User talk:J Milburn

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Feel free to leave me a new message below. I do not archive messages here, old messages will just be removed. I will reply on your talk page, or contact you if I reply here.

2014 ![edit]

Christmasornaments.png * * * 2014! * * *
Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:16, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


Hi J Milburn. Thanks for your message. These BBC clips are part of the BBC Speakerthon project. More info can be found here - In regards to the copyright, the BBC retains copyright on the full programmes and only excerpts which the BBC have explicitly released under an open licence have been uploaded to Wikimedia Commons. Many thanks.

Image copyright and undeletion request[edit]

@J Milburn: Dear Sir, I am the subject of an image [Mansoor-IJAZ.jpg] which you nominated for deletion. It was deleted earlier today. I have reached out to the photographer who made the photo, Mr Fournier, and have asked him to provide a release to us. I would like to then request that the image be undeleted so it can remain as the primary image in article Mansoor Ijaz. We did this in one other case where another image was deleted for copyright reasons and we obtained a suitable release from the photographer. I simply wanted to inform you that we will follow the same procedure in this case as well. Thanks --Mansoor Ijaz (talk) 22:46, 1 May 2014 (UTC)

Hello @Mansoor Ijaz: Apologies for the delay. I see that the image has been restored- I'm pleased that issue has been resolved. J Milburn (talk) 15:58, 5 May 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Patrick Heusinger.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Patrick Heusinger.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

CombatWombat42 (talk) 18:49, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Patrick Heusinger.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Patrick Heusinger.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

CombatWombat42 (talk) 18:50, 11 June 2014 (UTC)

De-adminship warning[edit]

This talk page in other languages:

Deutsch | English | español | français | italiano | 한국어 | മലയാളം | português | português do Brasil | +/−

Dear J Milburn, I am writing to inform you that you are in danger of losing your adminship on Commons because of inactivity.

If you want to keep your adminship, you need both to sign at Commons:Administrators/Inactivity section/Aug-Sep 2014 within 30 days of today's date, and also to make at least five further admin actions in the following six months. Anyone who does not do so will automatically lose administrator rights.

You can read the de-admin policy at Commons:Administrators/De-adminship.

Thank you, odder (talk) 20:06, 13 August 2014 (UTC)