User talk:Janericloebe/Archive/2012

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Bad Staffelstein Horsdorf 001.JPG

Bad Staffelstein Horsdorf 001.JPG

Wunderschönes Bild. -- ESFP (talk) 19:02, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Vielen Dank! --Janericloebe (talk) 18:52, 26 February 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely Lophotrochozoa (talk) 13:24, 25 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Erlangen Roethelheimgraben Brueckkanal 002.JPG

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 14:20, 31 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Paris Jardin des Tuileries 002.JPG

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Paris Jardin des Tuileries 002.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

~Pyb (talk) 17:41, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Paris Rue du Chevaleret Armée du salut 002.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Paris Rue du Chevaleret Armée du salut 002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

124.149.151.113 14:26, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Paris Rue du Chevaleret Armée du salut 003.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Paris Rue du Chevaleret Armée du salut 003.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

124.149.151.113 14:27, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Paris Rue du Chevaleret Armée du salut 004.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Paris Rue du Chevaleret Armée du salut 004.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

124.149.151.113 14:28, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Paris Rue du Chevaleret Armée du salut 001.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Paris Rue du Chevaleret Armée du salut 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

124.149.151.113 14:32, 12 July 2012 (UTC)

File:Alfred Abel 1919-1924 Alexander Binder 001.jpg

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Alfred Abel 1919-1924 Alexander Binder 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

cmadler (talk) 16:23, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

LMDK rund um Feucht

Hallo, ich sehe, dass du auch kräftig an den Ludwig Kanal Thema aktiv bist. Ich selber komme aus Feucht und habe vor die fehlenden Schleusen von Feucht bis zu Scheitelhaltung (60 ... 32) noch zu dokumentieren. Kann aber etwas dauern ;) Wenn du willst kann ich weiteres Bildmaterial aus der Gegend liefern müsste nur wissen was ich expl. knispsen soll. --Derzno (talk) 07:04, 13 August 2012 (UTC)

Hallo Derzno,
erst einmal Danke für die vielen Fotos. Da ich selbst aus Erlangen bin, stehen mir im Umkreis ja leider nur Fragmente des Kanals zur Verfügung, wobei es da mehr gibt als man denkt.
Zu Deiner Frage: Soweit sie sich auf den Kanal bezieht, gibt es da sicher einige Stellen, die noch fotografiert werden sollten. Spontan fällt mir da der Brückkanal über den Gauchsbach ein, der sich östlich von Röthenbach bei St. Wolfgang befindet. Für die Denkmallisten auf Wikipedia fehlen auch noch einige allgemeine Bilder von Abschnitten des Kanals. Und auch sonst sind da in Deiner Gegend noch einige Dinge, deren Bilder man gut gebrauchen kann.
Jetzt fehlen uns nur noch jemand aus dem Altmühltal und jemand aus der Oberpfalz, um auch diese (Kanal-Lücke) zu schließen.
Gruß --Janericloebe (talk) 08:45, 14 August 2012 (UTC)
Servus, Info für dich. Ich fahre meine uploads auf ein absolutes Minimum zurück, da meine Bilderflut und Motive einigen ein Dorn im Auge ist. Die Schleusen 60 downto 52 stelle ich aber noch rein (die habe ich schon) aber dann ist erst mal Schluss mit weiteren Bildern von mir. Ciao--Derzno (talk) 17:56, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Hallo, ich würde mal gerne wissen, wem das ein Dorn im Auge ist... Gerade bei Bildern aus Franken, kann von einer Flut ja wohl kaum die Rede sein! --Janericloebe (talk) 00:21, 19 August 2012 (UTC)
Hallo Janericloebe, ich habe jetzt mal auf meiner Diskussionseite die Themen angeschnitten und hoffe es wird kräftig diskutiert. Siehe : http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer_Diskussion:Derzno --Derzno (talk) 14:55, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Hallo Derzno, ich habe mich mal zu dem ein und anderen Punkt geäußert. Ich hoffe ja sehr, dass Du Dich wieder wie gehabt bei Wikipedia und Commons beteiligst. Die Kritik an Deiner Arbeit ist völlig haltlos, zumal die entsprechenden Person(en) weder mit den Regeln von Commons noch mit den Rechten und Pflichten von Fotografen vertraut sind. Gruß --Janericloebe (talk) 20:17, 20 August 2012 (UTC)
Hallo Janericloebe, danke für deine Unterstützung. Ja, es ist schon ein seltsamer Zeitgeist im Moment. Es ist scheinbar einfacher für den ein- oder Anderen einfach erst mal die "eigene Meinung" als Rule zu posten und nicht selber dazu vorher schlau zu machen. Mir passen auch viele Dinge nicht aber zumindest schreib ich Leuten nur was wenn ich mir meiner Sache (belegbar) sicher bin. Aber ist nicht nur hier in WP, das Verhalten ist in allen Lebenslagen zu finden. Damit müssen wir wohl leider leben--Derzno (talk) 10:02, 21 August 2012 (UTC)
Hallo. Umso wichtiger ist es, sich diesem Zeitgeist nicht anzupassen. Ich hoffe jedenfalls, dass Deine Auszeit bald beendet ist. Angesichts der z. T. zweifelhaften und jetzt offensichtlichen Vorwürfe einiger Benutzer, stellt sich allerdings die Frage, wie man dagegen vorgehen kann. Jedenfalls sind einige Behauptungen („Ich persönlich würde [...] als Besitzer „eines Baudenkmales“ [...] juristische Schritte einleiten“, „1200*800 ist völlig ausreichend bei reiner Sachphotographie“) nicht nur an den Haaren herbeigezogen, sondern auch kontraproduktiv und widersprechen den Regeln und normalen Umgangsformen bei Wikipedia oder Commons. Ich habe deshalb auch mal beim WikiProjekt Denkmalpflege darauf hingewiesen. Gruß --Janericloebe (talk) 00:48, 22 August 2012 (UTC)

