User talk:Plrk

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Jobjörn)
Jump to: navigation, search

TUSC token 27f0718510d1acd03a7d72de4e5ef7e4[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

FPC[edit]

Please stay mellow. Insulting never helps. Thank you. Lycaon (talk) 21:06, 26 January 2009 (UTC)

Featured Picture promotion[edit]

Martin Luther King memorial during Allt ljus på Uppsala 2008-11-15.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Martin Luther King memorial during Allt ljus på Uppsala 2008-11-15.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Martin Luther King memorial during Allt ljus på Uppsala 2008-11-15.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

Re: Unwarranted promotion?[edit]

Here is my basis: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Navy_binoculars.jpg Greetings --Simonizer (talk) 18:46, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token c4627178ce5a3e789db3d2a28ca1724e[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Plrk!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 06:11, 27 April 2009 (UTC)


File:Network_Railcard_4.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Network_Railcard_4.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Sfan00 IMG (talk) 16:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Schaijk, village en longeur (BHIC).PNG[edit]

To find evidence of permission:

  1. Go to http://www.bhic.nl/
  2. Click on "over ons" , then "Colofon"
  3. The section labelled "Auteursrecht" allows use of any photo not said to be otherwise copyrighted.

That said, I don't speak Dutch THAT well, so it should probably be checked. But I've removed the tag asking for deletion in two days; there's enough evidence to convince me we should take our time a bit. Should we nominate this for deletion to have it checked with a bit more scrutiny?

Adam Cuerden (talk) 01:07, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
I've corrected the link, all good! Plrk (talk) 07:23, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
I can't find the deletion request, so I comment here. My first series of uploads on commons were from the BHIC site, after I had contact with the webmaster of the site, which answered me by mail 22 may 2007 that he himself had uploaded a number, but that it took him too much time; that unless specific copyright restrictions, the pictures of the site could be uploaded with a licence including credit to BHIC. I think I have send a copy of that mail to wikipedia, but I am not sure about that. So I have no doubt about these being rightfully uploaded, although the procedure followed reflects my unexperience with OTRS at the time. Here you find all those uploads referring to the 22 may mail permission. You may treat all those upoloaded by me similarly (there are more uploads then mine). --Havang(nl) (talk) 08:35, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
Coincidences occur: I thought, the link to the deletion request didn't work, that's why I commented; but you meant the link on the file page to the website, and the deletion request was retired. Thanks both of you. --Havang(nl) (talk) 10:30, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

I'm afraid Adam Cuerden jumped the conclusions. On the same page that Cuerden refers, a little higer it says, under: "Alle rechten voorbehouden" De inhoud van deze site is bedoeld voor persoonlijk, niet-commercieel gebruik. (The inhold of this site is intended for personal, noncomercial use.)

And the following part seems to say that you need written permisson from BHIC för comercial use. My dutch isn't that good though. Bij commercieel gebruik is voorafgaande schriftelijke toestemming van de directeur van het BHIC nodig voor het verveelvoudigden, opslaan of in enige vorm of op enige wijze, hetzij elektronisch, mechanisch, via opname of op enige andere manier, openbaar maken van of uit de aangeboden teksten en het beeldmateriaal.

I think the deletion request should be reopened. Palmerston (talk) 10:55, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

Palmerston, no problem for me. I have evoluated since 2007 and I prefer having links to websites in articles rather than uploading from other websites. But that was no ground for a deletion request by myself as uploader. Off-topic: I was amazed to discover that the site has evoluated greatly, passing from about 100 pictures for Schaijk in 2007 to almost 4000 pictures now; [1], I enjoyed looking around there. Greetings, --Havang(nl) (talk) 12:34, 9 August 2010 (UTC)
The reason I removed it was because it wasn't a deletion request: It was a speedy deletion, and would have been automatically deleted on the 8th, when it looks like it should be discussed. Adam Cuerden (talk) 15:19, 9 August 2010 (UTC)

angående Commons:Deletion requests/File:Generalplan Pl 7521 Skarpnäcksfältet.jpg[edit]

Hej, Kollade lite i upphovsrättslagen (http://www.notisum.se/rnp/sls/lag/19600729.htm), och 9§ säger:

9 § Upphovsrätt gäller inte till
1. författningar,
2. beslut av myndigheter,
3. yttranden av svenska myndigheter och
4. officiella översättningar av sådant som avses i 1-3.

samt 26§, 26a§ och 26b§ säger:


26 § Var och en får återge vad som muntligen eller skriftligen anförs
1. inför myndigheter,
2. i statliga eller kommunala representationer,
3. vid offentliga debatter om allmänna angelägenheter eller
4. vid offentliga utfrågningar om sådana angelägenheter.

   Första stycket 1 och 2 gäller dock inte uppgifter för vilka sekretess gäller enligt 31 kap. 23 § offentlighets- och sekretesslagen (2009:400).
   Vid tillämpning av första stycket gäller
1. att skrifter vilka åberopas som bevis, utlåtanden och liknande får återges endast i samband med en redogörelse för det mål eller ärende i vilket de förekommit och endast i den omfattning som motiveras av ändamålet med redogörelsen,
2. att en upphovsman har ensamrätt att ge ut samlingar av sina anföranden och
3. att det som anförs vid sådana utfrågningar som avses i första stycket 4 inte får återges i ljudradio eller television med stöd av den bestämmelsen. Lag (2009:406).

