User talk:Husky

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Add a commment or question to my talk page

Eigenaardig fotoprobleem[edit]

Dag Husky. Vandaag werd deze deze foto geupload die oa zonder licentie op commons nu staat. Ik diende een verwijderverzoek in daarom. De uploader reageerde zojuist daarop op mijn overlegpagina. Zou je de uploader behulpzaam kunnen zijn in al de adminstratieve handelingen die moeten gebeuren? Mvg Sonty (talk) 15:34, 14 December 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 15:41, 16 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Boeing787 model transparant.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Boeing787 model transparant.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Crisco 1492 (talk) 06:02, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

missing OTRS in Wikiportrait[edit]

Hi, I noticed File:Peter Niemeyer.JPG is missing OTRS number. --Jarekt (talk) 19:48, 22 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi again, When I wrote the above message I was under impression you ware the uploader of the image. I apologize for my confusion. --Jarekt (talk) 02:54, 24 February 2013 (UTC)

User:Openbeelden[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg User:Openbeelden has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this user page, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

86.81.72.88 16:49, 1 April 2013 (UTC)

Follow up[edit]

I just had a look at Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Paintings by Theo van Doesburg which we were discussing before I had read it. This is just a quick note to say that I agree with the decision and rationale there. --99of9 (talk) 19:02, 13 May 2013 (UTC)

"glamwiki" on YouTube[edit]

Hi Hay. Are you the owner of the "glamwiki" channel on YouTube? I was asking around a little while ago trying to find out who has the password so that we can start using that channel for GLAM-Wiki videos, and Multichill pointed me your way. Could you share the password with me if you have it? Thanks! Dominic (talk) 16:18, 31 May 2013 (UTC)

I don't mean to pester you, but I'd like to be able to have this to upload content this week, if possible. Can you get back to me? Thanks! Dominic (talk) 20:02, 4 June 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

User:HuskyBot[edit]

I noticed this bot in recent changes/unpatrolled. 3500 edits without a flag seems a bit off, so I've temporarily blocked the account. I've asked about this on Commons:Bureaucrats' noticeboard#User:HuskeyBot as well. INeverCry 17:29, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Thanks. I've added something to the discussion on the noticeboard. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 18:26, 21 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Husky,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Anefo[edit]

Hello Husky, your bot is adding a Nationaal Archief template and is removing the Images from Anefo category. If an image is from Nationaal Archief, it does not necessarily mean the image is from Anefo. The image could also be from elsewhere. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 09:03, 1 April 2014 (UTC)

@Jan Arkesteijn: you're right. However, there are two Nationaal Archief templates: you've got Template:Nationaal Archief-license and Template:Nationaal Archief. The first adds both 'Images from Nationaal Archief' and 'Images from Anefo'.
The second one only adds 'Image from Nationaal Archief'. For example, File:NL-HaNA 1.01.19 2623 011 Unie van Utrecht.jpg only has 'Images from Nationaal Archief' because it uses the {Nationaal Archief} template, while File:Piet Zwart-NL-HaNA 2.24.01.03-917-1515.jpg has both categories because it uses {Nationaal Archief-license}.
Unfortunately the template name is a little bit confusing. I guess something like {Nationaal Archief - Anefo} would have made more sense. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 12:24, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Confusing it is. It is not a good idea to manage the categories through templates. In this case it shows, but for new contributors it is downright incomprehensible. It makes contributing to Wikipedia a mess. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:35, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Oh yes, i completely agree that it's confusing. However, there are good reasons why you want to add the categories using the template. For example, if you ever want to change the category on all of these images you only need to edit in in one place (the template). Otherwise, you need to run a bot through the complete collection to change it. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 12:37, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Even that advantage does not outweigh the disadvantage, I think. Anyway, it's better to rename one of the templates, to at least shed some light on it. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 12:53, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
I'll add that to my todo list (the renaming). Unfortunately, renaming a template involves editing all pages that already have it :(. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 12:55, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Well, it goes to show: ieder voordeel heb zijn nadeel. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:09, 3 April 2014 (UTC)
Johan Cruyff in trainingspak Nederlands Elftal , kop.jpg. En zo is het. Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 13:26, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

KB categories[edit]

example of a template change that puts the file into the "contributed by KB" category, though they didn't actively contribute it

Hmm, I saw that this now is in the category "media contributed by KB" as well as "images from KB", but I think only the ones that they actively contributed themselves should be in the "contributed by" category. Thpughts? Jane023 (talk) 09:50, 30 April 2014 (UTC)

Hey Jane, yes you're right. I was rearranging the categories, and it's less work to throw everything together and rearrange later than to go through all the files individually. I'll sort it out! Huskyoog.jpg Husky (talk to me) 13:31, 1 May 2014 (UTC)
OK sounds like a big job - good luck with it! Jane023 (talk) 12:54, 2 May 2014 (UTC)

Reply on your comment at Template talk:Artwork/Archiv/2014#Wikidata parameter[edit]

Beste Husky, you should be able to edit Template:Artwork/doc. Thanks for doing it! Cheers, --Marsupium (talk) 12:12, 9 July 2014 (UTC)