User talk:Joris

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Image:Doors of Basilica Maxentius.JPG[edit]

Hé Joris, wat is precies de bedoeling hiermee, de "goede versie" is dezelfde als de "foute"? Sowieso kan je verkeerd benoemde afbeeldingen voorzien van {{badname}}, opname op Commons:Deletion requests is niet nodig (en ongewenst). Laat maar even weten als de goede versie opgeladen is op mijn overleg (hier of nl:) en dan gooi ik hem wel weg. Groet, NielsF 12:25, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Hee Niels, ben je hier ook al mod? Ik keek even in de help sectie van commons daar stond dat ik deze tag moest gebruiken... Commons:FAQ#Technical questions. Ah wacht, ik zie het al. Ik moest daarnaast dus de nieuwe file opgeven :-). Ik heb de nieuwe file (Image:Doors of Curia Julia.JPG) inmiddels geupload. De oude kan weg. Ik zal volgende keer die andere tag gebruiken. gtroet, Joris1919 13:12, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Ah, dan staat het in de FAQ niet helemaal goed. Heb het daar maar veranderd, bedankt dat je me erop wijst. En ja ik hou wel van die weggooiknopjes ;-), dus je "foute" afbeelding staat er niet meer. Er waren te weinig NLtalige mods hier, dus heb me "opgeofferd". Groet, NielsF 13:33, 25 June 2006 (UTC)

Gates of Rome[edit]

Thanks for your message and for your adding, Joris: Rome friends are my friends :) --Lalupa 08:19, 14 July 2006 (UTC)

Atomium[edit]

Sorry Joris, maar ik ga zo helaas je atomium-artikel (en alle foto's daarin) moeten voordragen voor verwijdering, zie Template:Deletion requests#Atomium. Het Atomium is een beschermd kunstwerk (zie ook de mededeling in Category:Atomium), hoe belachelijk dat ook mag lijken. NielsF 23:18, 17 July 2006 (UTC)

Mura serviane & Ludus magnus[edit]

Received, Joris. We are working for you :) Meanwhile, i've found this, for Ludus Magnus --Lalupa 08:01, 20 January 2007 (UTC)


Image:Plan Rome- Mausoleum van Augustus.png[edit]

Hello, and many thanks for your really nice map ! Can you please add the year in which we should consider your map ? Remember that all maps always need to state the year show.

Regards --Yug (talk) 16:08, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Hi, there is no precise year for this map. It's a collection of the most important ancient buildings in Rome during the ages of the Roman empire. I think the map is based on a map made by Samual Platner who was the author of A topographical dictionary of ancient Rome. For the most part the map is situated 320 ad, but some buildings shown had by that time long disapered. I will add a comment "Map of ancient Rome around 320" to make it clearer. There are a lot more of these maps uploaded, not only by me, but also by our French collegue ColdEl, who is the original creator of the map. I think the date statement is already included on those maps. Regards, Joris1919 17:12, 7 May 2007 (UTC)

Hellevoetsluis, kerk[edit]

Omdat mijn camera nu stuk is en ik misschien rond de kerst van plan ben om een nieuwe te kopen, kan ik proberen om rond deze tijd een nieuwe foto te maken. Een alternatief is om naar reliwiki te gaan en contact op te nemen met de directie achter deze website: als u geluk heeft zijn de vele foto's op hun pagina over de Antonius van Padua kerk open domein. Zelf zal ik ook proberen op er achter te komen of wij deze foto's kunnen gebruiken om wikipedia. Hellevoetfotoshoot (talk) 07:48, 21 November 2009 (UTC)

Ik heb contact opgenomen met de reliwiki en dit antwoord gekregen:

De afbeeldingen op Reliwiki.nl zijn te gebruiken. Vermeldt u daarbij wel de bron (www.reliwiki.nl) en de maker van de afbeelding (de maker zet vaak zijn naam of initialen in de bestandsnaam). Het beeldmateriaal is te gebruiken zoals al het beeldmateriaal op internet, dmv. 'afbeelding opslaan als'. Er is ook een handleiding op Reliwiki.nl aanwezig (http://reliwiki.nl/index.php?title=Help:Inhoud). U kunt natuurlijk ook op Wikipedia.nl een link zetten naar Reliwiki.nl, zo voorkomt u dubbel werk.

