User talk:Hydro

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to the Commons, Hydro!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Contents

license violation[edit]

You uploaded a new version of the Image:Polyommatus_damon.jpeg and replaced the old version. According to the GFDL you made a license violation because you didn't kept a copy of the original! Thanks to you the Image:Polyommatus_damon.jpeg is no Qaulity image anymore because you reduced the size. And all the attended great composition is gone too. NEVER DO THAT AGAIN WITH ANY OF MY PHOTOS!!!! Fabelfroh 09:20, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

The original is still there and can easily be seen by clicking on the date of the version you want. It has never been seen as a GFDL license violation to upload new versions. But it makes no sense to replace images marked Quality Images or Featured picture as the new version needs to be assessed before it can retain that tag. Also it is normal practise to ask the original uploader before replacing an image as one's improvements are often not appreciated (of course sometimes they are greatful for the help). So just re-upload the new version under a different name :-) --Tony Wills 09:55, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
Yeah. Sorry about the harsh tone. I managed to get the original myself. Fabelfroh 10:09, 19 November 2007 (UTC)

Image Tagging Image:Wappen Lehrte.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Wappen Lehrte.png. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Motopark 19:27, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Hydro!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 15:13, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

File tagging File:Abisara_echerius1.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Abisara_echerius1.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Abisara_echerius1.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Eusebius (talk) 09:59, 11 September 2009 (UTC)

I didn't upload this picture, it's from User:Shyamal. --Hydro (talk) 11:32, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Löschantrag[edit]

Hallo Hydro, könntest du nicht zuerst die korrigierte Version von File:Buergerhaus Gisselberg.jpg hochladen, damit die Links nicht brechen? --Túrelio (talk) 12:01, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Soeben gemacht. --Hydro (talk) 12:19, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Ok, ich habe nun die alte Version selektiv gelöscht and dann das speedy-tag entfernt. --Túrelio (talk) 12:52, 17 September 2010 (UTC)
Danke! --Hydro (talk) 17:51, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Filemover[edit]

Hi Hydro. I've made you a filemover. I did this so that you would have the choice of renaming files on your own. If you'd rather continue using rename requests instead, that would be fine too. INeverCry 19:58, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Thanks a lot! --Hydro (talk) 20:08, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Stop![edit]

Hallo Hydro, ist dir bewusst, dass du derzeit eine recht breite Fehlerschneise durch verschiedene (?) WPs ziehst? Wenn du ein Bild verschiebst, muss du händisch doch auch eventuelle Einbindungen in den lokalen WPs korrigieren oder nicht? Imho passiert das nicht automatisch oder per WL. Ein Bot scheint sich ja nicht darum zu kümmern, sonst wäre das schon passiert. Derzeit werden zahlreiche Bilder nach deiner Verschiebung nicht mehr angezeigt, ein Beispiel ist de:Liste der Gartenpavillons in Dresden. Bitte gehe deine ganzen Verschiebungen durch und versuche die Fehler zu korrigieren. Gruß, --Paulae (talk) 13:58, 9 October 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Paulae, das kann ich nicht nachvollziehen. Es werden durchaus Weiterleitungen angelegt und in der Liste der Gartenpavillons in Dresden kann ich keine Lücken entdecken. Vielleicht bei dir ein Cache-Problem? Hast Du mal Strg+F5 gedrückt? Gruß --Hydro (talk) 17:55, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Also ich habs jetzt an zwei Rechnern ausprobiert, hab den Cache geleert und bei mir werden die Bilder nicht angezeigt. Bei de:Alte Kirche (Dresden-Leuben) wird anstelle des Kirchturms ein leeres kleines Feld angezeigt, bei der Liste der Pavillons der Blaulink auf das alte Bild. Das ist dann eben eine Weiterleitung, das Fotos erscheint in der Liste aber nicht. Ich bin noch mit Firefox 15 unterwegs, aber daran sollte das nicht liegen. --Paulae (talk) 19:53, 9 October 2012 (UTC) Nachtrag: Nach Update auf Firefox 16 und erneuter Cache-Leerung keine Besserung des Problems. Ich wüsste aber ehrlich auch nicht, wie das mit der Weiterleitung funktionieren sollte. Ich habe das auch noch nie erlebt, dass man von de.wp beim Klick auf ein Bild innerhalb Commons weitergeleitet wird. Vielleicht innerhalb von Commons, aber doch nicht von extern?! Hast du deinen Cache mal geleert? Kann ja sein, dass du noch die Version vor dem Verschieben drin hast. Hm, sehr merkwürdig. --Paulae (talk) 19:59, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
In der Tat merkwürdig. Bei mir (auch nach Cache-Leerung) alles in Ordnung. Sonst wären wohl auch schon mehr Beschwerden eingegangen. Vielleicht mal purgen? --Hydro (talk) 20:12, 9 October 2012 (UTC)
Das Wort des Tages heißt purgen. ;-) Das war tatsächlich des Rätsels Lösung, jetzt klappts auch bei mir. Danke für deine Geduld (mit mir) und viele Grüße, --Paulae (talk) 17:08, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
Freut mich sehr! Fing schon fast an, mir Sorgen zu machen. :-) Frohes Schaffen --Hydro (talk) 17:23, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

In letzter Zeit tauchen[edit]

verstärkt alte Bilder von mir in meiner Beo auf, bei denen Du Schreibfehler korrigierst. Höchste Zeit hierfür einmal "herzlichen Dank" zu sagen! Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 19:22, 10 October 2012 (UTC)

Da nicht für! :-) Gruß --Hydro (talk) 19:34, 10 October 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Hydro,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 08:22, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hirsefeldsteg 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hirsefeldsteg 4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche Rollshausen (Lohra) 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Rollshausen (Lohra) 3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Kameraposition[edit]

Hallo Hydro, ist mir nicht übermäßig wichtig, aber warum verschiebst du die Infos zur Kameraposition bei meinen Bildern regelmäßig aus dem Abschnitt "Beschreibung" (wo es meiner Meinung nach hingehört) in den Abschnitt "Lizenz" (wo es meiner Meinung nach überhaupt nicht hingehört), z.B. hier: [1]. Gruß --Hover dam (talk) 21:08, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Hover dam, mir eigentlich auch nicht wichtig, war es nur aus der Wikipedia so gewohnt, dass die Koordinaten direkt vor den Kategorien platziert werden. Dass sie damit im Abschnitt "Lizenz" stehen, hatte ich nicht bedacht. Danke für den Hinweis, werde das zukünftig lassen. – Schöne Bilder hast du gestern und heute gemacht! Gruß --Hydro (talk) 21:26, 13 November 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Friedhof Stausebach.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedhof Stausebach.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche Schwabendorf (Rauschenberg).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Schwabendorf (Rauschenberg).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche Sindersfeld 4.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Sindersfeld 4.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche Niederweidbach.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Niederweidbach.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Ein Obstkuchen für dich![edit]

A very beautiful Nectarine Pie.jpg Hallo Hydro, für deine Korrektur meiner Fehler, u.a. File:Kreishaus, St.-Apern-Straße Köln - 1316.jpg: Danke und ein Stück Kuchen für den Nachmittag :-) Raymond 13:15, 8 January 2013 (UTC)
Mmmh, lecker! :-) --Hydro (talk) 17:47, 8 January 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hessische Stipendiatenanstalt Marburg 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hessische Stipendiatenanstalt Marburg 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Hallo, ...[edit]

wenn Du schon der Meinung bist, dass Du einzelne Fotos mit der Endung „.JPG“ nach „.jpg“ verschieben musst, dann ersuche ich Dich, auch deren Einbindungen zu akutalisieren. Vgl.: [2], [3]. -- Bwag (talk) 08:23, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Ich habe nur Fotos mit "kiche" im Dateinamen nach "kirche" im Dateinamen verschoben. Die Änderung von JPG in jpg hat die Software ohne mein Zutun durchgeführt. Bisher wurden die Einbindungen immer automatisch aktualisiert. Vielleicht dauert es nur eine Weile. Siehe dazu auch dies. --Hydro (talk) 08:37, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
Oh, da ging es ja gar nicht um das „.jpg“, sondern um das fehlenden „R“, welches ich gar nicht registrierte. Ja, dann ein Dankeschön - ist ein „altes Leiden“ von mir, bei der Kirche das R zu unterschlagen. -- Bwag (talk) 08:43, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:32, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sender Marburg 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sender Marburg 3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Black Death Vodka 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kapelle Dilschhausen 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kapelle Dilschhausen 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kiesgrube Steinwedel 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kiesgrube Steinwedel 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Feuerwehr Gilserberg 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feuerwehr Gilserberg 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Feuerwehr Gilserberg 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feuerwehr Gilserberg 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fronhof Marburg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fronhof Marburg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Abendroth-Bruecke Marburg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abendroth-Bruecke Marburg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hauptpost Marburg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptpost Marburg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

WKA Gilserberg 2b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! WKA Gilserberg 2b.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche Marburg-Cappel 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Marburg-Cappel 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:Blickachsen9-BadHomburg-Zwingmann.jpg[edit]

Hallo Hydro, du hast bei o.g. file einige Kategorien entfernt. Das kann ich nicht ganz nachvollziehen. Das Kunstwerk gehört zur Ausstellung "Blickachsen 9", Niederhöchstadt ist ein Ortsteil von "Eschborn", das Werk ist eine "Skulptur" und die Ausstellung findet in "Hessen", "Germany" statt. Also sind die Kategorien doch korrekt? Grüße Klaus —Preceding unsigned comment added by KlausOhl (talk • contribs) 11:17, 15. Apr. 2013‎ (UTC)

Hallo Klaus, eine Kategorie "Blickachsen 9" existiert nicht. Und Dateien werden immer nur in die unterste Ebene des hierarchischen Kategoriesystems, also in die speziellst möglichen Kategorien eingeordnet. Die Category:Blickachsen ist eine Unterkategorie von Category:Sculptures in Bad Homburg vor der Höhe, beinhaltet also schon die Skulpturen. Ebenso gehört jede Datei in Category:Niederhöchstadt logischerweise zu Eschborn, Hesse und Germany. Grüße --Hydro (talk) 11:53, 15 April 2013 (UTC)

Danke[edit]

für deine zahlreichen Korrekturen von 'Stadteil' in meinen Bildbeschreibungen (hier und anderswo). Ich will mich bessern... Gruß --Harke (talk) 16:56, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Gern geschehen. :-) Gruß --Hydro (talk) 17:29, 21 April 2013 (UTC)

Johannes Nepomuk[edit]

Hi, Hydro, die Statue aus Amöneburg, die du heute hochgeladen hast, ist ein Johannes Nepomuk. Category:John of Nepomuk Die Darstellung ist typisch und der Name steht auf dem Schild am Sockel. MfG --Regiomontanus (talk) 11:13, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Klasse, vielen Dank! --Hydro (talk) 11:22, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Badesee Niederweimar.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Badesee Niederweimar.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Friedenstein Amöneburg 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Friedenstein Amöneburg 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-P046278, Berlin, Blutmai, Staßenbarrikade.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bundesarchiv B 145 Bild-P046278, Berlin, Blutmai, Staßenbarrikade.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Hasenläufer (talk) 21:30, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirchhain Stadtkirche.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchhain Stadtkirche.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

gräm dich nicht über "des - dem" kram[edit]

hallo hydro, frohes weiterkramen (hoffentlich ohne dich zu grämen!). ;-) dontworry (talk) 12:55, 9 June 2013 (UTC)

Hallo dontworry, kaum denkt man mal zwei Wochen drüber nach – schon hat man’s verstanden! :-) --Hydro (talk) 07:52, 23 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hunburgturm Burgholz innen.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hunburgturm Burgholz innen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lindenplatz 12, Burgholz 3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lindenplatz 12, Burgholz 3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Großseelheim, Marburger Ring x.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Großseelheim, Marburger Ring x.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Feuerwehr Frohnhausen (Gladenbach).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Feuerwehr Frohnhausen (Gladenbach).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche Diedenshausen (Gladenbach) 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Diedenshausen (Gladenbach) 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Danke[edit]

für die permanenten Korrekturen des fehlenden "t"s in "denkmalgeschütze ...". Ich hoffe, dass ich nach Deiner 99. Korrektur die Schreibweise begriffen habe :-). Gruß --Lienhard Schulz (talk) 18:36, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Ja, Geschütze sind was anderes. ;-) Gruß --Hydro (talk) 18:54, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche Rüchenbach 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Rüchenbach 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

denkmalgeschützes vs denkmalgeschütztes[edit]

vielen dank für die arbeit :-) ist ja erschreckend, wo ich überall den fehler gemacht habe. gruß --Z thomas 12:50, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche Frohnhausen (Gladenbach) 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Frohnhausen (Gladenbach) 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Schweinsberg (Stadtallendorf) (05).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schweinsberg (Stadtallendorf) (05).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche Rüdigheim (Amöneburg) 1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Rüdigheim (Amöneburg) 1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Amöneburg von SO (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amöneburg von SO (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Amöneburg von SO (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amöneburg von SO (3).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Amöneburg von SO (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Amöneburg von SO (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kreuz Schafe Amöneburg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kreuz Schafe Amöneburg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Steinmühle Marburg (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinmühle Marburg (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Fehlerkorrektur[edit]

