User talk:JoJan

; Archives
	Archive l : May 2005 - December 2006; Archive 2 : 2007;

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Jump to: navigation, search

Picture of the day

Graphomya eustolia fly of family muscidae. The fly was app 8mm long. Pictured in the Uluguru Mountains, Tanzania ^+/− (en)

1 photo permission
2 Image:Pula030.jpg
3 Photos of Pula
4 Image:Neopilina001.jpg
5 Image:Rijeka077.jpg
6 Image:Euthyrhynchus floridanus01.jpg
7 Baška or city of Krk
8 Image:Rimini039.jpg
9 Image Tagging Image:AmandineO129.jpg
10 TUSC token 1aa391559afc5aced61da8970e4fb800
11 Re: OTRS
12 nice
13 Image:Rimini031.jpg
14 Image Tagging Image:Asphodelus_microcarpus_b.web.JPG
15 OTRS permissions for works by Willy Bosschem
16 Image Tagging Image:Zanthoxylum.clava.herculis.jpg
17 Image Tagging Image:Mitchella.repens01.jpg
18 Image Tagging Image:Ambrosia-artemisiifolia01.jpg
19 Image:Oostende.Leopold_II_(01).jpg
20 Image:Oostende.Leopold_II_(03).jpg
21 Image:Oostende.Leopold_II_(04).jpg
22 Image:Oostende.Leopold_II_(05).jpg
23 Image:Oostende.LeopoldII_(02).jpg
24 Image:LeopoldII.ruiter.jpg
25 Please link images
26 Category:Agora of Izmir
27 Battle of Nieuwpoort
28 File:Duinenkerkje09.jpg
29 File:Duinenkerkje08.jpg
30 request
31 Not Clare of Assisi but Rita of Cascia
32 File source is not properly indicated: File:Latimeria_chalumnae01.jpg
33 Request for comment
34 Dicentrarchus labrax vs Chelon labrosus
35 Jetairfly and Freedom of Panorama
36 Image of St. Bernard

[edit] photo permission

Hello, I would like to contact you about permission to use one of your photographs from Wikimedia Commons in a book I am working on. Please contact me at jkwalton5@gmail.com at your earliest convenience. Thank you.

[edit] Image:Pula030.jpg

Hallo, I can't find the Ancient Roman part in this picture: this is a Renaissance/Mannerist bifora, even bearing the Lion of Saint Mark, symbol of the Republic of Venice. Perhaps you got confused with the description of another picture? Or, if the bifora was built spoiling Roman marbles, could you be so kind to edit the description to say so? Thank you in advance for your help. --User:G.dallorto 17:22, 29 December 2007 (UTC)

Looking closer at the picture, I must admit that this bifora doesn't even look Ancient Roman. However, even J.J. Wilkes in the the authoritative Grove Dictionary of Art mentions : "only the rear elevation of the other temple, probably dedicated to Diana, is preserved" (the first temple being the temple of Roma and Augustus). Furthermore, my Croatian guide said clearly that this was the remains of a Roman temple, a rare example of incorporating Roman marbles into a Renaissance building .If I remember well, this house presently consists of offices ( perhaps a bank ?). But I didn't look more closely, since it was raining hard at that moment and I had to take shelter. So I would agree with your conclusion that these Roman marbles were worked over during the Venetian period of Pula (in the 15th-16th century ?). If you agree with this explanation, i will change the description of the picture. JoJan 15:50, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

Hallo, you know better than I do, because you were there and you talked to the guide and I did not. So please do change the caption accordingly with what you are writing here. By the way, the example is not that rare: the reuse of roman marbles was very common at that time and, far from considering it a crime, it was considered a way to "revive" the ruins :-( . The point is that normally the reworkings have been demolished in the 19th and 20th century to "free" the original roman part. Even the Colosseum in the Middle ages looked like a fortress, with its battlements & re....

The only point is that the caption should make it more clear that this is not a "roman bifora" :-) , but a mannerist bifora created by spoiling ancient roman marbles and architectonical items and incroporating them into the final result. Thank you for your kind attention. --User:G.dallorto 17:25, 30 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Photos of Pula

Thanks for adding the photos of my hometown but one advice: please add category:Pula without that the photos could easily be lost if someone removes them from page Pula in order to add new photos. Cheers, --Orlovic (talk) 13:18, 13 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Neopilina001.jpg

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 17:05, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

It seems that the Commons doesn't accept Cyrilic script. If I read it correctly, the Makedonian wikipedia says that it belongs in the Category : GFDL and more probably GFDL-self. JoJan 19:27, 14 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Rijeka077.jpg

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 18:05, 29 February 2008 (UTC)

License added. JoJan 08:58, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Euthyrhynchus floridanus01.jpg

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 20:14, 18 March 2008 (UTC)

License added. JoJan 14:58, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Baška or city of Krk

Hi,

I've seen your pictures from Krk island, but I'm wondering are they from Baška (as you stated in the description) or from the city of Krk.

