User talk:High Contrast

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Special:Diff/122435012[edit]

Sorry for only answering after you have archived that thread, but: You can answer them, and if you want to please do so, but you told me that you have no time left to speak to [me] about this kinky thing any longer so I thought you probably actually did not want to.    FDMS  4    15:01, 29 April 2014 (UTC)

Authorisation of use on Wikipedia[edit]

The portrait of Christine Lauterburg made by Francesca Pfeffer was used in the article with the permission of the author Francesca Pfeffer herself!

A confirmation of this permission is needed. Please follow the steps on the file page. --High Contrast (talk) 17:59, 4 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Air Mobility Rodeo 2000.jpg[edit]

Hi there High Contrast. I saw you tagged the file with License review. I sort of keep to myself I suppose, so I'm not sure if I can perform the license review myself since I don't have the license reviewer or admin permissions but I would like to let you know that the file is marked as an Air Force image on the source as indicated by "DoD photo by Staff Sgt. Jerry Morrison, U.S. Air Force. (Released)" so it's in the Public Domain. I hope this helps. Regards, Dainomite (talk) 22:03, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello! The licensing is clear and I am aware of its PF status. License review is a review process for verifying the copyright status of images uploaded from external sites. What if the source site goes offline? Regards, High Contrast (talk) 14:56, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
Oh shoot, so should I be requesting licensing reviews for all the DOD pictures I upload incase the source site goes offline and/or removes the content in the future? Thanks, Dainomite (talk) 15:37, 6 May 2014 (UTC)
You can use this way in order to let this PD license confirm by another user. The reason is that some too much images get nominated years after upload because the source page is offline and nobody can image that this one once was created by a US governmental employee. By using {{licensereview}} another user (a so called trusted one) looked over it. Best regards, High Contrast (talk) 19:14, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Christine lauterburg.jpg[edit]

I am confused to what I should do next to clear the deletion request of the uploaded picture. What is an OTRS? What does the author (Francesca Pfeffer) who gave me the permission to publish her image need to do? I don't want to bother her with too much administrational issues. Can I do anything for her? This all seems to be way too complicated. You may could contact me offline through my e-mail address. Thank you--Urs Lauterburg (talk) 15:31, 6 May 2014 (UTC)

COM:OTRS. You only have to send this permission to the emailadress which is published on COM:OTRS. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 19:14, 10 May 2014 (UTC)

Frage betreffend Quellenangabe[edit]

Hallo High Contrast, Folgendes ist mir gerade aufgefallen: File:Gaz-3310 upper door.jpg hat der gute User aus einem meiner Fotos abgeleitet, nämlich File:Gaz-3310 dump-truck.jpg. Da hab eich ja nichts gegen, im Gegenteil. Aber Quelle ist dann ja wohl nicht eigenes Werk (von ihm), oder irre ich mich? Sollte ich das einfach korrigieren oder übergehe ich da das Protokoll? Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 18:57, 8 May 2014 (UTC)

Hallo! Ich habe es entsprechend abgeändert. Das darfst du natürlich auch - es trifft ja voll zu, dass es ein simpler Zuschnitt deines Fotos ist. Bitte weise den Falschquellenangeber darauf hin, dass sowas versehentlich schon mal passieren kann, aber in Zukunft bitte soll er besser aufpassen. --High Contrast (talk) 19:18, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Noch etwas, was mir gerade aufgefallen ist. Es dürfte hier: File:Автокран Клинцы.jpg ein Copyrightproblem geben. Siehe dazu auch hier: http://vk.com/autocrane (Randspalte...anklicken zum vergrößern...). Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 16:28, 9 May 2014 (UTC)
Ist entsprechend getagged. Viele Grüße, High Contrast (talk) 19:18, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
Merci, wieder etwas gelernt. Gruß, --Druschba 4 (talk) 00:46, 11 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fire station of Großarl in Slazburg state.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fire station of Großarl in Slazburg state.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lusen, Bayerischen Wald, 2013.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lusen, Bayerischen Wald, 2013.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Kategorie Militärmuseum[edit]

Hallo, die vorgeschlagene neue Kategorie "Firearms..." ist untauglich. Es gibt dort nur "Firearms" (ein Artilleriegeschütz ist auch "firearm") und die Waffen rotieren zwischen zwei Museen in Full und in Reuenthal. --Bunkerfunker (talk) 10:03, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

