User talk:JMCC1

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Image:PyramidenSteine.jpg[edit]

Hello,

You have added the category Category:Khafre's Pyramid to this image file, though there are no obvious features to do so.

If you have some knowledge about this pyramid, please complete the description and point out which side of the pyramid is showed in this picture. Otherwise, I'll revert your edit. --Juiced lemon 15:01, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Amenirdis, Shepenupet etc.[edit]

Hello JMCC1

You have added category 25th dynasty to the images of Amenirdis, Shepenupet... I think it's not necessary because those divine adoratrice are already included in Category:25th dynasty of Egypt.

See : Category:Shepenupet II or Category:Amenirdis I. What do you think about this subject? Do you think we have to duplicate these images in two categories? In this case what is your reasons?

Thanks for your answer. Neithsabes 12:18, 10 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not remove categories...[edit]

[1] Please do not remove categories when they correctly describe the subject of a picture, apart if you want to replace it with a more specific category (sub-category). Thanks for your comprehension. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:01, 11 March 2008 (UTC)

Ramose theban Tomb 55[edit]

Hi JMCC1

I see you remove my change about this image : Windowofappearances.gif... But it's a mistake because this relief is not at Tel el-Amarna but at Luxor.

Indeed it's an amarna style relief, but not from the Amarna tomb 11 as you correct it. Merely it's come from the Ramose Theban Tomb 55 where you can find two style of reliefs in it. One part of the tomb was done under Amenhotep III reign, then the relief appears in a classical form. The other part of the tomb was finished under the reign of Akhenaten and in the new amarna style. Both reliefs are on the same wall of the tomb of Ramose at Luxor. I visited this tomb the first time when I went to Egypt, it has several years now. I was so very surprised.

If you want further information about please consult this site : Ramose Theban Tomb. You will see what i am talking about.

Best regards. Neithsabes 14:50, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

File:Relief of Khnum.JPG‎[edit]

Hi JMCC1,

I undo your change on this file because there is a mistake originally in the title. Please see talk page of the file. Regards. Neithsabes (talk) 01:03, 23 July 2009 (UTC)

File:Tablet bowels sheep Louvre 6033.jpg[edit]

Bonjour ! Cette tablette ne représente pas un labyrinthe, mais des intestins de mouton. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 10:42, 12 August 2009 (UTC)

Pageant[edit]

[2]: Not sure this is a good change. The festival wasn't specifically Egyptian-themed; this was just a contingent within a larger festival. I created the category to segment these out and help organize the larger body of 250+ pictures. - Jmabel ! talk 18:53, 27 September 2009 (UTC)

I agree that this material is Egyptian-themed, and that it occurred at a festival, but what I'm saying is that the festival wasn't Egyptian-themed, and your category suggests it was. - Jmabel ! talk 00:41, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Categoría[edit]

Hola JMCC1, feliz año. La he borrado. No le he visto utilidad, la verdad. Un saludo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 22:49, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Egyptian Collection in the MANN[edit]

Please, don't change the name of the Category:Egyptian collection in the Museo Archeologico (Naples). This is his official name! I reversed your redirect, so the order in Category:Egyptian antiquities collections will be kept. Thank You! Best regards, --DenghiùComm (talk) 07:49, 20 January 2010 (UTC)

"zz" cat sort[edit]

What is the "zz" cat sort about? - Jmabel ! talk 18:06, 6 March 2010 (UTC)

Re: Bastante bién. - Jmabel ! talk 23:42, 6 March 2010 (UTC) (Copy)

Category:Egyptian hieroglyphs in Egypt[edit]

Hi. Since you remove all pictures from Category:Egyptian hieroglyphs in Egypt, why not just nominate it for deletion? Wknight94 talk 18:21, 27 March 2010 (UTC)

Pirámide que es un obelisco[edit]

Hola,

En realidad me parece que es incorrecto colocar a la pirámide de mayo en la categoría de "pirámides". Es que nadie sabe porqué se la llamó así, pero en realidad es un obelisco.

Cordialmente.

--Roberto Fiadone (talk) 17:01, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Opino que es un misterio. 0_0 --Roberto Fiadone (talk) 19:20, 30 March 2010 (UTC)

Category:Mastabas[edit]

I really do not understand what you are doing with edits like this. Only a few of the pictures in that category include hieroglyphs. Maybe you want to create a new category Category:Egyptian hieroglyphs in mastabas in Egypt? Wknight94 talk 02:37, 4 April 2010 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

Is this image also at Kom Ombo? It has almost no categories. I put one for Luxor...but I may be wrong! Maybe its at Kom Ombo?

