User talk:Hyronimus299

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Hyronimus299!
File:Mondkalb-Zeitschrift.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 02:12, 14 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

maybe could move the file into the German Wikipedia ?--Hyronimus299 (talk) 20:44, 27 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Honestly, I'm not familiar enough with German Wikipedia's rules. I think they allow certain logos as fair use which are too simple for copyright in German-speaking countries. We have a lot of German admins on Commons; you might try asking one of them. Magog the Ogre (talk) (contribs) 18:19, 30 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Apothekergarten.JPG. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

Warning: unless the permission information is given, the file may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

And also:

Yours sincerely, Green Giant (talk) 00:56, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message! On July 25th 2014, the Owner of copyright (Iris Köster, Bremervörde) assured me, to have sent the permission to Wikimedia commons. Immediately at Monday, I'll take care of it.--Hyronimus299 (talk) 12:23, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
العربية  беларуская беларуская (тарашкевіца)  ပအိုဝ်ႏဘာႏသာႏ  বাংলা  català  čeština  dansk  Deutsch  Deutsch (Sie-Form)  Ελληνικά  English  español  euskara  فارسی  suomi  français  galego  עברית  hrvatski  magyar  հայերեն  italiano  日本語  ಕನ್ನಡ  한국어  lietuvių  latviešu  македонски  മലയാളം  मराठी  မြန်မာဘာသာ  norsk bokmål  Plattdüütsch  Nederlands  norsk  polski  português  română  русский  sicilianu  slovenčina  slovenščina  српски / srpski  svenska  ไทย  Türkçe  українська  اردو  Tiếng Việt  中文(简体)  中文(繁體)  +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:NABU Umweltpyramide Bremervörde.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or ask the author or copyright holder to send an email with copy of a written permission to VRT (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). You may still be required to go through this procedure even if you are the author yourself; please see Commons:But it's my own work! for more details. After you emailed permission, you may replace the {{No permission since}} tag with {{subst:PP}} on file description page. Alternatively, you may click on "Challenge speedy deletion" below the tag if you wish to provide an argument why evidence of permission is not necessary in this case.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, or if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own, or work which has been previously published (regardless of whether it is your own).

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the VRT-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:NABU Umweltpyramide Bremervörde.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Yours sincerely, Green Giant (talk) 00:58, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the message! Immediately at Monday, I'll take care of it.--Hyronimus299 (talk) 13:16, 23 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Hallo, für die Bilder einen Absatz weiter oben gab es Freigaben und diese sind wiederhergestellt und können verwendet werden. Für die hier genannte Datei gab/gibt es m.E. (noch) keine Freigabe. Freundliche Grüße, --Emha (talk) 12:13, 9 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Danke für die Nachricht. Das Foto der Umweltpyramide bekam ich per e-mail von der Einrichtung selbst (für Wikipedia/Wikimedia) + die offizielle Erlaubnis sendet man nun nicht (reagiert auch nicht auf meine Nachfragen). Versteh ich nicht, doch dann soll es wohl so sein.--Hyronimus299 (talk) 15:52, 14 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Wheely on tour in HH.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Wheely on tour in HH.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the file because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the file, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the file itself. Please update the file description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you.

čeština | English | svenska | русский | മലയാളം | 中文 | 中文(简体) | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 23:09, 3 October 2014 (UTC) Stefan4 (talk) 23:09, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In fact! I did n't notice the error - thanks for the correction!--Hyronimus299 (talk) 19:43, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Better source request for File:Wheely on tour in HH1.jpg[edit]

Thanks for uploading File:Wheely on tour in HH1.jpg. You provided a source, but it is difficult for other users to examine the copyright status of the file because the source is incomplete. Please consider clarifying the exact source so that the copyright status may be checked more easily. It is best to specify the exact web page where you found the file, rather than only giving the source domain or the URL of the file itself. Please update the file description with a URL that will be more helpful to other users in determining the copyright status. If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source in a complete manner. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. If you have any questions please ask them at the help desk or me at my talkpage. Thank you.

čeština | English | svenska | русский | മലയാളം | 中文 | 中文(简体) | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 23:09, 3 October 2014 (UTC) Stefan4 (talk) 23:09, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

In fact! Unfortunately I did n't notice the error - thanks for the correction--Hyronimus299 (talk) 19:46, 4 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
File:Wheely on tour in HH.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 23:09, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wheely on tour in HH1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues.

Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 23:09, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]