User talk:JeanBono

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

Plaque Hubert et Sévrine - Château de Teillan[edit]

Bonjour, j'attire votre attention sur le fait que la sépulture représentée sur [cette photographie] est située dans un espace privé du Château de Teillan. Cette partie du parc n'est pas accessible au grand public durant les visites. Par respect pour leurs filles, je vous prie de bien vouloir supprimer cette photographie et ne pas la rendre publique.

Gallica[edit]

Attention, une image disponible sur le site de Gallica n'est pas obligatoire dans le domaine public ! Plus de détails ici. Les photos que tu as importées récemment sont donc des copyio !!! Il faut vraiment que tu sois plus prudent quand tu importes des fichiers sur Commons... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 09:12, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Jorge Lavelli 1991 - face.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jorge Lavelli 1991 - face.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:21, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Jorge Lavelli 1991.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jorge Lavelli 1991.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:21, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Caluire-Piscine.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Caluire-Piscine.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:29, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Caluire-Radiant.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Caluire-Radiant.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:29, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Caluire-Pedibus droit.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Caluire-Pedibus droit.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:30, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Piscine du Rhône Lyon Tours.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Piscine du Rhône Lyon Tours.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:37, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Théâtre de la Croix-Rousse Lyon.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Théâtre de la Croix-Rousse Lyon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:20, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Bâtiments Hôpital Croix-Rousse Lyon.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bâtiments Hôpital Croix-Rousse Lyon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:20, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Bâtiment Hôpital Croix Rousse Lyon.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bâtiment Hôpital Croix Rousse Lyon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 14:20, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Hôtel de Police Lyon Fort Montluc.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hôtel de Police Lyon Fort Montluc.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 15:42, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Chapelle Nôtre-Dame de l'Assomption Mont Cenis.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Chapelle Nôtre-Dame de l'Assomption Mont Cenis.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 05:44, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Église Saint-Côme et Saint Damien Caluire.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Église Saint-Côme et Saint Damien Caluire.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 05:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Église Saint-Côme et Saint Damien Caluire mosaïque.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Église Saint-Côme et Saint Damien Caluire mosaïque.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 05:54, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Fort de Bron Parcours sportif plan.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fort de Bron Parcours sportif plan.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 05:55, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Parcours du fort de Côte-Lorette.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Parcours du fort de Côte-Lorette.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 05:55, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Monument Diego Brosset Rillieux.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Monument Diego Brosset Rillieux.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:01, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Général Diego Brosset Rillieux.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Général Diego Brosset Rillieux.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:01, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Bibliothèque de la cité Rillieux.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bibliothèque de la cité Rillieux.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:01, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Aux combattants en AFN 1652-1962-Rillieux.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aux combattants en AFN 1652-1962-Rillieux.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:02, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Collège Maria Casarès Rillieux.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Collège Maria Casarès Rillieux.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:02, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Les Verchères 2 Rillieux.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Les Verchères 2 Rillieux.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:02, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Rillieux Espace Baudelaire.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Rillieux Espace Baudelaire.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:03, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Lycées Albert-Camus Sermenaz Rillieux-la-Pape.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lycées Albert-Camus Sermenaz Rillieux-la-Pape.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:03, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Fresque Cour des Loges Nardone.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fresque Cour des Loges Nardone.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:03, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

Ménage terminé...[edit]

Je voulais te dire au cas où que je n'avais évidemment rien contre toi et que je ne "m'acharnes" pas sur toi. C'est juste que, quand je vois un grand nombre de non-respects du droit d'auteur dans les contributions d'un utilisateur, j'essaie de passer en revue tous ses imports. Je pense avoir proposé la suppression de tous ceux qui sont évidents, mais j'ai des doutes sur quelques-uns que je n'ai pas proposés... Désolé pour les déceptions que j'ai engendré chez toi (je connais ça, il y a eu une époque où j'étais moins conscient des problèmes de droit d'auteur et des règles de Commons, et de nombreux fichiers parmi mes uploads ont fini à la "poubelle" !). Cordialement. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 06:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)

En cherchant bien, il doit encore y en avoir... Un ami dans l'Ain avait une expression sympathique pour ça, mais je l'ai oublié, une histoire de pré carré. Ce qui m'ennuie dans l'histoire, c'est ce zèle excessif : encore s'il y avait des plaintes, je comprendrai, mais je suis persuadé que tout le monde s'en cogne.
J'espère enfin que tu as une botte de foin chez toi, sinon c'est anormal. JeanBono (talk) 08:07, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Cela fait deux fois que tu me parles de "zèle" et ça en devient très désagréable. Tu ne trouveras pas beaucoup d'utilisateurs qui prennent le temps d'expliquer leurs démarches ou de signaler à d'autres qu'ils n'ont rien contre eux malgré leurs démarches ! Et qu'y gagné-je ? De l'ingratitude. Du zèle, me dis-tu ? Du zèle envers qui et pour quels bénéfices ? Ce n'est pas du zèle, vois-tu, et je vais à nouveau prendre du temps pour t'expliquer pourquoi (en espérant récolter autre chose que des reproches). Chaque utilisateur des projets Wikimedia est le garant du respect des règles, des objectifs et du bon fonctionnement de ces mêmes projets. Or, le non-respect des copyright et autres droits d'auteur est une chose sur laquelle il faut veiller constamment et surtout pas attendre d'éventuelles "plaintes" ! Imagine si on te prend au mot et au pied de la lettre : on n'a qu'à importer n'importe quelle œuvre (des Picasso, des extraits de film de Spielberg, des caricatures de Plantu, des romans in extenso de Stephen King, que sais-je encore...) et les garder jusqu'à ce que quelqu'un s'en plaigne ? Non. Cela ne fonctionne pas comme ça ici. Le risque de cette dérive, d'ailleurs, serait d'avoir très facilement des plaintes des artistes les plus connus alors que des artistes qui n'auraient pas les mêmes moyens ni les mêmes "fan-clubs" verraient leurs œuvres "pillées" allègrement et utilisées de façon illégale sous prétexte que personne ne s'en plaint ! Inacceptable. Il faut te souvenir d'une chose essentielle : le pourquoi de ces différentes règles. Les projets de Wikimedia doivent proposer un contenu librement utilisable y compris commercialement (n'importe qui peut donc essayer de vendre des images de Commons ou des articles de Wikipédia, tant qu'il mentionne correctement les auteurs et les licences qui vont avec). Ce qui veut dire que quelqu'un peut se croire libre de vendre la reproduction d'une œuvre qu'il trouve sur Commons s'il fait confiance aveuglément au fait que sa présence sur ce site fait de cette œuvre une œuvre librement utilisable (tu me suis ?). Conséquence : Wikimedia et, surtout, les utilisateurs qui importent ces fichiers, se rendent complices (involontairement ou volontairement selon les cas) d'un trafic illégal et d'un détournement du droit d'auteur. J'espère que tu comprends désormais qu'il ne s'agit donc pas de zèle mais simplement de sérieux vis-à-vis des projets auxquels je (on) participe. Cordialement. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 17:22, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Oh je connais les coutumes de Wikimedia, ne t'en fais pas ; il faut bien des nettoyeurs pour des gens comme moi. J'avoue que c'est frustrant de voir son travail balayé rapidement, mais ce sont les règles. Ce qui me gêne, c'est :
1. L'acharnement, comme dit plus haut.
2. L'avis de suppression : tu es étais visiblement un fervent contributeur de Wikipédia, ainsi tu dois en connaitre les rouages et notamment l'exception {{Bâtiment récent}} qui permet d'illustrer les articles avec des bâtiments récents. Vois-tu, quand je télécharge sur Commons, je mets tout d'un coup sans vraiment trier les FoP et compagnie ; les œuvres récentes, comme dit plus haut, je comprends bien. Au lieu de demander la suppression, ne peux-tu pas te charger de les transférer sur WP:FR avec le bandeau qui va bien afin de laisser les articles illustrés ? Quand ce sont 2-3 photos d'affilées, ça va, mais quand il y en a 20 d'un coup, je ne m'en sors pas.
A part ça, je me suis calmé, désolé pour les insinuations précédentes. JeanBono (talk) 18:24, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
"je me suis calmé, désolé pour les insinuations précédentes" > difficile pour moi de prendre "positivement" certains de tes propos ("tu es étais visiblement un fervent contributeur de Wikipédia" > à quoi sert cette "provocation" ? Je le suis toujours...)
"c'est frustrant de voir son travail balayé rapidement" > comme je te l'ai dit, j'ai déjà "subi" ça moi-même et c'est pour cela que j'avais cru bon te dire que je n'avais rien contre toi, mais tu l'as mal pris en m'accusant d'être trop zélé. Tu es dans un projet collaboratif, JeanBono, donc il faut parfois savoir laisser son égo et ses frustrations de côté. Je sais que c'est difficile, et je ne dis d'ailleurs pas que j'y arrive tout le temps moi-même ! Mais voilà, c'est comme ça, il faut savoir accepter de s'être trompé etc. Et œuvrer pour que les choses se fassent dans un bon état d'esprit.
"l'exception {{Bâtiment récent}} qui permet d'illustrer les articles avec des bâtiments récents" > comme tu le dis toi-même, il s'agit d'une "exception" valable sur la version francophone de WP. Et ce n'est pas vraiment une exception puisqu'on agit ici dans le domaine du "fair-use", ce qui n'est pas accepté sur Commons et ce qui ne conduit pas à la possibilité, pour le lecteur/réutilisateur de WP, d'utiliser librement ces illustrations (idem pour les logos sur WP).
"quand je télécharge sur Commons, je mets tout d'un coup sans vraiment trier les FoP et compagnie" > ben c'est bien le problème, si tu contribues, ce n'est pas "à la carte", et si tu veux "bien" contribuer, il faut être un peu rigoureux même si c'est fastidieux. Quand tu modifies des articles sur WP, j'imagine que tu ne te dis jamais "oh tiens, je n'ai pas envie de prendre le temps de reformuler moi-même, je vais copier-coller un paragraphe trouvé dans un article sur Internet" (rassure-moi). Alors pourquoi agir de la sorte quand il s'agit d'illustrations sur Commons ?
"Au lieu de demander la suppression, ne peux-tu pas te charger de les transférer sur WP:FR avec le bandeau qui va bien afin de laisser les articles illustrés ?" > parce que tu as le droit d'être flemmard quand tu importes mais je suis obligé de corriger tes erreurs ?! Quel culot ! Franchement, c'est osé... --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 20:15, 9 May 2013 (UTC)
Ta PU WPFR semble dire que tu l'es bien moins voir plus, je ne suis pas allé vérifier en profondeur, mes excuses pour ça aussi donc. Bon, je ferai un peu plus attention à l'avenir sur les images de Gallica et les bâtiments récents, mais je ne promets rien vis-à-vis des FoP avec 1 cm² de bâtiment récent dans un coin de photo et attends de voir si les tags sont considérés comme œuvres d'art. Bonne journée, et merci pour les fromages. JeanBono (talk) 06:23, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Bon, j'avoue que mon message de PU WPFR peut porter à confusion, toutes mes excuses pour cette méprise, j'y avais vu une forme d'animosité de ta part et je me suis visiblement trompé (tant mieux). En attendant, j'espère que tu as compris que mes activités sur les projets Wikimedia ne sont motivées par aucun "zèle".
Sinon je te répète et rappelle qu'une photo peut être conservée au titre de la règle de minimis si le bâtiment récent concerne une part mineure ou marginale d'une photo et qu'il n'est manifestement pas le sujet principal de la photo. Quant aux graffitis, je répète qu'il s'agit d'un sujet très complexe mais que les 2 que j'ai mis en PàS parmi tes uploads ont des spécificités qui les rendent potentiellement non-libres. Encore une fois, désolé si tout ça te déçoit et/ou frustre, je connais ça et ne peut que comprendre et compatir ! Cordialement (sincèrement). --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 11:55, 10 May 2013 (UTC)
Petit ajout pour info : cette photo n'a pu être conservée que parce qu'un graffiti représentant le logo de Super Mario Bros a été retirée numériquement (voir débat à ce sujet). Cela semble correspondre au même problème que le tag représentant des personnages des Simpsons et South Park. --TwoWings * to talk or not to talk... 12:00, 10 May 2013 (UTC)

