User talk:Ikiwaner

Archives 2005-01–2008-08 2007-08–2008-08 2008-08–2009-11 2009-11–2010-08

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Ngorongoro_Streifengnu.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Slight motion blur, but still ok to me. --Quartl 06:47, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

The image has been promoted to Featured picture The image File:Ngorongoro Spitzmaulnashorn.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Ngorongoro Spitzmaulnashorn.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 12:58, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Serengeti_Kongoni1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments They are not much of them around. This one certainly deserves promotion. --Nevit 06:23, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Serengeti_Ellipsenwasserbock.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments  SupportSurely QI, can be FPC too. --Nevit 15:04, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Serengeti Raubadler.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments  SupportA difficult shot. --Nevit 22:07, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

QI

We have a bot which handles the gruntwork - it removes images which are not commented on within X days, not those which merely were posted X days ago. Please leave it to do its job. -mattbuck (Talk) 10:45, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Tell me if I'm wrong but afaik there is no bot closing the consensual reviews. And the bot is stopped often so the queue gets bigger and bigger. What really counts are the guidelines, no matter if a human or a bot does the work. --Ikiwaner (talk) 10:57, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

I believe that humans have to decide on CR by changing it from discuss to promotion or decline, and at that point it will be sorted. It runs at roughly noon GMT every day, and finishes its job within 20mins or so. -mattbuck (Talk) 11:01, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

I closed most of the CRs this morning, so the bot should handle them in an hour or so. --Quartl (talk) 11:03, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Well I was wrong on the closure procedure but still your revert does not make sense. --Ikiwaner (talk) 16:43, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

You removed several discussions which had yet to be idle for the week or so - heck, one had a timestamp (confusingly) from tomorrow. -mattbuck (Talk) 17:04, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Really? Besides the images that got automatically archived a few hours after you reverted me there are just three other images left that I closed unassessed, the oldest of them being nominated half a month ago. The guidelines say: Nominated images which have not generated assessments either to promote nor to decline, or a consensus (equal opposition as support in consensual review) after 8 days on this page should be removed from this page without promotion. I hope it's not your understanding that this is 8 days after the last comment. It's 8 days from nomination. Otherwise an image can stay forever on the list. --Ikiwaner (talk) 17:23, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Sansibar_Dhau2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Nice --George Chernilevsky 08:19, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

Werbung

Hallo Ikiwaner, auch wenn das Bild nicht von dir ist, wird Werbung für FPC bei QIC als unangebracht angesehen. Ich habe deinen Edit daher rückgängig gemacht, ich hoffe du verstehst das. Viele Grüße, --Quartl (talk) 14:35, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Quartl, ich verstehe deinen Einwand und deinen Revert nicht. Was soll daran falsch sein? Ich habe gar keine Empfehlung abgegeben, sondern nur verlinkt. Es ist doch in unser aller Interesse, wenn möglichst viele Leute abstimmen?! --Ikiwaner (talk) 15:12, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Exactly. There is no Werbung nor COI here, so I reverted the revert. Regards. Lycaon (talk) 16:42, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Ich verstehe zwar nicht ganz, wie ein Link auf eine gleichzeitige FP-Kandidatur hilft, die Qualität eines Bildes besser einzuschätzen (und darum geht es primär bei QIC), aber wenn der Revert unangebracht war, dann möchte ich mich dafür entschuldigen. Der Schaden wurde ja von Lycaon schon repariert. Viele Grüße, --Quartl (talk) 17:35, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Mal halblang, ein Schaden ist nicht entstanden, ein Wiki lebt von verschiedenen Meinungen. Nach meinem Verständnis sind die QI eine Art Vorfilter für FP. Nominierungen, die ohne Gegenstimme mehrere positive Feedbacks erhalten, schneiden als FP normalerweise gut ab. Ich finde QI auch ein gutes Mittel, die Bilder der anderen Fotografen zu betrachten. Und wenn ich dann ein Bild für FP nominiere, interessiert es mich doch, ob und wieviele andere Benutzer das auch so sehen. Es ist nicht zu erwarten, dass wir in naher Zukunft mit solchen Links überschwemmt werden. --Ikiwaner (talk) 17:44, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Ich hätte "Schaden" in Anführungszeichen setzen sollen, natürlich ist ein solcher nicht entstanden. Gute QIs bekommen in der Regel auch nur eine Pro-Stimme, ein Indikator für potentielle FPs ist höchstens ein früher Zeitpunkt der Promotion und/oder ein sehr positiver Kommentar. Bei FP bin ich derzeit allerdings nicht sonderlich aktiv (mehr bei KEB in :de). Ich sehe QI und FP schon als recht unterschiedlich an, was die Zielsetzung betrifft. Viele Grüße, --Quartl (talk) 20:25, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gaivota - Portosín-5.jpg. Thanks--Lmbuga (talk) 15:48, 1 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Serengeti Impala3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Very nice. --Von.grzanka 13:35, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Etosha_panthera_leo.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Lion in natural environment. --Quartl 15:10, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