26 a § Var och en får återge verk, vilka ingår i de handlingar som avses i 9 § första stycket och är av de slag som anges i 9 § andra stycket 2-4. Detta gäller dock inte ett sådant verk som avses i 9 § tredje stycket. Upphovsmannen har rätt till ersättning, utom när återgivningen sker i samband med
1. en myndighets verksamhet eller
2. en redogörelse för ett mål eller ärende i vilket verket förekommit och verket återges endast i den omfattning som motiveras av ändamålet med redogörelsen.
   Var och en får återge handlingar som är upprättade hos svenska myndigheter men inte är sådana som avses i 9 § första stycket.
   Andra stycket gäller inte beträffande
1. kartor,
2. tekniska förebilder,
3. datorprogram,
4. verk som skapats för undervisning,
5. verk som är resultatet av vetenskaplig forskning,
6. alster av bildkonst,
7. musikaliska verk,
8. diktverk eller
9. verk av vilka exemplar genom en myndighets försorg tillhandahålls allmänheten i samband med affärsverksamhet. Lag (2000:92).

26 b § Allmänna handlingar skall oavsett upphovsrätten tillhandahållas enligt 2 kap. tryckfrihetsförordningen.
   Upphovsrätten hindrar inte att ett verk används i rättsvårdens eller den allmänna säkerhetens intresse. Lag (1997:790).

Då jag inte är någon expert så kan jag inte avgöra om "material skapad av Stockholms stadsbyggnadskontor" kommer under dessa paragrafer. kanske du vet bättre? :) AzaToth 17:02, 25 September 2011 (UTC)

Hej! Ursäkta sent svar, har haft problem med min internetuppkoppling. 26 § kan vi strunta i från början eftersom den inte påverkar upphovsrätten: att man får återge ett verk påverkar inte att det är upphovsrättsskyddat. 9 § verkar till första anblick relevant men jag har svårt att tänka mig att en ritning/karta anses passa in under någon av de fyra saker som nämns. Det är ju knappast 1, 2, eller 4, och jag är ganska säker på att det inte heller är ett "yttrande". T ex Lantmäteriverket är erkänt kinkiga med det där med upphovsrätt: [2]. Tyvärr! Plrk (talk) 20:15, 4 October 2011 (UTC)

File tagging File:Crowley LaPrincesa StThomas.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Crowley LaPrincesa StThomas.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

The file probably has been deleted. If you sent a permission, try to send it again after 14 days. Do not re-upload. When the OTRS-member processes your mail, the file can be undeleted. Additionally you can request undeletion here, providing a link to the File-page on Commons where it was uploaded ([[:File:Crowley LaPrincesa StThomas.jpg]]) and the above demanded information in your request.

Magog the Ogre (talk) 17:43, 15 November 2011 (UTC)

File:Plainclothes_policemen_involved_in_the_Gategate_incident_at_Hornstull,_2010_(1).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Plainclothes_policemen_involved_in_the_Gategate_incident_at_Hornstull,_2010_(1).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bensin (talk) 08:38, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Plainclothes_policemen_involved_in_the_Gategate_incident_at_Hornstull,_2010_(2).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Plainclothes_policemen_involved_in_the_Gategate_incident_at_Hornstull,_2010_(2).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bensin (talk) 08:39, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Plainclothes_policemen_involved_in_the_Gategate_incident_at_Hornstull,_2010_(3).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Plainclothes_policemen_involved_in_the_Gategate_incident_at_Hornstull,_2010_(3).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bensin (talk) 08:40, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Video_from_the_Gategate_incident_at_Hornstull,_2010.ogv[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Video_from_the_Gategate_incident_at_Hornstull,_2010.ogv has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Bensin (talk) 08:40, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely russavia (talk) 06:37, 16 May 2012 (UTC)

File:000 0486 edited-5.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:000 0486 edited-5.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Flag of Venezuela.svg George Miquilena · talk 02:21, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Abliss in 2007.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Abliss in 2007.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Quadell (talk) 13:38, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

File:PA Spanky broken Arm.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:PA Spanky broken Arm.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Quadell (talk) 13:09, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

File:PBlocsW.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:PBlocsW.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Quadell (talk) 13:21, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Picture of the Year 2013 R1 Announcement[edit]

Round 1 of Picture of the Year 2013 is open![edit]

2012 Picture of the Year: A pair of European Bee-eaters in Ariège, France.

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2013 Picture of the Year competition is now open. This year will be the eighth edition of the annual Wikimedia Commons photo competition, which recognizes exceptional contributions by users on Wikimedia Commons. Wikimedia users are invited to vote for their favorite images featured on Commons during the last year (2013) to produce a single Picture of the Year.

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. These images include professional animal and plant shots, breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historical images, photographs portraying the world's best architecture, impressive human portraits, and so much more.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topical categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you may vote for as many images as you like. The top 30 overall and the most popular image in each category will continue to the final. In the final round, you may vote for just one image to become the Picture of the Year.

Round 1 will end on . Click here to learn more and vote »

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee

You are receiving this message because you voted in the 2012 Picture of the Year contest.