User talk:High Contrast

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Alpines Museum in München, 2013.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alpines Museum in München, 2013.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Haupthaus Aktionsforum Praterinsel (Praterinsel 3,4) - Vorderansicht.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haupthaus Aktionsforum Praterinsel (Praterinsel 3,4) - Vorderansicht.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

fix the name[edit]

You can fix the name [[Category:Armored command post vehicles]] → Category:Armoured command post vehicles. [[Category:Interpolitex-2009]] → Category:Interpolitex 2009. — Octave Laval (talk) 06:17, 2 February 2014 (UTC)

Use {{move}}. A bot can do this. --High Contrast (talk) 20:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC)

Moving from Category:Files by High Contrast to Category:Files by User:High Contrast[edit]

Hey there, just wanted to let you know that I've finished moving most of the files to your new personal category page as you requested on User:CommonsDelinker/commands. One of your pages is still in the former category, so I suggest renaming the category if you want to keep it consistent, but as it is placed in your userspace you are free to do with it as you wish. Cheers, TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 12:10, 9 February 2014 (UTC)

Why did you this? --High Contrast (talk) 14:48, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
Oh, I did this because per the instructions at User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands, "Currently (as of 08:25, 3 February 2014 (UTC)), CommonsDelinker's cat move function is not working" so the rest of us have to take up the slack. Another thing, if you think the original categories were deleted improperly, feel free to recreate them at any time. Cheers, TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:42, 9 February 2014 (UTC)
This is no instruction on User talk:CommonsDelinker/commands or any demand for any user to process bot demands. Especially not if user related stuff is to be done. I do not appreciate your recent work on my user category. I had very good reasons why a bot should have done this thing and not a user. Now, you have ruined my watchlist for the next day! --High Contrast (talk) 16:32, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
I'm sorry, but I'm really confused why this ruins your watchlist. The category pages are moved no matter who does it, so the end result should be the same. TeleComNasSprVen (talk) 23:37, 11 February 2014 (UTC)
No, the end result is different - a bot can easily popped out whereas popping out registered user as you are is no good idea. --High Contrast (talk) 17:21, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Goggomobil grau.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Goggomobil grau.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Westseite des Maximilianeum - 2013.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westseite des Maximilianeum - 2013.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Category:Unidentified trams[edit]

Hallo! Irgendwie bin ich mir nicht wirklich sicher, wie sinnvoll das ist. Die Straßenbahntype ist ja (in der Beschreibung) identifiziert, diese konkrete Type hat nur noch keine Kategorie, so wie auch alle anderen historischen Linzer Straßenbahntypen. Sollten "unidentified"-Kategorien nicht eher für Fotos da sein, wo wir wirklich noch nicht genau wissen, was sie zeigen? darkweasel94 15:20, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Nein, Unidentified-Kategorien beziehen sich überlicherweise auf die Kategorisierung. --High Contrast (talk) 15:21, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Wo kann man das nachlesen? Diese Interpretation überrascht mich vor allem deshalb, weil sie meines Erachtens den Sinn dieser Kategorien ad absurdum führt: Dateien, von denen wir wirklich noch nicht wissen, was sie zeigen, werden dann mit Dateien durcheinander gewürfelt, von denen wir sehr genau wissen, was sie zeigen, aber wo jemand meint, dass der Kategorienbaum im jeweiligen Bereich noch nicht ausgereift genug für seinen Geschmack ist. darkweasel94 15:46, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Darkweasel94 wird in Kürze sicherlich fragen: Wie Irgendwie bin ich mir nicht wirklich sicher, wie sinnvoll das ist. Die Straßenbahntype ist ja (in der Beschreibung) identifiziert, diese konkrete Type hat nur noch keine Kategorie, so wie auch alle anderen historischen Linzer Straßenbahntypen. Sollten noch nicht existente Kategorien denn überhaupt eingebunden werden? Dann kommt vielleicht irgendwann: Wo kann man das nachlesen? Diese Interpretation überrascht mich vor allem deshalb, weil sie meines Erachtens den Sinn dieser Kategorien ad absurdum führt: Dateien, von denen wir wirklich genau wissen, was sie zeigen, aber wo jemand meint, dass der Kategorienbaum im jeweiligen Bereich noch nicht ausgereift genug für seinen Geschmack ist. Meines Erachtens, ... --High Contrast (talk) 15:55, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Hast du jetzt wirklich vor, Linzer Straßenbahnen nach einzelnen Wagennummern zu kategorisieren? Ich habe außerdem nicht die geringste Ahnung, was du mir mit deinem Kommentar zu sagen versuchst. darkweasel94 16:00, 13 February 2014 (UTC)
Das beruht wohl auf Gegenseitigkeit. Dein Problemchen erschließt sich mir auch nicht. Ich hoffe für dich, dass du im "Real-Life" anders bist. Viele Grüße, High Contrast (talk) 16:03, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much for your photos here![edit]

