User talk:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Crupet[edit]

Merci pour avoir mis cette image sur Wikimédia Commons! J'aimerais voter pour sa inclusion comme photo de qualité ; pourtant, la résolution pourrait être meilleure. Puisqu'on construit un fonds d'images pour l'avenir, il faut que la résolution de nos images soit très haute. Peut-être pourriez-vous nous donner une version de votre photo avec une résolution plus haute. --Zantastik 21:03, 14 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Bonjour,

Votre proposition de vote pour l’image [1] me fait réellement plaisir et m’encourage vraiment à publier mes photographies dans Commons. Malheureusement je ne possède plus le format original 2272x1704 de cette image. En effet habitué à insérer mes images dans des articles WIKIPEDIA (fr, en, nl et wa) et poussé à réduire le format de mes images à 120 Ko maximum par l’administrateur du site wa, j’ai réduit le format de cette image et je l’ai malheureusement sauvegardée sous ce format sans garder une copie de la photographie originale. Votre message aura eu le grand mérite d’attirer mon attention sur le problème de qualité maximum des photographies à envoyer et je ne manquerai pas de suivre vos conseils. Pourriez-vous me dire quel est le format idéal ?

Merci d’avance et à bientôt sur le net j’espère !

Jean-Pol

JPGrandmont 07:18, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Belgium cities/villages photos[edit]

Thank you for providing pictures on Commons.

Please put them into Category:Cities and villages in Belgium only or better into category about specific city/village. Just for avoiding Category:Belgium's overcrowding.

EugeneZelenko 13:40, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)

About some images you uploaded[edit]

I think that images of a mushroom of one specie should be in a page (like Boletus edulis or Clitocybe phyllophila, each inserted in their category: family <- fungi_by_family <- fungi) and they shouldn't be in a category like Ascocoryne sarcoides or Boletus edulis inserted in fungi.

--Qualc1 19:07, 21 October 2005 (UTC)

Answer[edit]

I have answered you in my discussion page

--Qualc1 12:39, 22 October 2005 (UTC)

Vos imådjes[edit]

Dj'a djustumint veyou co sacwantès imådjes ki vs avoz saetchî. Ele sont foirt beles. Proficiåte! Dji n'sapéve nén ki vos avoz stî a Carcasone, savoz. - Waelsch 19:43, 2 December 2005 (UTC)

Todi la? Dj'a djustumint veyou vos novelès imådjes. Waelsch 16:06, 14 December 2005 (UTC)

Cathédrale de Tournai[edit]

Bonjour, dans une question posée à l'Oracle, un visiteur souhaiterait une "photo en couleur du vitrail de la cathédrale de TOURNAI représentant le "poids public"". Auriez-vous cela dans vos cartons ? Merci pour lui :) --Neuceu 16:14, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

Derivative work[edit]

As far as I know, photos of statues in public space are allowed based on "panorama freedom", so I removed speedy deletion request on them. If you don't agree with that, plese make regular delation request. A.J. 14:06, 5 July 2006 (UTC)

  • Hmm... panorama freedom does not apply to some countries... :/ sorry for the mess, I reverted myself A.J. 14:22, 5 July 2006 (UTC)


Quality Image[edit]

Musa JPG01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Musa JPG01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

JeremyA 23:32, 8 November 2006 (UTC)


Image:Orcival JPG01.jpg and Image:Trois-Ponts JPG01.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --gildemax 15:41, 3 December 2006 (UTC)

Category:Medieval churches in Belgium | Category:Churches in Belgium[edit]

Hi Jean-Pol, Category:Medieval churches in Belgium is a subcat of Category:Churches in Belgium. I would therefore recommend that one cat (esp.: Category:Medieval churches in Belgium ) is enough. Greetings --Wst question 14:27, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

(insert)

I do not agree with you because :

  • 1. you do not have proceed on the same way for others photographies of the category ?
  • 2. you have lay in the main category some photographies who have nothing to do there ?
  • 3. you do not have lay at least one representative photography in the main category ?

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 18:35, 17 February 2007 (UTC)

Bonjour Jean-Pol,

I have moved all photographs from Chapels of Belgium to Chapels in Belgium (both categories were created by you anyway), now everything is together in one category. I chose the in version, because most subcategories of category:Chapels by country used this version.

Salut, --LimoWreck 21:04, 21 February 2007 (UTC)

Commons:Geocoding[edit]

Hello Jean-Pol GRANDMONT, at the Geocoding project we have noticed that you uploaded a number of pictures from one of the less covered regions on earth. Maybe you could consider adding coordinates to some of your images. They will show up on the WikiMiniAtlas and the Google Earth Commons-layer. You can find instructions on how to add coordinates to your images at Commons:Geocoding. Thank you in advance! The Geocoding team --EugeneZelenko 15:16, 6 June 2007 (UTC)

I think procedure is not too hard :-) You just need to find subject on the hight resolution map (like http://maps.google.com) and add {{location dec}} or {{location}} in image description. Everything else will be done automatically. Of course, subject location on map will take some time... --EugeneZelenko 14:10, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
Hi and thanks for participating! I'm curious of the geocoding of one of your images however. The geocoding history for Image:Redu AEaJPG.jpg goes:

50°9′33″N 5°8′35″E / 50.15917°N 5.14306°E / 50.15917; 5.14306 - Your original 50°0′27.2″N 5°9′34.1″E / 50.007556°N 5.159472°E / 50.007556; 5.159472 - My correction based on Google Earth satellite imagery 50°0′27.2″N 5°9′38″E / 50.007556°N 5.16056°E / 50.007556; 5.16056 - Your latest change 75m from the corrected location

Now, I've never been there, but comparing the photo to the satellite image, the building is the C shaped one. Your change puts the location to the other side of the nearby square. I wouldn't be so interested of a single image otherwise, but I'm curious of the difference in our coordinates. Which map service are you using for the data? Je comprends français aussi si ça va mieux. --Para 18:19, 11 June 2007 (UTC)
Thanks for checking, it indeed looks better now. I was only afraid that there would be online map services giving different coordinates for the same place, but I'm glad it wasn't the case. I marvel at this new possibility of seeing satellite images, and enjoy trying to find the camera location for photos. I think you're doing a good job too, after some verification. :) Merci et bon continuation!
J'ai oublié vous mentionner la façon la plus façile pour créer les coordonnées. Moi j'utilise Ald-Hjl-Koord-en.kmz (il s'ouvrira en GE), qui me permet de copier le modèle rempli en format wiki, après avoir deplacé l'object au centre d'écran. Bien simple. --Para 08:03, 12 June 2007 (UTC)

Walloon Region[edit]

Bonjour,

Juiced lemon essai d'introduire dans la structure des catégories la notion des régions et des communautés. Il a ajouté Category:Walloon Region et Category:Flemish Region. Il a aussi changé une bonne partie des noms des catégories des provinces wallonnes.

En ce qui concerne le Category:Flemish Region, nous avons déjà demandé une deletion (voir Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Flemish Region et c'est clair que personne veut de cette complexité supplémentaire.

Dans un deuxième temps, il y a quelqu'un qui a ajouté Category:Walloon Region à la nomination de deletion, mais je ne sais pas si cette procédure sera accepté.

De toute façon, je considère que vous êtes un wikipedian très important, si pas le plus important en Wallonie, donc je ne suis pas chaud pour prendre une position avant de connaître votre avis (sur la nomination Commons:Deletion requests/Category:Flemish Region).

Pourriez vous aussi me communiquer votre avis sur le changement des noms des provinces: si vous êtes d'accord, je pourrais faire la demande au bot d'effectuer les transferts.

Cordialement. --Foroa 18:07, 31 July 2007 (UTC)

Bonjour, Votre support sur Category_talk:Churches_in_Belgium#Resolution_september_2007 serait fort apprecié.

Je ne dis pas que la situation est gravée en pierre, mais je trouve que ces choses ne doivent uniquement changer ensemble et après un consensus entre les fournisseurs Belges d'images, pas parce qu'il y a quelqu'un qui décide de le faire autrement dans son coin. --Foroa 08:42, 7 October 2007 (UTC)

Email[edit]

Beste Jean-Pol Grandmont,

hopelijk vind je het niet erg dat ik in het Nederlands schrijf... Ik ben de webmaster van deze website over mammoetbomen, waar ik al jaren alle mammoetbomen (Sequoiadendron giganteum) in België probeer te inventariseren en waar ook een overzicht staat van de dikste bomen van België (deze met de grootste omtrek) ([2]). Misschien bent u deze website al eens tegengekomen.

Op deze pagina's heb ik ook af en toe enkele van uw foto's gebruikt en hiervan had ik u graag op de hoogte gesteld. Ik had u graag ook een email gestuurd met een paar kleine vraagjes (kan u mij eens uw emailadres laten weten of dit in Wikimedia inschakelen bij "My preferences"?)

Cordialement, Tim Bekaert (User Tbc)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rendeux AR1bJPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rendeux AR1bJPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

showcasing your photos[edit]

I just wanted to comment that I liked very much your pictures, and I'm showcasing a few of them on my blog [3]. I saw on the image pages you wanted email if someone reused your images, but then you don't have email enabled. Let me know if I attributed properly your work and if there's any problem. -- Drini 23:35, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

Image:Stropharia aeruginosa JPG1a.jpg[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello!

Thank you for providing images to the Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to the Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on the Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. GeorgHHtalk   13:00, 13 December 2007 (UTC)

Category[edit]

Hi!, can you tell me which of your photos were categorised by me? Here are recent changes on all your photos in last 7 days. Regards, Yarl TalkPL 16:27, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

OK, I'll correct it. Yarl TalkPL 17:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

Abbaye de Floreffe[edit]

D'abord mes félicitations pour la qualité de vos photos. J'apprécie tout particulièrement la grande variété de vues d'églises et d'abbayes de Belgique (Wallonie). J'ai créé l'article sur l'abbaye de Floreffe et me suis permis de l'illustrer avec votre photo. J'espère que c'est okay. J'avoue ne pas m'y retrouver dans ces règles de copyright de Wikicommons. Merci pour vos belle contributions. Zerged 4 février 2008

Li Pontia[edit]

Bonsoir. OK, la category:Li Pontia ayant été créée (pas par moi), je m'étais dit qu'y mettre la photo en question n'était pas absurde. Rien n'interdit d'ailleurs de catégoriser à la fois dans Li Pontia et dans Huy. Lykos 18:32, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

geo localisation[edit]

Bonjour Jean-Paul. J’aime beaucoup tes photographies, mais j’ai trouvé geo localisés près de Bavay deux photo de Dinant (Rocher Bayard et les Rivaves). J’ai fais la correction. Utilises-tu Google-earth ? Jean-Louis Hens (talk) 08:59, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Géo[edit]

Jean-Louis,

Merci pour ton message et ton aide. J'utilise en effet Google Earth mais dans le cas relevé j'ai plus que certainement été distrait.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 09:08, 31 August 2008 (UTC)

Félicitation[edit]

Bonjour,

Je trouve que les photos que vous avez prises pour Mons sont très belles et très réussies ! Vos photos mettent en valeur la cité du Doudou et la Wallonie. Merci !

vi:User:Dragon de Mons

juste pour vous le dire[edit]

Je viens de placer deux de vos photos sur l'article château de Grand-Bigard. Bonne journée--Rosier (talk) 22:24, 19 November 2008 (UTC)

Gallery[edit]

Bonjour,

J'ai vu que vous avez régulièrement ajouté une "galerie" dans la description de vos photos, comme ici ( [4] ).

