User talk:Haplochromis

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

[edit] NOAA images

Thank you for uploading files on Commons.

Please use {{PD-USGov-NOAA}} tag for them.

EugeneZelenko 14:48, 29 October 2005 (UTC)

I think the tag is wrong. The site clearly says that photo credit is to be given. Hence, {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} would be equivalent, and you have to give the photographer's name unless unknown. I changed that for Image:Etheostoma osburni.jpg but I am sure there are many more to be changed. --AndreasPraefcke 08:37, 21 March 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Centropyge bispinosa.jpg

Is this image correctly labelled? The text below the fish on the actual image says it's a w:Holacanthus not a w:Centropyge. See w:Talk:Centropyge as well. Thanks. Bigbluefish 10:58, 1 April 2006 (UTC)

Never mind... somebody explained the genus was misidentified over at w:Talk:Centropyge. Bigbluefish 19:46, 2 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] to be or not to be a Lobster?

TucacasBajoMeroPanulirusArgus.JPG En español este crustaceo es una Langosta Espinosa. Please, how do you say in English? --PSE 05:46, 30 June 2006 (UTC)

In English it´s a Spiny lobster, a member of the Family Palinuridae, not a real Lobster, wich belong to the Family Nephropidae.--Haplochromis 06:54, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Monatsname

Hi Haplochromis, bei deinen neuen Tierparkbildern steht immer "Seopt. 2006" als Datum drunter. Ist das der Monat zwischen September und Oktober? ;-) -- Gruß, aka 13:19, 9 September 2006 (UTC)

Hab ich auch gerade gemerkt. Wird bei den nächsten berichtigt. Danke aka. --Haplochromis 13:23, 9 September 2006 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Amblyglyphidodon curacao.jpg

Pay attention to copyright Image:Amblyglyphidodon curacao.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. The Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Die Flickr Lizenz ist nicht mit commons vereinbar, weil sie kommerzielle Nutzung ausschließt. Enricopedia 23:16, 11 February 2007 (UTC) Das gilt auch für:

Enricopedia 23:28, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

Bitte beim Hochladen von Bildern von Flickr nicht einfach eine Creative Commons Lizenz nach Wahl nehmen, es muß die Lizenz genommen werden die auch bei Flickr steht! Deine letzten Uploads bekamen von Dir alle schön cc-by-2.5 verpasst aber in der Realität bei Flickr war das meist eine cc-by-2.0 als nd oder nc oder gar einer Kombination dieser zwei nicht für die Commons geeigneten Lizenzformen. --Denniss 03:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Haliaeetus pelagicus

Magnificent picture of a Stellar's sea-eagle. KP Botany 21:50, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Chelus fimbriatus

Image deletion warning Category:Chelus fimbriatus has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. If the file is up for deletion because it has been superseded by a superior derivative of your work, consider the notion that although the file may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new file.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

  — Jeff G. (talk|contribs) 22:07, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] flickr

Hallo Haplochromis, ulkige Fische hast Du da „entdeckt“ ;-) Kannst Du demnächst, wenn Du wieder mal Fotos von Flickr hier einstellst, gleich die Vorlage {{flickrreview}} beim Hochladen reinpacken? Das spart einen Arbeitsschritt und sorgt dafür, dass uns die Bilder dauerhaft erhalten bleiben, wenn der Autor auf Flickr mal die Lizenzierung zu einer unfreien Lizenz ändern sollte (was leider gar nicht so selten vorkommt). Ein paar nützliche Infos zu dem Reviewvorgang findest Du unter User:FlickreviewR. Viele Grüße --Überraschungsbilder 11:12, 9 March 2007 (UTC)

Mach ich. Gruß --Haplochromis 11:16, 9 March 2007 (UTC)
Schon bemerkt, super :-) --Überraschungsbilder 11:22, 9 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Larus_michahellis_flying.JPG

