User talk:Itu

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Folder.svg
This user thinks categories are awful.
--> * Proposal for fast_tagging *


Bullshit.svg This user has a low tolerance for bullshit.


Tools:

This is both wrong way! Cropping has to be handled just like scaling for use in articles

useful things:

  • {{subst:nsd}} (no/missing source, tagged by date)
  • {{subst:nld}} (no/incomplete licensing information, tagged by date)
  • {{subst:npd}} (no/missing permission, tagged by date)
  • {{subst:dw-nsd}} (derivative work, no/missing original source, tagged by date)


{{PD-ineligible}}
{{PD-Art|PD-old-100}}
{{PD-1923}}

{{PD-Canada}}









Ideas[edit]

  • create ascii-filenames for every file, at least as Redir. Iron out Non-asciis in latin sequences. For non-ascii sequences, at least a hexcode(without %'s), maybe better a senseful, maybe automatic translation. Collisions treated with sequence appending.


Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Itu!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- Cirt (talk) 13:28, 17 May 2010 (UTC)


Hi Cirt & thank you for your welcome Bye.gif. Additional Thanks for that useful Info-Boxes, i hope i will find time to read. regards. --Itu (talk) 13:49, 17 May 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Itu!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:44, 19 June 2010 (UTC)


Dear CategorizationBot. Could you please check for the images when they became categorized and remove them or strike them out in the list above? :/ Be intelligent! --Itu (talk) 19:58, 7 August 2010 (UTC)


File:Loveparade-zugang.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Loveparade-zugang.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--rtc (talk) 20:28, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Ok. I've seen. --Itu (talk) 12:22, 27 July 2010 (UTC)

File:P1390390a.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 22:19, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

\o/ Whats that? There is no more content under this name and then there is a demand for license? The moved File does have sufficient licence info. --Itu (talk) 22:40, 29 August 2010 (UTC)

Species Filenames - my Policy[edit]

Maybe someone will read this:
My 'policy' regarding species is to use something like original filename(numbers) until there is a clear determination. Myself, i'm not an expert. Then, i personally would appreciate to keep the old filename (as the redirect) after renaming.
Beside of all that there really should be a bot that ASAP fixes all links after the renaming. --Itu (talk) 22:34, 29 August 2010 (UTC) edited --Itu (talk) 16:07, 21 September 2010 (UTC)

TUSC token 593d93fcdf9b5b154e859a1477f13c59[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

File:Itu09.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Itu09.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

– Adrignola talk 16:24, 3 March 2011 (UTC)

A bit late... --Itu (talk) 12:56, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Junge_Zeit_kritisiert_WP_Juni_2011.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Junge_Zeit_kritisiert_WP_Juni_2011.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Saibo (Δ) 05:19, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Re: Gaga-monster-ball-uk-speechless.jpg[edit]

Hi Itu, ja, ich hab es zu der Zeit am vollständigen Bild gesehen, aber jetzt ist die Lizenz dafür geändert worden und wir können das Bild nicht mehr hochladen - sich auf eine damalige Lizenz für ein Werk zu berufen, das so hier noch nicht hochgeladen war, von dem nur eine Ableitung legal existiert, und dem jetzt hinreichende Lizenzierung enzogen wurde, ist trotz des Nichtzurücknehmenkönnens problematisch. Wir haben es halt zu dem Zeitpunkt nicht getan, deshalb ist es jetzt zu spät. Beste Grüße Hekerui (talk) 20:42, 5 January 2012 (UTC)

Location?[edit]

Hi Itu - do you have a photo location for File:Delichon urbica by itu.jpg please? Danke! - MPF (talk) 11:59, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Middle-germany should be sufficient, i think. --Itu (talk) 15:48, 2 August 2012 (UTC)
Thanks! - MPF (talk) 23:08, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

May I ask…[edit]

…the reason for this edit ? Jean-Fred (talk) 20:08, 20 September 2012 (UTC)

I think a personality rights [warning] makes no sense for people who a very prominent (at least if they were not got naked in their own bathroom or something in that way). So, given one of the most popular,wellknown public people, this looked to me like pure nonsense. --Itu (talk) 20:29, 20 September 2012 (UTC)edit:+'warning' --Itu (talk) 20:08, 20 October 2012 (UTC)

Danke[edit]

hierfür. --4028mdk09 (talk) 03:54, 7 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Black-beaked-sea-bird-close-up.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:18, 11 December 2012 (UTC)

File tagging File:Wetten dass neu.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wetten dass neu.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Wetten dass neu.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Polarlys (talk) 21:27, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

Die Erlaubnis ist ja angegeben. Seit user:Mabdul vor einiger Zeit energisch alle Logos speziell von wikinews nach commons verschoben hat und scheinbar nicht auf Widerstand stiess, neige ich seinem Beispiel zu folgen. --Itu (talk) 23:12, 12 December 2012 (UTC)
Ja, ich "bewege" "einfache" und "copyrighted" Bilder/Logos nach Commons, aber nur wenn sie nur aus Text bestehen und/oder sie sehr einfach sind. Dieses Bild ist eindeutig nicht einfach, da es a) 3D-Effekte beinhaltet und b) Licht Effekte hat. Das rechtfertigt nicht, dass dieses Bild auf Commons ist. Siehe auch Commons:TOO. Gruß, mabdul 15:32, 15 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Wetten dass neu.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Wetten dass neu.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Polarlys (talk) 23:31, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

File:Twitter bird logo 2012.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Twitter bird logo 2012.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Fry1989 eh? 21:50, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

So what? Not even simple Logos are allowed? --Itu (talk) 23:36, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

File:Melek taus.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Melek taus.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gumruch (talk) 18:49, 11 February 2013 (UTC)

I ask for a 3rd opinion, or someone to explain[edit]

here Penyulap 22:12, 20 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Gekaufte Artikel Nein Danke.svg[edit]

Pay attention to licensing

File concerned:
Gekaufte Artikel Nein Danke.svg

Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content : images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose.

File:Gekaufte Artikel Nein Danke.svg seems to be free (or it would be proposed for deletion), but it was identified as having a wrong license. Usually, it is because a public domain image is tagged with a free license, or because the stated source or other information is not sufficient to prove the selected tag is correct. Please verify that you applied the correct license tag for this file.

If you believe this file has the correct license, please explain why on the file description page.


Deutsch | English | español | français | polski | svenska | +/−

Stefan4 (talk) 23:20, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Upload gleicher Name[edit]

Siehe bitte Commons:Forum#Upload_gleicher_Name - ich habe dasselbe Problem, und habe deshalb einen Bug auf Bugzilla gemeldet. --Slashme (talk) 19:46, 31 March 2013 (UTC)

Danke. --Itu (talk) 21:19, 31 March 2013 (UTC)
Können sie vielleicht für den Bug "wahlen"? Das kann man hier machen. Danke! --Slashme (talk) 15:44, 9 April 2013 (UTC)
Hm? Wie wählen? werden dort Stimmen gesammelt? Ich müsste dort wohl erst einen Account anlegen... --Itu (talk) 22:12, 9 April 2013 (UTC)

Agencia Brasil[edit]

Done. Thanks for the advie =) --Wiki erudito (talk) 19:40, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi, please do it for all the other pics similar! --Itu (talk) 20:53, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Uk.gif[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Uk.gif has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Gbawden (talk) 09:59, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Horst Arnold[edit]