Hallo! Danke für die Korrektur (Eulenturm). Den Fehler habe ich übersehen, wahrscheinlich weil umgangssprachlich zu oft der Genitiv genutzt wird. --XRay talk 11:42, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Kein Ding. :-) Gruß --Hydro (talk) 12:10, 12 November 2013 (UTC)

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Black Death Vodka 2.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Black Death Vodka 2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

.     Jim . . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 12:03, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 13:22, 21 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Marburger Schloss aus der Rudolf-Bultmann-Straße.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marburger Schloss aus der Rudolf-Bultmann-Straße.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Verschiebung[edit]

Hi Hydro, ich schnall das nicht: Ich seh nur einen Unterschied in der Dateierweiterung. Helf mir mal in den Sattel :-) Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 23:29, 9 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Nightflyer, Ostsee schreibt sich mit nur zwei e. Gruß --Hydro (talk) 09:32, 10 January 2014 (UTC)
Kopf -> Tisch -> Aua :-) Gruss --Nightflyer (talk) 22:31, 10 January 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kugelkirche 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kugelkirche 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Storch Steinwedel (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storch Steinwedel (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Damhirschkuh Kopf.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Damhirschkuh Kopf.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche Steinwedel innen (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Steinwedel innen (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Skulpturen Sophiental (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skulpturen Sophiental (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Brücke Sophiental (3).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brücke Sophiental (3).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kirche Kleinseelheim 5.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirche Kleinseelheim 5.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Geripptes 0,25l.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geripptes 0,25l.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kriegerdenkmal Gönnern (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kriegerdenkmal Gönnern (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Kleines Backhaus Steinperf.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kleines Backhaus Steinperf.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Löwe Marburg 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Löwe Marburg 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Figur Firmaneiplatz Marburg.fides.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Figur Firmaneiplatz Marburg.fides.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Franziskuskapelle Marburg 03.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Franziskuskapelle Marburg 03.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pferde Steinweg Marburg 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pferde Steinweg Marburg 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Turm der Elisabethkirche und Franziskuskapelle Marburg.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Turm der Elisabethkirche und Franziskuskapelle Marburg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Invitation to take part in the categorization of QI[edit]

Dear Hydro! Your images were reviewed and have been promoted to Quality Image status. Congratulations! I invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. All new images with this status are automatically placed to the page Commons:Quality_images/Recently_promoted. They have to be manually tagged with relevant categories using the QI categorization tool (see link at the top of the page, the author of this tool is User:Dschwen). Very few users do this job now, so a large number of uncategorizated photos accumulates on this page time to time… --Bff (talk) 09:33, 9 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Backhaus Cappel Marburg (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Backhaus Cappel Marburg (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Verschiebungsgrund?[edit]

Hallo Hydro, gibt es einen tieferen Sinn für diese deine Verschiebung? Die ursprüngliche Dateibezeichnung war korrekt, Wohnpark ist wohl eine euphemistische Umschreibung (für das) und die Adresse ist jetzt genauso richtig wie vorher. Mit dem einen Unterschied: Ich würde so eine gruselige Dateibeschreibung (Wohnpark Elsa Fenske) nicht nehmen und stehe jetzt aber genau dort als Autor. Bitte nimm solche Verschiebungen in Zukunft nicht vor, wenn es keine Verbesserungen oder Korrekturen sind. Oder ist mir irgendetwas nicht aufgefallen, was diese Verschiebung unumgänglich machte? Gruß, --Paulae (talk) 20:48, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Paulae, der Hauptgrund meiner Verschiebung war, dass dort „Fense“ statt „Fenske“ stand. Dann habe ich noch die m.E. falsche Adresse entsprechend [4] korrigiert. Wieso ist diese jetzt genauso richtig wie vorher, kann ein Haus zwei verschiedene Adressen haben? Dass ich aus der „Straße“ ein unschönes „Str.“ gemacht habe, war leider ein C&P-Fehler. „Wohnpark Elsa Fenske“ ist der offizielle Eigenname, aber gefällt mir auch nicht. Was hältst du von einer Verschiebung nach „Elsa-Fenske-Heim Dresden Freiberger Straße 18“? Schönen Gruß --Hydro (talk) 08:13, 14 June 2014 (UTC)
Ok, Fense statt Fenske ist nachvollziehbar, der Rest nicht. Der Komplex steht als Sachgesamtheit "Elsa-Fenske-Heim mit Garten u. Einfriedung (Alfred-Althus-Straße 9)" unter Denkmalschutz. Natürlich gibt es da mehr Gebäude, ist ja ein großes Gelände, eben Ehrlichstraße 3 und Freiberger Straße 18. Das ist ein Alten- und Pflegeheim, Wohnpark ist neudeutsches, euphemistisches Werbeheinisprech (sry, aber ist so). Ich fände es gut, wenn bei Verschiebungen von Dateien mit aussagekräftigem Namen wirklich nur echte Fehler korrigiert werden. I.d.R. ist der Uploader ja vor Ort gewesen und weiß, wie der Dateiname lauten soll, damit er gefunden wird. Rückverschiebe bitte entweder auf Elsa-Fenske-Heim Dresden Alfred-Althus-Straße 9 (mir ging es bei der Bildbeschreibung um den Gesamtkomplex, da das das Hauptgebäude & in der Denkmalliste eingebunden ist) oder auf Elsa-Fenske-Heim Dresden Freiberger Straße 18 (das wäre dann konkret das Gebäude auf dem Foto). Gruß, --Paulae (talk) 16:10, 14 June 2014 (UTC)