Mais les derniers jours, quelqu'un est en train d'effacer ces galeries. [5], [6], etc, etc... (entre autre, il efface également les titres pour marquer la description, la licence, etc). Je trouve ça étrange qu'on efface tous ces informations ajouté par un autre utilisateur (ajouté par vous dans ce cas), sans commentaire, sans informer, ou sans demander. C'est pourquoi j'ai défait beaucoup de ses changements... Je ne sais pas quels sont les intentions de cet utilisateurs, mais j'ai voulu quand-même faire cette petite remarque sur votre page de discussions, afin que vous poussiez contrôler ce que certains utilisateurs sont en train de faire avec vos images (ou les descriptions), si ça vous intéresse. Cordialement ;-) --LimoWreck (talk) 19:34, 26 November 2008 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fagus sylvatica JPG2a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fagus sylvatica JPG2a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

License change to File:Relieur JPG01.jpg[edit]

In your recent edit to File:Relieur JPG01.jpg, you changed the license tag from cc-by-2.5 to GFDL|cc-by-3.0. It is permissible to add new licenses but, sorry, it is not generally permissible to revoke a license. (See "What if I change my mind?" in the Creative Commons FAQ.) In effect, your edit added a license and now neither can be revoked and anyone can choose which one they prefer. I have listed both licenses in the "Licensing" section for the photo. —Danorton (talk) 13:30, 13 April 2009 (UTC)

Ça, c'est ce que la majorité des administrateurs de Commons veulent nous faire croire ; mais au final, nous sommes tous des « juristes en herbe » qui ne lisons pas assez les licences. Je suis en train d'essayer de te défendre sur Commons talk:Licensing#Prohibit revoking license. Diti the penguin 13:34, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
I hope that he doesn't need "defense." My only aim is to help and properly describe the image and its licenses. If I have made a mistake, I am more than happy to correct it. In the instance of File:Relieur JPG01.jpg, the license originally selected was cc-by-2.5 which is a perpetual license. In assigning that license he waived his right to subsequently revoke it. While Commons allows for certain specific restrictions, it doesn't allow for subsequent license revocation. I am happy to provide more information or to be informed with more accurate information. —Danorton (talk) 14:23, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
Je demande à ce que la dernière licence soit respectée car c'est mon droit jusqu'à preuve du contraire.
Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 21:39, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
The first license you agreed to was cc-by-2.5, an English-language license detailed here. This is a perpetual license:
3.   License Grant. Subject to the terms and conditions of this License, Licensor hereby grants You a worldwide, royalty-free, non-exclusive, perpetual (for the duration of the applicable copyright) license to exercise the rights in the Work...
The license states that you can revoke ("withdraw") the license under certain specific circumstances, but you have not described any such circumstance. I don't intend to criticize you or to defend Commons policy, but only to accurately and fairly reflect the facts. —Danorton (talk) 03:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I don't think the meaning of “perpetual” should be taken 100% accurate here. Let's imagine the author publishes his work under a CC-by-nc license. According to you, the fact that this license has near-infinite copyright terms would mean that latter uses of the work under a less restrictive license would be prohibited. Are they, actually? No. For me, what you are trying to do is to interpret the license terms so that you can justify your changes and chose the free license that you like (sorry for the bolded text, I'm not attacking you, I just want to give my text a better impact ;). Maybe I'm wrong, but try to understand what the uploader thinks of your acts. Creative Commons licenses aren't selective based on their level of freedom. PS: oops? :D Diti the penguin 06:24, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
I'm not following your argument as it applies in this instance. What's not true here?
  1. The author has assigned two licenses to this item, both of which are perpetual and non-revocable.
  2. Anyone may use either license.
  3. The page truthfully and accurately lists both licenses and indicates that anyone may use the license they prefer.
Danorton (talk) 20:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)

Important proposal[edit]

I wrote a proposal for equalizing the different picture formats on FPC Please have a look. Best regards --Richard Bartz (talk) 20:31, 17 April 2009 (UTC)

Photographe[edit]

Monsieur.

Après avoir découvert votre page sur Commons, je me suis permis de vous inclure dans ma rubrique "D'autres photographes talentueux" sur ma page Commons.

Cordialement.

--ComputerHotline (talk) 17:47, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

FP promotion[edit]

Laeken Se1aJPG.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Laeken Se1aJPG.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Laeken Se1aJPG.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

FP promotion[edit]

Fagus sylvatica Purpurea JPG4a.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Fagus sylvatica Purpurea JPG4a.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fagus sylvatica Purpurea JPG4a.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

Morlanwelz-Mariemont[edit]

I try to get all the botanical pictures off the park, only in the category:"Parc de Mariemont". This is a subcategory off "Morlanwelz-Mariemont" and "Parks in Belgium". Now the pictures of Morlanwelz-Mariemont wich have nothing to do with the park are drowned. Examples File:Mariemont sporen.JPG, File:Mariemont Splitsing.JPG and File:Mariemont tunnel lijn 30.JPG. In principle there the number of categories of a file should be limited. A picture should either be in the main category or a subcategory but not both.

Smiley.toerist (talk) 08:57, 24 April 2009 (UTC)

Transcluded user templates with embedded license templates[edit]

Hi Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

There is an issue with your user license and Commons policy. I have drafted a post about it here: User:Slaunger/Sandbox/COM:AN message, which I intend to post on COM:AN shortly. Since your user name is mentioned explicitly, I thought you should have a possibility to preview it and possibly correct any factual mistakes. Cheers, --Slaunger (talk) 19:23, 22 June 2009 (UTC)

Hi Jean-Pol, Its seems like virtually all users I contact, which have followed the same process is willing to change it such that the templates are in accordance with Commons policy. Therefore it seems unlikely that the policy will be changed, and since you have also asked for assistance to fix your user template, I thought we as well might get started. In relation to that I would like to ask you if it is OK if I create two subpages in your user name space, User:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT/My and User:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT/MyLicense. The first one will basically be a copy of Template:Jean-PolGRANDMONTCredit with the license extracted, and the second one will be the /My user template side by side with the license templates. The latter will be the one you should use in the future using
{{subst:User:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT/MyLicense}}
on your file pages. Once I have made that and you have approved that it looks OK (using a single file page as a test), we could schedule a job at a bot operator replacing all occurances of {{Jean-PolGRANDMONTCredit}} with {{subst:User:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT/MyLicense}} on your 2800 file pages.
If this all seems a little overwhelming, don't dispair. We will do it step by step such that you can follow the process and get a good understanding of the changes I would like to make.
Just reply here. I am watching.
Cheers, --Slaunger (talk) 19:42, 24 June 2009 (UTC)
Hi Jean-Pol, I am back and ready. I have now extracted the license template from you user template and placed it in User:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT/Credit. this is a template which will continue to be simply transcluded into your image pages, and you can maintain it centrally. It is used in User:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT/License alongside with a CC-BY-SA-3.0 license. (Note that I selected slightly different subpage names that I originally proposed, I think the names used here are better). Now, in the future you should add your credit template as well as the license by adding
Permission={{subst:User:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT/License}}
in your image pages in the {{Information}} template. As a test I have done this substitution manually in File:Conques JPG03.jpg. Please review if you are satisfied with the result (the substitution first generated two extra line breaks in the permission field, but I have now adjusted your new user templates such that they will not appear again). If you can confirm this kind of change I will make a test run with my bot on 20 of your image files. --Slaunger (talk) 19:37, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Test run with 20 template substitutions I have checked each one of them and they seem OK. Can I proceed provided I get the bot flag I have requested? --Slaunger (talk) 23:36, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks. I have to hold my horse though until a bureaucrat comes by and gives me a bot flag on my bot request. --Slaunger (talk) 20:40, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Hi Jean-Pol, the bot flag has been granted, and I have initiated my first job, which will replace your old user template on 1000 image pages of your this evening. The remaining pages will be done tomorrow. --Slaunger (talk) 20:09, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, Jean-Pol. I am not completely done yet though. I did +1000 replacements yesterday, and 1000 replacements two days ago (I have committed myself to limit the bot to about 1000 edit per day), but there are still 300-400 replacements left (which I anticipate will be done later this evening (if my wife does not turn off my PC again, while it is working - arrrgh Smile)). Once all transclusions of {{Jean-PolGRANDMONTCredit}} has been replaced by the new ones, I would like to nominate it for deletion, just to get rid of it once and for all. --Slaunger (talk) 13:33, 27 July 2009 (UTC)
✓ Done with all 2754 template replacements. I will now nominate your old template for deletion. --Slaunger (talk) 19:18, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

Once again thanks!![edit]

http://www.wereldpagina.nl/index.php/Bestand:Bas-Languedoc_Carcassonne.jpg

Photographers Blackbelt[edit]

Wikipedia laurier photo.png
Judo black belt.PNG
THE PHOTOGRAPHER'S BLACKBELT
J'ai l'honneur de vous décerner la Photographers Blackbelt (ceinture noire des photographes) pour vos photos remarquables et excellentes.
--ComputerHotline (talk) 18:47, 5 September 2009 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Bürstegg Biberkopf.jpg[edit]

I have uploaded a new version of this picture! Maybe you would like to change your vote! --Simonizer (talk) 06:35, 16 September 2009 (UTC)

Watermill[edit]

Hello, I used your image of the Hotton watermill in an article I wrote for a children's magazine. You asked to be sent a copy of the article, but I can't find a valid e-mail address for you. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 17:37, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

Charmilles[edit]

Cher Jean-Pol,
moi aussi, je ne trouve pas d'adresse courriel valable, donc j'écris ici
Merci beaucoup pour les images de charmilles
deux images sont incluses dans mon vidéo sur un poème de Paul Verlaine, j'espère qu'il vous plaira
Ariette Oubliée No 4
Amitiés
David
Dwsolo (talk) 15:24, 7 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Ganoderma applanatum JPG1.jpg[edit]

Allô Jean-Pol!

Est-ce-que tu es sûr que c'est le Polypore aplani (Ganoderma applanatum). Je pense que c'est l'amadouvier (Fomes fomentarius). Ce champignon est très (trôp ?) épais/bouffi pour G. applanatum. La couleur n'est pas vrai aussi. Qu'est-ce que tu pense? (I think it is better to go on in English ;-)) --Toffel (talk) 22:27, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Scarlet Oak[edit]

I used your Scarlet Oak Picture in my State Trees Gallery.Thanks Vanessa - Trees & Shrubs at About.com


Gouvy[edit]

Hallo,

Please have a look at this comment

Les Meloures (talk) 23:34, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

Image:Waha JPG00i.jpg[edit]

Hello Jean-Pol GRANDMONT!