It is close to this picture where you added some cats. It was taken by the same flickr photographer:

If you know the answer, please add 1-2 cats to the first photo. Gracias, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:15, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

  • Thank you/Gracias for your help. --Leoboudv (talk) 00:31, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

For moving/linking Double-headed serpent pics - very useful Victuallers (talk) 19:56, 28 August 2010 (UTC)

Category:Egyptian_antiques_by_Rama[edit]

I have endeavoured a much-belated labeling of the images of Category:Egyptian_antiques_by_Rama, and I would like to thank you for the help you provided without me even realising. Cheers! Rama (talk) 08:01, 17 September 2010 (UTC)

category:Art made from sandstone[edit]

- thanks a lot! --4028mdk09 (talk) 17:28, 9 October 2010 (UTC)

File:Muth (1885) - TIMEA.jpg[edit]

Hi, you have asked for "File:Muth (1885) - TIMEA.jpg" to be renamed. However, the source indicates that it is a drawing of Muth, not Hapy, and I cannot tell from the other images in "Category:Hapy" that the drawing is of Hapy. Have you got some evidence to show that it is in fact a drawing of Hapy? — Cheers, JackLee talk 15:47, 17 October 2010 (UTC)

Maps[edit]

Hello JMCC1,

The year that mentioned on the maps are the year that they made. It not necessarily describes the same year. Just a remainder. Geagea (talk) 00:00, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Ya lo he averiguado[edit]

Me ha contestado Anna, aquí lo tienes. Satisfecha tu curiosidad. Un abrazo Lourdes (talk) 22:13, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

Drawings of the Ancient Egyptian art in x year categories[edit]

Hello,

I know that you already created several of these categories, but do you think that a revised title like "x year drawings of Ancient Egyptian art" or "x year media of Ancient Egyptian art" (to allow for photos and drawings) might sound better? BrokenSphere (Talk) 23:58, 30 November 2010 (UTC)

"Elephants in art"[edit]

Hi, do you think that it's really practical to delete this category in case of the historical European prints and drawings of elephants? Regards, --Felistoria (talk) 02:18, 29 December 2010 (UTC)

Dear friend[edit]

Head of state is politician. Also head of ancient state. --Pomeranian (talk) 17:05, 31 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Vaso-cananeu.jpg[edit]

Hello. Why do you want to rename this file? What is the reason for "ww" at the end? Thank you.   — Jeff G. ツ 04:18, 9 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Triquetra-Interlaced-Triangle-Circle.svg[edit]

"Linked circles" would commonly imply that more than one circle is present, but there's only one circle there... AnonMoos (talk) 20:38, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Tefnakht Athens stela (T. Efthimiadis).jpg[edit]

Can you create a category for Tefnakht I ? Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:38, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment : Thank you very much for your kind help. Its much appreciated. Best regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:23, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Louvres-antiquites-egyptiennes-img 2902.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot


File:Louvres-antiquites-egyptiennes-img 2903.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Pedubast I[edit]

Maybe you have read my article here on Pedubast I's torso in the Gulbenkian museum? It is considered a masterpiece of art. There is now a picture of it. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 06:43, 31 May 2011 (UTC)

Egyptian hieroglyphs[edit]

Hello. I know you (and I) are in that club of people trying to get a handle on E. hieroglyphs. I also worked on cuneiform; and there was.... a partial list of some cuneiform characters. There is so much more to do in all fields, from the various languages with glyphs.

I am just saying hello. I see you made a category for the steles of various dynasties. I applaud you're diligence. We (All) in wikipedia have goals. I know there are wonderful unused Photos in WikiCommons... so there is so much more truth about things to UNCOVER. I have been going through E.A.Wallis Budges two part 2inches of dictionary... And now reading into the w:Coptic language list (in it) as well (while studying the origins, or relations to other Hieroglyph spellings).