The image has been promoted to Featured picture The image File:Serengeti Topi5.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Serengeti Topi3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 20:59, 3 September 2010 (UTC)

ton image File:Balearica regulorum 1 Luc Viatour.jpg (answer)

Merci, en effet c'est bien mieux dans leur "vrai" environnement ;) --Luc Viatour (talk) 19:11, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion

Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Aquila rapax rapax (Tawny Eagle).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

review

•  Oppose This one is of much higher technical quality than the other one you mentioned, sadly, the branch blocks much of the bird. --The High Fin Sperm Whale 23:41, 28 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Comment I agree that the image would be better if we'd see more of the bird and I had nominated it for FP then. But according to the criteria a VI is the best available image of its type on Commons, not the best that can be conceived of. To distinguish the Tawny Eagle from other brown predators it's important to see at least one leg, the eye and the bill which is not the case in any other image. If there is another image you think is more valuable feel free to nominate it. --Ikiwaner (talk) 17:00, 29 August 2010 (UTC)
•  Support Best in scope. This one is also good but it only shows the upper half of the bird. --Quartl (talk) 08:01, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

I like that one too but besides a light overexposure it probably falls within another scope (A. r. vindhiana). --Ikiwaner (talk) 10:57, 30 August 2010 (UTC)

•  Support Best in scope. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 09:21, 31 August 2010 (UTC)

Result: 2 support, 1 oppose =>
promoted. Ikiwaner (talk) 20:30, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

The image has been promoted to Featured picture The image File:Serengeti Elefantenbulle.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Serengeti Elefantenbulle.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 04:58, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Lens

Hi, I was just wondering what lens you used for the Serengeti and Ngorongoro trips. --Muhammad (talk) 16:23, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Hi Muhammad, I bought a EF-S 55-200 before I first came to Africa. Unfortunately it suddenly stopped working shortly after landing in Namimbia last year. I had to shoot all my wildlife pictures with a standard zoom! So I thought I need a reliable and desert-proof lens for Tanzania and I got the EF 100-400 F 4.5-5.6L IS USM. BTW: The lens information is stored in the image metadata. Congratulations to your picture of the zebras in Ngorongoro. I was unlucky with zebras on my trip but had luck with other animals. --Ikiwaner (talk) 16:33, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

I could only see the 400mm in the metadata so was not sure. Anyway, the pictures are amazing. It seems my luck was with zebras and wildebeests only :-) Hope to see some north TZ pics soon --Muhammad (talk) 23:30, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the compliment from such an established photographer! --Ikiwaner (talk) 16:50, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

The image has been promoted to Featured picture The image File:Gaivota - Portosín-5.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Gaivota - Portosín-5.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 12:57, 7 September 2010 (UTC)

Salaam!