Carl Friedrich Voigt Wangerooge 001.jpg

Dear Janericloebe,

I should like to inform you that I have used your image uploaded on wikimedia commons in my book „Nur wer tot ist, geht kein Risiko mehr ein“ a history of 20th century casino gambling, published at the German Libri Bod, ISBN: 978-3-8448-0977-0, page 90. Thank you for making the work available.

Yours faithfully

Henry Lohner, Munich, Germany --Zenwort (talk) 09:14, 22 August 2012 (UTC) User: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Zenwort

Quality Image Promotion

Berlin Bismarck-Nationaldenkmal 002.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Bismarck-Nationaldenkmal 002.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Berlin Moltkebrücke 002.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Moltkebrücke 002.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Erlangen Dechsendorf Backofen Naturbadstraße 6 001.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Erlangen Dechsendorf Backofen Naturbadstraße 6 001.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion

Berlin Hauptbahnhof 006.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Hauptbahnhof 006.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File source is not properly indicated: File:Tennenloher Forst 003.JPG

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Tennenloher Forst 003.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Stefan4 (talk) 21:07, 21 October 2012 (UTC)

Herzlichen Glückwunsch, Du hast gewonnen!

Du bist Gewinner im Fotowettbewerb
Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Liebe_r Janericloebe,

Herzlichen Glückwunsch! Du hast mit einem Deiner Bilder den dritten Platz bei Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 Deutschland gewonnen!

Wir freuen uns Dir mitzuteilen, dass eines Deiner Bilder am 20. Oktober 2012 auf der WLM-Jury-Sitzung in Nürnberg als Preisträger ausgewählt wurde. Wir sind begeistert über die Qualität, die Vielfalt und die Schönheit der zahlreichen eingesendeten Fotos – vielen Dank für Deinen Beitrag!

Anlässlich der Preisverleihung und der Abschlussveranstaltung des diesjährigen Wettbewerbs für Deutschland lädt Dich die WMDE herzlich zur Europäischen Denkmal-Messe am 22. November 2012 in Leipzig ein (Weitere Informationen findest Du hier). Wir würden uns freuen, Dich dort begrüßen zu können und Dir Deinen Preis persönlich zu überreichen. Für einen Reisekostenzuschuss und weitere Informationen kannst du dich (bitte möglichst bald) bei community@wikimedia.de melden.

Im Namen der WLM-Deutschland-Jury --Missyfox (talk) 14:36, 26 October 2012 (UTC)

Da kann ich mir nur anschliessen!!! Glückwunsch und weiter so --Derzno (talk) 15:59, 26 October 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Janericloebe/Archive,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 09:40, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Berlin Händelallee 3-9 001.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Berlin Händelallee 3-9 001.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

File:IMGP5136.JPG

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot

Lieber Janericloebe, herzlichen Glückwunsch zu Deinem 3. Sieg und Fotodruck hinter Acrylglas 80×60 cm im Wert ca. 150 Euro von pixum. Bitte schalte doch eine E-Mail-Adresse frei, damit ich Dich kontaktieren kann. Beste Grüße Christoph Jackel (WMDE) (talk) 15:51, 5 December 2012 (UTC)