File:Wikirencontre Arbois 2013 - 0045.jpg[edit]

Hi JeanBono, who is the sculptor and when was this sculpture created? We need to know this, as France has no freedom-of-panorama exemption from copyrighted, whereby your photo may violate the copyright of the sculptor.

--Túrelio (talk) 07:04, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

I just uploaded without checking all this, I'll do it later ; if you want to speedy delete it, you can go ahead. JeanBono (talk) 11:46, 17 June 2013 (UTC)
At least this one is ok File:Wikirencontre Arbois 2013 - 0035.jpg. This is a work by Alexis Rudier (dead in 1897: see Category:Fonderie Rudier). We can see his signature on the left of the scultpure. Actually this bronze sculpture was done few years before the elevation of the Category:Monument à Louis Pasteur (Arbois) (1901). --Agamitsudo (talk) 13:08, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Asterix - Goscinny - Uderzo - 1967.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Asterix - Goscinny - Uderzo - 1967.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 10:11, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Plan détaillé Fort de Bron.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Plan détaillé Fort de Bron.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 22:04, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

Category:Victor_Charlet[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Victor_Charlet has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Sammyday (talk) 17:34, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Antoine_François[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Antoine_François has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Sammyday (talk) 17:34, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Matthias_Dierckens[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Matthias_Dierckens has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Sammyday (talk) 17:34, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Julien_Thamin[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Julien_Thamin has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Sammyday (talk) 17:35, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Stanislas_Leguézec[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Stanislas_Leguézec has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Sammyday (talk) 17:35, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Florent_Fenaert[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Florent_Fenaert has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Sammyday (talk) 17:35, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Marc_Regnault[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Marc_Regnault has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Sammyday (talk) 17:35, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Valentin_Migneau[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Valentin_Migneau has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Sammyday (talk) 17:36, 20 October 2013 (UTC)

Category:Yannick_Schambert[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Category:Yannick_Schambert has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.

In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−

Sammyday (talk) 17:36, 20 October 2013 (UTC)


العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Eesti | English | Español | Français | Galego | Magyar | Italiano | Nederlands | Polski | Română | Svenska | ไทย | Українська | +/−

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2013! Please help with this survey.

Dear JeanBono,
Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2013, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! We would like to ask again a few minutes of your time.

Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 365,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from more than 50 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place.

You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet).

If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help.

To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2013.

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

File:Dessein géométral de la machine qui a servi pour l'élévation et le placement de la statue équestre du Roy.jpeg[edit]

Hi JeanBono. Some of your files are listed in Category:Pages using Information template with incorrect parameter. Could you please have a look and try to fix the syntax errors? Thank you. Leyo 09:53, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

✓ Done JeanBono (talk) 17:17, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Bellenger Tour de France 1929.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bellenger Tour de France 1929.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

JuTa 21:28, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, Herzi Pinki (talk) 11:58, 11 December 2013 (UTC)



العربية | Català | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Eesti | Français | Magyar | Nederlands | Polski | Svenska | ไทย | +/−

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey!

Dear JeanBono,

Thank you for taking part in the Wiki Loves Monuments participants' survey. Your answers will help us improve the organization of future photo contests!