Hallo, ich würde o. g. Kategorie ernsthaft umbenennen, und zwar in (Englisch) Category:Judicial error about Horst Arnold. Einspruch? |FDMS (WP: en, de) 20:44, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Hm, Begeisterung löst das erstmal nicht bei mir aus, ich halte auch die entsprechende Umbenennung des deWP-Artikels für Käse. Ausserhalb des deutschsprachigen Raums gibt es für den Fall auch nahezu keinerlei Rezeption. Und im Kern ist Category:Horst Arnold das sprachneutralste Label. Und damit sicher das Beste im moment. --Itu (talk) 21:10, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Sprachneutral ja, aber auch falsch, da viele Bilder die Person gar nicht zeigen. Außerdem müssen Commons-Kategorien grundsätzlich immer Englisch sein, solange es den "Begriff" (damit ist wohl Justizirrtum gemeint) im Englischen gibt. Es muss nicht dieser besondere Vorschlag sein, allerdings dürfen wenn der Name aus der Person besteht (Klammerkategorie) dann auch nur Bilder, die die Person zeigen, in der Kategorie zu finden sein. |FDMS (WP: en, de) 21:16, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Bei einem Bild verwendest du in der Beschreibung case Horst Arnold, das wäre mir z. B. auch recht. |FDMS (WP: en, de) 21:19, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Hm, wenn du denn meinst. Weiterleitungen sind wohl nicht vorgesehen für Kategorien!? --Itu (talk) 21:41, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Was meine ich denn nun – du hast die Wahl, Judicial error oder case? Ich glaube, dass Weiterleitungen sehr wohl möglich sind, muss mich dazu (vor der manuellen Umbenennung) aber noch informieren. |FDMS (WP: en, de) 21:44, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Template:Category redirect
'Judicial error about' wär grauslich. 'case' ist akzeptabel. --Itu (talk) 22:05, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Passt, mach ich, danke. |FDMS (WP: en, de) 22:06, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Und lassen wir den Redirect besser weg, es gibt ja noch mehr Horst Arnolds. --Itu (talk) 22:09, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Alles erledigt, {{speedydelete}} muss nur noch bearbeitet werden. |FDMS (WP: en, de) 22:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC)
Category:Case Horst Arnold

File:Blah blah.gif[edit]

Hallo Itu. Hast du die durch deinen Edit erzeugte Fehlermeldung nicht gesehen? Bitte korrigiere dies. --Leyo 17:11, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Hallo Leyo. Ja, das habe ich gesehen. Es ist hier das Gleiche wie mit vielen anderen Edits von mir, die - notgedrungen - in der Regel gelb unterlegte Fehl-Meldungen hinterlassen. Generell steht all das in dem Kontext, der leicht ironisch auf meiner Benutzerseite dargelegt ist...
In diesen Fall ist es so dass die Bildbeschreibung "Derived from File:Pffffft.gif" lautete und normal hätte ich die als ins Description-Feld geschoben. Nur wenn ich mir File:Pffffft.gif anschaue verstehe ich nicht wie Blah blah.gif aus Pffffft.gif gemacht sein soll.
Aber egal: eine Bildbeschreibung ist das so oder so nicht. Die hat einfach gefehlt.
Genau wie bei den idR viel wichtigeren fahlgelben Mangelhinweisen in den urheberrechtlich bedeutsamen Feldern, ist es schlicht am Autor diese korrekt zu befüllen. Nicht dass ich z.B. das nicht leisten wollte, ich kann idR es einfach nicht.
Und auch der Beschreibungstext hier wäre eigentlich Sache des Autors. Ich hab mir jetzt um deinem Hinweis gerecht zu werden mal eine hochobjektive Beschreibung aus den Fingern gesaugt.
Grundsätzlich sollte es anders laufen: Wenn nach dem Aufräumen gelbe oder auch rote Mangelhinweise entstehen (und sie entstehen berechtigt!) dann sollte ein Bot den Einsteller auf seiner Disk auf eine unbedingt verständliche und erklärende Weise ansprechen und nachdrücklich aber sanft um Ergänzung, jedenfalls der unabdingbar wichtigen Informationen bitten. Damit werden wir nicht alle Datei(seit)en in einen akzeptablen Zustand bringen, aber vielleicht 50% - und das wäre schon gewaltig in absoluter Arbeit betrachtet.
Sorry für die längliche Antwort aus dem scheinbar nichtigen Anlass. Vielleicht wolltest du das jetzt gar nicht so hören. Aber es muss so oder so mal gesagt werden.
Gruss. --Itu (talk) 18:02, 24 January 2014 (UTC)
Grundsätzlich finde ich deine Idee mit der Bot-Benachrichtigung nicht schlecht. In der en-WP gibt es solche Bots bereits. Allerdings gibt es auf Commons das Problem, dass man teilweise benachrichtigt werden könnte, auch wenn man den Fehler gar nicht verursacht hat. Bei diesen Edits sind beispielsweise die meisten korrekt. Trotzdem gelangen die Dateien teilweise erst durch sie in die Wartungskategorie, da die Dateibeschreibungsseiten neu gerendert werden. --Leyo 18:07, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

