User talk:JaGa

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

FP contribution[edit]

Dude, thank you for your comment. I mean it. By the way, I checked the pix you have contributed to and, honestly, they are cool. Cheers! --Soljaguar 21:50, 22 September 2007 (UTC)

Image:Rogers Center and CN Tower.jpg[edit]

Hi there. I have posted the 3 images on my user page uder the section "Toronto". I am unexperienced in photoshop and I welcome the help. Now that I look back at it, I think that stitching error could be revised by just using 2 photos instead of 3, unfortunately I dont have much time to do this. Thanks for the help! MarcusObal MarcusObal 17:15, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Rogers Center and CN Tower-bsfix.jpg[edit]

I fixed the photo, take a look on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Rogers Center and CN Tower.jpg ! Thanks --Beyond silence 22.5px 21:19, 4 October 2007 (UTC)

Bouncing ball FP candidate[edit]

There is a new extremely professional re-edit from my original RAW file by Richard Bartz, and I'd urge you to vote for this instead of my own imperfect Photoshop efforts. Thanks very much to Richard for the work he's put in. Please consider voting or amending your vote at: Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Bouncing ball - strobe.jpg. --MichaelMaggs 17:02, 9 October 2007 (UTC)

Image:Image-Jacksonville Skyline Panorama 2.jpg[edit]

Thank-you for the offer. I do have the originals, do you have an email address I can send them to? --Digon3 talk 16:52, 16 October 2007 (UTC)

FP re-nomination of Image:Falkland Islands topographic map-en.svg[edit]

Hello! You voted when Sting's Falkland's map was first nominated. The vote was halted, because Sting wanted to clean up the image. I am pleased to tell that the new version is now nominated for FP, see Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Falkland Islands topographic map-en.svg. Friendly regards --Ronja 05:35, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Cabell County Courthouse.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:Cabell County Courthouse.jpg, which was nominated by User:Tomascastelazo at Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Cabell County Courthouse.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

--Simonizer 17:31, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

New River Gorge Bridge[edit]

Pictogram voting question.svg Question How many photos did you use for this stitched image? Regarding Slaunger's comment, I think in this case you do not need to choose a different projection, as you were fortunate enough to be far enough away from the imaged object. You probably could use a different orientation of your rectilinear projection to align the bridge deck horizontally, if you wish to try this out. Here I just could not go further backwards without a drastic change in the foreground, but the piers look just too fat, that is why I thought this cylindrical projection better suited. -- Klaus with K 18:26, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment Now you told me the bridge deck is sloped, having it horizontal in the image makes little sense. -- Klaus with K 23:11, 30 November 2007 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

New River Gorge Bridge.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:New River Gorge Bridge.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:New River Gorge Bridge.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

--Simonizer 15:28, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Congratz, and I am glad I changed my mind regarding this image. -- Slaunger 15:34, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Rosa_canina_.jpg and friends[edit]

Yes, the main image is still there and the archived discussion is at Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/Image:Rosa_canina_.jpg, I believe we should keep all such discussions intact so they can always be referred back to. Of course the version of his image with the errors is in fact here [1]. --Tony Wills 01:01, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

Commons Guide[edit]

Hello,

Could you please see this this and consider participating:

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Photography_Guide_Project_Alpha

--Thermos 16:47, 7 January 2008 (UTC)

Hello,
Unfortunately the project page was deleted because of lack of media (I suppose). An undeletion request has been filed and I hope to have the page up on later day. In the meanwhile, sorry for inconvenience. I will notify you on the further developments. --Thermos 03:27, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
Restored to commons name-space --Tony Wills 23:32, 9 January 2008 (UTC)

Commons:Picture of the Year/2007[edit]

Hi, I'm writing to let you know that an image of yours that became a Commons Featured Picture during 2007 is now part of the 2007 Picture of the Year competition. If you have > 200 edits you are welcome to vote too. Thanks for contributing your valuable work and good luck. -- Bryan (talk to me) 20:23, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

HP Pavilion (angle).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! HP Pavilion (angle).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

FP promotion[edit]

HP Pavilion (angle).jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image Image:HP Pavilion (angle).jpg , that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:HP Pavilion (angle).jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

Alvesgaspar 22:37, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Confucius statue at Chinese Cultural Garden.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

SF wikimeets[edit]

I see on your user page several photos that indicate that you might be in the greater San Francisco Bay area. We're planning a meetup in San Francisco on the 28th. If you're interested, ask me and I'll make sure you connect with the right information. --Dvortygirl (talk) 06:13, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

And a link to SF Meetup #6 with the time & location. --ShakataGaNai Talk 06:14, 14 June 2008 (UTC)

Image:Confucius_statue_at_Chinese_Cultural_Garden.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Confucius_statue_at_Chinese_Cultural_Garden.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

EugeneZelenko (talk) 15:30, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

TUSC token 1ab4fefb301d8863a950cf17673b7ba9[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account! NOTE: you have chosen your own pwd; it wasn't assigned.


File:The_Turning_Road,_L´Estaque.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:The_Turning_Road,_L´Estaque.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Kam Solusar (talk) 17:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)


The quality of the chemical structure Image:3alpha-Mannobiose.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:3alpha-Mannobiose.svg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Images in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Leyo 18:36, 16 September 2009 (UTC)



The factual accuracy of the chemical structure Image:Desoxyfructo-serotonin.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:Desoxyfructo-serotonin.svg you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Edgar181 (talk) 18:45, 13 January 2010 (UTC)


Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, JaGa!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 14:18, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fayette Station Bridge.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fayette Station Bridge.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

A kitten for you![edit]

Red Kitten 01.jpg

Hi There! Thank you for alerting me to the Disambiguation issue I was having. I noticed that you have a ton of amazing things you support such as Free Tibet, environmentalism, and so forth and I just wanted to say that's awesome. Me too. Cheers and Greetings from Canada!

Neckercube (talk) 01:49, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Cool, thanks for the note! Cheers, --JaGa (talk) 07:08, 27 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Neuromedin N.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Neuromedin N.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Stonepoint (talk) 18:05, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

The quality of the chemical structure File:Ethchlorvynol.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Ethchlorvynol.svg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Files in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --DMacks (talk) 20:27, 15 January 2013 (UTC)