Het lijkt mij daarom een goed idee dat u, uw benodigde foto's van de reliwiki haalt. Ik heb voor u al één afbeelding geupload om te kijken hoe de administratie van de reliwiki verwacht dat ik hun bestanden erken. Hellevoetfotoshoot (talk) 09:10, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Beste HVS, heel erg bedankt voor de moeite! Volgens mij heb je de upload zo goed gedaan. Dit betekent voor ons op Wikipedia mogelijk een enorme bron van extra afbeeldingen, waar ik natuurlijk erg blij mee ben. Ik heb nog even doorgelezen op Reliwiki, omdat ik nergens een licentievermelding zag staan. Dit betekent normaal gesproken dat de hele site copyrighted is (en daarmee niet bruikbaar op Wikipedia wegens de door ons gebruikte redelijk vrije licentie), maar verder lezend kwam ik dit statement tegen: BELANGRIJKE OPMERKINGEN - Iedereen wordt van harte uitgenodigd om bij te dragen aan Reliwiki! Houdt u er echter rekening mee dat alle informatie die u toevoegt beschikbaar komt in het publieke domein. Een "public domain" verklaring betekent dat je als uploader van een document in het geheel geen rechten meer kunt ontleden aan je foto's. Ik vraag me af in hoeverre de gebruikers van Reliwiki daarvan op de hoogte zijn. De licentie die jij hebt gekozen bij de verplaatste foto van de kerk in Hellevoet is een creativecommons licentie die wel vereist dat in ieder geval de auteur wordt vermeld. Dat komt beter overeen met de vraag vanuit Reliwiki. Ik denk dat ik zelf ook even een mailtje ga sturen naar de beheerder, om deze zaak even helemaal helder te krijgen. Nogmaals bedankt voor de moeite, met vriendelijke groet, Joris (talk) 11:08, 24 November 2009 (UTC)
Zelf heb ik al laten weten dat ik graag zou zien dat reliwiki hun informatie over de copyrechten direct op hun voorpagina, of via een link op de voorpagina toegankelijk maken en ik heb contact opgenomen met de maker van deze foto om hem te vragen of hij geen problemen heeft dat wij de foto nu gebruiken.zie hier: Het is daarom misschien een goed idee om in de tussentijd contact op te nemen met de auteurs die hun foto's op de reliwiki plaatsen. Hellevoetfotoshoot (talk) 14:30, 24 November 2009 (UTC)


File:CityofRomeAD.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:CityofRomeAD.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Powers (talk) 14:05, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

mijlpaal trajanus[edit]

Mijlpaal Noviomagus.jpg

Heb je meer info over de mijlpaal van trajanus in het valkhof, het is wel een eigen lemma waard. http://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milliarium http://www.mijngelderland.nl/publicaties/boeken/boekennieuws-2008-3/ Hans Erren (talk) 22:08, 31 May 2010 (UTC)

File:Plan_Rome_-_Tabularium.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Plan_Rome_-_Tabularium.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

LX (talk, contribs) 09:33, 22 June 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Joris!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:11, 4 September 2011 (UTC)

File:Knakworst in blik.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Knakworst in blik.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Grashoofd (talk) 16:59, 6 May 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you![edit]

Tireless Contributor Barnstar Hires.gif The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
Een ster voor je onvermoeide bijdragen over de oudheid. Hans Erren (talk) 22:48, 10 November 2012 (UTC)

Dat is leuk! Bedankt! Joris (talk) 15:57, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

File:Disney Hotel Newport Bay.JPG[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Disney Hotel Newport Bay.JPG has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yann (talk) 15:32, 17 November 2012 (UTC)

Vraagje[edit]

Hoi, onlangs heb ik een nieuwe acc gemaakt onder het naam - bg wiki Денис Маринов, nl wiki Денис Маринов. Voordat had ik een andere acc. Mijn vraag eigenlijk is, kun je all mijn uploads van user Le DanGereux overdragen naar mijn nieuwe acc - Денис Маринов? -- Денис Маринов (talk) 21:07, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

Hoi Денис Маринов, ik heb helaas geen idee. Ik ben geen moderator op Commons. Je kunt je vraag misschien hier stellen? Commons:Help desk. Groet, Joris (talk) 13:09, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
Hoi weer, ken je dan tenminste iemand van de commons administrators die wel NL spreekt want mijn EN is niet so goed? -- Денис Маринов (talk) 09:29, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Den Haag - Sophialaan 2 - Carlton Hotel.JPG[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Den Haag - Sophialaan 2 - Carlton Hotel.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 23:09, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Den Haag - Sophialaan 4.JPG[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Den Haag - Sophialaan 4.JPG. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Denniss (talk) 23:10, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

Use of image[edit]

Hi Joris, I've used and attributed your photo of the classic Lego Space set in a blog post at http://www.tombell.net/?p=253. Just thought you'd like to know. Leafylomax (talk) 15:45, 12 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi, that's nice, thanks. Liked your blog as well. Joris (talk) 18:43, 13 July 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Plan Rome - Naumachia Vaticana.png[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Plan Rome - Naumachia Vaticana.png. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 21:58, 21 July 2013 (UTC)

License added, copied from similair file. Copyright holder is ColdEl. Joris (talk) 06:56, 22 July 2013 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:


Yours sincerely, -mattbuck (Talk) 15:26, 29 December 2013 (UTC)