User talk:Irate/Archive 1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Cheeky picture request

Hi - I've enjoyed your Liverpool pics. My great great grandfather lived at 18 Beech Street in the 1870s. If you happen to pass by Beech Street (as you've done in the past) I'd be very grateful if you could look to see if it's one of the older houses that still survive. I've tried with Google streetview but am having trouble seeing house numbers on the even side. If it is there, a picture would be ever so gratefully received! 81.132.250.204 22:55, 21 January 2010 (UTC)

I had a look today and there is no number 18 still in existance. However the even side of the street is devided into a number of indvidually numbered terraces. Elm Terrace, Beech Terrace and Oak Terrace. I'll take some photographs of the evenside some time and upload them. They should appear in Category:Kensington, Liverpool there are already some phptographs of buildings on beech street there.--JIrate (talk) 16:38, 22 January 2010 (UTC)


File:Scotscouncilgit2.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Scotscouncilgit2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Snigbrook (talk) 21:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

File:Mat of Liverpool City Council.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mat of Liverpool City Council.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Snigbrook (talk) 21:02, 5 February 2010 (UTC)

Hi

Thanks for your response. Sorry i dont mean to be thick but i didnt understand what you meant or it didnt answer my query. Anyhow i will just learn slowly. Scottierd (talk) 12:16, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

I am new to Wikimedia but i did take pictures of the Belle Vale area a couple of years ago, have you any advice on how to upload them? I am also interested in the Geograph.org site - same applies.

Scottierd (talk) 12:18, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

West Derby Cemetery

OK - So I noticed you removed my edit of adding Croxteth to this page. Why? It is in the Croxteth area and it makes the photo have a wider audience - so to speak - if it is linked to that area ? Certainly if you look at the Croxteth page it would have a sub category for West Derby Cemetery aswell as Croxteth Park, which makes sense, is that a problem? I realise you may be the owner of the photos and I dont mean to step out of line. Scottierd (talk) 12:27, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I think i have crossed wires here..I think your last reply was with the file for the Good Shepherd Church, which has been written as 'Good Shepherd West Derby'...when it is in Croxteth. No matter, as you say there is a Croxteth link and i will scrub the file that is effectively redundant. Scottierd (talk) 13:52, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

West Derby Cemetery

You done it again, but i seem to be making the mistake not you..West Derby Cem does have a croxteth link i did not see that. Scottierd (talk) 14:43, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for the response, West Derby Cem is Croxteth although it is often recorded as Norris Green, although no official boundary exist (as in the rest of the city) it is usually Lower House Lane dividing Croxteth and Norris Green and the East Lancs divides Croxteth and Fazakerley. I grew up around there i know the area quite well.

As for your other info / request, i am new i really dont know what it was you were talking about. For your info i am just curious about Wikimedia.Scottierd (talk) 16:19, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

I agree i wont get bogged down over names of files (thats up to the owner of the pic) but i will keep an active interest. I do understand about defining areas for Wikimedia - although most districts can be identified. Scottierd (talk) 16:34, 17 February 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Typhoon Prototype at Farn.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Typhoon Prototype at Farn.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--High Contrast (talk) 17:39, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for helping this fast. Greets, High Contrast (talk) 18:21, 2 March 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Irate!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:41, 8 March 2010 (UTC)

 

Image:Merseyside Police at Crash June 19 2010 (2).jpg

Hello Irate!

Is this file your own work? Are you the photographer/author of this file? If yes, please insert {{own}} as source instead of "Irate". So it is clear for anyone that you are the photographer of the image. According to Commons rules this fact must be clearly constituted.

Thanks in advance. Regards, High Contrast (talk) 16:50, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

I answered you on my talk page. --High Contrast (talk) 17:09, 19 June 2010 (UTC)

Abbatoirs

Hello Irate, I've renamed your file File:Stanley Abattoir Liverpool.jpg as asked, but I've noticed that its category seems mispelled too (Category:Abbatoirs in the UK) ; FYI, a Category:Slaughterhouses in the United Kingdom exists too. --Myrabella (talk) 13:01, 4 July 2010 (UTC)

You're welcome. The spelling "Abbatoirs" made me think of the Swedish pop music group ABBA, it's why I've noticed it (a rather silly reason indeed ;-) --Myrabella (talk) 13:49, 4 July 2010 (UTC)


Railway Junction Diagrams

There is a deletion debate concerning the Railway Junction Diagrams, Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Railways Junctions Diagram 1914

Perhaps as the up-loader you would like to comment? Sfan00 IMG (talk) 01:16, 28 August 2010 (UTC)


Railway Junction Diagrams

Any word back from your enquiries?

