User talk:Haraldbischoff

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Haraldbischoff!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−


File source is not properly indicated: File:Kessler_Zwillinge.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Kessler_Zwillinge.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 14:42, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Es ist sowohl Quelle, Autor und Lizenz ordentlich eingetragen

File source is not properly indicated: File:CvWagner_1984.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:CvWagner_1984.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Yann (talk) 14:43, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Haraldbischoff!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 05:56, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Philipp_Weber_1806.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Philipp_Weber_1806.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

High Contrast (talk) 18:34, 16 November 2010 (UTC)

1958 (Filename) oder 1968 (Beschreibung)?[edit]

Was stimmt? File:1958-Hauptbahnhof-München-innen-800px.jpg --FA2010 (talk) 11:33, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

Dito für: File:1958-alteMesseMünchen-EingangNord-450px.jpg. --FA2010 (talk) 11:33, 16 July 2011 (UTC)

File:OlyStadion-München-im_Bau-1-800px.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:OlyStadion-München-im_Bau-1-800px.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

95.157.4.62 22:37, 2 October 2011 (UTC)

Kategorienamen[edit]

Hallo, bitte beachte, dass Kategorien hier auf Commons im Allgemeinen englische Namen haben. Um eine passende, vorhandene Kategorie zu finden, hilft es oft, über die Suchfunktion ähnliche Bilder zu finden und von denen die Kategorien zu übernehmen. Oder du gehst in den Wikipedia-Artikel zum Thema des Bildes, schaust ob es dort bereits andere Bilder oder einen Link zu einer Kategorie auf Commons gibt, und folgst diesen. Gruß, --Sitacuisses (talk) 21:59, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

File:ClaudiaCane01a.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ClaudiaCane01a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

QU TalkQu 11:29, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Questions[edit]

Hello,

I'd have some questions to ask you about the photos you provided : this one states, in its title, that it shows Miou-Miou with Bertrand Blier, yet the description credits the man as "Jean-Pierre Blanc". The guy in the picture could be Bertrand Blier (it does look a little like him), but then again I don't know what Jean-Pierre Blanc looked like. If it is Bertrand Blier, which movie were they making at the time. Was it "Les Valseuses" ?

Then, about these pictures : 1, 2, 3 : the date states "1973", yet the film Miou-Miou and Julien Clerc made together, "D'Amour et d'eau fraîche", was released in 1976 ? Are you sure about the date ? 1975 would be a more likely one...

Again, if the first picture was taken on the set of the same movie (Miou-Miou has the same looks and wears the same clothing), I'd have to assume that the man is Jean-Pierre Blanc, who was the director of "D'Amour et d'eau fraîche".

I'm asking you this because the first picture is actually used on the French wikipedia as a picture taken on the set of "Les Valseuses", which WAS shot in 1973 by Bertrand Blier. If this is a mistake, I'll have to correct it, but I guess I'll need your help. Thanks, JJ Georges (talk) 11:27, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello again. I found the answer myself, see here : the man is indeed Jean-Pierre Blanc, not Bertrand Blier. JJ Georges (talk) 13:31, 7 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Anke Geissler 4226a.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Anke Geissler 4226a.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

77.5.194.4 20:03, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Anke Geißler 4226.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Anke Geißler 4226.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

77.5.194.4 20:23, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

You are right: I just wanted more accounts than one to give some systematic order in my pics - but I have the impression - that s.o. do not like it


Rutluk and Seleizos[edit]

The accounts Rutluk and Seleizos claim to belong to you. Are they your accounts? I just want to make sure someone isn't playing a prank on you. --Michaeldsuarez (talk) 15:50, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Yes. This accounts under my name are done to sort my pics in a certain way. But some anonymous wpusers startet shitstorm because of this additional accounts ...

FYI Discussion about your fotos[edit]

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Urheberrechtsfragen#Fotos_werden_Hochgeladen_-_gesucht_und_dann_gezielt_abgemahnt_.3F --93.198.143.211 16:04, 4 August 2013 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Unfortunately there is no Freedom of Panorama in Belarus for targets whose architects/ designers are still alive or it is less than 50 years since their death. Thus even excellent photos which violate copyright laws, could be deleted from Commons. Kindly note, however, that citation use might still be allowed. In such a case this (these) photo(s) should be - without delay - saved to and used from national wikipedia (as they are likely to be deleted in Commons). BR, Paju (talk) 22:53, 20 September 2013 (UTC)

File:Rolf Miller-BFa.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rolf Miller-BFa.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Xforyou (talk) 10:15, 18 October 2013 (UTC)

MdL[edit]

Hallo, Ihr habt ja offenbar schwere Kämpfe mit den Abgeordneten :-) Frau Waldmann riskiert natürlich, dass ihr doch sehr vorteilhaftes Bild durch einen wesentlich weniger gelungenen Schnappschuss ersetzt wird, den irgendjemand gelegentlich mal an einem Parteiabend macht. Aber das ist ihre Sache. Ich habe Deinen Löschantrag auf Englisch ergänzt, das erhöht die Chance auf rasche Abarbeitung. Gruß, --Rudolph Buch (talk) 20:30, 12 December 2013 (UTC)

Danke für das Lob bezgl Foto Waldmann. Ich bin eigentlich auch der Meinung daß das Foto brauchbar ist - aber warum sich mit jemandem anlegen?