Is this file your own work? Are you the photographer/author of this file? If yes, please insert {{own}} as source instead of nothing.

Thanks in advance. --High Contrast (talk) 09:14, 7 April 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for File:Fraxinus syriaca JPG1Fe.jpg[edit]

thumbs

Thank you for the image; used twice on the Hebrew wikipedia. RickP (talk) 18:54, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

FPC careless reviews[edit]

Hi Jean,

You may be interested in participating in this_discussion. Cheers, Alvesgaspar (talk) 16:06, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Warneton 051003 (8).JPG[edit]

Hello, I am trying to identify this gun in the photo you uploaded. Do you have any more information ? It looks like a 25-pounder but many details are different ! Rod. Rcbutcher (talk) 13:43, 27 June 2010 (UTC)

It appears to be a modernised version of Category:Škoda 100 mm Model 14/19 which was used by many smaller European countries before and into WWII. I can't find any reference to Belgium using it or why it has been so carefully preserved. But Poland produced a similar version with modern pneumatic tyres : See http://www.afv-news.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/72755_0.jpg. Rod. Rcbutcher (talk) 17:09, 2 July 2010 (UTC)

Congratulation[edit]

Congratulation Jean-pol for your remarkable contribution to the WP commons. By the way, are you not related to the Grandmont tribes of Forrières in Belgium. :-) Best wishes, Shinkolobwe (talk) 14:19, 25 July 2010 (UTC)

Tribes of Forrières[edit]

Bonjour Jean-Pol, Merci de ta réponse. C'est par le bias de la spéléo que je connais votre tribu. J'ai eu tout récemment le plaisir de descendre encore avec BG. Je vais lui demander ton adresse email pour te contacter de façon plus personnelle. Sinon, demande lui la mienne: πR, :-)) Shinkolobwe (talk) 21:08, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Rebonjour Jean-Pol,
Merci de ton second message. Décidément, le monde est petit et nous sommes en pays de connaissance. J'ai bien connu Claude et aussi certains de ses cousins d'Andennes. Bonjour à la famille. Bien amicalement, πR, Shinkolobwe (talk) 19:19, 28 July 2010 (UTC)

L'identification du champignon[edit]

Bonjour, Jean-Pol!
File:Ganoderma applanatum JPG1.jpg - Cela non Ganoderma applanatum. C'est le Fomes fomentarius.
Bien amicalement --George Chernilevsky talk 09:41, 28 September 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour Georges,

Je te remercie pour ton message. En consultant ma page de discussion, tu pourras constater que j'ai déjà débattu au sujet de cette identification en décembre 2009 avec Toffel et lui avais signalé que l'angle de prise de vue, ainsi que les conditions météo et de lumière avaient donné cet aspect d'épaisseur et de couleur verdâtre à ce spécimen ce qui rendait malaisée son identification au premier abord. L'étude des spores au microscope n'avait toutefois laissé aucun doute pour la détermination de l'espèce.

J'en profite puisque tu sembles être un spécialiste de l'identification des champignons sur document photographique, pour te demander si tu peux déterminer les champignons figurant sur les fichiers suivants:

Amicalement et au plaisir de te lire,

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT

J'ai pu identifier deux seulement.
Très amical --George Chernilevsky talk 15:20, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Bonjour Jean-Pol. Ajoutez une note sur l'identification par l'étude des spores au microscope à la description de cette image, s'il vous plait. Walter Siegmund (talk) 15:41, 28 September 2010 (UTC)
Je continue à m'assurer que cela - "Fomes fomentarius". Le meilleur biologiste mycologist de russe et ukrainien Wiki communique assurément : ce ne peut pas être "Ganoderma applanatum" --George Chernilevsky talk 18:30, 28 September 2010 (UTC)


Merci pour ta réponse partielle.

Comme tu as pu le constater, il est très difficile de déterminer l'identité biologique des champignons sur la simple étude d'un document photographique (deux identifications assurées et deux identifications sans certitude pour 16 images étudiées).

Avant de prendre position au sujet de l'image incriminée, j'attendrai donc que de plus amples informations me soient fournies par les spécialistes.

En effet, dans bien des cas, Il est prématuré de renommer une image sans en avoir parlé avec des personnes expertes en la matière. Cela est d'ailleurs également démontré par la discussion que j'ai eue en décembre 2009 avec Toffel.

Amicalement,

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT

Salut à tous aux participants de la discussion.

  • La remarque 0. Je propose toutes les discussions de faire ici. Il ne faut pas copier sur d'autres pages de la discussion.
  • La remarque 1. Je le biologiste non professionnel, cependant la science la biologie me plais beaucoup. J'ai lu beaucoup de livres de biologie (enseignement indépendant) et je tâche d'utiliser ces connaissances pratiquement. J'ai lu l'édition dans six volumes les in-folio de l'Académie des Sciences de l'URSS à l'âge de 11 ans. Je vivais parmi la nature sauvage la grande partie du temps et loin des villes.
  • La remarque 2. Je faisais aussi les erreurs aux identifications et deux fois mes fichiers étaient rebaptisés et ont échangé la catégorie.
  • La remarque 3. En 2009-2010 je voyais plus de centaine de fois les champignons Ganoderma applanatum et Fomes fomentarius. Ces deux champignons se rencontrent souvent dans les bois de l'Ukraine. Le champignon "Ganoderma applanatum" grandit d'habitude sur les arbres morts à côté de la terre (5-50 cm).

Sont suffisantes les négociations sur moi, maintenant nous regarderons le champignon.

  • Le champignon inconnu a les signes de l'âge approximativement 7 ans (un nouvel anneau chaque année). C'est un vieux champignon.
  • Un vieux champignon "Ganoderma applanatum" toujours plat. Un jeune champignon arrive parfois le haut. C'est un vieux champignon.
  • Un vieux champignon Fomes fomentarius a la forme du sabot.
  • Le champignon "Ganoderma applanatum" de la couleur grise arrive très sec ou mort. Le champignon ? ? ? mouillé.
  • Plus bas champignon "Ganoderma applanatum" d'habitude soulève la poussière beaucoup de la couleur rouillée brune. Je ne vois pas la poussière brune ici.
  • Le champignon "Ganoderma applanatum" a un domaine blanc sans division en les anneaux. C'est l'accroissement en un an.
  • Le champignon Fomes fomentarius a quelques anneaux clairs ces dernières années. Il s'assombrit lentement.

Tous les signes est recueilli ensemble => ? ? ? C'est une très bonne photo du champignon Fomes fomentarius.

C'est mes connaissances. Pouvez les contester et inviter les spécialistes. Je peux me tromper aussi.

Très amical --George Chernilevsky talk 13:59, 29 September 2010 (UTC)

Your description changes on file Arlon_E1_JPG.jpg[edit]

Hello,

Despite your changes having been reverted, why do you continue to silently push your own version of Arlon E1 JPG.jpg description with the wrong categories and less interwiki links, without giving your reasons? Thanks for your answer and for caring about others' work. Bjung (talk) 17:34, 27 October 2010 (UTC)

Aquarelliste JPG03.jpg[edit]

Aquarelliste JPG03.jpg

Hello, I was wondering which castle we see here in the background. (I would like to add that to the Dutch article about watercolour painting.)

Muijz (talk) 17:51, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Use of images, Wallonia & Brussels magazine[edit]

Hello I'd like to use one of your photos of Château de Dave near Namur in the next edition of Wallonia & Brussels magazine, but like others on here, I can't find your email address to contact you. If we publish it, we will of course credit you. Best wishes.

Photo use permission[edit]

Mr. Grandmont,

I am writing from Common Ground -- a high school, urban farm, and environmental education in New Haven, Connecticut. Our students are currently wrapping up work on a series of outdoor interpretive exhibits for our site, developed in collaboration with the staff at the Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History. You can read a little about their work at www.commongroundct.org/lessons.php, if you are interested.

One of our exhibits will focus on different invasive species on our campus, and I noticed this great photo (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Acer_platanoides_1aJPG.jpg) of a norway maple that you took. I was wondering if it might be possible for our students to get permission to use some of these photos in their exhibit. We would, of course, be happy to provide a photo credit acknowledging your contribution to the exhibit.

Thanks for your time, and for your great work. I look forward to hearing back, Evan Walker-Wells ewalkerwells@gmail.com

Utilisation d'une photo[edit]

Bonjour,

je suis graphiste amateur et j'aurais aimé pouvoir utiliser une de vos photos de chêne pédonculé (File:Quercus robur JPG (d2).jpg) pour effectuer un montage pour mon usage personnel et l'exposer sur mon compte deviantart.

Amicalement,

Amandine (amande74@gmail.com)

Descriptions multilingues[edit]

Bonjour. J'ai utilisé le modèle multilingue LangSwitch Error: no default --Ecummenic (talk) 15:09, 2 December 2010 (UTC)

GR-Atlas[edit]

Bonjour Monsieur Grandmont, J’ai utilisé quelques de vos photos trouvés sur Wikimedia pour l’illustration de notre projet de recherche GR-Atlas. Merci pour l'occasion de les utiliser.

Vous les trouvez sur les pages : Kathedrale von Tournai http://geo.uni.lu/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1641&Itemid=5

Belfriede in Belgien und Frankreich http://geo.uni.lu/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1640&Itemid=509

Hochschulwesen in Wallonien http://geo.uni.lu/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1635&Itemid=503

GK035 AGC Flat Glass Moustier http://geo.uni.lu/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1619&Itemid=477

GA041 1893: Gussignies - Roisin http://geo.uni.lu/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=1467&Itemid=296

GK050 Gerresheimer Momignies S.A. http://geo.uni.lu/joomla/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=862&Itemid=392

Cordialement Malte Helfer, Université du Luxembourg

Use of your pictures in print[edit]

Hello, I'd like to use some of your photos in the next edition of Newcomer magazine. The photos are Braine-l'Alleud_JPG00a, Braine-l'Alleud_JPG01 and Overijse_JPG01a. If we publish any of them, we will of course credit you. Best wishes.

  • Can you give me more details about your magazine ?