In case you haven't filled in the questionnaire yet, you can still do so during the next 7 days.

And by the way: the winning pictures of this year's international contest have been announced. Enjoy!

Kind regards,
the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Wiki Loves Monuments logo

File:Plan de Metz avec ses projets 1737.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Plan de Metz avec ses projets 1737.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jaredzimmerman (WMF) (talk) 10:43, 22 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Placetapis001.jpg[edit]

Please don't tag files as NC if they are clearly out of copyright. The copyright holder is of course the photographer, not some library. The photographer has died more than 70 years ago, so copyright has expired, whatever some library may claim. Jcb (talk) 23:25, 29 December 2013 (UTC)

Kewl, I'll remember of your answer next time I'll upload PD-old pictures from there :). Thanks ! JeanBono (talk) 00:04, 30 December 2013 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Carnaval Bagolino 2010.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Carnival of Bagolino, Italy..
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Château de Teillan vue intérieure (cropped).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Château de Teillan, France .
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

File:Villa Tony Garnier Lyon.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Villa Tony Garnier Lyon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Aga (d) 10:58, 6 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Église de la Sainte-Famille (Villeurbanne) face.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Église de la Sainte-Famille (Villeurbanne) face.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Aga (d) 14:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Église de la Sainte-Famille de Villeurbanne - côté (2).JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Église de la Sainte-Famille de Villeurbanne - côté (2).JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Aga (d) 14:25, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Eglise de la Sainte-Famille Villeurbanne.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Eglise de la Sainte-Famille Villeurbanne.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Aga (d) 14:30, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

File:4 tours Part Dieu Lyon.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:4 tours Part Dieu Lyon.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Aga (d) 13:53, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

File:Lyon Roue Tours Mont-Blanc.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Lyon Roue Tours Mont-Blanc.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Aga (d) 13:54, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Yo.
Tu peux la mettre sur WpFr ? (elle est franchement cool).
--Aga (d) 13:57, 17 February 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R2 Announcement[edit]

Round 2 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the second round of the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year were entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

There are two total rounds of voting. In the first round, you voted for as many images as you liked. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category have continued to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 2 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

This Picture of the Year vote notification was delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:22, 22 February 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Fort de Feyzin - caponnière double sud 2.JPG[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Fort de Feyzin - caponnière double sud 2.JPG, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Denniss (talk) 16:20, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Fort de Feyzin - caponnière double sud 2.JPG[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Fort de Feyzin - caponnière double sud 2.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 14:03, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 Results Announcement[edit]

Picture of the Year 2013 Results[edit]

The 2013 Picture of the Year. View all results »

Dear JeanBono,

The 2013 Picture of the Year competition has ended and we are pleased to announce the results: We shattered participation records this year — more people voted in Picture of the Year 2013 than ever before. In both rounds, 4070 different people voted for their favorite images. Additionally, there were more image candidates (featured pictures) in the contest than ever before (962 images total).

  • In the first round, 2852 people voted for all 962 files
  • In the second round, 2919 people voted for the 50 finalists (the top 30 overall and top 2 in each category)

We congratulate the winners of the contest and thank them for creating these beautiful images and sharing them as freely licensed content:

  1. 157 people voted for the winner, an image of a lightbulb with the tungsten filament smoking and burning.
  2. In second place, 155 people voted for an image of "Sviati Hory" (Holy Mountains) National Park in Donetsk Oblast, Ukraine.
  3. In third place, 131 people voted for an image of a swallow flying and drinking.

Click here to view the top images »

We also sincerely thank to all 4070 voters for participating and we hope you will return for next year's contest in early 2015. We invite you to continue to participate in the Commons community by sharing your work.

Thanks,
the Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2013 Picture of the Year contest.