21st century BC, Chinese. (lid of pottery mug/jar LOST)

How many of 'Us' actually have a clue about hieroglyphs? 20 to 50? I have started a list for a page for "Amulets of Ancient Egypt"; I am going thru "Carol Andrews" amulet hardcopy book. And ... therefore picking up some clues to hieroglyphs I don't fully understand, compared to how they are used in the 2inches of the Budge dictionary. Just saying hello.. my latest two articles are: en:Mudbrick stamp-(today)-(and its new category)...and the en:List of Egyptian hieroglyphs by alphabetization, where I am trying to clean-up the A-L, and M-Z lists. Cheers, Enjoy. (when I did the big hieroglyph cat in WikiCommons, (I went over to also do cuneiform, eventually), but also worked on the Timeline by centuries (using the wonderful Pottery (including especially the Chinese)(photo above)... -cheers/enjoy (from theSonoran Desert/Arizona USA)--(I worked on the steles, too, that is why I thought I would finally say hello.)-- Mmcannis (talk) 02:20, 2 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello, I'v just restored your zoom on File:Harpocrates-Thessaloniki Archaeological Museum.jpg[edit]

If you want to make a zoom please use another name for the file, and give me a credit for the original. Yair-haklai (talk) 20:57, 3 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Torso of Pedubast I by Michael Martin.jpg[edit]

No problem. Thanks for adding another category for it. You can tell Neithsabes about the Pedubast image if you wish. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 05:27, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Mask of Amenemope by John Campana.jpg[edit]

Can you 'crop' or 'zoom' the picture just a little to remove the light flash in the image? My image software is very old/antique and poor. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:38, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

  • OK. Please do what you can...when you have the time. That is all I ask, nothing more. Best wishes from Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:59, 23 June 2011 (UTC)
  • Yes, that is a much better image you created. And thank you for crediting the flickr author very much: John Campana. He will appreciate this too as do I. With kind Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:59, 23 June 2011 (UTC)

Hello[edit]

Re file http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SFEC-P-MEDINETHABU71.JPG, can you please revert the original and add this as a derivative from the original giving the necessary credit, the work you have presented bears little resemblance to the original photo or actual site in Egypt... thanks Merlin

8500 BC, and other century categories[edit]

What you decide about the categories is "fine by me." Let me explain: when I was making all the hieroglyph categories, Category:Hieroglyphs of Egypt, i branched into: Category:Hieroglyphs on media, (and even more, of Egypt-related), then also Category:Cuneiform on media. Somebody just made the en:Gudea cylinders article (cat: Cuneiform on cylinders)... so eventually the cats find a purpose.

I also found that the Century cats:.. Category:11th century BC and all going back to 29th century BC, were UNMADE, or undeveloped. I used Ancient Egypt, and Mesopotamia, (starting with Pottery) to start the cats with the Photos.

Only one confirmed date of 2627 BC came up for en:Peru, S. America where the mud pyramids were dated by the cloth used to carry mud. Another century was confirmed in 5500BC by the explosion of en:Mount Mazama, (Crater Lake, Oregon, USA). many items can only be identified to millenniums, or a couple of centuries. You know the problems. (en:Dendrochronology is wonderful!)..The old pottery-(I used) for the (centuries mentioned), are change-able guesses, (I think). Cheers, enjoy OUR human discoveries. Michael (in HOT, SonoranDesert, ArizonaUSA)....Mmcannis (talk) 14:26, 4 July 2011 (UTC)

File:Louvres-antiquites-egyptiennes-img 2810.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:55, 4 August 2011 (UTC)

Re:File:01-Segovia Acueducto.jpg[edit]

Gracias. La he marcado para borrar. La explicación la tienes en la página de discusión de User: Cookie: aquí y aquí. Son fotos de febrero de 2006, yo no conocía -supongo- OTRS. Gracias--Miguel Bugallo 12:12, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

File:Hammamat_Petros01.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hammamat_Petros01.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

77.182.139.83 11:39, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Lily perfume Louvre E11162.jpg[edit]

Thanks for adjusting the colour on my picture, but please don't compress it that much. The original file weighs 4.08MB; it now weighs 1.98MB. Such a compression rate makes the file virtually unusable for print. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 19:07, 21 September 2011 (UTC)

Thanks! Lots of academic people use our pictures in print because they can't afford the sometimes extortionate rates asked by museums or pictures agencies. It's important we offer them the best quality we can. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 12:28, 22 September 2011 (UTC)
I just realised you had reverted to my former blue picture ^^; I think I still have the RAW file. I will fix the colour balance so that it looks more natural, as you did in your edited version. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 12:41, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Sobre ayuda[edit]