Could you please check Category: Baška, Croatia.

Thanks. --Veliki Kategorizator 01:13, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

P.S. I guess it is Krk after all. See Category:Krk. --Veliki Kategorizator 01:16, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

Indeed my mistake. JoJan 16:07, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Rimini039.jpg

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful informations about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Filbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Fil nik 18:07, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

License added. JoJan 18:14, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:AmandineO129.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:AmandineO129.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. Kam Solusar 18:30, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

If I remember well, I made this photo of a photo on public display inside the museumship Amandine. JoJan 16:28, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] TUSC token 1aa391559afc5aced61da8970e4fb800

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

[edit] Re: OTRS

Ik heb de OTRS mail beantwoord. Voeg het volgende sjabloon toe aan de uploads: {{PermissionOTRS|ticket=https://secure.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=1596394&ArticleID=1934707&QueueID=53}} Helaas is de wachtlijst inmiddels 500 mails, dus het duurt normaalgesproken even voordat een mail beantwoord wordt. Indien er haast bij is zoals nu, laat mij dan even weten op mijn talk dan zal ik er wat spoed achter zetten. -- Bryan (talk to me) 18:29, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Hartelijk dank. JoJan 19:00, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] nice

Image:Ficus aurea02.jpg, you seem to be a little more experienced with where to look for these things than me. -- carol (talk) 21:00, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

Glad you noticed. Look again now, I've just enhanced the images I uploaded. JoJan (talk) 21:02, 20 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Rimini031.jpg

I'm pretty sure you got something wrong with your uploads here: if you look at the version history you see that first you had a completely different picture under the same name. I only discovered it because the category page still had the first one for its thumbnail. Did you really want to overwrite that? --Hk kng (talk) 17:22, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

You're right. When uploading one image after after another, I must have made a mistake. I've made new uploads, everything should be OK now. JoJan (talk) 08:47, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Asphodelus_microcarpus_b.web.JPG

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Asphodelus_microcarpus_b.web.JPG. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. O sama K 10:40, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

This was more than three years ago ! At this moment, this is as good as impossible for me to find out where this photo came from. But of one thing I'm certain : the license is OK, otherwise I wouldn't have uploaded the photo. Too bad that I can't provide any proof for this. JoJan (talk) 18:16, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

You're right, it's too late. Now, I'm trying to check old images that has no source or valid license. We have a long wide backlog. BTW, could you archive your talk page? :)--O sama K 08:15, 30 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] OTRS permissions for works by Willy Bosschem

Hi JoJan,

Regarding OTRS ticket 2008070110022901, when uploading the images please tag them using the following code:

{{PermissionOTRS|ticket=https://secure.wikimedia.org/otrs/index.pl?Action=AgentTicketZoom&TicketID=1675703}}

Thanks again, and let me know if you have any questions! --jonny-m t 14:35, 3 July 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Zanthoxylum.clava.herculis.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Zanthoxylum.clava.herculis.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. shizhao (talk) 18:41, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Copyright status and origin are now clearly indicated. JoJan (talk) 07:45, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Mitchella.repens01.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Mitchella.repens01.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. shizhao (talk) 18:41, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Source and copyright status are now clearly indicated. JoJan (talk) 07:47, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Ambrosia-artemisiifolia01.jpg

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Ambrosia-artemisiifolia01.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. shizhao (talk) 18:43, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

Originally this image came from the usda;gov website under the license PD-USGov-USDA. It seems that this page on this website is no longer available. Possibly the image has been removed or renamed. JoJan (talk) 08:10, 29 August 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Oostende.Leopold_II_(01).jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Oostende.Leopold_II_(01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Brbbl (talk) 08:03, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Oostende.Leopold_II_(03).jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Oostende.Leopold_II_(03).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Brbbl (talk) 08:38, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Oostende.Leopold_II_(04).jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Oostende.Leopold_II_(04).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Brbbl (talk) 08:40, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Oostende.Leopold_II_(05).jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Oostende.Leopold_II_(05).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Brbbl (talk) 08:41, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:Oostende.LeopoldII_(02).jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:Oostende.LeopoldII_(02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Brbbl (talk) 08:42, 1 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Image:LeopoldII.ruiter.jpg

Image deletion warning

Image:LeopoldII.ruiter.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Teofilo (talk) 13:48, 3 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please link images

Hello JoJan!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Commons images are used by editors on many projects in many languages. Each image is put into categories. This helps other editors find them. Please add categories to each image you upload.