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Larus_michahellis_flying.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 09:34, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry. Its my own photo. Now it´s licensed under Creative Commons and GNU Free Documentation License. --Haplochromis 09:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Image Tagging Image:Mogurnda_adspersa_2.JPG

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mogurnda_adspersa_2.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Siebrand 22:58, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

Sorry. Its my own photo. Now it´s licensed under Creative Commons and GNU Free Documentation License. --Haplochromis 09:48, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Morus nigra fruits.JPG

Hi Haplochromis - nice pic, but Image:Morus nigra fruits.JPG is Morus alba, not Morus nigra; identified by the smooth, glossy upper surface of the leaves, and the leaf shape. Do you have details of the location where the photo was taken? - MPF 21:34, 8 July 2007 (UTC)

I take it in the village Theologos on Thasos (Greece). --Haplochromis 10:32, 9 July 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Picture Morus_nigra_fruits to be published

Dear Haplochromis, We found here at Wikimedia a picture uploaded by you (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:Morus_nigra_fruits.JPG). Editora Sarandi (see below) intends to publish this photograph in a book about fruit trees, in Portuguese, named "Árvores Frutíiferas Exóticas". Editora Sarandi (www.sarandi.com.br) is a Brazilian publishing house that publishes textbooks for K-12 students to be used in public schools. The legal agreement associated with the image at the site (Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 2.5 License) states that we are free to “distribute and modify the file as long as you attribute its author(s) or licensor(s)”. So we write to you to ask if it is correct to credit the image as the following: Haplochromis / Wikimedia. If there is any problem in publishing your image, please inform us as soon as possible. If you do confirm the terms but wish to change the credit line, please inform us. On the other hand, if the terms and the credit line are correct, please do not feel obliged to confirm them. Thank you very much, Best regards, Roberto Homem de Mello (roberto@editorasarandi.com.br) Editora Sarandi Ltda. The preceding unsigned comment was added by 200.207.190.99 (talk • contribs) at 21:04, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Dear Roberto. There are no problems. You can publish the image and credit it by Haplochromis / Wikimedia. Best regards, --Haplochromis 07:27, 20 July 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Deprecated language templates

Hi,
I just wanted to let you know that {{english}}, {{deutsch}}, {{polski}}, {{français}} and so on are now deprecated and should not be used any more.
You can use {{en|Your English text}}, {{de|your Deutsch text}}, {{pl|your Polish text}}, {{fr|your French text}}, etc. instead :)
Best regards,
-- AlNo (discuter/talk/hablar/falar) 12:42, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Cladista

Hello Haplochromis,
You introducted the subclassis Cladista here. But I have found this taxon in none of the web site I use as reference. When I did google search of the taxon, I could only find it on spanish web pages!!
Are you sure this taxon is not a little bit new and unrecognized by the international community?
I would prefer to reference well recognized taxon in commons.
Cheers Liné1 15:25, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

As reference for Fishtaxon I use J.Nelsons Fishes of the World, Fourth Edition (2006). Most websites as ITIS or Fishbase refer to his Third Edition (1994). --Haplochromis 07:40, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Chinook Salmon

Hi, the image you uploaded to the commons of a Chinook Salmon appears on the Wikipedia page for the fish, in the infobox. However, a picture of the same fish (same spot pattern) appears on the Coho Salmon page - one of them is misidentified. I've left comment on the talk page for each fish on Wikipedia in the hope of expert attention, I was hoping you could identify the source of the image? Thanks, Bazzargh (on Wikipedia - I don't have a login here) --86.0.198.142 23:06, 2 February 2008 (UTC)


[edit] Image:Lampropeltis_triangulum_2.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Lampropeltis_triangulum_2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

82.198.250.67 13:34, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Chauliodus danae.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Chauliodus danae.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. • Rohan T 18:09, 25 May 2008

The picture is from [1], it is not copyrighted, look here [2]. --Haplochromis 05:31, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your image in the media

