User talk:Jonas Rogowski

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, Jonas Rogowski!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

-- 13:35, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

Das war ne automatische Nachricht ;) --Ralf Roleček 12:51, 16 December 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Jonas Rogowski!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:06, 17 December 2011 (UTC)

Künstler in Rostock, Leuchttürme[edit]

Hallo Jonas, schöne Bilder, die du da so hochlädst :-). Bei den Künstlern weiß ich nicht, wo sie in Rostock aufgetreten sind, es gibt die Category:Stadthalle Rostock, die man, wenn es denn der richtige Ort ist, vergeben könnte. Ansonsten vielleicht noch der Tipp, dass es für das Kategorienmanagement in den Einstellungen > Helferlein > Kategoriehelferlein > HotCat gibt, dass dir die Arbeit sicher erleichtern kann. Und gucke mal bitte in Category:Warnemünde Hafen Leuchtturm und Category:Warnemünde Leuchtturm. Es sind zwei verschiedene Bauwerke. Wenn auch nur ein Leuchtturm als Hauptmotiv zu sehen ist, muss die Hauptkat "Warnemünde" nicht nochmal vergeben werden, da die Turm-Kat sowie auch die "Warnemünde in the 2010s"-Kat bereits in dieser stecken. Viele Grüße -- Niteshift (talk) 11:28, 8 January 2012 (UTC)

Hej Niteshift, danke für die Tipps. Werd ich beherzigen und wenn das in der Stadthalle stattgefunden hätte, hätt ich die Kat auch vergeben ;-). Also Zuckerfabrik, MAU bzw. Festivals sind so meine Veranstaltungsorte und ich glaub mit den Bands, kann ich einen ganz guten Beitrag leisten...diesen Sommer steht noch so einiges an. Also sorry für die späte Reaktion und Grüße zurück --Jonas Rogowski (talk) 19:19, 6 March 2012 (UTC)

Neue Cats[edit]

Hallo Jonas, bitte verzichte vorerst auf das Anlegen neuer Categorien. Bitte schaue dir zuerst das Kategoriensystem an und versuche, dich dort einzulesen. Ich habe auf eine deienr Kats einen Löschantrag gestellt. Kategorien sollte man erst anlegen, wenn die Anzahl der Kats die übergeordnete Kat. unübersichtlich macht. Außerdem wird in der internationalen Commons die englische Sprache verwendet, es sei denn, es handelt sich um Eigennamen. Gruß. --Schiwago (talk) 08:23, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, ich habe völlig übersehen, dass du ja Artikel angelegt hast. Das passiert hier so selten, dass ich von einer Kategorie ausgegangen bin. Entschuldige bitte den Zwischenruf. --Schiwago (talk) 08:27, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Hej Schiwago, also ist jetzt der Ist-Zustand vor dem Löschen wieder hergestellt? Ansonsten werd ich in Zukunft darauf achten, kein Problem. Gruß zurück. Jonas Rogowski (talk) 14:40, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Ja, ich habe gleich zurückgesetzt. Übrigens habe ich lange Zeit immer wieder an der Stadtschule vorbeigeschaut, um ein Foto ohne Gerüste zu machen, nun bist du mir zuvorgekommen! Sehr schön. Im Artikel fehlt irgendwie die neueste Geschichte (Umbau zum Konservatorium/Musikschule). Fiel mir gerade auf. Ich muss mal Quellen suchen. Gruß. --Schiwago (talk) 17:25, 11 April 2012 (UTC)
Ja, ging mir genauso. Scheinbar wildern wir im gleichen Revier ;). Von der Geschichte weiß ich aber auch nichts weiter. Gruß. Jonas Rogowski (talk) 21:33, 11 April 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Dorfkirche Bölkendorf.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dorfkirche Bölkendorf.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Dorfkirche Senftenhütte.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dorfkirche Senftenhütte.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rostocker Rathaus.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rostocker Rathaus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Category:Mecklenburg-Vorpommern in the 2010s[edit]

Hallo Jonas, ich hatte die Kategorie gestern erst geleert. Sortierst du deine schönen Bilder bitte gleich in die Unterkategorien (bspw. "2012 in Landkreis Rostock") ein? Vielen Dank! Gruß -- Niteshift (talk) 19:21, 13 May 2012 (UTC)

Hej Niteshift, klar mach ich. Ich nehm die bei Mecklenburg-Vorpommern in the 2010s raus und pack sie bei Rostock rein. Soll die dann komplett leer bleiben? Sicherlich kommen da sonst noch neue dazu irgendwann. Gruß Jonas Rogowski (talk) 21:41, 13 May 2012 (UTC)
Hallo Jonas, da die 2010er Jahre auf Grund der Menge an Bildern in 2010, 2011 und 2012 unterteilt sind und wir so tief wie möglich kategorisieren, sollte sich in der Hauptkat kein Bild befinden ;-). Gruß -- Niteshift (talk) 16:54, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Feuerwehr Lütten Klein[edit]

Hallo Jonas, wieso hast du hier die Cat entfernt? Gruß. --Schiwago (talk) 10:53, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Hej Schiwago, das kommt davon wenn man unkonzentriert ist. Hatte nur M-V gelesen und schon wars gelöscht. Ist wieder drin. Besten Dank für den Hinweis :). Jonas Rogowski (talk) 12:34, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Party.San + Festivalsommer 2013[edit]