A kitten for you![edit]

Kitten-stare.jpg

... das all deine Kribelkrabelinsekten aufschleckt :P

Kritzolina (talk) 12:59, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Black-box-finder WEB.svg[edit]

Hallo [User:Itu|Itu], das ist ein sehr schönes Bild. Willst Du nicht auch eine deutschsprachige Version erzeugen ?

Grüße --Furfur (talk) 12:56, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Ich hab es ja nicht selber gemacht. Und für mich ist das so schonmal gut. Aber ich halte niemand von einer Übersetzung ab ;) --Itu (talk) 23:07, 31 March 2014 (UTC)
Danke. Ich hätte das auch nur gekonnt wenn der Text im Quellfile gestanden wäre. --Itu (talk) 02:40, 4 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Black-box-finder WEB.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Black-box-finder WEB.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Brian Dell (talk) 18:10, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

Move of 140324-N-ZZ999-002[edit]

Hi Itu, I have uploaded over 40,000 photographs from the Department of Defense and the unique key that I keep in the filename is the VIRIN. You have removed this in your renaming of this file. Not having the VIRIN in the filename makes it far more likely that we will have non-identical duplicate uploads in the future. As a consequence, this may have failed properly to comply with Commons:File renaming.

Could you please fix this by renaming to include the VIRIN and make it clear in the name that "Navy" means the U.S. Navy? -- (talk) 14:51, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

The old "Filename" is kept as redirect, so this should prevent the non(?)-identical duplicate uploads as before
Preventing kinds of duplicate upload, especially bit-identical ones is simple job of the system(If that fails this is a big fail).
Having that Virgin number in the file name would be ok. But i think it's not possible to make a second redirect, not beeing sysop. Now the description has "VIRIN: 140324-N-ZZ999-002". Even this should be sufficient for databaseworking/-controlling.
Maybe the Rules will not explicitly allow my action, but my pure common sense states that a filename should never be confused or abused for description. There is a description field in the information box, you know? --Itu (talk) 15:14, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Yes, I'm aware how it works, I have made a lot of uploads. The DoD has a particular problem with non-identical duplicates as they change their EXIF data for the same photograph depending on where they release it to, and they release these photographs on several sites including Flickr. This means that the Wikimedia Commons SHA-1 checks on the file do not work in order to detect duplicates. Using the filename to check for potential duplicates is far more reliable when using the in-Commons search engine or if we create alternative checks as we can then use a much smaller dump of metadata from Commons rather than a full dump. Please correct this filename so that it harmonizes with the vast majority of other files we host from this source, including the 40,000 uploads I have made using this community accepted standard filenaming pattern. Harmonization, and complying with existing practices of batch upload projects, are basic norms that the file renaming official guideline includes. -- (talk) 15:45, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
I would like to insist that a Filename is just a designator and not full-text-description, even if if that is accepted hundredthousand times before and not explicitly prohibited by the rules. This should be stopped, regardless how often it was done before.
Someone may turn back my renaming. As long as File:Navy Towed Pinger Locator.jpg is kept, i will not complain.
As long as something like File:Towed Pinger Locator VIRIN_140324-N-ZZ999-002.jpg is kept, i will not complain, too. --Itu (talk) 16:20, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
Technically you should be able to move files same as i can do. Afaik it's not possible or at least not recommended to create more then one redirect(having more then 2 filenames) --Itu (talk) 16:20, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
You are using a special template {{milim - why not create and use a field virin=  ? That would be far more professionel than using the filename. Filename is not intended for database-keys, too. --Itu (talk) 16:25, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
  1. I have never suggested that filenames are full description, in fact I have not objected to shortening the name.
  2. My batch upload projects do not simply use "full-text-descriptions". However if you think that I must be stopped after I have successfully uploading over 260,000 photographs to this project, please raise a request on COM:AN/U.
  3. I am not interested in move-warring with you. You have failed to fully comply with the official guidelines, this makes the onerous duty of tidying up after yourself, yours to handle rather than mine.
  4. The template does have "virin=". I have already explained how burying this information in the image page decreases the probability of identifying duplicates for future uploaders.
-- (talk) 16:33, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Bittner[edit]

