User talk:Haneburger

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Haneburger!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Contents

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Haneburger!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Checklist anonymous edits (COM:CVU)[edit]

Hi Haneburger,

As a you've probebly noticed, since this week the patrolling functionality has been enabled for all edits, no longer just for page creations (hence the Sitenotice). This enables us to track, for example, anonymous edits on Commons. I'd like to invite you to check out the Anonymous edits list and maybe patrol part of a day. See also the updated Commons:Patrol.
If you have any questions please leave message on the CVU talkpage, my talkpage or on IRC. --Krinkletalk 12:25, 17 March 2010 (UTC)


Hi Krinkle,
Thanks for the invitation. A systematic patrolling of a day-part I can make only from time to time, because it needs more time than I normally have. Mainly I want to focus on the fields of my interests (i.e. mountains, geography). --Haneburger (talk) 07:41, 18 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Königspitze Sunrise.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Königspitze Sunrise.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fitz Roy group - Laguna Capri - 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fitz Roy group - Laguna Capri - 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thanks for the nomination of this picture! I even never have thought that it would be selected as quality image. Sincerely, --Gagea (talk) 17:42, 2 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hochnissl from Walder Alm.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochnissl from Walder Alm.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kapelle auf der Walder Alm.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle auf der Walder Alm.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Herbstlicher Buchenwald bei Gaflenz.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Herbstlicher Buchenwald bei Gaflenz.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Erklärungstafel im Freilichtmuseum Himmelreich.JPG[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


File:Gedenktafel Karl Stainer und Alfons Kasseroler.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

TUSC token 585df7d7ec45f08d119e0708621998dc[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Haneburger,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:07, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schloss Summersberg 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schloss Summersberg 1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wegkreuz bei Rum.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wegkreuz bei Rum.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:ÖBB 4024 Innsbruck Hauptbahnhof.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 19:54, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Obernberg am Brenner gegen Olperer.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Obernberg am Brenner gegen Olperer.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Burning tractor.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burning tractor.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gaflenz2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gaflenz2.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Karren am Dürrenstein.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Karren am Dürrenstein.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kuhmöser von Süden.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kuhmöser von Süden.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Canisianum Innsbruck from NNW.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Canisianum Innsbruck from NNW.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Folded serpentinite.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Folded serpentinite.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lizumer Sonnenspitze from S.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lizumer Sonnenspitze from S.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Junsjoch und Pluderling.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Junsjoch und Pluderling.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Turm der Karlskirche Volders.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turm der Karlskirche Volders.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gebetsfahnen bei der Kellerjochhütte.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gebetsfahnen bei der Kellerjochhütte.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hall in Tirol, Medienturm auf dem Salinenareal.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hall in Tirol, Medienturm auf dem Salinenareal.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Skibild mit Berghintergrund[edit]

Hallo, bei File:Carving.jpg ist sowohl das Bild selbst als auch deine Beschreibung, die das Bild wesentlich nützlicher gemacht hat, geändert worden. Wie früher der unidentifizierte Berg ist auch jetzt wieder etwas zu sehen, das wesentlich interessanter wäre, wenn im Text stünde, was es ist. Die Person, die die Änderung vorgenommen hat, scheint weder auf Commons noch auf der en-Wikipedia auf Anschreiben zu reagieren. Vielleicht magst du ja Bild und Text zurücksetzen und findest vielleicht sogar ein Zuhause für das aktuelle Bild? --Dustsucker (talk) 02:13, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Danke für das Hinweis, habe die Sache repariert. --Haneburger (talk) 09:57, 10 October 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Haneburger,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 07:21, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

OE-LIR at Innsbruck.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! OE-LIR at Innsbruck.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Category:Karlskirche[edit]

bitte unterlass solche schnappsideen fürderhin, das macht nur arbeit W!B: (talk) 12:12, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Stimmt, hätte nicht passieren dürfen aber wenn man fast neben der wohnt kann es schon passieren, dass man plötzlich nur mehr die eine sieht. Viele Grüße, --Haneburger (talk) 12:19, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
danke, sorry für den ruppigen anpfiff, wenn das mit deutschen passiert, sag ich mir, na ja, dass die zu bornioert oder beschrankt sind, über den tellerrand zu gucken, kennt man, putz man ein bisserl den hintern ab, den rest sollen sie selber machen: bei einem österreicher geht mir mein argument abhanden, wir wären umsichtiger: Dein nettes wiedergutmachen zeigt, dass Du aber eh aus derselben schule kommst: danke, und ich hab BKS gemacht statt speedy - lg W!B: (talk) 12:28, 5 November 2012 (UTC)
Danke auch, BKS ist wohl das Bessere. LG --Haneburger (talk) 12:30, 5 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bärenbach (Urschenbach).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bärenbach (Urschenbach).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Burg Tschanüff in Ramosch.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Burg Tschanüff in Ramosch.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Decrease of quality in the corners[edit]