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 09:32, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Carpinus[edit]

Bonjour,Monsieur Grandmont, tout d'abord félicitations pour vos images. Elles expriment une grande sensibilité avec la nature. Habitant en France, en Sologne, terre de forêts et de bruyères, il serait bien possible que votre coup d'œil soit charmé par cette région. Je travaille sur un projet où l'arbre à une place prépondérante dans sa réalisation, notamment le charme (carpinus betulus), je souhaite créer un site internet en utilisant Carpinus betulus 'Fastigiata' JPG1.jpg pour illustrer ma page d'accueil, me concéder vous cette possibilité. J'apporterai juste une modification en enlevant les 2 personnages. Si vous le souhaitez nous pourrons ainsi échanger sur les passions qui nous animent. Stéphane

  • Bonjour Stéphane,

Merci pour votre sympathique message. Il se pourrait fort bien que je passe par la Sologne, car je visite régulièrement diverses régions de France depuis pas mal d'années. De plus, la lecture de Raboliot m'a réellement passionné dans ma jeunesse et cela me pousse vraiment à mieux connaître toutes ces beautés décrites par Maurice Genevoix. En ce qui concerne l'utilisation de l'image sur votre site, je n'émets que les restrictions décrites par la licence (crédit photographique à l'auteur) et me demande pourquoi vouloir enlever les personnages de l'image puisque ceux-ci situent bien le cadre du parc dans lequel l'arbre a grandi. J'aimerais aussi connaître le lien vers votre site.

Bonne continuation et à bientôt.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 14:49, 18 February 2011 (UTC)

Carpinus (suite)[edit]

Bonjour Jean-Pol, Je viens de prendre connaissance de votre message, et vous en remercie. Pour ce qui est des 2 personnages, ils s'inscrivent parfaitement dans la quiétude du lieu sous la majesté de ce charme, mais en fait, je souhaite mettre l'accent sur la majesté de cet arbre, sous ce magnifique contre-jour. Mon site ne sera pas créé avant 2 mois, et à ce moment je ne manquerais pas de vous adresser le lien. Pour ce qui est de la Sologne, le printemps et l'automne sont les périodes les plus magnifiques, avec un faible pour le printemps où les contrastes sont les plus forts. S'il était possible de converser autrement ce serait avec plaisir,mais n'ose laisser mon adresse mail. Nous pourrions échanger différemment, d'autant plus que ma voisine est une de vos compatriotes, de Waterloo... A bientôt peut être. Stéphane

Bonjour Jean-Pol, j'ai finalement réalisé les images de mon site moi-même sans la majesté du charme que tu avais pris. Je t'invite donc à découvrir www.billot-sologne.com A bientôt peut-être sur les chemins de Sologne. Stéphane

Vol de photos[edit]

Je me permet de te signaler des vols massifs de photos par http://www.infotourisme.net qui fait des fiches de communes françaises partiellement copiées de Wikipédia, avec photos, volées elles aussi. Comme tu fais beaucoup de photos, et qu'elles illustrent des pages de Wikipédia, tu es potentiellement concerné. Markus3 est "en plein dedans", il en parle ici, et au bistro de Wikipédia, suivre les liens. Cordialement, ----MGuf (d) 19:05, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Non respect des licences photos[edit]

J’ai constaté depuis longtemps le vol de mes documents sur de nombreux sites référencés par google mais aussi dans diverses revues et journaux. C’est pour cela que dans un premier temps et par réflexe de défense j’avais inséré le watermark que tu connais. La politique de Wikipédia ayant changé au sujet des licences acceptées, certaines personnes y ont vu très vite une source de profits à peu de frais puisque Wikipédia n’est pas à même de faire respecter le droit des licences qu’elle impose sur les documents importés par ses membres. Bien que je me sois fait une raison, je pense que ces règles nuiront à plus ou moins brève échéance à l’encyclopédie car beaucoup voient déjà d’un mauvais œil que leurs documents destinés aux nobles buts éducatifs d’une entreprise participative servent souvent à des fins uniquement commerciales.

Cordialement

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 14:20, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

"La politique de Wikipédia ayant changé au sujet des licences acceptées" : ah bon ? quel changements ? Hors exception (logo, timbres...) il n'y a sur Wikipédia que des photos de Commons, c'est "la politique" de Commons qui prime, elle n'a pas changé à ma connaissance.
"Wikipédia n’est pas à même de faire respecter le droit des licences" : ben non, c'est à l'auteur de faire respecter si il veux la licence qu'il a choisi.
C'est clair que celui qui refuse l'utilisation commerciale ne peut pas mettre son travail sous CC-By-SA !
Et à par ça, je n'ai pas compris ta position : tu baisses les bras et laisse quiconque voler ton travail ? Au contraire tu souhaites changer de licence pour PD-self ou CC0 ? Pas compris.
Et quelle attitude pouvons nous adopter quand on voit une de tes images volée ? Je sais qu'on n'a pas légitimité à agir pour autrui, mais on peut "conseiller" les fautifs ; il semble également qu'une procédure collective appuyée par Wikimedia France se mette en place prochainement pour tenter de résoudre le problème avec Infotourisme : souhaites tu t'y associer ? Cordialement, ----MGuf (d) 19:03, 18 March 2011 (UTC)

Quercus castaneifolia[edit]

Hello - I work for a non-profit organization dedicated to bio-diversity conservation in the Caucasus. Quercus castaneifolia is a species endemic to the Caucasus, and we would like to use your photo on our new website, which we will be launching in the next two months or so.

I was unable to access your email information on Wikimedia Commons.

You can reach me at contact@caucasus-naturefund.org.

Merci!

It's OK for me, if the licence conditions are met. Please let me know the link to the website where the documents will be published.

P.S. I could not contact you at your email: contact@caucasus-naturefund.org.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 16:11, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

User:Jean-Pol GRANDMONT/Credit[edit]

Hello Jean-Pol, I noted your template ("An email to Jean-Pol GRANDMONT would be appreciated"), and that you haven't enabled receiving e-mails here on Commons. Therefore the link Special:EmailUser/Jean-Pol_GRANDMONT in all your image descriptions only gives an error. Maybe you could fix this, either by enabling e-mail, or by adapting the template. Regards --:bdk: 23:06, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Files tagged as duplicates[edit]

Hi, I notice you have tagged 5 of your uploads (File:Burg-Reuland JPG001.jpg, File:Burg-Reuland JPG12.jpg, File:Burg-Reuland JPG02.jpg, File:Burg-Reuland JPG13.jpg and File:Abbaye ND de Scourmont JPG02.jpg) as duplicates after uploading copies / new versions of each of these images.

However there is one issue here: You originally uploaded the images under cc-by-2.0. The new uploads are licensed under cc-by-sa-3.0. Of course this is a free license, but it is more restrictive than the original release which was over 6 years ago. Two options to my mind here: If the new file is changed to a cc-by licence, the old one can be speedied or if you want to keep the more restrictive license, it should go through Commons:Deletion requests. Bear in mind Commons does not typically allow revocation of licenses, and that is effectively what would happen here.--Nilfanion (talk) 16:00, 30 July 2011 (UTC) }}

File:Mons 050424 JPG106.jpg (Marché aux fleurs à Mons)[edit]

Bonjour Jean-Pol.

De rien. C'est avec plaisir que j'ai adapté la traduction néerlandaise. La vôtre n'était pas erronée d'ailleurs, "zondagse bloemenmarkt" sonne simplement mieux...

Entre-temps, j'ai promu votre photo - après quelques hésitations dues aux détails surexposés (un effet pratiquement inévitable dans ces conditions de prise de vue). Mais j'aime beaucoup l'atmosphère printanière de l'image.

Bien cordialement, Marc (MJJR)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mons 050424 JPG106.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons 050424 JPG106.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Brugge Koningsbrug R02.jpg[edit]

Bonjour Jean-Pol,
Merci pour la promotion 'QI' de ma photo de Bruges. J'allais juste réagir à votre demande concernant la procédure à suivre, mais je vois que vous avez trouvé entre-temps.
Cordiales salutations, Marc (MJJR)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sculpteur sur bois JPG02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sculpteur sur bois JPG02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Missing template with identifier[edit]

Hello Jean-Pol GRANDMONT, It is a must to add to your uploaded files a template in what the number of the monument (identifier) is filled in. Otherwise submissions for Wiki Loves Monuments do not participate in the contest. Can you please make sure that your uploaded files have the monument-number in the apropiate template? For Flanders: Template:Onroerend erfgoed, for Wallonie: Template:Monument Wallonie and for Brussels: Template:Monument Brussels. Thanks! Romaine (talk) 00:15, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Hanvec - ossuaire - 002.jpg[edit]

Bonjour Thesupermat,

L'image susmentionnée est très jolie mais tu as oublié d'insérer la description. Dès que tu auras mis cette description, je voterai pour la promouvoir.

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 10:06, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

✓ Done, merci d'avoir noté cet oubli, bonne journée. --Thesupermat (talk) 10:18, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

File:0_Verdun_-_Ossuaire_de_Douaumont_(1).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:0_Verdun_-_Ossuaire_de_Douaumont_(1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Trizek here or on fr:wp 12:04, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Bonjour,
En ce qui me concerne, je ne fais que veiller au respect du règlement pour wiki loves monuments, où il est indiqué que tout participant doit s'assurer que les différents droits doivent être respectés avant de poster une photographie sur Commons, même si certains de ces droits sont stupides. Ayant fort à faire avec WLM, je ne traîte pas les photos postées dans les autres cas.
Tu peux répondre par toi même à la question "pourquoi moi, pas les autres ?" que tu me poses indirectement : parmi tous les liens à droite de ta page, il existe celui marqué nominate for deletion. N'hésite pas à t'en servir si tu estimes que cela est nécessaire. En outre, n'hésite pas à écrire à ton député européen afin d'unifier cette fichue liberté de panorama, qui nous ennuie bien.
Cordialement, Trizek here or on fr:wp 13:26, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Meise 060629 (24).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Meise 060629 (24).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Ossuaire de Douaumont[edit]

Hello M. Grandmont,

Im sorry about the deletion request of your picture File:0_Verdun_-_Ossuaire_de_Douaumont_(1).jpg in the course of Wiki Monuments. But why did you request the deletion of unique contemporary historical documents like File:Bundesarchiv Bild 121-0365, Verdun, Besichtigung, Gedenkstätte.jpg ? So is mine (File:Douaumont ossuary during german occupation.jpg), at least i think so. Aware of the builders property rights, i dont't see the proportionality in this case of documents. Removing these files would be a great loss for wikimedia. Christian Ude (talk) 15:13, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

bonjour.

Inutile d'ouvrir un nouveau fil de discussion, c'est bien le sujet que je souhaite aborder en réponse à ton amical message. L'opportunité de la présence ou du maintien dans Commons de cette image ne fait pas de doute pour moi, évidemment. Je suis à cet égard du même avis que ton interlocuteur ci-dessus. La majesté funèbre et grandiose de ces lieux que je connais me parle aussi. L'aspect légal de la chose, au regard du droit français, m'incline plutôt à penser comme Trizek. Mais devant le consensus qui semble se dessiner (à mon avis sujet à caution, je le maintiens), je vais avec plaisir revenir sur mon opposition, qui n'était que juridique, mais ni technique, ni d'opportunité. Bien cordialement, --Jebulon (talk) 22:26, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Category:Glass manufacturing companies in Belgium[edit]

Hi, a few months back you created Category:Glass manufacturing companies in Belgium. It is advisable to give a category more than one parent category. In this case, there was no link with Belgium when browsing through categories. Please keep this in mind in the future. --Vera (talk) 18:06, 7 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Clervaux - Le vieux château féodal (XIIe siècle).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clervaux - Le vieux château féodal (XIIe siècle).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Verdun - Ossuaire de Douaumont (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Lompret - Village (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Lompret - Village (3).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Soignies - Garde Impériale 2.JPG[edit]

Superb! (whatever happens at QI, I love it). NVO (talk) 05:51, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

QIC[edit]

Hi Jean-Pol,

did you made two times a mistake [7], [8] or did you want to promote all the three images? Greetings --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:38, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Ancien abattoir de Bergues[edit]

Bonjour et merci pour votre participation à Wiki loves Monuments.