Also I was going to suggest you ask Ian Allen (the publisher) directly as to the absence of a copyright note in the front of the book (suggest checking the cover as well). Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:27, 4 September 2010 (UTC)


Railway Junction Diagrams

OK, Things are progressing. Hoepfully, you can establish an open-minded dialouge.

The thought was that rather than having the items as PD, it would be better to have them as some form of CC-BY-SA so that BRB(Residuary) gets appropriate crediting as the rights holder, ( I think this was done in respect of the material donated by the Bundesarkiv), and that downstream users credit them as well, whilst still being able to make use of the diagrams (and data within them.), The form of attribution wording I'd considered putting in an FUR if needed was as follows. ("This image contains material originally developed by the Railway Clearing House in the United Kingdom. As far as can be determined this material may be (C)BRB(Residuary) Ltd..") , which subject to negotiation, could be amended to a CC-BY-SA type form :).

If they are open-minded, then there is considerable material generated by the Railway Clearing House, the British Transport Comission that could be opened up for Commons/Wikisource, (without even considering material generated by railway companies themselves.)

My initial notes on this were that the key works Commons/Wikisource should clarify the status on with a view to inclusion (on Commons/Wikisource were:-

*1904 Rail Atlas of Great Britan (Railway Clearing House)
*1914 Railway Junction Diagrams ( including a contemporary index if it existed)
*1912 Railway Station Handbook for Great Britain ( There may also be later versions)

That said, once there is an open-dialouge, I would hope it's a two-way process :) Sfan00 IMG (talk) 15:44, 4 September 2010 (UTC)

Railway Junction Diagrams

Any progress? , Hadn't heard anything for a while. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 18:04, 12 September 2010 (UTC)

images with dates on

I noticed you have created a run of months of images in Liverpool within the 2010's. Is there any reason for that is it a new category ? It just seems to overcomplicate things with all manor of images. Is there any reason for the dating ? I just noticed it and didnt get it, if it was say Christmas or Beatles festival or Pope visit then yeah but this is entirely indiscriminate. I just wonder if it is needed. Scottierd (talk) 14:20, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

I see no problem. It just seems to me a load of indiscriminate images based on the month. The streets of Liverpool is also questionable (in my opinion) cos youll end up with hundreds of "Streets of Liverpool" rather than just primary and semi important roads. Which is why i've been adding the local districts. Scottierd (talk) 15:27, 13 September 2010 (UTC)
Im not clued up on 'policies' that is not my issue. I think you totally miss my point. Not to worry. Scottierd (talk) 15:38, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Stanley Dock images

Okey doke. There is a page for Canalside Park, but i dont know which if any of the images are within Canalside Park. If you know (if you took the images youll know better than me) add them to that page. Scottierd (talk) 14:12, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Template:Coor_dms2dec

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Template:Coor_dms2dec has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

:| TelCoNaSpVe :| 12:19, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:UndergroundInfrastructure.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:UndergroundInfrastructure.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:UndergroundInfrastructure.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 16:33, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:MerseyRailway.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:MerseyRailway.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:MerseyRailway.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 16:33, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:MerseyrailUnderground.jpg

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:MerseyrailUnderground.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:MerseyrailUnderground.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

LX (talk, contribs) 16:33, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:FutureMerseyrail.jpg

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:FutureMerseyrail.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:FutureMerseyrail.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

LX (talk, contribs) 16:33, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

The permission quoted on the file description page is a {{wikipediaonly}} permission and does not mention the Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 license. Please obtain an appropriate permission statement and send it to OTRS. LX (talk, contribs) 16:35, 8 May 2011 (UTC)

Category:Liverpool_in_2009

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Liverpool_in_2009 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Sweetie candykim (talk) 00:10, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

Category:Liverpool_in_2011

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Liverpool_in_2011 has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Sweetie candykim (talk) 00:19, 7 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Erbele STreet sign, Liverpool 9 June 2012.JPG