Hallo Jonas Rogowski,
sehr prima - eine Bitte: wäre es möglich, dass du eine Kategorie zum Party.San Open Air parallel zu Category:Wacken Open Air u.a. anlegst und mit den Bildern befüllst? Ich würde dich ausserdem gern auf de:Benutzer:Achim Raschka/Festivalsommer 2013 hinweisen, wo ich ein Projekt zur Planung eines Festivalsommers 2013 gestartet habe - wäre schön, wenn du dabei wärest. Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 11:16, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Hej Achim, hab mich gerade in deinen Festivalsommer eingetragen und noch das Party.San als Veranstaltung hinzugefügt. Hoffe das war ok. Es ist aber auch sehr wahrscheinlich, dass ich dort wieder dabei bin. Das mit der Party.San-Kat versuche ich. Gibt es da eine Möglichkeit alle Bilder auf einmal oder zumindest alle Bilder aus einer meiner Benutzer-Kat zusammen dort dann einzutragen oder muss ich jedes Foto einzeln nachtragen? Gruß --Jonas Rogowski (talk) 13:33, 16 August 2012 (UTC)
Hi Jonas, gern auch mehr ;O) - als Tool für solche Verschiebungen kenne ich nur Commander (muss auf deine Kats angepasst werden). Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 14:33, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Picture of the Year voting round 1 open[edit]

Dear Wikimedians,

Wikimedia Commons is happy to announce that the 2012 Picture of the Year competition is now open. We're interested in your opinion as to which images qualify to be the Picture of the Year for 2012. Voting is open to established Wikimedia users who meet the following criteria:

  1. Users must have an account, at any Wikimedia project, which was registered before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC].
  2. This user account must have more than 75 edits on any single Wikimedia project before Tue, 01 Jan 2013 00:00:00 +0000 [UTC]. Please check your account eligibility at the POTY 2012 Contest Eligibility tool.
  3. Users must vote with an account meeting the above requirements either on Commons or another SUL-related Wikimedia project (for other Wikimedia projects, the account must be attached to the user's Commons account through SUL).

Hundreds of images that have been rated Featured Pictures by the international Wikimedia Commons community in the past year are all entered in this competition. From professional animal and plant shots to breathtaking panoramas and skylines, restorations of historically relevant images, images portraying the world's best architecture, maps, emblems, diagrams created with the most modern technology, and impressive human portraits, Commons features pictures of all flavors.

For your convenience, we have sorted the images into topic categories. Two rounds of voting will be held: In the first round, you can vote for as many images as you like. The first round category winners and the top ten overall will then make it to the final. In the final round, when a limited number of images are left, you must decide on the one image that you want to become the Picture of the Year.

To see the candidate images just go to the POTY 2012 page on Wikimedia Commons

Wikimedia Commons celebrates our featured images of 2012 with this contest. Your votes decide the Picture of the Year, so remember to vote in the first round by January 30, 2013.

Thanks,
the Wikimedia Commons Picture of the Year committee


Delivered by Orbot1 (talk) at 09:38, 19 January 2013 (UTC) - you are receiving this message because you voted last year

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Margret Seemann, SPD.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Margret Seemann, SPD.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bad Doberaner Münster.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bad Doberaner Münster.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Festivalsommervorlage[edit]

Hi Jonas,
wie ich sehe lädst du schon eifrig Bilder von Wacken und vom Parti.San hoch - kannst du bitte in alle Bilder die Vorlage {{Festivalsommer 2013}} aufnehmen, damit die in die entsprechende Kategorie aufgenommen werden? Infos zur Vorlage: Template:Festivalsommer 2013. Gruß -- Achim Raschka (talk) 21:29, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Ihsahn, Vegard „Ihsahn“ Tveitan at Wacken Open Air 2013 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ihsahn, Vegard „Ihsahn“ Tveitan at Wacken Open Air 2013 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tsjuder, Jan-Erik „Nag“ Romøren at Party.San Metal Open Air 2013.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tsjuder, Jan-Erik „Nag“ Romøren at Party.San Metal Open Air 2013.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Anaal Nathrakh, Dave „V.I.T.R.I.O.L.“ Hunt at Party.San Metal Open Air 2013 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anaal Nathrakh, Dave „V.I.T.R.I.O.L.“ Hunt at Party.San Metal Open Air 2013 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Carpathian Forest, Roger „Nattefrost“ Rasmussen at Party.San Metal Open Air 2013 08.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Carpathian Forest, Roger „Nattefrost“ Rasmussen at Party.San Metal Open Air 2013 08.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Sabaton, Joakim Brodén 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sabaton, Joakim Brodén 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Sabaton, Joakim Brodén 04.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Sabaton, Joakim Brodén 04.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yanguas (talk) 01:23, 5 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2013-12-06 Orkan Xaver in Warnemünde 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2013-12-06 Orkan Xaver in Warnemünde 12.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Copyright status: File:Heidemarie Beyer, SPD.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Heidemarie Beyer, SPD.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:28, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Gabriele Měšťan, Die Linke 01.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gabriele Měšťan, Die Linke 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Gabriele Měšťan, Die Linke 02.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gabriele Měšťan, Die Linke 02.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:30, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Michael Nötzel, CDU.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Michael Nötzel, CDU.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Eberhard Hoppe, SPD.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Eberhard Hoppe, SPD.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Gottfried Timm, SPD.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gottfried Timm, SPD.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:32, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Wolfgang Griese, Die Linke.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Wolfgang Griese, Die Linke.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:38, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Klaus Gollert, FDP.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Klaus Gollert, FDP.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:39, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Ute Schildt, SPD.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Ute Schildt, SPD.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:39, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Joachim Steinmann, CDU.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Joachim Steinmann, CDU.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 14:39, 27 December 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Anaal Nathrakh, Mick „Irrumator“ Kenney at Party.San Metal Open Air 2013 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anaal Nathrakh, Mick „Irrumator“ Kenney at Party.San Metal Open Air 2013 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Copyright status: File:Torsten Koplin, DIE LINKE.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Torsten Koplin, DIE LINKE.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:13, 9 June 2014 (UTC)