Cependant, la photographie File:0 Bergues - Ancien abattoir (1).jpg ne représente apparemment pas un monument historique protégé par le ministère de la Culture. Aussi suis-je obligé de la retirer du concours.

N'hésitez pas à ajouter d'autres clichés, en vérifiant bien que l'édifice concerné est un monument historique (identifiant Mérimée commençant par PA).

Bonne participation, cordialement, VIGNERON (talk) 21:46, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

PS: de plus, sauf erreur de ma part, il y a erreur sur la commune dans le titre des fichiers : File:0 Bergues - Citerne de la citadelle (1).jpg, File:0 Bergues - Citerne de la citadelle (2).jpg, et File:0 Bergues - Robinet de la citerne de Freville.jpg. Puis-je renommer ces fichiers pour remplacer Bergues par Gravelines ?

Bonsoir,
Je t'en prie, si tu as d'autres questions sur les MH ou la base Mérimée, n'hésite pas à demander.
Je viens d'effectuer les trois renommages comme prévu.
Je viens aussi de clore en conservation la PàS pour ton fichier. Je trouve que c'est assez limite du point de vue légal ; mais après tout, c'est ton fichier, je te préviens juste que les éventuels problèmes légaux et juridiques sont entièrement sous ta responsabilité et à tes risques et périls.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 22:53, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Bergues - Hôtel de ville (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Bergues - Hôtel de ville (1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Soignies - Garde Impériale 2.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Soignies - Garde Impériale 2.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Mozet - Ferme de Basseille (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Mozet - Ferme de Basseille (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Aubechies - Église Saint-Géry (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Aubechies - Église Saint-Géry (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Lobbes - Collégiale Saint-Ursmer (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Lobbes - Collégiale Saint-Ursmer (1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Bergues - Ancien mont-de-piété (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Bergues - Ancien mont-de-piété (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 La Hestre - Drève de Mariemont (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 La Hestre - Drève de Mariemont (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Château de Celles (Houyet)[edit]

Bonsoir,

Merci de ta confiance.
J'ai tenté quelque chose, mais ne suis pas entièrement satisfait du résultat. à toi de voir. Si ça ne te convient pas, ne te prive pas de revenir à ta version, je n'ai pas d'amour-propre d'auteur !
De toutes façons, il y a un gros problème de surexposition du ciel tout à fait en haut à droite et que je n'ai pas pu régler, qui me parait rédhibitoire en QI.
C'est toutefois un bien joli site !
Bien cordialement, --Jebulon (talk) 22:41, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mons St2aJPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons St2aJPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Grille du Théatre royal de Mons.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Grille du Théatre royal de Mons.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Mariemont Fontaine des lions 101225 (1).JPG[edit]

Salut !

Tu m'as bien fait sourire avec ton catalpa, c'était très sympa et amusant !!--Jebulon (talk) 23:36, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Ce petit mot pour te dire que ta Fontaine aux Lions visée dans le titre penche un peu à gauche, tu devrais peut-être la redresser.
Ne va pas à Grenade pour voir l'original, il est encore pour longtemps démonté et en restauration, j'ai été bien déçu.
Mais si tu ne connais pas cette ville, alors je t'engage vraiment à y aller, elle est merveilleuse (quelques images dans ma galerie).
Amicalement,--Jebulon (talk) 23:36, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Our E1bJPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our E1bJPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mohiville Mo1bJPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mohiville Mo1bJPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Serres Royales de Laeken (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Serres Royales de Laeken (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Thoricourt PH1JPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thoricourt PH1JPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mons St2aJPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mons St2aJPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Grille du Théatre royal de Mons.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Grille du Théatre royal de Mons.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Aubechies - Église Saint-Géry (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Aubechies - Église Saint-Géry (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 La Bruyère (Beauvechain) - Ferme de Wahenge (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 La Bruyère (Beauvechain) - Ferme de Wahenge (1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Gembloux - Palais de l'ancienne abbaye St-Pierre (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Gembloux - Palais de l'ancienne abbaye St-Pierre (2).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Opprebais - Moulin (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Opprebais - Moulin (1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Walcourt - Parclose - Satire d'une nourice.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Walcourt - Parclose - Satire d'une nourice.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Walcourt - Miséricorde - Deux personnes déféquant.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Walcourt - Miséricorde - Deux personnes déféquant.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

QIC[edit]

Jean-Pol, merci pour les mots encourageants. A mon tour, je prends plaisir à suivre l'apparition de tes photos sur la page QIC. Cordialement, --Cayambe (talk) 14:53, 20 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Moulbaix - Moulin de la Marquise (2).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Moulbaix - Moulin de la Marquise (2).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Huy - Grand'Place (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Huy - Grand'Place (1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Mons - Hôtel de ville (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Mons - Hôtel de ville (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Moulbaix MV1fJPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Moulbaix MV1fJPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mariemont Fontaine des lions 101225 (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mariemont Fontaine des lions 101225 (1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Château d'Havré (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Château d'Havré (3).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Celles (Houyet) - Château de Vêves (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Celles (Houyet) - Château de Vêves (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Your signature on QIC page[edit]

Hello! Please sign your promotion from this edit on QIC page. Greetings ---- Jakubhal 22:02, 22 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cugnon ME1aJPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cugnon ME1aJPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Falaën Mme Parisse - JPG01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Falaën Mme Parisse - JPG01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

BMW R75 - 116 Pz Div - JPG2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! BMW R75 - 116 Pz Div - JPG2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cambron-Casteau AB4a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambron-Casteau AB4a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Grand-Reng JPG01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand-Reng JPG01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Char T34 - Cal 85 - JPG1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Char T34 - Cal 85 - JPG1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Catalpa bignonioides Aurea JPG1a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Catalpa bignonioides Aurea JPG1a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Opprebais - Ferme-château (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Opprebais - Ferme-château (1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Ecaussinnes-d'Enghien AR2bJPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ecaussinnes-d'Enghien AR2bJPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Stitching errors ?[edit]

Bonjour,

je viens de m'opposer à la nomination de File:0 Les Gilles d'Havré (1).JPG dans la CR des QIC. Je voudrais que tu la regardes de près s'il te plaît, je pense qu'il y a un problème grave avec ton appareil. On dirait que la photo est composée de colonnes et de bandes qui ne s'accordent pas entre elles. Il y en a partout, et trop pour qu'il ne s'agisse que d'une erreur de composition ou de "collage". C'est vraiment très visible notamment sur les visages, mais ailleurs aussi. Peux-tu jeter un coup d'oeil ?--Jebulon (talk) 13:36, 24 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Bouillon - Château-fort et pont sur la Semois (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Bouillon - Château-fort et pont sur la Semois (1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rebaix ME1cJPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rebaix ME1cJPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Château de Logne - Vieuxville (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Château de Logne - Vieuxville (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tirailleurs algériens de Fosse-la-Ville - Havré.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tirailleurs algériens de Fosse-la-Ville - Havré.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Falaën 060823 (5).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Falaën 060823 (5).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Enghien CH1bJPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Enghien CH1bJPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Cambron-Casteau JPG05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambron-Casteau JPG05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Renier de Huy JPG02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Renier de Huy JPG02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

02-Namur-100109 (1) JPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 02-Namur-100109 (1) JPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Clervaux - L'église décanale (1910-1912).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clervaux - L'église décanale (1910-1912).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Autorail diesel 4610 - Treignes.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Autorail diesel 4610 - Treignes.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tervuren ARB2JPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tervuren ARB2JPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Taxodium distichum (Rendeux) JPG1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Taxodium distichum (Rendeux) JPG1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Odeigne Vi1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Odeigne Vi1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Moulbaix - Moulin de la Marquie (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Moulbaix - Moulin de la Marquie (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tournai JPG02f.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tournai JPG02f.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Gravelines - Fort de Vauban (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Gravelines - Fort de Vauban (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Enghien - Pavillon des 7 Étoiles (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Enghien - Pavillon des 7 Étoiles (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Jef Lambeaux JPG1a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Jef Lambeaux JPG1a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Carpinus (resuite)[edit]

Bonjour Jean-Pol, j'ai finalement réalisé les images de mon site moi-même sans la majesté du charme que tu avais pris. Je t'invite donc à découvrir www.billot-sologne.com A bientôt peut-être sur les chemins de Sologne. Stéphane

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Dréhance - Château de Walzin (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Dréhance - Château de Walzin (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Binsfeld (Luxembourg) 101021 V1.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Binsfeld (Luxembourg) 101021 V1.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

01 Bruges - Chocolate Corner - JPG2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 01 Bruges - Chocolate Corner - JPG2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Ange d'A. Giorgetti - Ponte Sant'Angelo - Rome (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Ange d'A. Giorgetti - Ponte Sant'Angelo - Rome (1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Fiat 500 - Rome.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Fiat 500 - Rome.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Fresque représentant Mercure - Musée du Vatican (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Fresque représentant Mercure - Musée du Vatican (1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Vierge ornant la porte de Ste-Marie Majeure.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Vierge ornant la porte de Ste-Marie Majeure.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Mosaïque - Buste de Dionysos - Palazzo Massimo.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mosaïque - Buste de Dionysos - Palazzo Massimo.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished[edit]

Logo Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 català | dansk | Deutsch | English | Esperanto | español | eesti | français | galego | magyar | Lëtzebuergesch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | русский | svenska | +/−

Dear Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help.
You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Map of participating countries of Wiki Loves Monuments 2011
Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:26, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Mosaïque - Buste de Satyre - Palazzo Massimo.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Mosaïque - Buste de Satyre - Palazzo Massimo.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Pont et château Sant'Angelo - Rome (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Pont et château Sant'Angelo - Rome (1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Esneux AR7aJPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Esneux AR7aJPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Rhododendron - Celles (Hainaut) 3.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Rhododendron - Celles (Hainaut) 3.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Aphrodite de Ménophantos - Pal. Masssimo alle Terme.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Aphrodite de Ménophantos - Pal. Masssimo alle Terme.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Chambre de Raphaël - École d'Athènes - Musées du Vatican.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Chambre de Raphaël - École d'Athènes - Musées du Vatican.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Havré - Chapelle N-D de Bon Vouloir (1).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Havré - Chapelle N-D de Bon Vouloir (1).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Forgotten signature[edit]