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:18, 9 June 2012 (UTC)


File:Erbele STreet, Liverpool 9 June 2012.JPG

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:21, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

File:Garlands Erbele STreet, Liverpool 9 June 2012.JPG

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 15:22, 9 June 2012 (UTC)

AWB

You can now use AWB on Commons. INeverCry 18:52, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Ta--JIrate (talk) 18:55, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Lodge Lane Rgeneration Zone Sign.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lodge Lane Rgeneration Zone Sign.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rodhullandemu (talk) 01:07, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

{{self}}

Thats not a template for use in the source field. For the source field please use {{own}}. --Martin H. (talk) 21:32, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

2000 presses of the return button later. Done.--JIrate (talk) 23:23, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
You could have asked a bot to do it! But never mind. Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:36, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Which BOT does that? I used AWB, I could do it and read at the same time.--JIrate (talk) 00:14, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

FYI

I've been going around lately snapping listed buildings; I think it's the time to split the categories we have here by postcode, as Wikipedia itself does (to avoid bloat)- although sadly, it seems that nobody is maintaining the list articles there, Daveissimo seems to have given up editing over a year ago. Your comments welcome. Cheers. Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:13, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Too be onest I think it can wait till they have all been done. I wasn't that happy with the Wikipedia split up. In the mean time our time might be better spent working out which in the list have not been done. The problem with the wikilist as it is now is it bears no relationship to the councils list.--JIrate (talk) 23:26, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
Well OK. If my printer still worked, I'd print off the WP lists, cross-check them against the council list and English Heritage (there are some duplicates both within and between the WP lists) and identify those for which photos are needed. I've planned a trip to St Michael's hamlet to cover those missing, but I'm not going to do it while the weather is this crap. Rodhullandemu (talk) 23:34, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
I'd do it via a spread sheet. If you have a look at an old version it might be easier to get an import going. I produced that with some C++ which I now cannot find parsed the whole thing, might be around somewhere in the notes. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Listed_buildings_in_Liverpool&oldid=332669964 . I just a little busy with 2 OU TMAs to finish and 3 exams next month.----JIrate (talk) 00:12, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

File:Wavertree Sign.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wavertree Sign.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

-mattbuck (Talk) 00:12, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

File:O'Neills Pub 1 Guiness Sign.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:O'Neills Pub 1 Guiness Sign.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Dcoetzee (talk) 23:31, 10 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Sefton Park 20112009 (10).jpg

Pay attention to copyright
File:Sefton Park 20112009 (10).jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Rodhullandemu (talk) 15:09, 3 April 2013 (UTC)

Reversals

Can i ask why you are reversing my edits on the category for districts? What you fail to realise is the area around the Black Bull is known as Aintree. Including Long Lane. The problem is it is in Liverpool boundaries so the council say it is under Walton, but this is not Walton. Plus i not you write Warbreck, there is no such place. This is only a name of a council ward. It is a quandary as the area isn't in Sefton but still recognised as Aintree EXCEPT for the city council who plonked a WALTON district sign. Babydoll0409 (talk) 23:00, 10 April 2013 (UTC)

It is know as Aintree to you but I can find no evidence that anyone else agrees with you and as far as Wikipedia is concerned what the Ordinance Survey say's is what goes. BTW I was born in Walton and grew up in Maghull. The oldest part of Aintree is around Bull Bridge Lane. As for the council just plonking a sign down, that is simple rubbish the border is defined by HMG. See http://www.ordnancesurvey.co.uk/oswebsite/opendata/viewer/ with the correct boundary layer selected. 23:16, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
Respectfully i disagree. I have not and do not question the boundaries, as they are easily identified. What i do question is this neck of the woods is known as Aintree ie Long Lane (which isn't part of this i know). You can say Walton as it is in the city boundaries, but it isn't clear cut. By the way i do also disagree with the signage as the council have many district signs in the wrong places. Babydoll0409 (talk) 12:21, 11 April 2013 (UTC)

File:Aintree Dogs in Trim, Walton, Liverpool.JPG

Hi again,

Please can you see User talk:Rept0n1x#Aintree / Walton. Thanks,

Rept0n1x (talk) 07:21, 11 April 2013 (UTC)