Gracias, si me pierdo por las categorías pasaré. Un abrazo, Mercedes Gusgus (discusión) 09:11, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Clonycavan Man.jpg[edit]

Hi JMCC1,
Your recent edit to File:Clonycavan Man.jpg, left it a bit too over-exposed. I really apriciate your thought, but I'm going to try to fix the image up. Thank you, --Gourami Watcher (talk) 22:10, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, JMCC1!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 15:33, 10 October 2011 (UTC)

Re: Teóricamente estaba categorizada [3] Es un extraño error de los bots ??? --JMCC1 (talk) 03:37, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

BM category move[edit]

Hi,

I notice you've moved the images relating to the British Museum mummy once known as "Ginger". In all sources relating to the mummy, the reference used is "EA 32751" rather than "BM 32751". How the "Big Number" is used has changed over time for the BM, however I believe we should go by the sources that people would find when they verify material. For the most part, it is less ambiguous to use the Registration number 1900,1018.1 though good practice would be to quote both references in any publication. As the new category Category:Human mummy BM 32751 does not reflect the most meaningful reference, I suggest Category:Predynastic human mummy, EA 32751. -- (talk) 08:46, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Estela de Nebet y Jui[edit]

Hola. Aceptando tu invitación, me paso para pedir: no encuentro ninguna foto de esa estela, que se encuentra actualmente en el Museo Egipcio de El Cairo, catalogada con la referencia CG1578. La he visto mencionar también como estela de Nebit y estela de Nebit y Khui. Es de la sexta dinastía, y se encontró (según la wiki inglesa) en el cementerio central de Abidos. Gracias por tu interés, un abrazo, Mercedes Gusgus (discusión) 18:58, 23 October 2011 (UTC)

Buto[edit]

✓OK Un saludo --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 09:06, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

File:Psamtik II museo britânico.jpg[edit]

I saw you changed my edits of this figure again. However, this is certainly NOT Psamtek II. I gave a reference to another picture of the same head with the correct dating on the discussion page. Please also have look on the database of the British Museum: [4] and here [5] (the head has the Registration number: 1907,0713.4) and dated by the museum to the 18th Dynasty. The Encyclopedia Britannica evidently made a mistake (which is anyway not a very reliable source). bw -- Udimu (talk) 08:42, 1 November 2011 (UTC)

Category:Brown circles[edit]

  (vBHFc1 legende)   (vBHFc2 legende)   (vBHFc3 legende)   (vBHFc4 legende)   (exvBHFc1 legende)   (exvBHFc2 legende)   (exvBHFc3 legende)   (exvBHFc4 legende)
I'm not sure why you placed all these files in Category:Brown circles, as they really should be in Category:Red circles. Useddenim (talk) 00:44, 14 November 2011 (UTC)

Category:Egyptian revival parade?[edit]

What's with this Category:Egyptian revival parade? The parade as a whole wasn't "Egyptian revival": this was just one large contingent in a much larger parade. - Jmabel ! talk 06:08, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

"Egyptian revival parade" sugiera que "Egyptian revival" pertenecía al desfile entero. Pero la gente en vestuario que evoca el antiguo Egipto constituyó quizás la decena del desfile. No era ningún "Egyptian revival parade". Eran gente vestido en esta manera que formaron parte de un desfile.
No se necesita responder en me página de discusión. Es más fácil responder aquí, para mantener toda la discusión en un solo lugar. - Jmabel ! talk 07:42, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Propuesta
  • Egyptian revival parade (Files: Fremont Solstice Parade 2007 Egyptians 01.jpg, 02, 03, 04, 05. Fremont Solstice Parade 2007 pyramid apex 01.jpg, 02. Fremont Solstice Parade 2007 pyramid pieces 01.jpg, 02, 03. Fremont Solstice Parade 2007 pyramid structure 01.jpg Fremont Solstice Parade 2007 winged Egyptians 01.jpg, 04)
    • Summer Solstice Parade and Pageant 2007 Ancient Egyptian motifs
      • Anubis Fremont Solstice Parade
      • Eye of Horus Fremont Solstice Parade
--JMCC1 (talk) 08:07, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Si consideras que deben estar en una categoría con otro nombre más adecuado, coméntamelo y las traslado.
--JMCC1 (talk) 08:27, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Como he dicho, es engañoso sugerir que el mismo desfile pertenece a "Egyptian revival", y sus nombres para categorías lo sugieren.
La categoría "Egyptian revival parade" no me parece necesario, pero si necesitamos haberlo, debe ser "Egyptian revival motifs in parades". Do modo similar, "Anubis motifs in Fremont Solstice Parade", "Eye of Horus in Fremont Solstice Parade" (o "... in Fremont Solstice Parade and Pageant" si incluye el concurso en Gasworks Park, no solamente el desfile. - Jmabel ! talk 17:01, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Me parece buen criterio. Me ocupo de arreglarlo. --JMCC1 (talk) 22:27, 22 November 2011 (UTC)
Grácias. - Jmabel ! talk 00:55, 23 November 2011 (UTC)

Categorías[edit]

✓OK (ya no estaba protegida; siento la tardanza) --Ecemaml talk to me/habla conmigo 14:10, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Dacia[edit]

Roman bust of a Dacian tarabostes, Hermitage, St Petersburg, Russia - 20070614.jpg
Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Dacia as a sister project to WP:DACIA English and WP:DACIA română to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to ancient Dacia. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 19:30, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Edit Mishap[edit]

Hi JMCC1 - I guess something went wrong while you have been editing here? I did a revert for first aid. Regards, --Burkhard (talk) 16:22, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

Reversions[edit]

Hi, I reverted some of your modifications as HotCat seems to have deleted half of the information structure. --Foroa (talk) 10:21, 14 March 2012 (UTC)

Colorized image[edit]

Is there a reason for the colorization of this image, File:Papyrus Hearst Plate 2b.jpg? While the color may in fact be closer to the color of the actual document, we dont know that, and all we have right now is the bw image. Im not saying it doesnt belong here, but without a reason for the colorization, i dont think we can use it for scholarly articles, including the one on the document itself.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:40, 18 March 2012 (UTC)

Your use of Cat-a-lot[edit]

You are breaking all the images I'm uploading. Please stop immediately. Thanks! Kaldari (talk) 05:26, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

I'm not. It is an error of Cat-a-lot [6] --JMCC1 (talk) 14:04, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
if you can find a recipe for invoking the cat-a-lot bug, i will be grateful if you can share it. we can create for this purpose a "junk" category or categories, and add them and remove them from a list of files. once i'll see a reproducible recipe that invokes the problem (ideally, there should also be some browser information, preferably with as complete version information as practical, e.g. "Google chrome 19.0.1084.15 beta-m" or such), i will do my best to get to the bottom of it and fix cat-a-lot. your help is greatly appreciated, peace - קיפודנחש (talk) 02:31, 15 April 2012 (UTC)

failed to replicate problem[edit]

so i created a new category: Category:CAL2012 2, and did mass movement of these files to and from the other category, using both "Move" and "Copy". then i did another mass "Copy" to the new cat, and finally "Remove"d from it all the files. I used both chrome (19) and ff (12 - did not want to reinstall 11). in all those exercises i did not get a single case of truncation.

i did stumble on a bug/problem: when using chrome, even though cat-a-lot reports it moved (or copied) all the files, it actually only moved *most* of them (e.g., i selected 200 files, executed "move", cat-a-lot told me they were all moved, but only 191 files actually moved).

this problem did not occur in firefox. however, in all this activity (you can peek in my "user contribs", some 600-700 junk edits, just doing those tests. i hope the people patrolling commons won't get *too* pissed at me...) not a single file got corrupted: i can tell, thanks to a new 1.19 feature which shows the pagesize change (in bytes) on "contribs". in each phase of the test, all the files show exactly the same size change. in the case of truncation such as you experienced, one sees much larger reduction in page size (typically several K, depending on the exact truncation point), with the actual weight loss being unique to each file.

so, i actually do not have a recipe to reproduce the errors. i guess i could go back to firefox 11 and give it one more try - maybe i will, but this is really very thin chance. without replication, i am actually quite helpless diving any deeper into the issue.

peace, קיפודנחש (talk) 23:07, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

