User talk:JuTa

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Jutta234)
Jump to: navigation, search

Category:Pages using Complex date template with incorrect parameter[edit]

Hallo JuTa, kannst du mir bitte helfen, was oben genannte Kategorie betrifft? In dieser befinden sich diverse Dateien wie diese, bei denen mir nicht klar ist, welches Problem es gibts. Würde gern die nötigen Korrekturen durchführen. --Arnd (talk) 21:23, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi, also bei der Datei hat ein einfacher "Null-Edit" geholfen. Vermutlich hatte sich da irgendetwas in den verwendeten Vorlagrn verändert. Gruß --JuTa 21:29, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Danke, kann man das irgendwie automatisiert für alle Dateien in der Kategorie machen? --Arnd (talk) 07:11, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Ich denke auf Commons:Bots/Work requests kann man so etwas "beantragen". Gruß --JuTa 08:27, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Erledigt! User talk:Jarekt#Category:Pages using Complex date template with incorrect parameter. Gruß, --Arnd (talk) 14:37, 18 February 2015 (UTC)

Starship Troopers[edit]

Last year you deleted a file from Commons (File:Starship Troopers (Role-Playing Game) Cover Art.JPG) that was used on the en:Starship Troopers: The Roleplaying Game article. Would it be possible for me to obtain a copy of the file with the proper info and re-upload it to en-wiki? BOZ (talk) 19:28, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi, the source was You may upload it on en: under fair use clause, you may not. I'm not familiar with the en: rules. --JuTa 18:55, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Thanks, I think I can just use that image with a fair-use rationale. BOZ (talk) 16:16, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

File Deletion[edit]

Hello, I've accidentally uploaded a lot of copyrighted images. I want to delete them all but I don't know how. I've marked them for speedy deletion but they still exist. What else do I have to do? KariEllien (talk) 23:40, 28 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi, a bit more explanation why the files are copyrighted and not your own work could be helpfull. But otherwise you can not do more, just wait until an admin will look at your requests and decide the cases. regards. --JuTa 06:25, 1 March 2015 (UTC)


Hi! Natasha has sent license information to otrs-commons email. But status is still {OTRS pending}. Do we need to send some more information? Thanx.

Hi, there is normaly a huge backlog on OTRS. You should ask on Commons:OTRS/Noticeboard for your case. I'm not a menmber of the OTRS team, an cannot see the ticket or the mail(s). regards. --JuTa 06:28, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

à propos Djamel Dahou[edit]

Bonjour je voulais vous demander comment je peux avoir la license de ce fichier ? Djamel Dahou --YacineDZ (talk) 10:07, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, the copyright holder, which is normaly the fotografer (not the model), has to send an email to the commons support team, releasing the image with a free license of his choise ({{cc-by-sa-4.0}} is recommanded. For details see Commons:OTRS. regards. --JuTa 10:11, 1 March 2015 (UTC)

Fake bonds[edit]

Hi, I don't understand why you deleted these files. As mentioned in the DRs by Carl, these fake bonds got news reports, and are quite known on their own. Regards, Yann (talk) 08:46, 3 March 2015 (UTC)

They do not have an unclear copyright status -- it's all PD-USGov artwork just rearranged slightly. With non-coyprightable numbers added. I can understand the scope argument -- I hate having fakes around, but warning people about fakes actually in circulation can also be a good thing. Also, if they were in use, they are automatically in scope and that is not a valid reason to delete. They are also the subject of news reports, so they probably are in scope anyways. If you do reconsider and undelete, definitely rename them so that "fake" or "counterfeit" is in the filename somewhere. Carl Lindberg (talk) 19:55, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
(BK) Hi Yann, its true there are borderline cases. The doubtfull scope and the unclear copyright status are the bases of my deletion decision. But feel free to raise an undeletion request. Maybe other admin(s) will come to a different result. regards. --JuTa 19:59, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
As Carl said in the DRs and above, there is no copyright issue. I think that these are in scope, as Carl also explained above. Please could please restore them? Regards, Yann (talk) 22:57, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
As I allready wrote: feel free to raise an undeletion request. Maybe other admin(s) will come to a different result. regards. --JuTa 22:59, 3 March 2015 (UTC)
I don't understand why you deleted these, specially since you kept the one below without a rationale. Regards, Yann (talk) 12:18, 4 March 2015 (UTC)
The fact that these are fake money notes with a douptfull scope together with the "slippery" {{PD-because}} license makes it for me slightly below the border to keep them, I will not revise my decision. Its up to you if you like to raise an undeletion request or not. --JuTa 20:02, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Seal of Haikou[edit]

Regarding this. With great respect, did you read it carefully? Anna Frodesiak (talk) 11:38, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, thats a borderline case. I could follow more the arguments to keep than to delete the file. If you realy think so, feel free to raise a new deletion request. Don't expect a quick decision, the last one took about 6 weeks. I will not decide this case again (of corse). --JuTa 20:08, 4 March 2015 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by Campeones 2008[edit]

Hi JuTa, you've just closed the DR but the result is unclear to me. I asked for keeping File:Gobierno de España de Zapatero. Abril 2006..jpg and deleting File:Primer Gobierno de Mariano RAJOY.jpg. Has it been a mistake (you deleted the first one and kept the second one). Best regards --Discasto talk | contr. | analysis 23:13, 4 March 2015 (UTC)