Hi Jean-Pol,

thank you for promoting my picture of the CN Tower. But you have forgotten here to sign. Please catch this up. Best regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 08:45, 27 October 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

00 Strépy-Bracquegnies.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 00 Strépy-Bracquegnies.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pinus nigra JPG4Ad.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pinus nigra JPG4Ad.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sorbus alnifolia 'Submollis' JPG1Ta.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sorbus alnifolia 'Submollis' JPG1Ta.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Céroux-Mousty 050910 (26).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Céroux-Mousty 050910 (26).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Torgny - Village 050615 (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Torgny - Village 050615 (2).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Ange de Paolo Naldini - Ponte Sant'Angelo - Rome (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Ange de Paolo Naldini - Ponte Sant'Angelo - Rome (1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tilia insularis JPG1FeFl.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tilia insularis JPG1FeFl.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Strépy-Bracquegnies JPG1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strépy-Bracquegnies JPG1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Ferula communis JPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ferula communis JPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Couvin JPG01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Couvin JPG01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Fanciulla offerente - Palazzo Masimo - Rome.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Fanciulla offerente - Palazzo Masimo - Rome.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

requête identification conifère[edit]

Bonjour Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

Peux-tu s'il te plaît identifier ce conifère, qui était ainsi début août 2011 en Dordogne ?
Merci de ton aide précieuse.
--Jebulon (talk) 23:11, 5 November 2011 (UTC)
Salut et merci de ta réponse.
Finalement, je me suis adressé à "Quelle est cette plante" du projet botanique de la wikipedia en français. Ils m'ont répondu tout de suite, de façon argumentée et précise.
C'est un Pinus sylvestris, pin sylvestre.
Je tire mon chapeau à leur réactivité et à leur savoir, immense mais modeste dans l'expression, et toujours amicalement offert à tous.
Et je te remercie aussi d'avoir pris le temps d'examiner ma photo. J'ai ainsi pu la proposer en QI avec une Id. acceptable.
A bientôt.--Jebulon (talk) 15:35, 6 November 2011 (UTC)
je ne comprends pas très bien comment fonctionne ta page d'utilisateur. C'est normal ?

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bray-Dunes - Le bateau dans les nuages.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bray-Dunes - Le bateau dans les nuages.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Circus Maximus et Domus Augustana - Rome 111001.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Circus Maximus et Domus Augustana - Rome 111001.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Vellereille-les-Brayeux - Abbaye de Bonne Espérance.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Abbaye de Bonne Espérance 01 JPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 La Hulpe - Étang de la Longue Queue (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 La Hulpe - Étang de la Longue Queue (1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Liquidambar stiyraciflua - La Hulpe (2).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Liquidambar stiyraciflua - La Hulpe (2).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Pterocarya fraxinifolia - La Hulpe (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Pterocarya fraxinifolia - La Hulpe (1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Félicitations !![edit]

Salut Jean-Pol Grandmont.

Je viens de voir que ta photo de Douaumont fait partie des dix vainqueurs du concours Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 France !
C'est un magnifique et remarquable succès ! Te rends-tu compte ? Distingué parmi plus de 25.000 clichés !!
Je me réjouis vraiment pour toi, et je suis ravi d'être parmi les premiers à te féliciter !!--Jebulon (talk) 09:14, 10 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Parrotia persica - Parc de Mariemont (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Parrotia persica - Parc de Mariemont (1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 La Hulpe - Étang de la Longue Queue (5).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 La Hulpe - Étang de la Longue Queue (5).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Concours Wiki Love Monuments 2011 (réponse)[edit]

Oui dans le jury ton travail remarquable n'est pas passé inaperçu ;)

Je n'ai fais partie que du jury, pas de l'organisation. J'étais d’ailleurs étonné de ne pas t'avoir vu à la soirée, j'aurais bien aimé te rencontrer en vrai. Le mieux est de contacter les organisateurs pour recevoir ton prix et savoir pourquoi tu n'étais pas au courant de cette soirée, vraiment dommage... --Luc Viatour (talk) 10:18, 13 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fontaine Sainte-Thérèse - Domaine de Mariemont.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontaine Sainte-Thérèse - Domaine de Mariemont.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Clervaux Cadran solaire 101021.JPG[edit]

Bravo pour ta photo, vraiment très jolie. A mon avis, faudrait la placer sur cadran solaire. --PierreSelim (talk) 16:10, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Clervaux Cadran solaire 101021.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Clervaux Cadran solaire 101021.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Strépy-Bracquegnies JPG2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strépy-Bracquegnies JPG2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Harchies RN1dJPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Harchies RN1dJPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Acer spicatum JPG1L.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acer spicatum JPG1L.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Castanea dentata JPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castanea dentata JPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Liriodendron tulipifera JPG5a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liriodendron tulipifera JPG5a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Haltinne - Château.jpg[edit]

Hallo, I was not really convinced by the new version, so I made an own try. Feel free to rollback if you don't like it. --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:02, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Pleurotus ostreatus JPG2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pleurotus ostreatus JPG2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Ange à la couronne de P. Naldini - Ponte Sant'Angelo - Rome.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Ange à la couronne de P. Naldini - Ponte Sant'Angelo - Rome.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Hensies RN1cJPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hensies RN1cJPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Botassart - Tombeau du Géant (1)JPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Botassart - Tombeau du Géant (1)JPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Bruxelles - Petit Sablon - Blanchisseur.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Bruxelles - Petit Sablon - Blanchisseur.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Prunus serrulata - Kalmthout (3).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Prunus serrulata - Kalmthout (3).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Betula uber JPG1Fe.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Betula uber JPG1Fe.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Acer griseum JPG01b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Acer griseum JPG01b.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Publicité murale - Houdeng-Aimeries.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Publicité murale - Houdeng-Aimeries.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Signature[edit]

Bonjour, je crains que tu n'aies oublié de signer ta dernière proposition d'image de qualité de l'Ange sur le Pont-Saint-Ange à Rome.--Jebulon (talk) 17:28, 3 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Thieu - Canal du Centre 080109 (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thieu - Canal du Centre 080109 (1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tarcienne Eo1b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tarcienne Eo1b.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Persée et Méduse[edit]

Bonsoir Jean-Pol GRANDMONT.

Je te remercie d'avoir jugé que mon Persée était de qualité suffisante. Je dois néanmoins te signaler, pour la bonne forme, que j'ai modifié l'image depuis ton vote. Un de nos amis (Archaeodontosaurus) m'a fait remarquer par mail que le socle souffrait d'une aberration de perspective. Il a raison, j'ai donc corrigé. L'image étant techniquement meilleure maintenant, cela n'a pas vraiment d'importance, et je ne l'ai pas mentionné sur la page des propositions. Mais je crois devoir à l'honnêteté de te prévenir au cas où tu souhaiterais revenir sur ton premier choix.
Bien amicalement, --Jebulon (talk) 18:07, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
PS amusant: as-tu un rapport avec Marie-Claire ? Elle est de Mons comme tu sembles l'être, et a fait la même faute en anglais sur sa page de présentation ("somme images I've uploaded"), avec deux "m" à "some", comme s'il s'agissait de la Somme en France. Marrant, non ? --Jebulon (talk) 18:13, 4 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bonifacio Cal1JPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bonifacio Cal1JPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Strépy-Bracquegnies JPG10.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strépy-Bracquegnies JPG10.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Sallertaine - Moulin de Raire (1).jpg[edit]

Bonjour Jean-Pol,

je vous remercie pour le mot que vous m'avez adressé suite à mes premières requêtes de QI. J'ignorais l'importance de ce critère de perspective redressée. Contributeur depuis longtemps sur fr.wiki, je suis encore débutant sur commons. Du coup, j'ai modifié cette image, http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Hôtel_de_préfecture_de_la_Loire-Atlantique_-_Nantes.jpg, avant de la soumettre ce matin-même à la sagacité de tous :)

Cordialement, Selbymay (talk) 17:45, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Aiguilles de Bavella JPG1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Aiguilles de Bavella JPG1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Seneffe - La volière du château (1).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Seneffe - La volière du château (1).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pholiota squarrosa JPG3.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pholiota squarrosa JPG3.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Ville-Sur-Haine[edit]

I loved your image of the old bridge there. Did you happen to also make one of the Passerelle George Price? It would make a nice addition to the WP article about him.LeadSongDog (talk) 22:01, 6 December 2011 (UTC)

Quercus suber JPG1.jpg[edit]

J'aime bien ce chêne, mais on ne voit pas bien le tronc. or les informations sont là tu devrais pouvoir les "sortir". Si tu as le temps intéresses-toi à VI. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 08:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ajaccio San1JPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ajaccio San1JPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Ange au titulus de Giulio Cartari - Ponte Sant'Angelo - Rome.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Ange au titulus de Giulio Cartari - Ponte Sant'Angelo - Rome.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Sorbus 'Leonard Messel' JPG1b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sorbus 'Leonard Messel' JPG1b.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

QIC[edit]

Bonjour Jean-Pol,

Merci pour tes bonnes intentions et les remarques sur l'amélioration de mes images. C'est chose faite pour le Fichier Folie_Saint-James.jpg dont j'ai redressé la perspective et j'ai recadré un peu plus serré. La nouvelle version est déjà rechargée et disponible sur Commons. Par ailleurs, j'aime beaucoup tes photos pour leur beauté et leur ambiance. Les couleurs de l'automne sont si bien captées, avec ce brin de lumière qui donne aux choses une nouvelle vie. N'ayant pas encore beaucoup d'expérience technique j'ose pas toujours les promouvoir, laissant la place aux expertes des aberrations chromatiques et d'autres poussières. Cala ne m’empêche pas de respirer leur atmosphère et de les admirer. Bien à toi --Moonik (talk) 15:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

  • Merci Jean-Pol --Moonik (talk) 16:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Porto-Vechio Port1aJPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porto-Vechio Port1aJPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Pancratium illyricum JPG1.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pancratium illyricum JPG1.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Commons:Valued image candidates/0 Quercus suber - Filitosa JPG1.jpg[edit]

Bonjour,

Il semble qu'il y ait un problème dans la création de la candidature pour une image de valeur. Pourrais-tu la refaire ? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 04:41, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Je confirme, tu as utilisé la mauvaise ligne pour "introduire" ton image; c'est la première pour les photos simple et non la seconde pour les SET que tu as utilisé. le mieux et de mettre : Withdrawn dans la ligne Statut et de recommancer sur le bon formulaire. Nous avons tous eu des début difficile avec les "mystères" de VI... --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:43, 9 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Enghien 050918 (21).jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Enghien 050918 (21).jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rencontre Wiki Loves Monuments[edit]

Bonsoir M. GRANDMONT,

Un petit message pour vous réaffirmé ma sympathie suite à notre échange lors de la cérémonie de remise des récompenses du concours Wiki Loves Monuments.