Hello HC!

I would like to use this image

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Scenic_Diamond,_Donau.JPG

in a magazine published in Munich.

I have sent you an Emaill!

Cheers, K.Mair

✓ Done --High Contrast (talk) 14:23, 14 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Staatliches Museum Ägyptischer Kunst und HFF.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Staatliches Museum Ägyptischer Kunst und HFF.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Feuerwehrmuseum München - U-Bahn Typ A ausgebrannt (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feuerwehrmuseum München - U-Bahn Typ A ausgebrannt (2).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Perchta in Lower Bavaria -01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Perchta in Lower Bavaria -01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Monopteros in Englischer Garten, Munich.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Monopteros in Englischer Garten, Munich.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

"Ungesichtete Version"[edit]

Hallo High Contrast, Wenn du mal Zeit hast habe ich ein kleines Rätsel, auf das ich noch keine rechte Lösung weiß. Folgendes: Ich habe schon einige Tage auf WP am Artikel "Jaroslawski Awtomobilny Sawod" rumgebastelt, und immer erscheint im blauen Balken am oberen Rand: "Vorlagen- und Dateiänderungen dieser Version sind noch nicht markiert." Es liegt nicht an meinen Bearbeitungen, die sind als gesichtet markiert und werden auch standardmäßig angezeigt. Aber: wie bekomme ich (oder jemand anderes) diese Meldung dort weg? Macht mich noch ganz nervös... (hat aber noch Zeit. Ich werde die Seite jetzt zumachen und warten, ob was passiert :)). Kannst du dir das bei Gelegenheit mal anschauen? Danke dir. Lieben Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 19:25, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Hallo! Merkwürdig... Deine Bearbeitungen werden allerdings mit "[automatisch gesichtet]" angegeben, was so auch stimmt. Nervös machen braucht dich sowas wirklich nicht. Oftmals vertuen sich die Server und man kann dies evtl. manuell erneut sichten. Das habe ich nun gemacht - warum das von Nöten war ist mir schleierhaft. Naja... Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 20:45, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Vielen Dank. Das mich das nervös macht war mehr Spaß als Ernst ;). Liebe Grüße und vielen Dank für die Zeit. --Druschba 4 (talk) 21:43, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
Nichts zu danken. Dass du aber an diesem Sichtungssystem verzagst habe ich dir auch nicht wirklich zugetraut. Übrigens: Das müsste ebenso ein MAZ-LKW sein. --High Contrast (talk) 14:52, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
Das ist richtig. Ich hab emich mal ein wenig umgesehen und festgestellt, dass es ein MAZ-5432 ist, wenn auch die Scheinwerfer etwas geändert wurden. Steht jetzt auch in der entsprechenden Kategorie. Das eigentlich interessante ist, dass es ein Reimport aus Finnland sein könnte. KOFF ist finnisches Bier, die geänderten Blinker deuten darauf hin, dass er mal außerhalb Russlands fuhr. Leider lässt sich das wohl nie nachweisen. Heute jedenfalls wird er von einem Veranstalter als Transporter für Equipment genutzt. Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 15:17, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Noch eine Anfrage an Sender Jerewan: Wie gehe ich im Moment am sinnvollsten vor, wenn eine Kategorie umzubenennen ist? Mit dem Bot dazu scheint es ja gewisse Problemchen zu geben. Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 18:50, 20 February 2014 (UTC)

