (talk) 18:57, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to the project! A wishlist would be a great idea; unfortunately there doesn't seem to be one at the moment. Here are some places for ideas though:
In general any high-quality images are greatly appreciated, as long as you have created them and own the copyright.
Some members I know of (hope you don't mind being listed) who are interested in sexuality and BDSM include me, User:Niabot, User:AnonMoos, and User:Sinnamon. I know of others but I don't know if they would identify it as a significant portion of their activity on Commons. Generally there seems to be many users who upload a few pictures and then leave.
Please, any questions you have, any efforts you might want to collaborate on, let me know! Handcuffed (talk) 08:52, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
These links are useful, thank you. I will begin having a look at them. Typically, I do not have access to famous people, but I have access to objects and on some occasions I may be able to arrange settings to illustrate the uses of whips, for instance. And yes, the photos will be taken by me and as such posted here under the correct license since I will own the copyright to them. In case you're wondering why the photos lack metadata information about the equipment I use, it is for reasons of anonymity. If there is ever a need to prove that the photos really were taken by me, I will keep the original files.--VilHaMer (talk) 21:57, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Ah, I see, that's why I suspected the metadata was missing. I don't think it should be a problem for now; maybe if someone questions it we could go through COM:OTRS where your anonymity will be protected. Yeah, a lot of the images on the list are not really things you can easily photograph; I just generated it automatically from the BDSM category on Wikipedia. Anyway, I think images or videos of objects and situations are more valuable than just photographs of famous people. I'm really looking forward to your continued contributions! Handcuffed (talk) 22:32, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Idw/layout Fabrice Florin (WMF) (talk) 06:38, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File:A man bent over, wearing women's panties, taking a self photograph of buttocks in mirror.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

JuTa 00:58, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification about possible deletion

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, 24.134.38.87 08:44, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArchiveBot

Hi, I noticed you have set up User:MiszaBot to archive your talk page. Unfortunately, the bot has stopped working, and given how its operator is inactive, it is unclear when/if this will fixed. For the time being, I have volunteered to operate a MiszaBot clone (running the exact same code). With that said, your input would be appreciated at Commons:Bots/Requests/ArchiveBot 1. Regards, FASTILY 07:44, 20 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Night Ranger ([[User talk:Night Ranger|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 06:00, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Btmpnr01 ([[User talk:Btmpnr01|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:53, 28 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Achim Raschka ([[User talk:Achim Raschka|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 14:18, 11 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 174.1.37.231 19:39, 8 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Scalhotrod ([[User talk:Scalhotrod|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:26, 31 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate LorChat 01:18, 5 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Phc20141209 ([[User talk:Phc20141209|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 04:01, 9 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate FredWalsh ([[User talk:FredWalsh|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:30, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Kevin Rutherford (talk) 22:54, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Swarm ([[User talk:Swarm|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 18:17, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Marcos Araújo Braulio 10:57, 13 August 2015 (UTC)

Template:Autotranslate 2003:75:F08:3583:553F:BCBA:FA99:F36A 20:54, 10 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Vysotsky ([[User talk:Vysotsky|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:21, 25 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate KDS4444 ([[User talk:KDS4444|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:00, 27 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

It seems you have no e-mail possibility on Wikimedia so I just put my thank you here. Thanks for uploading many images that might be seen as controversial by some. I would love to see more you might have. If you want you can e-mail me. Thanks again. Alice2Alice ([[User talk:Alice2Alice|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 12:54, 15 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate ShakespeareFan00 ([[User talk:ShakespeareFan00|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:39, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate ShakespeareFan00 ([[User talk:ShakespeareFan00|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:40, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate ShakespeareFan00 ([[User talk:ShakespeareFan00|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:42, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate ShakespeareFan00 ([[User talk:ShakespeareFan00|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:44, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate ShakespeareFan00 ([[User talk:ShakespeareFan00|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:45, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate ShakespeareFan00 ([[User talk:ShakespeareFan00|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:46, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate ShakespeareFan00 ([[User talk:ShakespeareFan00|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:47, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate ShakespeareFan00 ([[User talk:ShakespeareFan00|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:47, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate ShakespeareFan00 ([[User talk:ShakespeareFan00|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:48, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate ShakespeareFan00 ([[User talk:ShakespeareFan00|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 19:49, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Sfan00 IMG ([[User talk:Sfan00 IMG|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 20:06, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate ShakespeareFan00 ([[User talk:ShakespeareFan00|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:35, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate ShakespeareFan00 ([[User talk:ShakespeareFan00|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:37, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate ShakespeareFan00 ([[User talk:ShakespeareFan00|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:39, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate ShakespeareFan00 ([[User talk:ShakespeareFan00|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:40, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate ShakespeareFan00 ([[User talk:ShakespeareFan00|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:41, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate ShakespeareFan00 ([[User talk:ShakespeareFan00|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:48, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 18:34, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Affected:


Yours sincerely, —/Mendaliv//Δ's/ 19:11, 29 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 109.190.70.102 16:18, 9 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate TünnesUndSchäl ([[User talk:TünnesUndSchäl|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 23:26, 1 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 2003:D9:7BC8:D5F:ECB4:D73E:F852:E217 12:19, 8 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate RichieBrown ([[User talk:RichieBrown|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 13:09, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 200.89.86.42 21:50, 18 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 2604:6000:140E:800D:592A:C15B:ED4B:C722 20:26, 13 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Pippobuono ([[User talk:Pippobuono|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 10:23, 14 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 2A02:587:6E08:4A00:41F8:D487:80DB:C3E5 14:15, 8 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Younss souhidi ([[User talk:Younss souhidi|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 21:48, 14 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 129.45.93.150 22:17, 2 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 154.76.231.167 20:40, 30 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate --Majora (talk) 21:35, 7 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Elie Hague ([[User talk:Elie Hague|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:11, 20 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 49.150.116.127 09:09, 6 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Veroforus ([[User talk:Veroforus|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:21, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Veroforus ([[User talk:Veroforus|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:23, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate Veroforus ([[User talk:Veroforus|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 07:23, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 72.238.67.165 20:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 194.233.96.65 06:11, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 81.191.203.225 15:39, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 81.191.203.225 15:41, 29 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate A1Cafel ([[User talk:A1Cafel|int:Talkpagelinktext]]) 16:39, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 188.147.12.36 21:45, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 188.147.12.36 21:45, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 188.147.12.36 21:46, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 188.147.12.36 21:46, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 188.147.12.36 21:46, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 188.147.12.36 21:47, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 188.147.12.36 21:47, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 188.147.12.36 21:47, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 188.147.12.36 21:47, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 188.147.12.36 21:48, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Autotranslate 188.147.12.36 21:48, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]