I do not understand. See [7] --JMCC1 (talk) 05:14, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
good news/bad news: so we really do not need to move hundreds of files - that the good news. i will be able to kick this one file back and forth (apparently, the problem occured both when executing "move" and "copy", so i can just as well use "move"). however (that's the bad news), it did not happen for me on chrome 19 and ff 12. the last resort is for me to downgrade to ff 11 - maybe it's something particular to this browser at this version. btw - i am using the windows 64-bit version of the browser. i can also test on linux-64 bit, and maybe also on windows-32 bit. may i ask, which OS did you use when the issue happened? peace - קיפודנחש (talk) 17:47, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
PC1 OS: Windows XP Home Edition 32 bits - Mozilla Firefox 11.0
PC2 OS: Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bits - Mozilla Firefox 11.0
Fails on both PCs. --JMCC1 (talk) 14:24, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
sorry, still failed to reproduce. let's do one more try: this time, let's see if it may be a result of gadget/preference interoperability.
could you please list all the gadgets that are activated in your preferences? also, which skin do you use, and what options are enabled under "Advanced options" in the "Appearance" tab in your preferences? i know this is a long shot, but i tried quite a few times, including with FF 11. since it happens for you on more than one PC, i doubt it's a problem with your browser (unless you have some unusual extension(s) installed on both pc? do you?). i want to configure my user to behavfe as similarly as i can to yours - maybe this will allow me to reproduce.
peace - קיפודנחש (talk) 15:55, 20 April 2012 (UTC)
PC2 OS: Windows 7 Home Premium 64 bits - Mozilla Firefox 11.0 Acquired in January 2012. Original preferences (default). Peace --JMCC1 (talk) 01:01, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
this can't be entirely true - after all, cat-a-lot itself is not "on" in the default config, and obviously it's "on" in your setup...
my last strand of hope is that the problem stems from gadgets-collision, so it would really help to know which gadgets are "on" in your preferences. peace - קיפודנחש (talk) 23:23, 25 April 2012 (UTC)
Preferences:
  • Interface: Editing and uploads:
    • UploadWizard
    • MyUploads
  • Interface: Files and categories
    • RotateLink
    • RenameLink
  • Interface: Other
    • StockPhoto
    • ExtraTabs2
    • WikiMiniAtlas
    • AjaxQuickDelete
  • Tools for categories
    • Cat-a-lot (added) obviously
    • HotCat (added) obviously

I pressed "default" again (added Cat-a-lot y HotCat obviously). Thanks for your advice and help. peace --JMCC1 (talk) 11:27, 26 April 2012 (UTC)

thanks for documenting this. this is very good - it will allow me (not today, unfortunately) to replicate your setup exactly. if i will still fail to replicate, then i just don't know what to do next. if replication will succeed, good chances we'll eventually nail this bastard. peace - קיפודנחש (talk) 23:26, 26 April 2012 (UTC)
I doubt it has anything to do with the browser. Cat-a-lot functions through API calls and the API calls are the same regardless of browser. The only explanations I could imagine are:
  1. An unreliable internet connection is causing the API messages to get truncated, but somehow they are still being accepted by the server.
  2. There is an error on the server/MediaWiki side, possibly caused by the heavy concurrent processing required by Cat-a-lot
  3. The API messages are not being escaped properly by Cat-a-lot. In this case you would see the content truncated at the spot where a quote or double-quote character was supposed to appear and it would be reproducible.
Kaldari (talk) 00:26, 2 May 2012 (UTC)
Now, it works well. Thanks for your help.

Peace --JMCC1 (talk) 11:43, 4 May 2012 (UTC)

Almost solved[edit]

Almost solved... [8] [9]
--JMCC1 (talk) 09:45, 19 May 2012 (UTC)

Category:CAL2012 ?[edit]

Hello JMCC1 ,

I've noticed that you tag some files with this category. What is it ? It seems to be files with errors, but what errors ?

Sémhur (talk) 10:58, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

this category (and also Category:CAL2012 2) are temporary hidden categories we use to try and get to the bottom of a bug in gadget cat-a-lot (see previous section in this discussion page). once we nail it down (or once we give up on nailing it...), we should ask these cats to be removed. in the meantime, please bear with us. peace - קיפודנחש (talk) 17:41, 19 April 2012 (UTC)
No problem, do what you want. Cat-a-lot is a very useful program; thank you to improve it! Sémhur (talk) 20:05, 19 April 2012 (UTC)

Supermarket?[edit]

This seems a bit odd. Pike Place Market is a farmers' market, not a supermarket. Mind if I revert? - Jmabel ! talk 01:19, 31 May 2012 (UTC)

Cameos/intaglios[edit]

Hi! I'm a bit confused by some of your recent categorisations. You removed Category:Intaglios from File:Geta Caracalla CdM Chabouillet1200.jpg and File:Jasper intaglio Massimo 108684.jpg and added Category:Cameos, but these are intaglios, not cameos. Intaglios feature an incised image; cameos feature a raised relief image. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 07:08, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