Mambo vipi? Nimeona michango yako kule katika Betawiki - and I was a bit surprised to see what you did! Si mbaya, kwa Tanzania wewe unaishi wapi? Si unajua sisi Wanawikipedia ni afadhali tukijuana since we are not so many in Tanzania. Cheers.--Muddyb Blast Producer (talk) 07:33, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

Boa! Nimekuandika pepe. --Ikiwaner (talk) 17:12, 8 September 2010 (UTC)

I've blogged about you and Siebrand on my blog: http://muddybtz.blog.com/ - please check it up.--Muddyb Blast Producer (talk) 05:59, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Tarangire_Marabu.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments  Support Great! -- Archaeodontosaurus 19:15, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

Your comment on my QI-candidate "Balearica pavonina"

Halli Ikiwaner,
many thanks you for your comments on my QI-candidate (nominated September 5), you're right, it is B. regulorum. I changed all descriptions and also the file name. Could you please rewiev it again? Many thanks. --Llez (talk) 06:15, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

Lieber Llez, vielen Dank, dass du dich um die Verbesserung deines Bildes gekümmert hast. Ich habe deine Änderungen schon gesehen, aber da ich gleichzeitig ein Bild zum gleichen Thema als FP-Kandidat habe, fände ich es nicht fair, abzustimmen. Ansonsten würde ich das Bild ablehnen, weil der weisse Teil am Kopf überbelichtet ist und darum die feinen Punkte verloren gehen. Bei Luc Viatours Bild aus demselben Park sieht man die sehr schön. Ich bedauere, dir keine bessere Antwort geben zu können. --Ikiwaner (talk) 11:46, 9 September 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

The image has been promoted to Featured picture The image File:NgoroNgoro Suedafrika-Kronenkranich.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:NgoroNgoro Suedafrika-Kronenkranich.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:02, 10 September 2010 (UTC)

Sherman QIC

Something is wrong with your review for the picture of the Sherman, the template broke down and I can't figure out why... Wolf (talk) 22:05, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

It looks like there is an error in the template. Let's the techies fix it. --Ikiwaner (talk) 12:26, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Serengeti_Loewin1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments The cut tail is a bummer. Lycaon 22:57, 11 September 2010 (UTC)  Support OK Lycaon, but QI for me--Lmbuga 23:37, 11 September 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

The image has been promoted to Featured picture The image File:Serengeti Bueffel1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Serengeti Bueffel1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:01, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

QI review

Salut Ikiwaner l'Africain !
Puis-je t'écrire en français ? C'est naturellement plus facile pour moi. Réponds moi dans la langue que tu préfères (Fr, en, ou de) si tu souhaites me répondre.
Merci de ton message.
merci surtout de tes magnifiques photos d'Afrique qui font rêver, même si j'ai des opinions qui me font parfois m'opposer à leur promotion. C'est le jeu !
Je ne suis pas sûr de devoir mettre le template "support" ou le template "oppose" dans le vote initial. Celà me parait évident, puisque j'ai créé un cadre jaune "Discuss" pour donner une opinion opposée à celle du au premier votant ("pro" pour le fifre, "contra" pour ta lionne). Est-ce la règle ? C'est difficile, parce que ça devient illisible dans la Consensual review qui suit. Comme les deux votes s'annulent, c'est comme s'il n'y en avait pas. Ou alors, il faut mettre les deux signes, dans la revue initiale, ce qui ne se fait pas jusqu'à présent.
Ce n'est pas un problème pour moi, je ferai ce qui sera décidé, mais pour l'instant la règle me paraît un peu floue.
Je veux bien discuter de ça avec les autres.
Bien cordialement à toi depuis Paris, --Jebulon (talk) 15:51, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Lieber Jebulon, danke deine Antwort, selbstverständlich lese ich deine Bemerkungen gerne auf Französisch. Ich hoffe, dass du meine Ablehung der Steinvase nicht personlich nimmst, aber wie du sagst: c'est le jeu!