To add an image to a category, add the following code to the end of the page.

[[Category:Category Name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbit of comets, add the following to the image description page:

[[Category:Astronomy diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories: Astronomy diagrams, Comets.

For further information on categories read Commons:Categories.

The CommonSense Tool often helps you find the best category for your image.

Here is a gallery of your images. Please check that each image has a category. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the help desk. Thank you.

BotMultichillT (talk) 05:56, 25 December 2008 (UTC)

Image:Cast Brass Eagle.jpg is uncategorized since 24 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:56, 25 December 2008 (UTC)
Image:Historische kaart Nederlandse kust.jpg is uncategorized since 25 December 2008. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:50, 26 December 2008 (UTC)
Image:Altes Museum - Antikensammlung 022.jpg is uncategorized since 10 January 2009. BotMultichillT (talk) 05:57, 11 January 2009 (UTC)
Image:Spello069.jpg is uncategorized since 16 January 2009. BotMultichillT 05:57, 17 January 2009 (UTC)
Image:Fort Wellington.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Evora16.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Mir(28).jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Evora18.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Belem.Jeronimos15.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Belem.Torre10.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Batalha46.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:FortN.buitenzicht.pano01.JPEG was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Belem.Jeronimos28.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Evora12.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Batalha50.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Batalha54.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Evora13.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:De verloren stappen.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Evora09.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:De Tweeling.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Belem.Torre05.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Evora15.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:De lach.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Bayonne08.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Batalha53.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Forsythia.x.intermedia04.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Evora11.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Belem.Jeronimos02.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Evora29.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Belem.Jeronimos27.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Evora10.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Belem.Jeronimos19.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Evora19.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Batalha52.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Batalha.Platanus x hispanicus02.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Belem.Jeronimos22.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Evora36.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Cinchona.pubescens04.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Belem.Jeronimos11.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Evora20.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Forsythia.x.intermedia03.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Batalha57.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Batalha58.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Belem.Jeronimos21.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Evora23.jpg was uncategorized on 6 September 2009.
Image:Pieter Pourbus.Joos de Damhoiuder.jpg was uncategorized on 20 October 2009.

They are all categorized now. JoJan (talk) 15:23, 11 January 2009 (UTC)

Done. JoJan (talk) 17:59, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

File deletion warning

File:Oostende.King_Baudouin_(01).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Brbbl (talk) 09:41, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

File deletion warning

File:Oostende.King_Baudouin_(02).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Brbbl (talk) 09:46, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

File deletion warning

File:Oostende.King_Baudouin_(03).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Brbbl (talk) 09:48, 12 January 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Category:Agora of Izmir

Hello JoJan! I saw that you created the above category. I suggest gathering the related images under Category:Agora of Smyrna, which seems more fitting and will offer the advantage of being directly incorporated into Category:Smyrna. I also do think it's worth preserving a distinct category for the agora under the category for the ancient city though. Regards. Cretanforever (talk) 25 January 2009

Hi. Please contact me. I would like to use three of your photos in a book about european art-museums. kristina.arvidson@gmail.com

[edit] Battle of Nieuwpoort

Are you planning to add images to this gallery? If it remains empty it will most likely be deleted. Regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 21:03, 25 February 2009 (UTC)

Please delete the empty gallery. JoJan (talk) 19:12, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

Done Regards, Finn Rindahl (talk) 19:15, 26 February 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Duinenkerkje09.jpg

File deletion warning

File:Duinenkerkje09.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Simonxag (talk) 19:44, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Duinenkerkje08.jpg

File deletion warning

File:Duinenkerkje08.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

--Simonxag (talk) 19:49, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

[edit] request

JoJan,

I would like to get your permission for using the picture of Galileo Galilei in my book. Please respond to marekj.

Reagrds Marek

If you mean this photo File:Galileo Galilei01.jpg, there is no problem, but attribution is required. JoJan (talk) 17:12, 31 July 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Not Clare of Assisi but Rita of Cascia

1 Scueseme I'm not a good English speaker.

2 Your image http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Temple.of.Minerva03.jpg is not Clare of Assisi but Rita of Cascia.

[edit] File source is not properly indicated: File:Latimeria_chalumnae01.jpg

This media may be deleted.

A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Latimeria_chalumnae01.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-1.0+}} or {{PD-self}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

FunkMonk (talk) 19:46, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

The source has been added. JoJan (talk) 16:26, 2 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Request for comment

Discussion regarding the Categories "Fossil xxx" is occurring on Wp:ToL (here). As a member of the project you input is requested in to gain a larger view of the communities opinion on how to handle the points raised. Thanks --Kevmin (talk) 18:22, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Dicentrarchus labrax vs Chelon labrosus

Hello JoJan, I've seen your picture "Chelon labrosus.jpg" and I think the "main" fish is an European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax). Actually, you can also see half Thicklip grey mullet but a Wrasse and an European spider crab (Maja squinado) too. So, I think you should change the category (and perhaps the name) of this file, in order to avoid confusions. Best wishes, --DPC (talk) 17:24, 12 September 2009 (UTC)

Move the mouse over the picture "Chelon labrosus.jpg" to see some notes. I'd like you to answer me, thanks.--DPC (talk) 08:26, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Sorry for the belated answer. You're right, the fish in the center is Dicentrarchus labrax. My mistake arose because I relied on the name at the aquarium. I have re-uploaded the image at File:Dicentrarchus labrax001.jpg, while at the same time photoshopping the image for better contrast and color balance. I've also asked for the deletion of File:Chelon labrosus.jpg.

renamed and improved image

Chelon labrosus.jpg

original image

Cheers. JoJan (talk) 16:42, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

Great!--DPC (talk) 18:40, 2 November 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Jetairfly and Freedom of Panorama

It turns out that Belgium does not have the Freedom of Panorama, as seen here: Commons:Freedom of Panorama

Therefore the Jetairfly image may have to be moved to the English Wikipedia. See: Commons:Deletion requests/File:HPIM1924.JPG - I did this after consulting the village pump here: Commons:Village_pump#Belgium_and_Freedom_of_panorama - If it is removed from the Commons, it will be put on the English Wikipedia instead.

Thank you for taking the photo - It will still be here, even if it is on EN instead of the Commons. WhisperToMe (talk) 20:18, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

OK JoJan (talk) 10:27, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

Dear JoJan,

I would like to use your photograph of the stained glass window of St. Bernard in the Pisa baptistery in an article to be published in the scholarly journal (non-profit) Journal of Glass Studies. I see that you have given the rights to publish on the Wikipedia site, but could you also give me a written permission to publish your image? I am new to all of this! I am wondering how to give you proper credit for the image?

Thanks

[edit] Image of St. Bernard

Dear JoJan,

I would like to use your photograph of the stained glass window of St. Bernard in the Pisa baptistery in an article to be published in the scholarly journal (non-profit) Journal of Glass Studies. I see that you have given the rights to publish on the Wikipedia site, but could you also give me a written permission to publish your image? I am new to all of this! I am wondering how to give you proper credit for the image? Feel free to email me: thompsn@stolaf.edu

Thanks

User talk:JoJan

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Contents

[edit] photo permission

[edit] Image:Pula030.jpg

[edit] Photos of Pula

[edit] Image:Neopilina001.jpg

[edit] Image:Rijeka077.jpg

[edit] Image:Euthyrhynchus floridanus01.jpg

[edit] Baška or city of Krk

[edit] Image:Rimini039.jpg

[edit] Image Tagging Image:AmandineO129.jpg

[edit] TUSC token 1aa391559afc5aced61da8970e4fb800

[edit] Re: OTRS

[edit] nice

[edit] Image:Rimini031.jpg

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Asphodelus_microcarpus_b.web.JPG

[edit] OTRS permissions for works by Willy Bosschem

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Zanthoxylum.clava.herculis.jpg

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Mitchella.repens01.jpg

[edit] Image Tagging Image:Ambrosia-artemisiifolia01.jpg

[edit] Image:Oostende.Leopold_II_(01).jpg

[edit] Image:Oostende.Leopold_II_(03).jpg

[edit] Image:Oostende.Leopold_II_(04).jpg

[edit] Image:Oostende.Leopold_II_(05).jpg

[edit] Image:Oostende.LeopoldII_(02).jpg

[edit] Image:LeopoldII.ruiter.jpg

[edit] Please link images

[edit] Category:Agora of Izmir

[edit] Battle of Nieuwpoort

[edit] File:Duinenkerkje09.jpg

[edit] File:Duinenkerkje08.jpg

[edit] request

[edit] Not Clare of Assisi but Rita of Cascia

[edit] File source is not properly indicated: File:Latimeria_chalumnae01.jpg

[edit] Request for comment

[edit] Dicentrarchus labrax vs Chelon labrosus

[edit] Jetairfly and Freedom of Panorama

[edit] Image of St. Bernard

Views

Personal tools

Search

Navigation

Participate

Toolbox