Hallo! Die derzeitige Kategoriebezeichnung kann nicht bleiben, da auf Deutsch. Es muss auf englisch sein. Und nein, en:Firearm definiert anders. Also bleibt es beim "Firearms". Ansonsten sollte noch der Museumsname angepasst werden. Vorschläge bzgl. dieser Rotation? --High Contrast (talk) 11:43, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Natürlilch kann es auf deutsch sein. Die Unterkategorien mit Full-Reuenthal betreffen jeweils beide Museen. Das eine ist in Full, das andere in Reuenthal. Firearms=Feuerwaffen ist nicht dasselbe wie Infanteriewaffen. Panzer-, Flugzeug- und Artilleriekanonen sind Feuerwaffen, und es gibt Infanteriewaffen, die nicht Feuerwaffen sind. --Bunkerfunker (talk) 11:50, 18 May 2014 (UTC)
Natürlich kann es nicht auf Deutsch sein. Kategoriebezeichnungen dieser Art müssen auf Commons auf Englisch sein. Außerdem: lies dir en:Firearm durch - bereits in der Einleitung wird eindeutig eine "Firearm" als portable weapon definiert. Dieser Definition wird Glauben zuerkannt als deiner persönlichen Definition.
Wann bist du fertig mit deinen Bilder-uploads dieses Full-Museums? --High Contrast (talk) 19:15, 28 May 2014 (UTC)

Deletion of Wikipedia commons picture of Christine Lauterburg[edit]

Now for some reason which is not transparent to me the picture, which is authorized to be published on Wikipedia by the Swiss Photographer Francesca Pfeffer got deleted. How can I restore it to be shown again? How can I make sure it does not get deleted again? I am not a very frequent publisher of Wikipedia contributions but I did some work which I believe to be of fairly good quality about topics I think I know well enough. Is there a comprehensive description of the procedure that will let a published photograph that has the proper permission by the author undeleted. Is a verbal agreement by the autor not enough? Does the author herself has to take action? I really have no clue to where to go from now. Any kind of assistance by an more experienced volunteer is greatly appreciated.

Thank you

Urs Lauterburg

Hi! We need a written (valid and trustworthy) permission by the author which must be sent to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org . Then, this permission gets checked there. --High Contrast (talk) 12:30, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Tucano (4892097633).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Tucano (4892097633).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

OAlexander (talk) 09:06, 19 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Aircraft at Nuremberg Airport (9629420549).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aircraft at Nuremberg Airport (9629420549).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Magnolia677 (talk) 00:34, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Museum Quintana in Künzing, Bayern (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Museum Quintana in Künzing, Bayern (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Andoni Ferreño.jpg[edit]

(I've rearranged the thread to ease the reading)

Hi, They aren't the owners of the image, just publishers. Regards, Chanchus (talk) 21:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC).

Hi! Ok, User:Steinsplitter deleted this image already because of this. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 20:12, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
No, I'm talking about "https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Andoni_Ferre%C3%B1o.jpg" because you marked as suspicious. But, moreover, What's now with the first one?? --> "Ramon Landa.jpg" Chanchus (talk) 21:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC).
You need to provide clear source information for the used free CC license. I think you've ment this? --High Contrast (talk) 20:20, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
What more clearness do you need? I put the link of the source page and there you can read that you can resend to anyone the image freely! Chanchus (talk) 21:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC).
Again, if you talk about image you should not worry about it. Another editor - not you and not me - will look over it. And if there is everything OK with its licensing it will gratefully stay here on Commons. All right? ,High Contrast (talk) 20:38, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
OK about image. But, just another question, What's the way to can add an image of somebody that is popular and who logically you can't photograph? Chanchus (talk) 21:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC).
Hmm, that's a difficult question. Mostly, such images are strictly copyrighted so that they cannot be uploaded to Commons because they are not freely available. Commons is an ultimatively free media repository. have you tried flickr yet? For who do you look for? --High Contrast (talk) 21:03, 30 May 2014 (UTC)
Hi again! OK, understood. Pitifully there are no images of a lot of famous people of my country so the Wiki´s archives will stay empty by now. However, thank you very much for all your help and information. :) Regards, Chanchus (talk) 15:52, 5 June 2014 (UTC).

Note[edit]

Hi, I note a discussion has been raised at Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard#Possible_sockpuppet earlier today, that I believe you ought to have been notified about. -- (talk) 04:47, 1 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Gemeindeamt Großarl -07.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gemeindeamt Großarl -07.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nordhälfte des Karlsplatzrondells in München.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nordhälfte des Karlsplatzrondells in München.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Theatinerkirche München 2014.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Theatinerkirche München 2014.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Using your photo[edit]

Hey! I'm doing a schoolproject and I want to use one of your photos (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Dead_trees_in_the_Bavarian_Forest_-_Dreisesselberg_-01.JPG). You said that you wanted us to let you know, also, I'm wondering what I can use when crediting you in the end credits? Your name? Wikimedia page? Webpage? Wikimedias homepage?

Thanks in advance!

- Pauliina

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hotel The Old Inn - Hotel Měšťák.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel The Old Inn - Hotel Měšťák.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirchturm St. Laurentius in Künzing.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchturm St. Laurentius in Künzing.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

(I've rearranged the thread to ease the reading)

Hi, They aren't the owners of the image, just publishers. Regards, Chanchus (talk) 21:00, 30 May 2014 (UTC).