Es gibt keine Vorschrift, dass man  Oppose oder  Support schreiben muss, aber es erleichtert es allen Leuten. Dein Argument, das Consensual Review würde unleserlich verstehe ich nicht, schau dir doch mal die Seite an, nachdem ich manuell die Tags gesetzt habe. Ich finde es jetzt leserlicher. Ja, am Besten setzt du auch ein  Oppose oder  Support beim ersten Review. Manchmal kommt es auch vor, dass jemand einen Kommentar abgibt, anschliessend jemand zustimmt und dann jemand ablehnt. In solchen Fällen wird es sehr schwierig, die Stimmen zu zählen, ohne die Templates. Liebe Grüsse nach Paris --Ikiwaner (talk) 17:30, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

• Hallo Ikiwafrikaner !

Kein problem für mich mit dem Steinvase natürlich. Ich weiss (und sehe) dass Du nie persönnlich sprichst
Ich verstehe was du sagst über erleichung, vielleicht bist Du richtig.
Je vais donc désormais mettre le petit signe  Support ou  Oppose dès le premier vote, de façon à le différencier du  Comment. Cela va-t'il faire double emploi avec les cadres bleus verts jaunes ou rouges ? On verra bien.
essayons.
Salut, sous l'orage parisien ce soir. --Jebulon (talk) 17:18, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Niederlauterbach 290.jpg

Hallo Ikiwaner Vielen Dank für deine Rückmeldung zu meinem Bild, das User:LuFiLa vorgeschlagen hat. Leider bin ich in Bildbearbeitung denkbar unerfahren und habe keine Ahnung, wie ich den Sensorstaub (wo ist der eigentlich?) entferne und die Perspektive entzerre. Gut, dass du deutsch kannst, dann ist es weniger kompliziert als auf Englisch -- Badener  06:41, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Hoi Badener, willkommen im Klub! Das Entzerren hat sich in den letzen Jahren für dokumentarische Architekturfotografie bei QI einbegürgert, warum die schiefen Häuser am Rand tolerieren, wenn es auch ohne geht? Den Staub habe ich eingezeichnet. Ihn zu entfernen geht mit verschiedenen Methoden, ich benutze meistens den Healing Brush in Photoshop. Gimp wird was analoges haben, wahrscheinlich auch die Canon-Software DPP. Die Perspektive entzerrst du am besten mit Hugin. Wie das geht steht in der Anleitung Architekturfotografie mit Hugin, noch eins hier. Meine persönlichen Tipps:

1. Bilder, in denen die Perspektive um mehr als 20° korrigiert werden muss, wirken schlecht. Suche in diesem Fall einen weiter entfernten Standpunkt. (Kein Problem in diesem Bild)
2. Überkorrigiere die Perspektive nicht, sondern reduziere den vom Optimierer gefundenen Nickwinkel um etwa 1.5°.

Viel Geduld beim Üben und Freude am Resultat. --Ikiwaner (talk) 10:38, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Serengeti_Bueffel2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Nice portrait, QI without doubt. Lycaon 15:49, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Zuerich Boerse.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments  Support technically satisfactory --Archaeodontosaurus 06:25, 16 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Makoko_shule_ya_lugha_aussen.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good. --Cayambe 20:39, 15 September 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

The image has been promoted to Featured picture The image File:Serengeti Thomson-Gazelle3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Serengeti Thomson-Gazelle3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 20:59, 18 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Sansibar Dhau1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Tilted (can be fixed), but unfortunately also unsharp (difficult to fix). Lycaon 15:28, 13 September 2010 (UTC) rotated 0.4° --Ikiwaner 19:40, 13 September 2010 (UTC) Too nice to oppose. Lycaon 07:07, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

The image has been promoted to Featured picture The image File:Serengeti Elefantenherde1.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Serengeti Elefantenherde1.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:00, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

File:Suricata suricatta 006.jpg

Hallo Ikiwaner, danke für Deinen Hinweis bei den Quality Images - Kandidaturen, ich habe mal beim Fotografen nachgefragt, der von der angestoßenen Kandidatur bislang gar nix wußte. Tut mir leid, ich hatte mich nur auf das Bild, weniger auf die Beschreibung konzentriert. Gruß, --4028mdk09 (talk) 18:40, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Gern geschehen, dafür sind QI-reviews da, denn viele Augen sehen mehr als zwei. --Ikiwaner (talk) 19:17, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

Information

Hello.

You can install it : {{Babel| |fr |en-1 |PH-3 |}} on your user page.

I have maked a link to your user page on my user page because I think you are a very good photographer. --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:37, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Salut Service en ligne d'ordinateur! Merci pour ton compliment merveilleux. Moi aussi j'apprécie tes photos. L'idée de créer un lien vers les autres artistes qu'on apprécies est bonne. Peut-être je commence quelque chose comme ca sur mon site personnel moi aussi. --Ikiwaner (talk) 12:38, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Serengeti_Loewin2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Serengeti_Suedliche_Gruenmeerkatze.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Very good. --Cayambe 14:54, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

The image has been promoted to Featured picture The image File:Lake Manyara Bartvogel.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Lake Manyara Bartvogel.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 20:59, 24 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Lake_Manyara_Diademmeerkatze2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Lake_Manyara_Diademmeerkatze1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good and interesting image. Alofok 18:31, 23 September 2010 (UTC)

New proposal about changing the rules of FPC

is here.Cheers.--Mbz1 (talk) 21:19, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Boat man.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Very impressive --George Chernilevsky 11:13, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Child worker.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Valuable and very good photograph. --A.Ceta 15:29, 27 September 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

The image has been promoted to Featured picture The image File:Serengeti Impala3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Serengeti Impala3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 5 October 2010 (UTC)

MOP

Hallo Ikiwaner, möchtest du dich nicht auch bei COM:MOP eintragen? Viele Grüße, --Quartl (talk) 08:19, 25 October 2010 (UTC)

Danke für den Hinweis, habe mich mit einiger Verspätung eingetragen. --Ikiwaner 13:18, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Besser spät als nie :-). Viele Grüße, --Quartl 17:40, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Zuerich Sunrise Tower 7.jpg

Hallo Ikiwaner, Glückwunsch zu obigem Foto. Mit welchem Objektiv wurde es aufgenommen? Gruß --Hedwig Storch (talk) 11:29, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

Danke für den Glückwunsch. Das Foto ist aus zwei überlappenden Aufnahmen zusammengesetzt. Es wurde mit dem Canon EF-S 17-55 aufgenommen. Das Objektiv ist optisch absolut Spitzenklasse, mechanisch gut. --Ikiwaner (talk) 12:20, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Winterthur_Stadthaus.jpg

Hallo Ikiwaner,

Wir (Orell Füssli Kartographie AG, Zürich) möchten gerne Ihr wunderschönes Photo für den Titel des neuen Stadtplanes von Winterthur benutzen. Gehts das und was müssten wir dazu schreiben? Danke! Hausibek (talk) 09:57, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

Ihr Interesse freut mich! Das Bild steht unter anderem unter der CC-By-SA 3.0 Lizenz zur Verfügung. Bei einem gedruckten Plan müsste also in der Nähe des Bildes (im Bild, neben dem Bild oder rückseitig) stehen «Foto: Ikiwaner, Lizenz: CC-by-SA 3.0». Wichtig ist die Erwähnung des Pseudonyms und der Lizenz. Kosten fallen keine an. Wenn Sie irgendwo auf dem Plan schreiben möchten: «Alle Rechte vorbehalten», dann wäre es nett, dies zu ergänzen mit: … «sofern nicht anders angegeben». Denn Das Bild darf weiterkopiert werden. Freundliche Weihnachtsgrüsse, -- Ikiwaner (talk) 12:14, 25 December 2010 (UTC)