FYI, your image Image:Male Frigate bird.jpg has been used for a crossword in the Israeli newspaper Yediot Ahronot (the 7 Days sections) on Friday, June 13, 2008. It has not been attributed to you. -- Ynhockey (talk) 18:56, 13 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Mei_long.JPG

Image deletion warning Image:Mei_long.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 16:05, 9 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Rhinoptera_steindachneri.jpg

العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Rhinoptera_steindachneri.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Trixt (talk) 18:09, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

Now the copyright status is clear. I take it from the english wikipedia. --Haplochromis (talk) 22:48, 23 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Macaw

This is an interesting image; "Image:Ara severa.JPG". Can you add where it was photographed in the description? Was it in the wild or in a zoo? Snowmanradio (talk) 18:43, 24 August 2008 (UTC)

Done.--Haplochromis (talk) 05:45, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Crotalus_atrox.jpg

Image deletion warning Image:Crotalus_atrox.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Jwinius (talk) 23:58, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Lactophrys bicaudalis.jpg

Hi, I just wanted to drop you a note that that in 2006 you uploaded Image:Lactophrys bicaudalis.jpg over a prior file that was a different image. Ideally all images should get new file names to avoid overwriting a prior image. Thanks for the cute fishy though. MBisanz talk 03:34, 5 October 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please link images

Afrikaans | العربية | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Svenska | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−


Hello Haplochromis!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Commons images are used by editors on many projects in many languages. Each image is put into categories. This helps other editors find them. Please add categories to each image you upload.

To add an image to a category, add the following code to the end of the page.

[[Category:Category Name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbit of comets, add the following to the image description page:

[[Category:Astronomy diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories: Astronomy diagrams, Comets.

For further information on categories read Commons:Categories.

The CommonSense Tool often helps you find the best category for your image.

Here is a gallery of your images. Please check that each image has a category. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the help desk. Thank you.

BotMultichillT 05:52, 9 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Commons image: Agora of Thasos

Hallo, das Bild wäre gut und brauchbar, wenn du das erfasste Gebäude (innerhalb der Agora) und die Richtung aus der du es aufgenommen hast, angeben könntest. Danke -- Haubi (talk) 17:10, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Actinia

Could you explain why you are certain that this is Actinia equina? I'm not at all convinced. Lycaon (talk) 15:40, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

I´m not certain. --Haplochromis (talk) 16:28, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
Then I 'd rather categorize at the highest certain level so that it is not inadvertently used in articles. Lycaon (talk) 17:46, 16 March 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Lesser-Adjutant-2007Dec-Assam-India.jpg

Hello!

I am new to Wikipedia, so I don't know if this is the right place to post a comment, I will simply try. The Picture: Lesser-Adjutant-2007Dec-Assam-India.jpg does not show a Lesser Adjutant (Leptoptilos javanicus)!! This bird is definitely a Greater adjutant (L. dubius)! As the article on the Greater adjutant contains only one, not very good picture, it would be great if you could upload your picture there. Your photo is one of the best pics of the Greater adjutant I have ever seen.

Kind regards

Acharat

[edit] File:Amblyeleotris sp.jpg

Hi,

You did a really good job identifying and correcting the colors on this picture. Can you tell me what filter/procedure you used to correct the colors ? Mirgolth (talk) 11:14, 7 April 2009 (UTC)

I use ArcSoft Photo Base 4.5, which is Shareware. --Haplochromis (talk) 11:44, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, does it have an automatic "correct underwater" feature or did you do it manually changing the color channels ? Mirgolth (talk) 11:45, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
It has no "correct underwater" feature, but a AutoFix-feature which i use most and often the result is good. --Haplochromis (talk) 12:25, 9 April 2009 (UTC)
Ok ! Mirgolth (talk) 07:46, 12 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Zistrose.jpg

Das Bild steht auf dem Kopf. Gruß RLJ --83.189.96.35 20:46, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Periophthalmus.jpg

File deletion warning File:Periophthalmus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

--Túrelio (talk) 14:36, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Gallotia galloti palmae male.jpg