La seule différence entre une intaille et un camée est le fait que l'intaille est en creux et le camée en relief. La transparence ou non du matériau n'intervient pas. On trouve des intailles sur des pierres opaques, par exemple sur du jaspe noir, du jaspe sanguin ou du sardonyx. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 11:23, 10 July 2012 (UTC)

My Silver crystal image[edit]

Hello JMCC1, why are you change the category of my industry made silver crystal. It isn't a "mineral"! You changed cat is simply nonsens. It is simply pure silver, made by elecrolysis. I revert your cat again. Best regards, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 21:24, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi again, and similar my Gold-crystal! There isn't a mineral! The Gold crystal are laboratory made. Please read the image description. Thanks, --Alchemist-hp (talk) 22:53, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Category:Buddhist symbols[edit]

Hi,

Why did you delete Category:Buddhist symbols from my Buddhist pictures? These images are used in the Buddhism, so I can't understand you. Bye: Madboy74 (talk) 14:10, 17 February 2013 (UTC)

Add categories[edit]

Feel free to add more categories to these images. I did what I could. You can also use the images if you wish.

These images were licensed freely by the flickr account owner who visited the King Tut exhibit in Seattle in 2012. Most other pictures by other people on flickr who visited the exhibit had Non-Commercial restrictions or were 'All Rights Reserved.' Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 00:51, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

  • Thank you for the message. The photos are mostly those of objects from the Cairo Museum (where photography is banned) which one normally couldn't get an image if it wasn't on an exhibition in the US. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 04:12, 25 February 2013 (UTC)
I uploaded these two images plus one more image of an ewer today:

Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 22:51, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

I hope you know any other useful cats to give these images. Goodbye, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:41, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Hathor Kiosk in Dendera[edit]

I reestablished the category Hathor Kiosk in Dendera because its name is really Hathor Kiosk. It was a temple of a goddess which could be learned from the Hathoric columns. The chapel was dedicated to Hathor. In Porter Moss, vol. VI, p. 100, it is named as Hathor Kiosk, too. The chapel did not had a roof at all the times, also no roof for the zodiac or disk. This chapel was often confused with the Chapel of the Zodiac, Chapel of the Disk or Western Osiris Chapel at the opposite side. --RolandUnger (talk) 06:52, 2 March 2013 (UTC)

File:Canopic container Lid (Tutankhamun).jpg & File:Egyptian Gold Collar (19th dynasty).jpg[edit]

Please give better cats for these 2 images if you can. Maybe 'Category:Treasure of Tutankhamun' applies to Tutankhamun's canopic lid?

I also uploaded this other image below:

From this short News story by the Pacific Science Centre, it is clear that all the objects on display at the king tut exhibit came from the Cairo Museum.

  • Best Regards from Vancouver, Canada, --Leoboudv (talk) 01:59, 21 March 2013 (UTC)

Strange edit[edit]

See this one. Cat-a-lot problems? --Jarekt (talk) 18:56, 28 March 2013 (UTC)

Imagen importada[edit]

Hola, José Manuel, ayer importé esta foto desde flickr. Mira si la titulé y categoricé bien y si se puede describir mejor. Muchas gracias. Un abrazo. Dorieo (talk) 17:03, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Ya me gustaría ser un experto como tú. Gracias ;). Dorieo (talk) 18:12, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Y a mí el Antiguo Egipto. Si eres como un faraón, sabes de todo y de todo haces. Dorieo (talk) 18:23, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Y ciegos como Tiresias :P. Dorieo (talk) 18:28, 8 April 2013 (UTC)
Que Ra nos guíe, y que Anubis nos acompañe hasta que demos cuenta de nuestras vidas a Osiris. Dorieo (talk) 18:44, 8 April 2013 (UTC)

Category:Al-Qasr, Egypt vs. Al-Qusair fort[edit]

I see that you are helping in Egypt photos categories, thanks. However you have misunderstood the Al-Qasr vs. Al-Qusair namings. Al-Qasr is present in Egypt Dakhla Oasis at the Western desert. Al-Qusair is a port on the Red Sea cost at the eastern desert. I have corrected the categories.--Ashashyou (talk) 03:15, 3 May 2013 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you[edit]

(After Re-examining Category:Hieroglyphs of Egypt)