es warat …[edit]

deswegen. Hallo Hydro, ich halte es nicht für günstig, wenn diese Doppelkategorisierung als COM:OVERCAT verstanden wird. Siehe auch die Beschreibung der Wurzelkategorie. Denkmalschutz ist eine versteckte, nicht offensichtliche Eigenschaft, die alternative Einteilung in denkmalgeschützte Objekte und den Rest macht es mE schwierig, instinktiv in der richtigen Unterkategorie zu suchen (v.a. dann wenn man nicht den Bias auf Denkmalschutz gesetzt hat). Wir schieben die Bilder und Kategorien ja auch nicht in Unterkategorien nach Bauzeitpunkt, Stil, innen mit Fresco oder ohne, usw und erwarten vom Suchenden, dass er genau weiß, unter welchem Stil er ein gesuchtes Gebäude finden wird. Nicht mal für blaue und gelbe Gebäude, offensichtliche Eigenschaften, macht es Sinn die Gebäude in Category:Blue buildings und Category:Yellow buildings innerhalb einer Stadt zu unterteilen. DS ist eine zusätzliche Eigenschaft, die sich mE nicht zur Strukturierung in DS und die Differenzmenge innerhalb einer Gemeinde eignet. lg --Herzi Pinki (talk) 18:54, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Leuchtet ein. Danke für den Hinweis, werde ich zukünftig berücksichtigen. Schönen Gruß --Hydro (talk) 19:53, 22 June 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Steinmühle Marburg Wehr (6).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Steinmühle Marburg Wehr (6).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Wiki Loves Earth 2014 - Ein Wiki-Beitrag für den Naturschutz[edit]

WLE-Deutschland-2014.jpg

Hallo Hydro,

vor einer Woche endete der zweimonatige Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Earth. Du hast daran aktiv teilgenommen und wir möchten Dir dafür herzlich danken.

Mit rund 14.500 Fotos hat Deutschland einen Anteil von 20 % an diesem internationalen Projekt erbracht, an dem sich 15 Länder beteiligten. Sehr erfreulich ist die hohe Zahl an 729 Teilnehmern allein in Deutschland. Einen Überblick zu den Fotos und Teilnehmern findest du auf unserer WLE-Projektseite.

Gegenwärtig ist die deutsche Jury dabei, diesen wertvollen Fotobestand zu geschützten Naturlandschaften und Naturdenkmalen zu sichten. An diesem Wochenende wird in Hamburg die entscheidende Jury-Sitzung stattfinden. Wir wünschen auch Dir mit Deinem Foto-Beitrag dabei viel Glück und Erfolg.

Der nächste Fotowettbewerb steht bereits vor der Tür. Im September findet nun schon zum vierten Mal der Wettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments statt, wo die Kulturdenkmale im Vordergrund stehen. Doch du musst mit dem Fotografieren nicht bis zum September warten. Vielleicht kannst du den Sommer nutzen um entsprechend den offiziellen Denkmallisten geeignete Motive aufzuspüren. Ebenso kannst du gerne dabei helfen, die hochgeladenen Fotos zu kategorisieren oder in Wikipedia-Artikel und Listen einzubinden.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß dabei wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 11. Juli 2014)