Woher hast Du diese Information? Heinz-Josef Lücking (talk) 19:27, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

Da > rechts unterm Bild. mfg. --Itu (talk) 20:38, 4 June 2014 (UTC)

File:MH17-Route 13z15.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:MH17-Route 13z15.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kopiersperre (talk) 15:33, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

Schabe[edit]

Hallo itu,

Bezüglich dieses Schabenbild: Kannst Du zwecks möglicher Bestimmung noch nachreichen wann und wo die Schabe abgelichtet wurde? Und hättest Du u.U. noch ein Bild derselben wo etwas mehr des Kopfes zu sehen ist? Danke schonmal Pudding4brains (talk) 16:44, 26 July 2014 (UTC)

Nachtrag: Soeben hier gefunden. Fund"ort" Rhein-Neckar, Deutschland. DD 2011-08-24.
Damit wird es wohl ein Weibl Planuncus tingitanus s.l. sein, die war ja schon plusminus seit 2007 in Süddeutschland unterwegs.
Ein weiteres Foto des Kopfes wäre aber trotzdem nicht schlecht zur Absicherung
Pudding4brains (talk) 16:51, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi. Schön dass jemand meine Viecher anschaut und bestimmt. Direkt von vorne hab ich kein Bild. Hilft das hier?
Wenn du Lust hast evt. weitere Bilder zu drehen und auszuschneiden könnt ich dir die roh zukommen lassen. gruss. --Itu (talk) 08:33, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Oh, Treffer? "aufsehenerregende Entdeckung" !? --
Aha. Grosse Unbestimmtheit. --
Zeitungsartikel, ~Genbestimmung. --
dpa vom 01.06.2014 (via focus)
........... etc. --Itu (talk) 09:55, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
PS: Bin auch im chat erreichbar --Itu (talk) 16:38, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Hi itu,
Jo, das Geschreibe auf observation.org war meins ;o) Wenn Du mir die Bilder schicken könntest würde ich gerne sehen was ich da noch rauskitzeln kann. Das einfachste Merkmal gegenüber vergleichbare Arten (pallidus/vittiventris) ist die Färbung am Hinterkopf zwisschen den Augen, aber vieleicht finde ich so ja auch noch was. Die RAWs, oder Link nach wetransfer oder sontwas, können dann an:
pudding4brains ÄT gmail PUNKT com
Danke schonmal :o) Pudding4brains (talk) 22:35, 27 July 2014 (UTC)
Ich hoffe das ist dieselbe mailadresse wie unter "Email this user" , an letztere hab ich das jetzt mal geschickt. gruss. --Itu (talk) 15:22, 28 July 2014 (UTC)