Lege die neue Kategorie an, entleere die alte und, weil du es bist, sag mir wie die alte, zu löschende, Kategorie heißt und ich schließe das Ganze ab :-) Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 19:05, 23 February 2014 (UTC)
Ich danke dir :). Alte Kategorie: Category:Drujba (chainsaw). War einfach falsch geschrieben. Ich sitze jetzt übrigens wieder in russischeen Landen und habe etwas weniger Internet als vorher. Nur, dass du vorgewarnt bist, falls ich mal ein paar Tage nicht da bin. Vielen Dank auch für deine Bearbeitungen bei BAZ. War schon sehr spät, als ich den Artikel erstellt habe. Gute Nacht und schönen Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 21:11, 24 February 2014 (UTC)
✓ Done. Ist in Ordnung - die alte Kat ist gelöscht. Danke für die Info - du weißt ja, Fotos, die auf Commons noch fehlen sind immer höchst willkommen. Ich hoffe, du hast deine Kamera mit. Gruß nach RUS, High Contrast (talk) 13:08, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Sei beruhigt, die Kamera hatte ich gar nicht mit nach Deutschland genommen :). Vielen Dank und Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 15:07, 25 February 2014 (UTC)
Einen schönen Nachmittag Dir,
Ich habe heute und gestern tatsächlich mal ein paar Fotos vom hiesigen Straßenverkehr zusammenbekommen :). Ein paar sind schon hochgeladen. Wenn du mal Lust und Zeit hast kannst du ja mal einen Blick drauf werfen. Der aktuelle MAZ-6312 könnte dich z.B. interessieren. Gegen den einen oder anderen Tip habe ich natürlich auch nichts. Aber wie gesagt, lass dich nicht stören, nur wenn du Zeit hast. Ich hätte noch ein paar GAZ-Modelle, die russische Post und noch ein bisschen anderen Kleinkram in Petto. Mal schauen, was das Modem noch hergibt. Lieben Gruß und ein angenehmes Wochenende, --Druschba 4 (talk) 16:30, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
1a! Besten Dank für deine Beiträge! Die ein oder andere passende Kategorie setzte ich bereits drauf. Viele Grüße nach Russland! --High Contrast (talk) 16:35, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Und noch eine Frage... Ich könnte folgendes Foto aus der russischen WP ganz gut hier bzw. später in der de.WP gebrauchen: https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:%D0%90%D0%B2%D1%82%D0%BE%D0%B1%D1%83%D1%81_%D0%97%D0%98%D0%A1_%D0%B2_%D0%93%D0%BB%D1%83%D1%85%D0%BE%D0%B2%D0%B5.jpg Ist da was zu machen oder ist das aussichtslos? Mir ist zwar klar, dass das lizenztechnisch wahrscheinlich geht, wie ich es aber am besten hierher bekomme ist mir noch etwas schleierhaft. Beste Grüße und danke für deine Geduld (die ich heute wohl schon recht strapaziert habe...), --Druschba 4 (talk) 19:09, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done Hier ist es. Lizenztechnisch ist es zwar unproblematisch, aber die Quellenangabe bedarf einiger goodwill-Interpretation (Frage in diesem Zusammenhang: ist ein Artikel in Planung). Und nein, strapaziert hast du nichts. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 21:01, 28 February 2014 (UTC)
Morgen (nein, so wikipediasüchtig bin ich noch nicht, ich musste eh so früh raus :) ),
Ja, ein Artikel zum ZIS-155 ist in Planung. Die Quellseiten sind schon alle zusammengesucht und geöffnet, ich muss nur noch anfangen. Mittelfristig will ich die Bus-Zeile in der ZIL-Navileiste blau bekommen, das ist quellentechnisch ganz gut zu schaffen. Auf meiner Benutzerseite in WP habe ich relativ tagesaktuell meine schon geschriebenen Artikel und meine Projekte. Dort kannst du auch nachschauen, wenn du Zeit und Lust hast. Morgendlichen Gruß und Dank für die Arbeit, --Druschba 4 (talk) 00:57, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

Guten Abend.