Deleting SANY's pictures[edit]

Dear High Contrast. As I can notice, you deleted all the pictures I uploaded (I had the permissions for those pictures, as I explained it very clearly). You even left me a message warning me about the suspension of my account, namely "If I do not stop uploading files that are not free, my account will be blocked". Now it seems that we even need to send an email and explain why the pictures are legal. My message (and I wish everyone in your talk page can read it) is that thanks to people like you lots of potential editors loose interest in Wikipedia, I already found several guys like you that make the effort and satisfaction of working on this project (which was very interesting at the beginning) worthless and unsavory. Congratulations, you got one editor less. By the way, please proceed to block my account, I am not interested in working on it anymore. Jorge Rodríguez. San José, Costa Rica

--JorgeRodriguez (talk) 04:14, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:APB pistol[edit]

Why have you restored deleted empty ctgr? Regards, --Klemen Kocjančič (Pogovor - Quick response) 04:57, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

Sockpuppet thread at the administrators' noticeboard[edit]

As previously mentioned by , a discussion concering your actions is currently taking place at the administrators' noticeboard. Some users have hinted that further action should be taken in relation to your account, so I am leaving this message to let you respond to those comments and give you the opportunity to express your views about the situation that has taken place. This is a very serious situation, so please kindly respond as soon as possible. If we do not hear from you in the coming 48 hours, I intend to file a request with the community to remove your administrator privileges. Thank you! odder (talk) 10:25, 5 June 2014 (UTC)

De-adminship request[edit]

This is just to inform you that in line with my previous message, I started a request to remove administrator privileges from your account. Your involvement in the discussion there is encouraged and would be welcomed. Thank you! odder (talk) 13:20, 7 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ortskern von Großarl, 2014.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ortskern von Großarl, 2014.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

A cup of tea for you![edit]

Meissen-teacup pinkrose01.jpg I was sorry to return to see what's happened to you recently. So far, I've put in the only keep in the RFDA, but hey, one's better than none! Anyways, I hope you're well. I also hope you'll return, or that you already have... Take care. INeverCry 06:42, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Removal of admin rights[edit]

Dear High Contrast, I am posting a note here to inform you that following closure of the de-adminship proceedings you no longer have admin rights on Commons. I would like to thank you for the very substantial work you have done here as admin over many years. I am not sure whether you have retired or whether you are simply unable to edit at the moment, but in any event if at some future point you feel able to share your thoughts on what happened we would be more than happy to hear from you. --MichaelMaggs (talk) 14:35, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

Frisch geerntet...[edit]

Erdbeerteller01.jpg Hallo High Contrast,

Auch wenn die letzte Woche, so du denn mitbekommen hast was vorging, sicher die schwerste in vielen Jahren der Projektarbeit für dich hier war, solltest du dir immer im Klaren darüber sein, dass es hier sehr viele User gibt, denen du als Mensch eine Menge bedeutest. Ohne deine Motivation wäre z.B. ich sicher nie dauerhaft bei WP und Commons hängen geblieben. Anderen geht es bestimmt ähnlich. Abgesehen vom persönlichen Verlust und dem Verlust für WP und C, wenn du dich fern halten würdest: Es würde so totenstill und langweilig werden in der eh schon sehr ruhigen Ecke rund um die russische Technik. Ich würde mich sehr freuen, wie viele andere sicher auch, von dir etwas zu hören. Gerne auch per Mail über de:WP. Nimm dir so viel Zeit wie du brauchst, aber eine kurze Nachricht wäre wirklich ganz toll. Grüße aus dem sonnigen aber kühlen Nordwestrussland. Druschba 4 (talk) 16:17, 15 June 2014 (UTC)

Hi und Ho! Wow, da lief ja eine wahre Hatz gegen meinen Account. Das entging mir komplett. Einige Tage ohne dem gewöhnten Internet und dann sowas. Auch zeitliche Ressourcen sind/waren schwer verfügbar. Auch ist es so, dass kaum Zeit zu einer umfassenden Erfassung (!) zur Verfügung steht/stehen wird. Irgendiwe bezeichnend. Via VPN habe ich derzeit (kurzzeitig) wieder Kontakt zur Welt - 56k lässt grüßen. Haltlose Anschuldigungen, wie derort getätigt, stehen im Raume und die Mehrheit scheint diesen zu folgen. Eine Antwort meinerseits bzw. eine Gegendarstellung meinerseits abwarten zu wollen interessierte wohl keinen. Wenn mein Account in einigen Wochen wieder in heimatlichen Gefilden (sicherlich nicht unter den "gepasteten Ips") sein kann, dann weiß ich nicht, ob ich wieder beteiligen werde. Zumindest hier sah man meinen Account nahe an Commons. Druschba! Mit Grüßen, High Contrast (talk) 22:47, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Was läuft denn hier? Adminsachen interessieren mich eigentlich nicht. Deshalb habe ich das alles nicht mitbekommen, kann damit auch nicht wissen, worum es eigentlich geht. In anderem Zusammenhang hast Du mir aber mal geschrieben: "Bildarbeit geht vor". Also, bitte nicht aufhören. --Johanning (talk) 07:55, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