File:87-14-Titel.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:87-14-Titel.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rosenzweig τ 20:47, 10 April 2014 (UTC)

Tja liebe Aufpasser - nach lamgem Suchen stelle ich fest dass es sich um einen eingescannten Titelblatt der Jugendzeitschrift POP/Rocky handelt aus einer Zeit zu der ich selber in der Chefredaktion gearbeitet hatte.Probleme mit dem Urheberrecht kann es also garnicht geben! Was steckt noch dahinter?

Bitte lesen[edit]

Hallo Haraldbischoff, bitte befasse dich mit dem Kategoriesystem, bevor du zahlreiche falsche Kategorien einsetzt. Das Wichtige steht unter ausführlich unter Commons:Categories bzw. auf Deutsch unter Commons:Kategorien. Bitte unterlasse beispielsweise das Einsetzen deutschsprachiger, rotverlinkter Kategorienamen, wo die Systematik englischsprachig ist. Bemühe dich bitte, den passenden vorhandenen Zweig zu finden und ordne die Bilder darin möglichst weit unten, also möglichst spezifisch ein. Bei File:Efeu Haus 270242.jpg ist Category:Efeu falsch, (falsche Sprache, zu generell), richtig ist Category:Ivy-covered buildings. Auch eine Kategorie "Kruzifix" gibt es beispielsweise nicht. --Sitacuisses (talk) 15:45, 13 February 2015 (UTC)


Danke für die Nachricht.... Das ist schwieriger als ich dachte! Vielleicht überlasse ich das lieber anderen. Ich weis wirklich nicht, warum bei mir auf einmal alles in englisch kommt.Ich sehe gerade bei einigen zufällig kontrollierten Bildbeschreibungsseiten (wikimedia), daß alle Kategorieen auf englisch sind und nicht von mir gemacht worden sind. Also: Ist da noch jemand anders dran?

Hallo Haraldbischoff, ja - da war noch jemand anders dran, nämlich ich :-) Ich versuche gelegentlich, Bilder aus Category:Munich oder Category:Bavaria in die zutreffenderen Unterkategorien zu verteilen, und das Efeu-Haus war einer der Fälle, wo das geschehen ist. Ihr habt natürlich beide recht: Sitacuisses, wenn er sagt, dass Bilder nicht "freischwebend" kategorisiert warden sollten, weil sie dann nicht entlang der Kategorienbäume erschlossen sind. Und Du mit der Feststellung, dass das leider alles etwas kompliziert ist. Wenn man mal durch das Kategoriensystem durchgestiegen ist, macht es aber auch Spaß. Bis dahin biete ich Dir gerne Unterstützung an: Wenn Du neue Bilder aus München einfach mit Category:Munich versiehst, werde ich eventuelle Fehlkategorisierungen gelegentlich gerne korrigieren. Voraussetzung ist aber, dass die Datei im "Description"-Feld einigermaßen gut beschrieben ist: Beim Efeu-Haus oben war die Beschreibung anfangs wenig aussagekräftig, und ich musste ziemlich lange suchen, bis ich herausgefunden habe, welches Haus das ist. Oder frag mich bei Zweifeln gerne einfach auf meiner Diskussionsseite. Viele Grüße, --Rudolph Buch (talk) 13:34, 14 February 2015 (UTC)

Danke für diese Ausführungen ... langsam habe ich den Eindruck, daß ich doch mal sowas wie einen Kurs besuchen muss um das alles zu kapieren. Aber ausdrücklichen Dank, es ist toll, wenn sich Leute so engagiert in dieses Projekt einbringen...

HALT STOPP! Ich glaube dir, dass das nicht so einfach mit dem Kategorisieren am Anfang ist. Aber dann fang auch bitte langsam an und mache nicht gleich haufenweise Bearbeitungen. Ein Beispiel: File:Thomas Müller 2703.jpg ist in der Kategorie Thomas Müller, diese wiederum in der Kategorie Players of FC Bayern München und diese in FC Bayern München. Also hilft es nicht weiter das Bild direkt in die FC-Bayern-Kategorie einzusortieren, da diese sonst nur unglaublich unübersichtlich werden würde. Und das ist bei ziemlich allen Fußballern so und da gibts viele Leute, die sich Mühe mit der Kategorisierung geben. Und mit einem Klick bei Cat-A-Lot machst du da ganz schnell mehrere 100 Dateien kaputt die mühsam per Hand nachgearbeitet werden müssen. Früher oder später könntest du dir mit solchen massenhaften falschen Edits auch eine Sperre wegen Vandalismus einfangen und das will ja niemand. Wenn du Probleme mit der englischen Sprache hast, kannst du dir auch ruhig das Kategoriesystem in der deutschen Wikipedia anschauen, dass sehr ähnlich funktioniert, nur dass es dort Artikel und keine Bilder sind die kategorisiert werden. Schönen Abend --Indeedous (talk) 22:04, 15 February 2015 (UTC)

Tja, da sag ich leise sorry. Ich lasses jetzt - eigentlich versteh ich nicht, mit FC-Bayern .... die Kategorie wurde mir angeboten, nach FC kam das automatisch. Mit der englischen Sprache hab ich eigentlich kein Problem, nur dieses: bei manchen Dateien schaltet das einfach in eine andere Sprache um, sodass ich ja zunächst in der von wiki vorgegebenen Sprache anfangen muss. Na ja ... las mal gut sein!Nur abschliessend noch eines: was bitte ist "Cat-A-Lot" das kenn ich nicht und ich habe höchstens 30 Fussballer drin und nicht 100 wie du meinst. Von "massenhaften edits" kann also keine Rede sein. Also: ich lasses jetzt

File:Peter Herrmann 0910.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Peter Herrmann 0910.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

84.57.63.114 09:39, 19 February 2015 (UTC)