Ich komme mal wieder mit einer dieser unangenehmen Anfragen :). Ich suche gerade Material zusammen für den Artikel zum ZIL-3250. Leider ist mal wieder nur in der russischen WP ein Foto aufzutreiben. Siehe dort https://ru.wikipedia.org/wiki/%D0%A4%D0%B0%D0%B9%D0%BB:ZIL-3250AO.JPG . Grund meiner Anfrage ist folgender: Im Prinzip ist an dem Foto nichts auszusetzen. Vor mehr als 4 Jahren hochgeladen, anstandslos in Artikeln verwendet. Aber: Der Uploader Sah68 ist seinerzeit (2009) wegen diverser Lizenzprobleme recht negativ aufgefallen (siehe Diskussionsseite), viele Bilder wurden gelöscht. Dieses ist neben ein paar anderen stehengeblieben. Es findet sich auch noch an anderer Stelle im Netz, jedoch sehe ich bisher nur eine Seite, die erstens russisch (und sich um Bildlizenzen eh nicht schert) sowie jünger als 2009 ist (2010 entstanden). Bevor ich mir die Finger verbrenne an diesem Fall frage ich lieber. Zur Entschädigung für die Arbeit gibt es inzwischen von mir fertige Artikel für den ZIS-155, den ZIS-127, den ZIS-8, den ZIS-16, den ZIL-158 sowie eine Generalüberholung des ZIL-118. Beste Grüße.

PS: Wenn nicht, dann eben nicht. Dann lasse ich mir schon was Anderes einfallen. Probleme will ich dir auch keine machen. --Druschba 4 (talk) 22:06, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Vorsichtig hochschieb. Übersehen oder aktuell keine Zeit?. Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 22:42, 12 March 2014 (UTC) *duck und wech*
Oh, sorry. Habe deinen Eintrag gänzlich übersehen. Das hätte nicht sollen sein. Zum Foto: Du hast Recht, dass der ru-wiki-Benutzer einiges hinsichtlich Foto-upload falsch gemacht hat. Aber da ich kein admin auf ru:wiki bin, ist es mir nicht möglich zu rekonstruieren, was damals schief lief. Nichtsdestotrotz sehe ich beim Bus-Bild kein Problem. Ich konnte keine URV nachweisen. Zumal die Dateigröße, Auflösung, Aufmachung und das Vorhandensein von EXIF-Daten glaubhaft wirken, sodass ich davon ausgehe, dass es sich um sein eigens Werk handelt - wie angegeben. Ich habe es nach Commons transferiert; es findet sich hier. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 17:20, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Macht nix. Der Bot hatte wahrscheinlich nach mir gepostet, sodass ich etwas untergegangen bin. Kommt alles noch zurecht und hilft mir sehr weiter. Ich habe es immer ungerne, Fahrzeugartikel ohne Bilder zu erstellen, deswegen kläre ich das gerne vorher. Da ich kürzlich einen MAZ-6430 vor die Linse bekommen habe wird das wohl eines der nächsten Projekte, die dich auch interessieren könnten :). Die ZIL/ZIS-Busse sind ja durch soweit nach dem -3520. Gruß und Dank, --Druschba 4 (talk) 21:02, 13 March 2014 (UTC)
Läuft. Wenns wieder etwas geben sollte, dann gerne wieder. Übrigens, eine eventuelle rechtliche Belange brauchst du nicht zu fürchten, wenn ein Bildchen auf einem anderen Wiki bereits vorhanden ist. Viele Grüße nach Russland und bis bald (mit neuen Bildern ;-) ) --High Contrast (talk) 23:40, 14 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Deutz D40.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Deutz D40.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Unimog-based drilling machine (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Unimog-based drilling machine (1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Hochbunker am Lohnrößlerweg - Munich-Trudering.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochbunker am Lohnrößlerweg - Munich-Trudering.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Beulas Aura Bus in Munich, 2014.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beulas Aura Bus in Munich, 2014.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Undeletion request[edit]

