User talk:JPRoche

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, JPRoche!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 12:53, 2 February 2013 (UTC)


File:PSP DSC7372WP.jpg and File:Nikon Capture NX DSC7373WP.jpg[edit]

Hi JPRoche, are the images on (not of) the cover originally your own creation, i.e. did you shoot them? --Túrelio (talk) 14:11, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Yes I shoot it ! As you can see in EXIF ! I shoot the box of the product. --JPRoche (talk) 15:15, 20 May 2013 (UTC)
Hmm, we are not communicating. I do not doubt that you took the shot of the whole box cover. But on the box-cover there was a collage of at least 3 different images. What I want to know, who shot these single images? --Túrelio (talk) 15:21, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Sorry... I don't know. It's a commercial packaging.--JPRoche (talk) 15:31, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

O.k. thanks for your honest reply. Packages and covers which contain artwork above threshold of originality (more than merely text or a simple logo) are (to be considered as) copyrighted. Taking a photo of them results in a derivative, which may violate the copyright of the rights holder for the original cover. Sorry. --Túrelio (talk) 15:48, 20 May 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Stefan4 (talk) 19:36, 11 August 2014 (UTC)

Dear JPRoche
I've already copied you mosque files before they were deleted! would you mind if I upload them to other Wikipedia projects?Maher27777 (talk) 22:37, 20 September 2014 (UTC)
No problem for me but I think you may have the same problem of copyright in others Wikipedia projects. --JPRoche (talk) 06:27, 21 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Trocadéro 7SC1150EC.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Trocadéro 7SC1150EC.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ras67 (talk) 19:24, 11 December 2014 (UTC)