User talk:Felipe Menegaz
From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
[edit] Flickr
Basta ele mudar para uma permissão compatível no Flick até o momento que a imagem for verificada. Entende? Dantadd✉ 04:05, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Sugarloaf mountain in Rio de Janeiro.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
[edit] File:Rio de Janeiro - Pão de Açucar - Cablecar.jpg
Hi. Could you please try to find a presentation layout that suits you and that relies on the standard language templates (like {{en|description}})? Some internationalization tools need them and you're preventing them from working. Regards, --Eusebius (talk) 06:51, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
- Done. João Felipe C.S (talk) 03:52, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
Hi, in order to keep the original picture accessible, I've re-uploaded your modification at File:Rio de Janeiro - Pão de Açucar - Cablecar (resampled and denoised).jpg. That way, people can use either version of the image. I think it's best to leave the original file untouched, especially since it's been promoted as a valued image. Best wishes. –Tryphon☂ 18:49, 3 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] File source is not properly indicated: File:Sugarloaf mountain in Rio de Janeiro edit.jpg
|
العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk (bokmål) | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/− |
| This media may be deleted. |
| A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Sugarloaf mountain in Rio de Janeiro edit.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
--Yarnalgo (talk) 09:18, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] File Tagging File:Sc_pt_hercilio_luz3.jpg
|
Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Lietuvių | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk (bokmål) | Polski | Português | Русский | Tiếng Việt | +/− |
| This media may be deleted. |
| Thanks for uploading File:Sc_pt_hercilio_luz3.jpg. This image is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org).
Unless the permission information is given, the image may be speedy deleted after seven days. Thank you. |
Lugusto • ※ 19:07, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
[edit] File:H1N1_map.svg
Hi João, I'm sorry but I reverted the change you made to this image. I agree that your style and colouration is much better, but the changes you made were done with an image editor. Previously, we had been editing the file using a text editor. This makes it much easier to maintain, because when a new country needs to be coloured, it merely needs to be added to the CSS definitions area at the top of the file. If we were to keep this new version, it would be required to edit the file with an image editor and fill countries, which is harder to maintain and which would bloat the file size. Perhaps we could implement a new colour scheme on the file while maintaining the CSS definitions? I copy the current CSS definitions below, to make it obvious what I'm talking about. --Oldak Quill 16:05, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
/* Confirmed infections with death */ .mx { fill: #751012; }
/* Confirmed infections */ .ca, .es, .gb, .il, .nz, .us { fill: #cd3412; }
/* Unconfirmed infections */ .ar, .au, .br, .ch, .cl, .co, .cr, .de, .dk, .fr, .gt, .hk, .ie, .kr, .no, .pe, .pl, .pt, .ru, .th { fill: #eaa912; }
- Hi. Using CSS definitions is not just my view. This is how the file was being edited before I began editing it and it is what a number of editors have used. Not everyone has an SVG image editor, but everyone has a text editor. Using fill, especially on countries with many islands, is time-consuming and is hard to remove if the country changes status. Since each country already has ID tags, the whole country can be coloured by adding it to CSS definitions. Also, using fill bloats the file size and the fill-feature in different image editors produces different code, leading to a messy file. --Oldak Quill 16:30, 28 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] 2009 swine flu Brazil map
Please update Brazil map, Espírito Santo has a suspected case, citing official sources.
2 - http://www1.folha.uol.com.br/folha/cotidiano/ult95u557632.shtml
[edit] File source is not properly indicated: Image:MapaBrasilPortos.jpg
|
العربية | Asturianu | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Euskara | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk (bokmål) | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/− |
| This media may be deleted. |
| A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, Image:MapaBrasilPortos.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.
If you created the content yourself, enter If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so. Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you! |
Patrícia msg 20:17, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
- OK, eliminei o mapa então. Obrigada pela ajuda, e muito obrigada por ter agora mais sensatez ;). Patrícia msg 09:48, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Mapa Rio
Rapaz... essas coisas técnicas não são comigo... aliás, já aconteceu com imagens carregadas por mim. Desculpa por não poder ajudar! Dantadd✉ 19:19, 30 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] File:Michael Jackson in 2005.jpg
| Critically evaluate Flickr licenses | File:Michael Jackson in 2005.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. You may have preserved the information shown on Flickr correctly when transferring the image here, but the Flickr uploader is not the copyright holder of this image. Either the image was created by someone else, or it is a derivative of someone else's work. As stated in Commons:Licensing, only the copyright holder may issue a license, so the one shown on Flickr is invalid.