Hi High Contrast, I had nominated this file for deletion because it had already been published prior to being uploaded to Commons, but the uploader says he really was the creator of that photo and that it had been entered in that website as part of a photo competition. Could you undelete it? Cheers,--Underlying lk (talk) 13:09, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done --High Contrast (talk) 19:12, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Steyr Diesel 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Steyr Diesel 2.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Blutenburg Castle in the West of Munich, 2013.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blutenburg Castle in the West of Munich, 2013.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Mercedes-benz Cabrio.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Mercedes-benz Cabrio.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Geschäftshaus Dallmayr in München - Fassade.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geschäftshaus Dallmayr in München - Fassade.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bahnhofplatz 7 - München.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bahnhofplatz 7 - München.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Fendt Dieselross F18 (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Fendt Dieselross F18 (2).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Deutz 7.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Deutz 7.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Steyr Diesel 1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Steyr Diesel 1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Steyr Diesel 3.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Steyr Diesel 3.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Westseite des Maximilianeum in 2013.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Westseite des Maximilianeum in 2013.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Museum Lenbachhaus in München (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum Lenbachhaus in München (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Staatliches Museum Ägyptischer Kunst - Gabelsbergerstraße 33–35.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Staatliches Museum Ägyptischer Kunst - Gabelsbergerstraße 33–35.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Maize field in Bavaria in Summer 2013.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maize field in Bavaria in Summer 2013.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bronzedenkmal König Maximilian I. Joseph (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bronzedenkmal König Maximilian I. Joseph (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Lehrstuhl für Geodäsie - Arcisstraße 21 - München.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lehrstuhl für Geodäsie - Arcisstraße 21 - München.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Palais Leuchtenberg - Odeonsplatz 4 - München (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais Leuchtenberg - Odeonsplatz 4 - München (1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Palais Leuchtenberg - Odeonsplatz 4 - München (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais Leuchtenberg - Odeonsplatz 4 - München (3).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Schlüter 6.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oldtimerumzug Aidenbach 2013-08-18 - Schlüter 6.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Frauenkirche mit Geruest.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Frauenkirche mit Geruest.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cap San Diego - Hamburger Hafen -01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cap San Diego - Hamburger Hafen -01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

HFF-Haupteingang in München (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HFF-Haupteingang in München (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Deletion Appeal of File:FComite - Headshot.jpg and File:Doctor Florence Comite .28Office.29.jpg[edit]

[see the appeal and needed permisison. Thank you] The photographer Nick Coleman sent the permission and release. Can you please help? Thanks Juda S. Engelmayer (talk)

Please contact the admin who deleted these images: User:INeverCry. Thanks. --High Contrast (talk) 20:20, 19 March 2014 (UTC)

Special:Diff/115936426[edit]

In case you don't watch every page you edit: I've reverted your adding of {{LicenseReview}} because as far as I know files that have always been in the PD do not require a License Review, as this status does not depend on the license shown on the website.    FDMS  4    20:43, 20 March 2014 (UTC)