Rosetta Barnstar.png The Rosetta-(Revealing) Barnstar
The shoulders of many people before us, now have YOU upon them, creating an understanding of Egyptian hieroglyphs, with your diligent development of the Egyptian hieroglyph categories. For the un-initiated, examine, (in High-Resolution expansion) the stele in the Louvre, with the Category:Meteor (hieroglyph), the Stele of Irtysen. (a small number of hieroglyphs are still to be discovered!). Cheers! happy discovering, and revealing! Mmcannis (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2013 (UTC)

Photo, Photo, Photo, Photo, Photo & Photo[edit]

If you have the time, please consider adding categories to these 6 pictures. Some are of objects for kings and Queens that we never had any photos before. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 08:33, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

  • Thank You for the cats. Best Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 19:08, 27 May 2013 (UTC)


File:Amenemhat V.jpg[edit]

Perhaps you can create a category for this rare image of this 13th dynasty king. Thank You, --Leoboudv (talk) 09:31, 8 June 2013 (UTC)

Wrong category Kalabsha/Uronarti[edit]

The category Temple of Thutmosis III in Uronarti is wrongly named. The hemi speos shown at the photographs stood at Kalabsha outside the main temple in the south-west corner (see Gauthier, Temple de Kalabchah, vol. ii, p. 331-7, pl. cxv, cxvi) sometimes named rock chapel of Dedwen. Maspero named it in his Rapports a mammisi but maybe this is not correct.

Of course there was a temple of Thutmosis III at Uronarti but this was a mud-brick temple which was not transferred to another place (see Dunham, Uronarti; Shalfak; Mirgissa. Second Cataract Forts; 2. 1967).

I propose to rename the category to "Hemi-speos of Dedwen at Kalabsha". --RolandUnger (talk) 08:47, 15 June 2013 (UTC)


File:Moai liverpool.JPG[edit]

I've noticed you recategorised this. The problem is that it is a loan item from the british museum.Geni (talk) 18:38, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

Category:Service ware in the Los Angeles County Museum of Art[edit]

Hi, what means Service ware exactly? Marcus Cyron (talk) 17:30, 8 November 2013 (UTC)

The problem stays. Ancient Amphoras are for storage and transport - not for service. Amphoriskoi, Alabastra and Aryballoi are for Cosmetics, Lekythoi too - but also for funeral culture. Marcus Cyron (talk) 03:30, 13 November 2013 (UTC)
Yes, but is the classification of the museum LACMA. See [10] [11] etc.
Sometimes, I added the containers Category, wider
--JMCC1 (talk) 12:22, 13 November 2013 (UTC)

"Freezing Tag"[edit]

a new "Freezing" tag or category or bot or anything (other than deletion) is needed for the many files at the following link deletion request--Ashashyou (talk) 04:55, 13 December 2013 (UTC)

Natural History Museum[edit]

Hey, you're doing a great job here with the Natural History Museum categories. I made some new categories, as you can see. I populated one, then accidentally emptied it, so thanks for helping with that. I wasn't sure that plaques are considered sculptures, but the the ones in the museum appear to be sculpted in some way. Anyway, keep up the good work - and happy new year!

(De Google Translate, así que lo siento si no es una buena traducción). Hola, estás haciendo un gran trabajo aquí con las categorías de "Natural History Museum". Hice algunas nuevas categorías, como se puede ver. Me pobladas uno, entonces accidentalmente vacié, así que gracias por ayudarme con eso. Yo no estaba seguro de que las placas son considerados esculturas, pero los los que están en el museo parecen estar esculpidas de alguna manera. De todos modos, mantener el buen trabajo - ¡Feliz año nuevo! AnemoneProjectors (talk) (Flickr) 13:11, 1 January 2014 (UTC)

File:Pectoral of Amenemhat III.jpg[edit]

There is a photo of a pectoral for Amenemhat III] if you need to use it. Regards, --Leoboudv (talk) 03:58, 13 January 2014 (UTC)

Category:Excavations_(construction)[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Excavations_(construction) has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | español | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | македонски | português | русский | +/−

Geo Swan (talk) 17:05, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

Category:Terracotta figurines of Isis and Osiris[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Terracotta figurines of Isis and Osiris has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 21:12, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Delos Museum 3079 d1.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Delos Museum 3079 d1.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Zde (talk) 23:21, 4 March 2014 (UTC)