Vous m'aviez demandé un lien vers quelques autres de mes photos : sur mon compte flickr, vous pourrez trouver l'ensemble de ces photos, dont l'intérêt est très variable.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/bigpilou/

Dans l'attente de vos nouvelles.

Bien cordialement,

Pierre-Louis FERRER

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Davidia involucrata 'Vilmoriana' 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Davidia involucrata 'Vilmoriana' 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nyssa sylvatica JPG1b.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nyssa sylvatica JPG1b.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fraxinus excelsior 'Aurea pendula' JPG.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fraxinus excelsior 'Aurea pendula' JPG.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Cambron-Casteau JPG04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cambron-Casteau JPG04.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:0 Cathédrale Notre-Dame de Paris.JPG[edit]

Bonsoir Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

Désolé d'avoir envoyé Notre-Dame de Paris à la "revue consensuelle", mais je pense qu'elle ne peut pas être promue en l'état. Tout le long de presque toutes les lignes verticales (et de certaines statues), en grande taille, il y a des lignes rouges-magenta vraiment visibles, qui sont dues au soleil couchant. Je trouve par ailleurs que ce n'est globalement pas assez net, et il y a par dessus le marché des zones surexposées. Je pense que c'est améliorable, mais peut-être pas au point d'amener une promotion.
J'espère que tu ne m'en voudras pas !
Amitiés, --Jebulon (talk) 17:52, 22 December 2011 (UTC)

Bonne renommée vaut mieux que statue dorée[edit]

Bonjour Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

Merci de ta vigilance sur la statue du pont Alexandre III que tu connais bien. Tu as eu parfaitement raison, et j'ai donc écarté cette photo de la liste. Je l'ai retravaillée, et la reproposerai prochainement. Je crains d'avoir voulu aller trop vite pour cette image, heureusement que tu étais là.
Pour info, j'ai à proposer une image du même sujet que toi ("ronde des amours"), j'attends que ta promotion prenne effet afin qu'il n'y ait pas de concurrence (as-tu remarqué le cadenas -love padlock ?- sur la patte du crabe ?), mais ça sera amusant de comparer.
D'ici là, je te souhaite une bonne soirée de Noël, et je me réjouis de continuer à partager avec toi de belles images.
Bien cordialement.--Jebulon (talk) 12:07, 24 December 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Lampadaire du Pont Alexandre III - Ronde des amours.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Lampadaire du Pont Alexandre III - Ronde des amours.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

0 Haltinne - Château.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Haltinne - Château.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Sculpture du Pont Alexandre III - Néréide (A. Massoulle).JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Sculpture du Pont Alexandre III - Néréide (A. Massoulle).JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Voeux[edit]

Cher ami d'outre-Quiévrain et collègue du Pont Alexandre III,
Merci infiniment de tes vœux qui me touchent.
Reçois les miens en retour, pour toi bien sûr et, hors de "Commons", pour ceux qui te sont chers.
Je me réjouis à l'avance de partager encore avec toi, cette année, de belles images.
Bien amicalement,--Jebulon (talk) 10:05, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Voeux II[edit]

Tous mes Voeux pour 2012 pour toi et ta famille et que l'aventure wikipedienne continue! --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 10:08, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Voeux III[edit]

Merci pour tes voeux! A mon tour, je te souhaite une bonne année, pleine de bonheur ... et de belles photos, bien sûr! -- MJJR (talk) 17:26, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Bonne année ![edit]

Bonjour,

Tous mes vœux pour l'année 2012 ! Puisse-t-elle être une année de rencontres, de découvertes et de comptes-rendus photographiques passionnants.

Rendez-vous pour WLM2012 ?

Trizek here or on fr:wp 18:21, 2 January 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Sculpteur sur bois JPG01.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Wood sculptors at work, sculpteur sur bois..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

0 Givet - Quai de la Houille 111021.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
the Houille river in Givet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
0 Agapanthus praecox ssp. Orientalis - Meise.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Agapanthus praecox subsp. orientalis, flower.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

2012[edit]

Jean-Pol, merci pour les voeux. A mon tour je te présente, bien tardivement mais avec d'autant plus de plaisir, mes meilleurs voeux pour 2012. --Cayambe (talk) 20:56, 15 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

0 Fresque et stucs - G. Muziano - C. Nebbia - Galleria delle carte geografiche.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 0 Fresque et stucs - G. Muziano - C. Nebbia - Galleria delle carte geografiche.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Spa JPG05.jpg[edit]

Dear Mr. Gradmont,

I should like to inform you that I have used your image uploaded on wikimedia commons in my book „Nur wer tot ist, geht kein Risiko mehr ein“ a history of 20th century casino gambling, published at the German Libri Bod, ISBN: 978-3-8448-0977-0, on page 23, credit on page 597. Thank you for making the work available.

Yours faithfully

Henry Lohner, Munich, Germany --Zenwort (talk) 09:10, 22 August 2012 (UTC) User: http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Zenwort

Bien vu Smile[edit]

Merci pour la correction. --Agamitsudo (talk) 09:32, 21 September 2012 (UTC)

Award[edit]

Bruges - Wijngaardplein - Lucarne décorée de façon humoristique.jpg Paréidolian photographical award
For all the excellent photographic additions and your great work on Commons Lotje ʘ‿ʘ (talk) 09:21, 28 September 2012 (UTC)

Filemover[edit]

Hi Jean-Pol. I've added the filemover right to your account. If you'd rather continue to use rename requests, I'm happy to rename files for you. I just wanted to give you the choice. INeverCry 19:35, 1 October 2012 (UTC)


Palais Stoclet[edit]

Bonsoir Jean-Pol. Belle image du Palais Stoclet! Vous me demandez mon avis sur la proposition de la supprimer sur Commons. Lorsqu'on applique la loi belge sur les droits d'auteur, je crois que votre photo ne peut en effet pas être publiée, pour la simple raison que l'architecte est décédé en 1956, c'est-à-dire il y a moins de septante ans. Le fait qu'il s'agit d'un monument classé au patrimoine mondial de l'UNESCO n'y change rien. C'est évidemment complètement dingue et absurde - et révoltant pour un wikipédien pur et dur - mais même les lois stupides doivent être appliquées... Vous avez la malchance que quelques intégristes s'acharnent contre cette image. Ils ont malheureusement la loi de leur côté. Maintenant il faudra attendre 2026 pour publier l'image sur Commons - à moins que quelqu'un ne trouve la formule magique pour la faire passer quand-même d'une façon légalement acceptable.

Tout à fait autre chose: avez-vous participé cette année au concours WLM? L'année passée c'était un franc succès pour vous! Moi-même j'ai de nouveau participé, non seulement en Belgique, mais aussi aux Pays-Bas et en France. Je suis curieux ce que cela donnera, tout en ne me faisant pas trop d'illusions. Cordialement, Marc Ryckaert - MJJR (talk) 20:41, 9 October 2012 (UTC).

Bonsoir et désolé de cette réponse tardive. En effet, je rejoins les propos de MJJR. Il est vraiment dommage de ne pas pouvoir publier ce genre de photos. J'en ai moi-même fait les frais avec certaines photos de sculptures et peintures murales trop récentes. Il est temps que la loi belge s'assouplisse à ce niveau-là.
Je profite de cette intervention pour saluer le travail remarquable que vous fournissez depuis de nombreuses années sur Commons. Cordialement, JNélis 18:13, 11 October 2012 (UTC)



Afrikaans | беларуская | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | español | eesti | français | עברית | हिन्दी | italiano | Lëtzebuergesch | മലയാളം | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | norsk nynorsk | polski | română | русский | српски (ћирилица)‎ | srpski (latinica)‎ | slovenčina | svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | తెలుగు | Tagalog | українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012!

Dear Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world!

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo
Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 10:06, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

Thank You for the Wikipedia Picture[edit]

Hello, My name is Duane Hurst and I recently made a free (non-commercial) English web site to share information with people. I added links to your Wikipedia/Wikimedia freeware picture (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:L%27Alleud_-_Butte_du_Lion_dite_de_Wateroo.jpg and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:BelfortGent.jpg and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:01_Houdeng-Goegnies_050323_(3).JPG). I also gave credit to you on my web pages for your work. Thank you for sharing with the public. My website is:

http://www.freeenglishsite.com/

I add pictures such as yours to one of the following major sections of my site: 1. World section - contains information and over 10,000 images of every world country and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/index.htm

2. USA section - contains information and images of every USA state and territory. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/world/usa/index.htm

3. English section - "Mel and Wes" lessons in conversation format. Stories are located in various USA states and world countries such as China, England, Germany, Japan, Mexico and Thailand. Each lesson has many slang terms and idioms, which I link to my Slang Dictionary. This eventually will have over 5,000 terms. Currently, it has about 3,000 slang and idioms. I regularly add new lessons and slang terms. Link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/lessons/index.htm Slang Dictionary link at: http://www.freeenglishsite.com/english/slang/Eslang_a.htm

Prior to retirement, I taught English at several private and public universities in the United States.

Please share this free site with your friends. I hope all will enjoy the pictures and find the English information useful. Sincerely,  Duane Hurst in Utah, USA

Email address: duanerhurst@freeenglishsite.com --75.169.5.71 17:10, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

2013![edit]

Juletræet.jpg * * * 2013 !!! * * *
Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année !

Respectueusement, Georges -- George Chernilevsky talk 22:05, 24 December 2012 (UTC)

Fin d'année[edit]

Bonsoir Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

Nous ne nous sommes que peu croisés cette année, car j'ai le sentiment que ton intérêt pour les labels de type "QI" s'est sérieusement émoussé.
Quoi qu'il en soit, j'espère que 2013 te sera aussi fructueuse en belles images que les années précédentes.
Reçois ici mes voeux et mes pensées amicales.
--Jebulon (talk) 17:29, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
ps:en parcourant ta page, je m'aperçois que tu as eu des déboires avec des demandes de suppression, la loi belge étant semble-t-il aussi bête et stupide que la loi française (ou italienne). Ici en France, nous faisons un "lobbying" intense auprès du Parlement et du Gouvernement pour la faire évoluer, mais si ça se trouve, on devrait essayer de faire changer les choses auprès de l'Union Européenne !--Jebulon (talk) 17:29, 30 December 2012 (UTC)
Bonjour Jean-Pol GRANDMONT.
Merci de ton aimable réponse.
Le fait que je sois membre cotisant de l'Association "Wikimedia France" n'implique en aucune façon que j'aie disposé de quelque information que ce soit relativement à WLM 2012, événement auquel, tu l'auras peut-être remarqué, je n'ai aucunement participé, à la différence de l'année précédente...
Je continue, quant à moi, à présenter mes images dans le cadre classique et quotidien des "QI" et parfois des "FP", ce qui, confronté au jugement des autres, me permet de progresser.
J'y trouve toujours autant de plaisir, malgré les déboires du "No FoP" !!
Amitiés,--Jebulon (talk) 14:33, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Bonne Année 2013[edit]

Je te remercie de tes bons vœux, et d’adresse les miens pour toi et ta famille. Tes images ont toujours une belle lumière, et même les objets inertes donnent l’impression qu’ils sont vivants. Je le vois avec d’autant plus d’envie que les miens sont morts avec une lumière de scialytique qui les décrit bien, mais ne fait pas rêver. Bien amicalement. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:47, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Vœux[edit]

Bonjour Jean-Pol,

Merci pour tes vœux! A mon tour je te souhaite une belle année 2013, pleine de lumière et de bonheur. Et avec une riche moisson en images, bien sûr. Cordialement. -- Marc (MJJR (talk) 10:45, 1 January 2013 (UTC)).