* * * :) * * *

Ich wünsche Dir fröhliche Weihnachtsfeiertage und alles Gute und ganz best im Neuen Jahr!
--George Chernilevsky ^talk 12:30, 24 December 2010 (UTC)

Techtalk

Hallo Ikiwaner. Ich habe dir nun [etwas verspätet :-)] auf meiner Diskussionsseite geantwortet. Beste Grüße   • Richard • [®] • 12:00, 24 March 2011 (UTC)

Photo permission request

Hello Ikiwaner,

I'm putting together an article for a scientific journal, and would love to use one of your photos of African buffalo (Syncerus caffer). If you're willing to discuss its use, I'd love to hear from you!

Cheers, Max. maxwell.b.joseph@colorado.edu

answered through email --Ikiwaner 12:10, 30 April 2011 (UTC)

Autonummer auf Foto

Sollte File:Zuerich_Hochhaus_SIA_fern.jpg nicht noch etwas nachbearbeitet werden - Nummernschild, Gesichter der Personen? -- 84.75.128.136 18:18, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Siehe hier. --Leyo 21:56, 12 May 2011 (UTC)

Aber wie es dort heisst ist die Situation hier in der Schweiz anders und auch im Kanton Zürich gibt es eine Autoindex, der online abrufbar ist. Ist da nicht Vorsicht geboten? -- Badener  12:43, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

Als Architekturfotograf hätte ich es ja bevorzugt, wenn ein Foto ohne hässliche Autoschlangen an diesem Abend möglich gewesen wäre. War es aber nicht. Ich bin gegen den Zeitgeist, ohne triftige Argumente immer neue Dinge verbieten zu wollen. Und meines Wissens ist das Fotografieren in der Stadt ohne Verpixelung zum Glück noch nicht verboten. --Ikiwaner (talk) 11:21, 20 May 2011 (UTC)

File:Etosha elefant.jpg in voller Auflösung

Hallo Ikiwaner,

eine gute Freundin von mir, die ein großer Elefanten-Fan ist ist auf dein Bild "Etosha elefant" gestoßen und würde es gerne als Poster für ihr Zimmer drucken lassen. Die Auflösung des Bildes hier auf Wikimedia ist ja sicher nicht die volle, die EOS 40D hat ja 10 Mega Pixel. Wäre es möglich, dass du mir das Bild für diesen Zweck in voller Auflösung zukommen lässt? Das wäre total genial. wikimedia@23r.de Viele Grüße Rüdiger

Lieber Rüdiger, schön, dass dir mein Bild gefällt. Besagtes Bild ist etwas beschnitten, da mit einem Weitwinkelobjektiv fotografiert. Daher gibt es keine höher aufgelöste Version. Du kannst aber beruhigt sein, es wird auch so ein schönes Poster, solange du es nicht ausschliesslich aus 10cm Entfernung beobachtest. LG, --Ikiwaner (talk) 11:24, 11 July 2011 (UTC)

Request

Hallo Ikiwaner, I am in the process of publishing a book on the history of Ornithology on a “print on demand” basis. I found your amazing photo of the Blue Wildebeest and would like to include it in my book. I wondered if you would allow me to do so free of charge. I will include a clear attribution to you in the book, and gladly let you have a complimentary copy of the book. Thank you. Tian Hattingh.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Helsingor_Kronborg.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments QI for me -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 12:58, 27 September 2011 (UTC)

http://de.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Datei:Rothenthurm_Gemeindehaus.jpg&filetimestamp=20070714064416

Guten Tag

Bei diesem Bild handelt es sich nicht um das Gemeindehaus von Rothenthurm, sondern um den Pfarrhof.

Das ist das Gemeindehaus: http://www.rothenthurm.ch/Standorte.191.0.html

Wollen Sie dies auf Wikipedia korrigieren?

Freundliche Grüsse

pam.

HNY

--Nevit Dilmen (talk) 13:54, 27 December 2011 (UTC)