Hallo Haplochromis, kannst Du es ein bisschen einengen: wo auf La Palma hast Du diese Westkanareneidechse geknipst? Ich würde das Bild gerne in die richtige Unterkategorie von Category:Nature of La Palma einordnen. -- Ies (talk) 14:09, 22 April 2009 (UTC)

Das könnte ich, mach es aber nicht, da die Art auf der ganzen Insel vorkommt und ich die Kategorisierung von Tieren nach Gemeindegrenzen einfach für dämlich halte. --Haplochromis (talk) 05:47, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Danke für Deine freundliche Antwort. Um in dem Ton zu antworten, den Du zu mögen scheinst: Sicher noch dämlicher ist es, solch ein Bild nicht einmal nach La Palma zu verlinken. -- Ies (talk) 15:01, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
Mir genügt eine systematische Kategorisierung. --Haplochromis (talk) 05:11, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Wallago_attu_046.JPG

Pay attention to copyright File:Wallago_attu_046.JPG has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

shizhao (talk) 07:08, 11 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Fruitafossor_popeye232.jpg

File deletion warning File:Fruitafossor_popeye232.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 17:32, 19 May 2009 (UTC)

[edit] An incorrect ID on a mollusk image

Hi Haplochromis. I just wanted to let you know that your very nice image:

is not in fact of a Cerithium species. It is in fact of a Nassarius species, a very different family. You may want to change the title and the category for the image. Thanks, best wishes from User:Invertzoo of the English Wikipedia. 69.86.104.233 14:37, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for the information. --Haplochromis (talk) 15:48, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Sicklefin lemon shark.jpg

Pay attention to copyright File:Sicklefin lemon shark.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

--Captain-tucker (talk) 01:00, 25 August 2009 (UTC)


[edit] File:Glaucus_atlanticus.jpg

File deletion warning File:Glaucus_atlanticus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 19:17, 20 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] scrub hare images

Dear Haplochromis, I found here at Wikimedia two pictures uploaded by you http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Lepus_saxatilis.jpg and http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:James_-_this_one's_for_you_2366572849.jpg. Johns Hopkins University Press is publishing my book called "Rabbits: Animal Answer Guide." I would like to use these images in the book. The legal agreement associated with the image at the site (Creative Commons Attribution Share-Alike 2.5 License) states that we are free to “distribute and modify the file as long as you attribute its author(s) or licensor(s)”. So we write to you to ask if it is correct to credit the image as the following: Haplochromis / Wikimedia. If there is any problem in publishing your image, please inform us as soon as possible. If you do confirm the terms but wish to change the credit line, please inform us. On the other hand, if the terms and the credit line are correct, please do not feel obliged to confirm them. Thank you very much, Best regards, Susan Lumpkin (susanlumpkin@gmail.com)

Dear Susan, you can use my picture File:Lepus_saxatilis.jpg and credit it as: Haplochromis / Wikimedia. But the second picture is not from me. Best regards, --Haplochromis (talk) 14:22, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] thank you

thanks for your reply and permission (and correction!)Best, Susan


Dear Susan, you can use my picture File:Lepus_saxatilis.jpg and credit it as: Haplochromis / Wikimedia. But the second picture is not from me. Best regards, --Haplochromis (talk) 14:22, 28 September 2009 (UTC)


[edit] File:Opha3343.png

File deletion warning File:Opha3343.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (nynorsk)‬ | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | ‪中文(简体)‬ | ‪中文(繁體)‬ | +/−

Sorry, it seems to have been unsourced by the previous uploader at en:W. If you have any additional information, please share. Thanks. --Infrogmation (talk) 22:39, 7 November 2009 (UTC)


[edit] File Tagging File:Kenyanthropus.jpg

Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Lietuvių | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | ‪Norsk (bokmål)‬ | Polski | Português | Русский | Tiếng Việt | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kenyanthropus.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you.

FunkMonk (talk) 10:25, 23 November 2009 (UTC)