This is total nonsense. You may find out for yourself. And do not play on other people's work - ask instead before. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 16:42, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
Well, I'm here because I think you could help me find out (and because I only noticed that it was you who requested License Review after I removed the tag; also in de if you prefer). CDC PD licenses aren't licenses that can change ...    FDMS  4    16:54, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
OK, I thought you as a Sir Karl Popper student might come to the solution independently Att-like.svg: LR is not useful for a photograph of the Mona Lisa or scan out of a 400-year-old monk book. But here we have a map. A map which can also come from a non-PD source, e.g. some scientific publication from Germany or from the UK (both are usually non "PD sources"). Because it is possible that this CDC-internet-source runs down in the future somebody might doubt its PD status in the future - a positive LR avoids that (very definately). Sorry, but I have no time left to speak to you about this kinky thing any longer. Focus on different activities. Have a nice life. Adieu. --High Contrast (talk) 17:03, 21 March 2014 (UTC)
You do not have to reply to this, but to "defend" myself as a student of the Sir-Karl-Popper-Schule: What about files from an offline source, such as a CDC leaflet? We can check whether files from that kind of source are really PD as much as whether files from 404 sources are. What do you mean saying I should focus on different activites? I am an elected license reviewer after all ...    FDMS  4    18:33, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Propyläen München - 2013.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Propyläen München - 2013.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Alstom LHB Coradia LINT - Fulda Bahnhof - 2014.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Alstom LHB Coradia LINT - Fulda Bahnhof - 2014.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Pasing "Renovierung" im Januar 2014.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pasing "Renovierung" im Januar 2014.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fulda - Kurfürstenstraße 36.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fulda - Kurfürstenstraße 36.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kinderbibliothek im Schloss Blutenburg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kinderbibliothek im Schloss Blutenburg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wehrsteg in Munich.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wehrsteg in Munich.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Anita Ehlers - Hamburg.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anita Ehlers - Hamburg.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Grenze zu Tschechien auf dem Dreisessel.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grenze zu Tschechien auf dem Dreisessel.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Geländewagen Puch G.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geländewagen Puch G.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear High Contrast,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Conrad Daniel von Blücher-Altona Denkmal, Hamburg-Altona.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Conrad Daniel von Blücher-Altona Denkmal, Hamburg-Altona.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ruins of the temple of Hercules in Amman, Jordan.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ruins of the temple of Hercules in Amman, Jordan.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gedenkkreuz für die bayerisch-galizische Freundschaft -01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gedenkkreuz für die bayerisch-galizische Freundschaft -01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Blutenburg Castle in the West of Munich, 2014 (deux).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blutenburg Castle in the West of Munich, 2014 (deux).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Blutenburg Castle in the West of Munich, 2014.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blutenburg Castle in the West of Munich, 2014.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Städtische Realschule an der Blutenburg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Städtische Realschule an der Blutenburg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Your Flinfo recommendation[edit]

I love the tool, it's so very handy! Just wanted to say thanks once more! Palosirkka (talk) 05:33, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Hello! You're welcome! Happy editing with the tool! Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 19:23, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Isar von der Maximiliansbrücke in München aus.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Isar von der Maximiliansbrücke in München aus.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Beer truck - Braucommune Freistadt - Linz.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Beer truck - Braucommune Freistadt - Linz.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Abandoned former restaurant in Freyung.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abandoned former restaurant in Freyung.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Stadtpfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt - Linz -06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtpfarrkirche Mariä Himmelfahrt - Linz -06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Fendt 714 Vario with a Claas-baler.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fendt 714 Vario with a Claas-baler.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

CANCOM Zentrale Deutschland - Erika-Mann-Straße 69, München.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! CANCOM Zentrale Deutschland - Erika-Mann-Straße 69, München.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Fendt-Traktor beim Transport von Heuballen.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fendt-Traktor beim Transport von Heuballen.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Vilskraftwerk Vilshofen - Unterlauf, 2013.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vilskraftwerk Vilshofen - Unterlauf, 2013.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

St. Rupert - Schwanthalerhöhe -02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St. Rupert - Schwanthalerhöhe -02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Auferstehungskirche in München-Schwanthalerhöhe.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auferstehungskirche in München-Schwanthalerhöhe.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Benefiziatenhaus - Sindlhuberhaus in Aschach an der Donau.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Benefiziatenhaus - Sindlhuberhaus in Aschach an der Donau.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality images[edit]

Hello, and thank you for your review. It seems that some of the images uploaded in this batch are lacking description, but I didn't see it. I've corrected it.

