User talk:Jmh2o

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Quelle est la source de l'image Charleroi_blason.gif? Et quel serait le blasonnement? J'ai de toutes autres armes pour cette commune, mais il serait bien sur possible qu'il y ait eu un changement après la fusion des communes.--Caranorn 12:19, 18 September 2006 (UTC)

Image:Charleroi-Au_pigeon_soldat.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. Thank you. Siebrand 13:56, 17 October 2007 (UTC)
This message was placed by an automated process. Please go to Commons:Help desk if you need help.

COA of Lithuania[edit]

The version you used was not made by me. The original image (made by me) was overwritten by User:Zscout370. I have changed the page to reflect the changes made. I also copied by original hand made version (not extracted) to a new page: Image:Alternate Coat of Arms of Lithuania.svg. --Ysangkok 17:06, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Jmh2o!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:06, 23 February 2009 (UTC)


File:Charleroi_-_Maurice_Cambier_-_plaque_Grand_Rue.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Charleroi_-_Maurice_Cambier_-_plaque_Grand_Rue.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 09:37, 22 April 2010 (UTC)

Oude kaarten?[edit]

En wat is de regel met File:Liege.RELSE.TULE.SNCV.png? Het gaat over 1939, maar wel met een moderne kaart achtergrond.Smiley.toerist (talk) 22:14, 2 September 2010 (UTC)

Sculptures de Martin Guyaux à Charleroi[edit]

Bonjour,

Le sculpteur est toujours vivant, et il n'y a pas de liberté de panorama en Belgique, aussi la publication de photos de ces sculptures constitue-t-il pour l'instant (une évolution législative en la matière au niveau national ou plus probablement européen n'étant pas impropable dans les 20 ans à venir) une violation de droit d'auteur.

J'ai donc supprimé ces photos.

Si la problématique de pouvoir librement diffuser des photographies de lieux publics vous concerne, il pourrait être intéressant de créer un chapter local Wikimedia Belgium et d'y œuvrer pour des actions de sensibilisation et de lobbying en vue de l'adoption d'une liberté de panorama dans notre pays. --Dereckson (talk) 10:31, 20 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Blason_utilisateur_jmh2o.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Blason_utilisateur_jmh2o.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bulwersator (talk) 14:51, 27 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Pierre Paulus.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Pierre Paulus.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 14:27, 11 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Jules Destree.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jules Destree.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 12:16, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

File:Charleroi - Ilot des sciences.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Charleroi - Ilot des sciences.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

BrightRaven (talk) 11:32, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Blason de Tournai[edit]

En quoi ma version ne respecte-elle pas le blasonnement comme décrit dans l'arrêté royal?

--Philjon (talk) 22:10, 25 January 2013 (UTC)

Elle le respecte. Mais il est inutile de reproduire au mieux l'image tel que sur la site de la ville pour respecter "plus" le blason. À coller de trop prêt à une image publiée sous copyright, on peut même friser la violation de copyright. Je vous invite à ne pas écraser les versions précédentes, correcte du point de vue héraldique, mais d'uploader vos propositions alternatives. Bien à vous. --Jmh2o (talk) 08:07, 26 January 2013 (UTC)

Thorembais-les-Beguines[edit]

Bonjour. Je vous remercie de votre correction de classement. Je dois vous avouer que je ne comprends pas bien la nuance. Je vous fait entièrement confiance .Mais j'ai déjà crée trois ou quatre articles avec les classement que j'avais fait. Est-ce que cela ne posera pas de problèmes? Je suppose que non. Merci et cordialement Mortier.Daniel (talk) 11:13, 14 September 2014 (UTC)

File:Léon Degrelle à Charleroi - 01.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Léon Degrelle à Charleroi - 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Paulae (talk) 20:45, 19 October 2014 (UTC)

:File:Église_réformée_Saint-Martin_de_Vevey_-_10_-_vitrail_du_chœur.jpg[edit]

I don't know how do you managed that, but while you perfectly cropped the image, the sharpness is now worse. Did you cropped the jpg or the RAW? --CEphoto, Uwe Aranas (talk) 10:44, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

I use a wrong picture. Now, it will be better. --H2O(talk) 11:18, 10 November 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Charleroi - Art nouveau - sgrafitte - Paul Cauchie - rue de la Montagne 38.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Art nouveau - sgrafitte - Paul Cauchie - rue de la Montagne 38.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Charleroi - Maison dorée - verrière.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - Maison dorée - verrière.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Couillet - chevalements de la mine du Pêchon - 7.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Couillet - chevalements de la mine du Pêchon - 7.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Couillet - chevalements de la mine du Pêchon - 9.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Couillet - chevalements de la mine du Pêchon - 9.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

RE: File:Musée de Confluences 14-06-2014 parvis.jpg[edit]

Bonjour et merci pour le conseil ! Je n'avais pas réalisé que le Musée était une oeuvre d'art et qu'il était, par conséquent, interdit de diffuser la photo sur Commons. Au moins j'aurai appris un truc ... Du coup comment fait-on pour importer sur Wiki ? Impossible de trouver le formulaire d'import ... je me souviens que tout avais migré sur Commons il y a quelques années. Cordialement, Tibidibtibo (talk) 17:57, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Finalement j'ai trouvé le lien (il était bien caché !), merci, Tibidibtibo (talk) 18:09, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Charleroi - quai de Brabant 15 - 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - quai de Brabant 15 - 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Charleroi - monument aux martyrs - victoire - 2.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Charleroi - monument aux martyrs - victoire - 2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.