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:00, 26 March 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


--  Gazebo (talk) 13:58, 13 June 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Jacques de Molay, grand maître des Templiers - Fleury François Richard - MBA Lyon 2014.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Jacques de Molay, grand maître des Templiers by Fleury François Richard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Scène de la saint-Barthélemy - Joseph-Nicolas Robert-Fleury - MBA Lyon 2014.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Scène de la saint-Barthélemy by Joseph-Nicolas Robert-Fleury.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

VIC[edit]

Bonjour,

Pourrais-tu ajouter la géolocalisation à tes tableaux nominés comme images de valeur, stp? Cordialement, Yann (talk) 08:58, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Bonjour Yann, j'y avais pensé mais je ne vois pas laquelle mettre ; l'ouvre se promenant à travers le monde, que faut-il indiquer ? Le modèle institution lié au tableau devrait inclure ces coordonnées GPS ? JeanBono (talk) 09:01, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Christophe Colomb devant le conseil de Salamanque - Emanuel Leutze - MBA Lyon 2014.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Christophe Colomb devant le conseil de Salamanque by Emanuel Leutze.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Le Combat du duc de Clarence et du champion du Dauphin - Émilien de Nieuwerkerke - MBA Lyon 2014.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Combat du duc de Clarence by Émilien de Nieuwerkerke.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
L’Éducation de Marie Stuart à la cour de François II - Gillot Saint-Evre - MBA Lyon 2014.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
L’Éducation de Marie Stuart à la cour de François II by Gillot Saint-Evre.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Comminge by Claudius Jacquand 2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Comminge by Claudius Jacquand.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Les Cordeliers. Épisode du siège de Metz by Laurent Charles Maréchal 2.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Les Cordeliers. Épisode du siège de Metz de Laurent Charles Maréchal.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
La Lecture de la sentence de Marie Stuart - Eugène Devéria - MBA Lyon 2014.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
La Lecture de la sentence de Marie Stuart by Eugène Devéria.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Interrogatoire de Savonarole - François Marius Granet - MBA Lyon 2014.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Interrogatoire de Savonarole by François Marius Granet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Le Corps d'Henri IV exposé au Louvre - Alexandre Hesse - MBA Lyon 2014.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Corps d'Henri IV exposé au Louvre by Alexandre Hesse.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
La Rencontre d'Henri III et du duc de Guise - Pierre-Charles Comte - MBA Lyon 2014.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
La Rencontre d'Henri III et du duc de Guise by Pierre-Charles Comte.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Le Couronnement d'Inès de Castro en 1361 - Pierre-Charles Comte - MBA Lyon 2014 (cropped).JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Couronnement d'Inès de Castro en 1361 by Pierre-Charles Comte.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Louis d'Orléans montrant sa maîtresse - Eugène Delacroix - MBA Lyon 2014.JPG
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Louis d'Orléans montrant sa maîtresse by Eugène Delacroix.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Le Serment de Henri de Guise - Pierre-Charles Comte - MBA Lyon 2014.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Serment de Henri de Guise by Pierre-Charles Comte.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Le Jeune Gaston, dit l'ange de Foix - Claudius Jacquand - MBA Lyon 2014.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Le Jeune Gaston, dit l'ange de Foix by Claudius Jacquand.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
L'Éducation d'Henri IV - Jean-Baptiste Mallet - MBA Lyon 2014.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
L'Éducation d'Henri IV by Jean-Baptiste Mallet.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Bianca Cappello et son amant fuyant vers Florence à travers les Apennins - Jean-Louis Ducis - MBA Lyon 2014.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Bianca Cappello et son amant fuyant vers Florence à travers les Apennins by Jean-Louis Ducis.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
François Ier montre à Marguerite de Navarre, sa sœur, les vers qu'il vient d'écrire sur une vitre avec son diamant - Fleury François Richard - MBA Lyon 2014 (cropped).jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
François Ier montre à Marguerite de Navarre, sa sœur, les vers qu'il vient d'écrire sur une vitre avec son diamant by Fleury François Richard.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.
Marie Stuart, reine d'Écosse, recevant sa sentence de mort que vient de ratifier le Parlement - Jean-Baptiste Vermay - MBA Lyon 2014.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Marie Stuart, reine d'Écosse, recevant sa sentence de mort que vient de ratifier le Parlement by Jean-Baptiste Vermay.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