For your information, it seems that the use of => in the comment provokes a bug in the template. Better to avoid it in the future I think :)

Pleclown (talk) 16:01, 11 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi! Thanks for your response! I really hope to see more of your very good images! Thanks for editing on your uploads! Greetings from Milan! --High Contrast (talk) 22:36, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Eisenbahngasse 1 Linz-2013.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Eisenbahngasse 1 Linz-2013.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kaiser Bier in Österreich -01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kaiser Bier in Österreich -01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Katholische Pfarrkirche St. Michael, Ringelai.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Katholische Pfarrkirche St. Michael, Ringelai.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Kriegerdenkmal in Ringelai.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kriegerdenkmal in Ringelai.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Mal wieder ich...[edit]

...ich habe nämlich Mist gebaut, weil ich mich auf andere verlassen habe. Folgendes: Der gesamte Inhalt der Kat. "MAZ-5433" ist kein MAZ-5433, sondern ein MAZ-5434. Das ist ein komplett anderer LKW mit anderer Historie. Eigentlich gut daran zu erkennen, dass der MAZ-5434 Allradantrieb hat, der MAZ-5433 aber nicht. Sonst sind sie optisch recht identisch, bis auf den Auspuff. Es wäre also zu korrigieren (nach meinen zwei Uploads leider mehr Arbeit als vorher....):

  1. Alle Dateien nach MAZ-5434 verschieben (gibt es noch nicht).
  2. "meine" 2 Dateien umbenennen, von -5433 nach -5434
  3. die alte Kat. löschen, wir haben nichts zum MAZ-5433 soweit ich das überblicke
  4. die Bildbeschreibungen ändern...das kann ich auch selbst machen

Lässt sich da was machen? Ich bin gerade dabei, einen Artikel zum MAZ-5433 zu schreiben und bin deshalb auf dieses Wirrwarr gestoßen. Ein paar Beweisfotos gibt es hier, wenn auch nicht tauglich für WP oder Commons: [1]

Trotzdem liebe Grüße, in Hoffung auf etwas Zeit und eine gute Idee, --Druschba 4 (talk) 22:50, 17 April 2014 (UTC)

Gerne! Punkte 1, 2, 3 kann ich machen, aber gib mir bitte die/den exakten Link/s der Dateien/Kategorien. Die Beschreibung kann ich sicherlich nicht besser erstellen als du, deshalb: machst du das bitte? Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 20:48, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Das sollte kein Problem sein.
Eine neue Kat. "MAZ-5434" habe ich noch nicht angelegt, das wäre noch zu machen. Dort sollten sich (logischer Weise) am Ende alle drei Bilder finden, die jetzt in der falschen Kategorie sind. Die Beschreibungen ändere ich gerne selbst. Vielen Dank und Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 21:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
So, nun gibt es das hier: Category:MAZ-5434. Ich hoffe, dass alles passt. Die nun leere MAZ-5433-Kategorie ist entfernt. Schade, dass wir keine Bilder des 5433-Modells haben. Beste Grüße, High Contrast (talk) 22:18, 18 April 2014 (UTC)
Alles bestens, danke.
Ja, ich weiß, schade. Das ist aber auch ein komisches Ding das. Eine leichte Nahverkehrssattelzugmaschine für 15-Tonnen-Auflieger mit lediglich russ. Motoren und einem Fünfganggetriebe. Wozu braucht man soetwas? Als Watte-Schüttgut-Transport? Ich weiß es nicht. Jedenfalls ist mir noch keine vor die Linse gekommen. Wobei das so eine Sache ist. Die Fahrerhäuser sehen alle ähnlich aus, und ich traue den hiesigen Verkehrsteilnehmern zu, dass sie einen 25-Tonnen-Standardauflieger dranhängen (wenn ich unsere Holztransporter manchmal so sehe....). Schwer zu unterscheiden also. Wie auch immer, dir eine gute Nacht, ich verschwinde jetzt. Gruß und nochmals danke, --Druschba 4 (talk) 22:44, 18 April 2014 (UTC), der die Beschreibungen noch schnell geändert hat...

File:Dr. Zhivago American Author and Cartoonist.jpg[edit]

Hello I uploaded a photo for commons to be used on my wiki. It is a photo I took of myself for my Author page on wikipedia.

Why was it rejected. I am semi-new to this. Wikipedia has changed alot.