Neue Pinakothek[edit]

Hallo

Wir würden gerne dass Foto der Neuen Pinakothek, für unsere Seite

http://www.minihostelmunich.com

nutzen. Ich hoffe, daß das in Ordnung ist. Wenn nicht, dann schicke mir bitte ein kurzes Email und ich werde das Foto umgehend löschen.

Viele Grüße aus Kiew (momentan)

Joachim

Gerne doch! Alles ok! Gute Gesundheit! Vielleicht sehen wir uns! Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 22:47, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:APB pistol[edit]

Category:APB pistol ist jetzt befüllt und kann wieder angelegt werden. --Slick (talk) 17:38, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Hallo! Frag bitte die Löscher der entsprechenden Kategorien. Gruß, High Contrast (talk) 22:47, 21 June 2014 (UTC)

Category:Police_trucks_of_Austria[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Police_trucks_of_Austria has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Alan Liefting (talk) 22:23, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Hola.

Tengo una consulta sobre las imágenes que he subido y que han sido catalogadas de plagio. ¿Sus acusaciones son por haber usado las licencias Creative Commons reconocimiento 3.0 y Creative Commons reconocimiento compartir igual 3.0?Chang2002 (talk) 22:50, 4 July 2014 (UTC)

Category:ALDI_supermarkets_in_Austria[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:ALDI_supermarkets_in_Austria has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

darkweasel94 20:08, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Beach in Kolka, Latvia.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Beach in Kolka, Latvia.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The Devil's Advocate (talk) 20:36, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Slovak International Air Fest 2012 - AFRC -11.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Slovak International Air Fest 2012 - AFRC -11.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

The Devil's Advocate (talk) 20:41, 22 July 2014 (UTC)

Kubinka[edit]

Ich habe das und das rückgängig gemacht. Der Standort des 45-й ОРП СпН ВДВ (в/ч 28337) ist nicht auf dem Flugplatz, sondern südlich der Stadt Kubinka (55° 47' 6" N, 37° 41' 36" E). Der Flugplatz ist nordwestlich von Kubinka. --Kreteglobi (talk) 20:03, 10 August 2014 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze[edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Hallo High Contrast,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Vorder/Hinterfirmiansreut[edit]

Hallo High Contrast, dieses Bild zeigt nicht Hinterfirmiansreut, sondern Vorderfirmiansreut, worauf mich hier jemand aufmerksam gemacht hat. Grüße! --Konrad Lackerbeck (talk) 10:37, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


--  Gazebo (talk) 09:45, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

WikiProject Aviation now on Twitter[edit]

Hi, as mentioned here, Commons:WikiProject Aviation is now on Twitter. I will be using the feed to tweet photos from our now extensive repository of aviation imagery, and will also use it for outreach activities. If you have any suggestions on how to get the maximum use out of Twitter feel free to leave suggestions on the Aviation project talk page. You can follow the account at http://www.twitter.com/commonsaviation. Cheers, russavia (talk) 14:08, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

File:Leerstand in der Donaupassage, Passau.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Leerstand in der Donaupassage, Passau.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 18:54, 7 September 2014 (UTC)

Hi!

I have filed this file for an undeletion. I hope that somebody who understands this legal text in German language will help here. It would be great if you reupload it on regio wiki Passau or here if it is wanted!

Best wishes! PassauerW (talk) 17:52, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, russavia (talk) 17:31, 15 October 2014 (UTC)

File:2010 09 27 Hannover 154228 (8599657279).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2010 09 27 Hannover 154228 (8599657279).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

69.24.31.130 13:30, 23 October 2014 (UTC)

File:120407-F-GX122-014 (Marrakech Aeroexpo 2012) (26).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:120407-F-GX122-014 (Marrakech Aeroexpo 2012) (26).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Buxtehude (talk) 18:16, 13 November 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, INeverCry 08:56, 16 November 2014 (UTC)

Template Australian War Memorial[edit]

Hi, das AWM hat den Link für die Fotos geändert (von http://cas.awm.gov.au/photograph/XXSignaturXX zu http://www.awm.gov.au/collection/XXSignaturXX/). Ich habe keine Ahnung, wie man das Template AWM-image|XXSignaturXX ändert oder an wen man sich da wenden kann. Ich wäre für Hinweise dankbar. Cobatfor (talk) 22:14, 25 November 2014 (UTC)