Hallo Haneburger! Thanks for promoting my image and for your comment which I find interesting. How can you tell that the quality decreases in the corners? Couldn't it be the lens? Regards, Wolfgang --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 13:06, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Wolfgang Moroder, ich antworte auf Deutsch, auf Englisch muss ich mich herumplagen, den richtigen Ausdruck zu finden. Natürlich habe ich das Objektiv gemeint, dessen Leistung etwa in der rechten oberen Ecke sichtlich abfällt. Aber was meine D200 mit ihren 10 MP oft noch verbirgt, offenbart die D800 mit ihren 36 MP schonungslos. Ich halte die D800 für eine gigantisch gute Kamera, nur offenbart sie einfach gnadenlos alles, seien es Unschärfen, Verwackler oder die Qualität der Objektive. Ich schätze deine Bilder, die du mit der D800 machst sehr und bewundere auch ihren Detailreichtum. Viele Grüße, --Haneburger (talk) 10:52, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Hallo, vielleicht war das Objectiv (ich hab mir etwas Geld dafür geleistet) nur schmutzig. Sonst muss ich es zurückgeben? Liebe Grüsse und Dank --Wolfgang Moroder (talk) 12:41, 14 November 2012 (UTC)
Bin da kein Experte, Schmutz will ich nicht ausschließen, glaube ich aber irgendwie nicht ganz. Daher nur Mutmaßungen: Es gibt bei Objektiven und bei der Ausrichtung der Sensorebene bekanntlich Toleranzen und wenn sich die beiden in negativer Weise addieren...? Daher ist nicht jedes Objektiv auf jedem Apparat gleich gut. Bevor du es zurückgibst vielleicht den Backstein-Test machen? Kamera aufs Stativ und eine gleichmäßige Ziegelwand mit verschiedenen Einstellungen aufnehmen. Habe ich selber noch nie gemacht, soll aber gut funktionieren.
Habe übrigens gerade gesehen, dass du ein Bild von mir für die QI kandidieren hast lassen. Danke! Ich halte das Bild für nicht schlecht - aber auch nicht für perfekt, mal sehen. Liebe Grüße --Haneburger (talk) 13:16, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Piz dal Ras und Zug der Rhätischen Bahn.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Piz dal Ras und Zug der Rhätischen Bahn.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Die Passhöhe am Ofenpass.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Die Passhöhe am Ofenpass.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Himmelsrichtungen …[edit]

Hallo Haneburger, 3 von 4 Himmelsrichtungen hätten wir durch :-) Danke für deine Aufmerksamkeit. Aber was will man auch bei einem Berg der Kellerjoch heißt, da ist ja oben und unten auch fraglich? lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:51, 25 March 2013 (UTC)

Stimmt, bei dem Berg ist alles verkehrt. Das mit Norden ist übrigens davon gekommen, weil ich den Berg so gefühlsmäßig mehr von Norden her fotografiert habe und erst dann auf der Karte gesehen habe, wie weit westlich ich gestanden bin. Danke übrigens auch, dass du immer wieder mal bei Bildern von mir die Kategorien nachbesserst. Die Beobachtungsliste offenbart immer wieder, wo ich schlampig war. Liebe Grüße --Haneburger (talk) 05:21, 26 March 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Opere di scarico.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Opere di scarico.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chiostro di San Zeno.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chiostro di San Zeno.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kreuzgang barmherzige Schwestern Innsbruck.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kreuzgang barmherzige Schwestern Innsbruck.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stiftsalm-Kapelle aussen.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stiftsalm-Kapelle aussen.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Frage[edit]

Hi, Was stimmt da mit den Hintergrund nicht? Stört dich etwa das unschärfe Buqet? ... ist so beabsichtigt und soll auch so sein. Interessanterweise hat ein solches anderes Bild von mir ein positive Bewertung erhalten. LG--Steinsplitter (talk) 06:47, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Hallo Steinsplitter, das ist sicher auch eine Geschmacksfrage. Mich persönlich haben bei dem Bild mit den Anemonen die extrem hellen Lichter im Hintergrund gestört, die in starke Konkurrenz zu dem Weiß der Blüten treten. Bei mir haben sie den Blick automatisch von den Blüten weggelenkt. Dass der Hintergrund unscharf ist, stört überhaupt nicht, im Gegenteil - aber die extremen Kontraste machen das Bouquet unruhig. Beim Trollblumenbild stören mich die hellen Lichter im Hintergrund schon etwas weniger, nur wirkt das Weiß irgendwie wie ein Halo rund um die Bäume. Was mich bei dem Bild aber vor allem stört ist die rechte Blume, die direkt aus dem Bild hinauszeigt und die rechts meines Erachtens mehr Raum bräuchte. Trotzdem, den Ansatz Blumen mit kurzen Brennweiten zu fotografieren, kann man sicher etwas abgewinnen, bildgestalterisch ist das aber recht anspruchsvoll...Aber das alles sind mehr so meine persönlichen Eindrücke, ich bin am Lernen und vielleicht sieht das ein anderer wieder ganz anders. LG --Haneburger (talk) 07:43, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Nel chiostro di San Zeno.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nel chiostro di San Zeno.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sendeanlage am Dach des ORF Tirol.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sendeanlage am Dach des ORF Tirol.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Martinswand from SE.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martinswand from SE.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Balduinstein, center from west.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Balduinstein, center from west.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gipfelkreuz Haneburger.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gipfelkreuz Haneburger.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Chapel on the Walder Alm.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chapel on the Walder Alm.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Voldertal from Walder Alm.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Voldertal from Walder Alm.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Potsdamer Hütte.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Potsdamer Hütte.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Haneburger,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)