Bonjour Jean-Pol ! Je rejoins MJJR dans ses remerciements, et te souhaite une très bonne année 2013 qu'elle soit riche en belles photographies ! Bien à toi. --M0tty (talk) 13:07, 1 January 2013 (UTC)

Fichiers sans licence[edit]

Bonjour Jean-Pol,

J’ai remarqué que les fichiers suivant ne portent pas de licence. Je suppose qu’il s’agit d’une erreur. Je peux me charger d’apposer un {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} si tu le souhaites.

Amicalement, Jean-Fred (talk) 16:49, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

    • Bonsoir Jean-Frédéric,

Merci pour ta vigilance et ton offre d'aide. Il s'agissait effectivement d'un oubli que j'ai immédiatement solutionné dès que j'ai vu que les fichiers avaient été modifiés par Moogsi.

Amicalement, Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 19:40, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

C’est parfait, tout est bien qui finit bien :-) Bonne continuation, Jean-Fred (talk) 21:17, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

0 Naming[edit]

Hi. I've noticed that you lead your image titles with a "0". My impression is that you do that to place your images first in category pages. I must say that I find that a bit questionable. Not that many of your contributions wouldn't deserve an early mention if our categories were sorted by quality. /Dcastor (talk) 12:46, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

  • Hi Dcastor,

The identification of my file is in no way associated with their classification in the Commons but a classification system that I use in other area.

Just to be convinced to see a category such as this one.

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Ancient_Roman_reliefs_in_Rome

Here you can see that my files are not systematically placed at the head of class.

However, you are free to think what you want.

Regards

Jean-Pol GRANDMONT (talk) 13:38, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png The Photographer's Barnstar
Excellent photographs indeed. Chrs84 (talk) 01:44, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Confirmation[edit]

Bonjour,

J’ai vu que tu as été au château de Pierrefonds (très belles photos au passage), pourrais-tu confirmer ou infirmer que la photographie File:Château de Pierrefond.JPEG représente une partie de ce château ? (vu le style d'architecture, j’ai comme un léger doute).

Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 18:53, 19 September 2013 (UTC)

Edelseider a trouvé que ladaite photo représente l'Abbaye de Saint-Jean-des-Vignes. Problème réglé.
Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 08:59, 20 September 2013 (UTC)
PS: il y a un bug sur cette page, les sections ne sont pas modifiables individuellement (surement une balise ou un modèle mal fermé quelque part).

Image du jour de Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 en France, [edit]

Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 Votre photo File:0 Ambleteuse - Fort Mahon (2).JPG a été choisie par les bénévoles de Wiki Loves Monuments 2013 comme image coup de cœur (ou image du jour) du . Vous avez ainsi remporté un tee-shirt Wiki Loves Monuments. Wikimédia France vous recontactera prochainement pour préparer l'envoi de votre lot. 0 Ambleteuse - Fort Mahon (2).JPG

--Pymouss Let’s talk - 11:10, 26 September 2013 (UTC)

File:0 Coffre d'une urne en albâtre - Groupe Anfora Liscia - Museo Gregoriano Etrusco.JPG[edit]

Hi Jean-Pol. Could you please fix the parameter error in your file? There are more files of yours in Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter and Category:Pages using Artwork template with incorrect parameter. --Leyo 09:07, 8 October 2013 (UTC)

WikiLovesMonuments[edit]

Wikimedia Belgium logo.png Winning image
Hey, one of your images was selected as a winner in this year's WLM edition. Your image was selected out of a total of 3600 images. We want to celebrate you, and invite you for the award session on November 5, 19h, in Brussels.

You can contact me on md@wikilovesmonuments.co.za MADe (talk) 07:30, 23 October 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

Editor @ ar.wiki[edit]

Hello. I would like to inform you that I have granted you editor flag at the Arabic Wikipedia, all your edits there will be automatically marked as patrolled. Best regards.--Avocato (talk) 07:11, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

Eleassar (t/p) 13:26, 9 December 2013 (UTC)



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

2014 ![edit]

Christmasornaments.png * * * 2014! * * *
Merry Christmas! Happy New Year! Happy holidays! -- George Chernilevsky talk 21:26, 22 December 2013 (UTC)


Category:Chevron[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Chevron has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Mjrmtg (talk) 12:54, 5 January 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Labattblueboy (talk) 07:28, 16 January 2014 (UTC)

File:0 Le Massacre des Innocents d'après P.P. Rubens - Musées royaux des beaux-arts de Belgique (2).JPG[edit]

Hallo Jean-Pol GRANDMONT, tu as placé ce file du l'atelier du Rubens qui se trouve en Belgique comme peinture original d'Ontario dans les articles dans des autres langues aussi et c'était beaucoup de travail pour les corriger.[9] [10][11][12][13] [14][15] [16]--Oursana (talk) 01:08, 18 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.

COM:MDR[edit]

Bonjour. J'ai vu que tu avais initié un grand nombre de propositions de suppression. Celles-ci concernent souvent des fichiers ayant le même sujet. Je voulais juste te conseiller, au cas où tu ne connaîtrais pas cet outil, d'utiliser Help:VisualFileChange.js. Il permet d'inclure dans une seule proposition de suppression plusieurs images qui se trouvent dans une même catégorie ou qui ont été uploadées par le même utilisateur. Cela permet de centraliser les discussions concernant la suppression et de catégoriser facilement les propositions de suppression. Meilleures salutations. BrightRaven (talk) 15:51, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:23, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:59, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

M4 Sherman Tank, fr;wikipedia[edit]

Bonjour Jean-Pol,

Tout d'abord, félicitation pour vos photos.

J'envisage d'utiliser votre photo "Sherman A4 - JPG1a.jpg - Shermans en mouvement à Hyon (Belgique)" pour illustrer l'infobox en tête de l'article M4 Sherman dans la wiki française que je suis en train de compléter (la photo figure déjà dans la galerie en bas de page mais je la trouve parfaite pour illustrer l'article).

Pourriez-vous svp me donner un peu plus de détail sur cette photo (circonstances etc.) - éventuellement en anglais pour que les autres utilisateurs puissent en bénéficier également ?

In English, for other users : congratulations for your pictures. Could you provide more info on "Sherman A4 - JPG1a.jpg". I am thinking of other usages in Wikipedia. Many thanks in advance. Sincerely.

Merci d'avance. Très cordialement.--Domenjod (talk) 11:12, 19 July 2014 (UTC)

Cher Monsieur Grandmont,

les archives départementales de l'Aube ( FRANCE) souhaiteraient utiliser votre photographie de l'abbaye de la Cambre pour illustrer un catalogue d'exposition sur les abbayes cisterciennes qui sera publié en 2015. Les crédits photographiques seront recpectés. Pourriez vous me contacter à l'adresse suivante compte.arch3@cg10.fr? j'ai besoin de renseignements afin de vous envoyer un exemplaire du catalogue une fois celui-ci édité.

Cordialement, Pauline F. Archives départementales de l'Aube.

Wiki Loves Monuments 2014 startet in Kürze[edit]

LUSITANA WLM 2011 d.svg

Hallo Jean-Pol GRANDMONT,

in Kürze ist es wieder soweit. Der nun schon traditionelle Fotowettbewerb Wiki Loves Monuments wird im September zum vierten Mal stattfinden. In ähnlicher Form hatte unlängst der Wettbewerb "Wiki Loves Earth" eine erfolgreiche Premiere. Zu allen bisherigen vier Wettbewerben haben seit 2011 gut 3000 unterschiedliche Teilnehmer (User) ihren Beitrag geleistet. Du warst dabei, und bist auch herzlich eingeladen, am bevorstehenden WLM-Wettbewerb wieder dabei zu sein.

Allein in Deutschland wurden in den letzten drei Jahren im Rahmen von WLM rund 100.000 Fotos zu den insgesamt ca. 850.000 Kulturdenkmalen bundesweit hochgeladen. Jährlich haben sich mehrere Hundert Wiki-Fotographen daran beteiligt. Auch im kommenden Denkmalmonat wird dies gewiss wieder der Fall sein. Der Tag des offenen Denkmals am 14. September bietet bundesweit vielfältige Möglichkeiten, Denkmale nicht nur von außen, sondern auch von innen zu fotografieren. Denkmallisten sind dabei ein wichtiger Orientierungspunkt und zugleich auch Ziel der Einbindung der Fotos. Auch in diesem Jahr sind wieder neue Denkmallisten hinzugekommen, die hilfreich bei der Planung von individuellen oder Gruppen-Fototouren sind und auf eine Bebilderung warten, wie z.B. zu Görlitz oder Zittau. Unter den Landeshauptstädten fehlt nur noch Stuttgart. Aber auch hier ist Licht in Sicht.

In der Mitte Deutschlands hat die Denkmallandschaft der thüringischen Landeshauptstadt Erfurt nun das Licht der Wikipedia-Welt entdeckt. Mehr als 50 Tabellen enthalten 3.700 Denkmale. Allein die wunderschön restaurierte Altstadt umfasst 1.800 Denkmale. Eine von WMDE geförderte WLM-Fototour nach Erfurt am Wochenende vom 29. – 31. August lädt herzlich ein, diese einzigartige Kulturlandschaft zu dokumentieren. Mehr Informationen findest Du auf der Projektseite.

Wir freuen uns auf Deine weiteren Beiträge für Wikimedia-Projekte.

Viel Spaß beim größten Fotowettbewerb der Wiki(m/p)edia wünscht Dir das Orga-Team.

( Bernd Gross, 16. August 2014)

Nouveau modèle utilisateur[edit]

Salut.

J'ai créé un nouveau modèle utilisateur : https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Template:User_info2

Je l'ai utilisé sur ma page utilisateur.

Cordialement. --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:05, 29 November 2014 (UTC)

New level {{User PH-4}}[edit]

Hi ; new level 4 for you ?--Medium69 You wanted talk to me? 15:35, 11 December 2014 (UTC)

PH-4




Happy holidays! 2015![edit]

Snowman icon.png * * * Happy Holidays 2015 ! * * *
* Merry Christmas! Happy New Year!
* Joyeux Noël ! Bonne année!
* Frohes Weihnachten! Frohes Neues Jahr!
* Счастливого Рождества! С Новым годом!
-- George Chernilevsky talk 19:56, 24 December 2014 (UTC)