コーヒーをどうぞ![edit]

A small cup of coffee.JPG I am grateful that you had to resolve the problem with the template of the iPhone 5c and iPhone 5s. SakuraMikado(御門桜) (talk) 15:26, 28 July 2014 (UTC)

File:Château de Teillan - Plaque Hubert et Sévrine de Cazenove 1913-2011 1949-20xx.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Château de Teillan - Plaque Hubert et Sévrine de Cazenove 1913-2011 1949-20xx.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

SpringComp (talk) 21:01, 18 August 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Basilica of Superga - front view.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Basilica of Superga - front view.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Please create template "Taken with iPhone 6" and "Taken with iPhone 6 Plus"[edit]

hello, Hou are you?

Finally, the "iPhone 6", "iPhone 6 Plus" is now released from Apple. Can you create a template such as "Taken with iPhone 5"?

I hope that it will be created. Thank you. --SakuraMikado(御門桜) (talk) 15:35, 20 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Chapelle Sainte-Madeleine - Bourg-en-Bresse 001.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Chapelle Sainte-Madeleine - Bourg-en-Bresse 001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Aga (d) 08:18, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Chapelle Sainte-Madeleine - Bourg-en-Bresse.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Chapelle Sainte-Madeleine - Bourg-en-Bresse.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Aga (d) 08:18, 23 September 2014 (UTC)

Thank you for create "Template:Taken with iPhone 6"![edit]

Thank you for create "Template:Taken with iPhone 6"! By the way, I have a question. Template for this "iPhone6" ​​Can I use any "iPhone6 Plus"?

I plan to in the near future, to buy either the "iPhone 6 Plus" or "iPhone 6".(Stock is very odd in Japan. Rather than the Apple Store, If I tried to buy a mobile phone dealer, I heard from the clerk and do not have to wait one month.) Very thanks! --MIKADO Sakura (御門桜) (talk) 17:53, 27 September 2014 (UTC)

✓ Done JeanBono (talk) 09:31, 29 September 2014 (UTC)
Thank you very much! --MIKADO Sakura (御門桜) (talk) 16:53, 30 September 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/File:85-Decines-Billy.jpg[edit]

Je m'interroge sur cette deletion request... car [1] date de 2013 alors que la photo a été importée sur commons en 2008... Copyfraude ou l'auteur de la photo aurait changé d'avis ? Otourly (talk) 17:01, 11 November 2014 (UTC)

D'autant que sur la page d'accueil de ce site est écrit « Certaines photos de la galerie photos T-U-F sont publiées sur Wikimedia Commons sous le pseudonyme Billy69150, sous licence Créative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 4.0 International » Otourly (talk) 17:03, 11 November 2014 (UTC)
voir la conversation avec son ange-gardien. JeanBono (talk) 09:38, 12 November 2014 (UTC)

Can I Use "Template:Taken with iPhone 6" or "Template:Taken with iPhone 6 Plus"?[edit]

Hello, Thank you create Template "Template:Taken with iPhone 6" and "Taken with iPhone 6 Plus".

I habe a question for using there. I take video with iPhone 6 Plus. (ex. this video).

Template massage wrote "This Photo has been taken with". Can I use other media (Videos,Audios etc.) thlem with (use) iPhone 6 and iPhone 6 Plus ?

Can you help or advice to me? --MIKADO Sakura (御門桜) (talk) 15:42, 14 November 2014 (UTC)

Thank you very much create "Template:Taken with iPhone 6 Plus (Video)" amd change media templete. I just had to translate this template to Japanese. Please confirm it. --MIKADO Sakura (御門桜) (talk) 17:10, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
Well done, however I can't read japanese :) JeanBono (talk) 22:20, 15 November 2014 (UTC)