Always remember to critically evaluate Flickr licenses. Photostreams with professional-looking photographs, album covers, posters, and images in a wide range of styles or quality taken by many different cameras often indicate that the Flickr uploader either does not understand or does not care about copyright matters. Deutsch | English | Suomi | Français | Italiano | Македонски | Norsk (bokmål) | Português | Svenska | +/− |
-Martin H. (talk) 00:05, 28 June 2009 (UTC)
==Your financial crisis 2007-2008 map
Nice map. But this map is based on non-factual estimates made in December 2008. Factual data for 1st half of 2009 is completely different, so your map is misleading. You do great maps so please could you make a new map for this topic based on factual data for the first half of 2009?Chumchum7 (talk) 07:15, 25 July 2009 (UTC)
[edit] File:Mercosul.svg
Your map "File:Mercosul.svg" includes Venezuela as a member state; but it appears Venezuela hasn't been fully ratified, so it should be shaded differently. thanks 96.49.149.158 01:57, 15 August 2009 (UTC)
[edit] File:Rio de Janeiro 2016 Olympic banner.jpg may be deleted
Česky | Deutsch | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Nederlands | Português | Русский | +/−
The File:Rio de Janeiro 2016 Olympic banner.jpg which you uploaded has been tagged {{OTRS pending}} for more than 30 days. This tag indicates that an email setting out permission to use the file was sent to the OTRS team. Unfortunately, we cannot find any record that such an email has been received, and accordingly the file remains without permission. Unless the OTRS team receives evidence that permission has been granted within 15 days of today's date, the file will be deleted. If you have already sent the permission, please re-send it to "permissions-commons
wikimedia.org" now. Please quote the file name in your email. At the same time, please leave a message at the OTRS noticeboard so that a volunteer can follow this up. Alternatively, you can contact an OTRS volunteer directly. HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 00:13, 16 August 2009 (UTC)
[edit] User:Felipe Menegaz/License
Would you be willing to change {{cc-by-sa-2.5,2.0,1.0}} to {{cc-by-sa-3.0,2.5,2.0,1.0}}? Would be very nice for the big license migration. Thank you, Multichill (talk) 11:45, 5 September 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Please link images
Afrikaans | العربية | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk (bokmål) | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Svenska | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(繁體) | +/−
Hello Felipe Menegaz!
Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Commons images are used by editors on many projects in many languages. Each image is put into categories. This helps other editors find them. Please add categories to each image you upload.
To add an image to a category, add the following code to the end of the page.
- [[Category:Category Name]]
For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbit of comets, add the following to the image description page:
- [[Category:Astronomy diagrams]]
- [[Category:Comets]]
This will make the diagram show up in the categories: Astronomy diagrams, Comets.
For further information on categories read Commons:Categories.
The CommonSense Tool often helps you find the best category for your image.
Here is a gallery of your images. Please check that each image has a category. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the help desk. Thank you.
BotMultichillT 12:58, 7 September 2009 (UTC)
- Image:Usan.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
- Image:WikiProject Brazil 2.svg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
[edit] File:Rio de Janeiro 2016 Olympic banner.jpg
| Pay attention to copyright | File:Rio de Janeiro 2016 Olympic banner.jpg has been marked as a copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content, that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. For images, you may find Commons:Image casebook useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this image is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the image description page. Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Български | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Español | Suomi | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk (nynorsk) | Norsk (bokmål) | Polski | Português | Русский | Slovenčina | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/− |
--Filipe Ribeiro Msg 23:28, 9 September 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Brazilian States by Education index.svg
Olá! Estava organizando as categorias de educação no Brasil, e me deparei com este arquivo, que achei bastante interessante, mas que por estar sem legenda e uma explicação ou referência ao índice usado para medir a educação em cada estado, acaba ficando de pouca utilidade. Se você puder adicionar uma legenda com o que cada cor significa e um link na descrição ao estudo original, acho que é uma imagem que poderia ser bastante utilizada.
Um abraço, Leonardo (talk) 03:51, 27 September 2009 (UTC)
[edit] File:Marvinicons123.PNG
| File deletion warning | File:Marvinicons123.PNG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца) | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form) | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk (nynorsk) | Norsk (bokmål) | Occitan | Polski | Português | Русский | Српски / Srpski | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体) | 中文(繁體) | +/− |
--FordPrefect42 (talk) 14:56, 9 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Encomenda
Felipe, estou precisando de um mapinha simples baseado nesta imagem File:Brazil States.svg ou File:Brazil Blank Map.svg. É uma coisa pessoal e se necessário posso pagar. Se estiver disponível me avise, caso contrário, tudo bem! Obrigado, Dantadd✉ 18:32, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
- Obrigadíssimo, Felipe. Então, eu estou precisando de um mapa que identifique os estados (pode ser com as siglas), mas que os reúna em sete cores diferentes, da seguinte forma:
- 1) Vermelho: Amazonas, Roraima, Pará, Amapá, Maranhão, Piauí, Cearé, Rio Grande do Norte, Paraíba, Pernambuco, Alagoas e Sergipe.
- 2) Verde: Tocantins, Goiás (sem o DF) e Minas Gerais.
- 3) Cinza: Distrito Federal.
- 4) Azul: Acre, Rondônia, Mato Grosso, Mato Grosso do Sul e São Paulo.
- 5) Laranja: Bahia, Espírito Santo e Rio de Janeiro.
- 6) Amarelo: Paraná e Santa Catarina.
- 7) Rosa: Rio Grande do Sul.
As cores são sugestões, podendo ser mudadas sem problemas.
Em cada uma das sete "regiões" é preciso identificar uma cidade
- 1) Recife
- 2) Belo Horizonte
- 3) Brasília
- 4) São Paulo
- 5) Rio de Janeiro
- 6) Curitiba
- 7) Porto Alegre
E então... muito complicado? Me expliquei bem? Abraço, Dantadd✉ 16:19, 29 October 2009 (UTC)
[edit] VIC Dilma Rousseff 2009.jpg
Hello Felipe, Could you please add geocoded data in order to fulfill the request posted on Commons:Valued image candidates/Dilma Rousseff 2009.jpg? I think you could locate the precise place, see the clue on the review page. Thanks and regards, --Myrabella (talk) 12:50, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Dilma Rousseff.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.
[edit] Valued Image Promotion
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates.