User talk:Keepscases

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
  • {{superseded|}}
  • {{vva|}}
  • {{image extracted|}}
  • {{inkscape}}
  • {{No source since}}

Re: Coronas[edit]

Puedes saber más aquí: es:Timbre (heráldica). Brevemente: 1,2 y 3, no hay, hay corona real, imperial y de príncipe, no de rey y de emperador. 4 de reina no hay, el blasón lo especifica, es una posible representación de la corona antigua. Su descripción está aquí: [1]. 5 en la propia imagen la explica. 6 a ninguno en especial, es corona antigua. 7 no representa a un título nobiliario, representa a la realeza. En el propio escudo lo explica, ese modelo dice que es corona real catalano-aragonesa del siglo XIV. 8 Sí y no, parece una real abierta, pero con algunos florones más pequeños, no se porque de esa variación. 9 no conozco que haya ningún timbre con ese nombre. Mira en [2], en glosario heráldico sobre las coronas. Sí y casi, ya que no se dice corona de rey, sino corona real. Existe diferencia en el número de diadémas. --Xavigivax (talk) 08:08, 1 October 2009 (UTC)

Thanks![edit]

Thanks! I really appreciate your help. The image looks so much better now. I was having a bit of trouble with aligning and cropping it correctly, so I'm glad you were able to do so. Thanks! Bobamnertiopsis (talk) 02:43, 8 October 2009 (UTC)

San Marino[edit]

Please supply the source for the updated Coat of arms of San Marino. /Lokal_Profil 15:03, 31 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Idiomaespañol.svg[edit]

I think the sun is supposed to be for Argentina, not Incas... AnonMoos (talk) 14:55, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Hola, el sol, si bien tiene origen inca, indiscutido, aunque en su diseño actual remite a versiones de fines del siglo XVIII, no representaria al imperio inca, sino al Rio de la plata (Argentina y Uruguay) como representantes del mundo de habla castellana. Por eso debe cvolver a su edicion anterior, a menos que te parezca que ese simbolo seria improcedente, pero seria una opinion personal. eL sol de las banderas y escudos de los paises rioplatenses tiene ya mas historial que el incaico, es mas, los descendientes incaicos se ven mas reprenentados por la bandera de los colores del arco isis que por el sol incaico. Saludos.--Pruxo (talk) 16:06, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Sobre esta polemica, yo, como autor de la bandera, creo que el hecho de que el sol incaico "no tenga que ver con españa" no significa que NO TIENE QUE VER con el mundo de habla castellana. El mundo de habla castellan excede ampliamente en albito peninsular, y al incluir el sol incaico, se incluye al peru, a ecuador, a bolivia, ademas de incluir al rio de la plata. --Pruxo (talk) 16:17, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
Porque volves a borrar el sol de la argentina y uruguay? alguien mas que vos te apoyo en esto?--Pruxo (talk) 17:45, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Tu opinion es interesante. Me parece bien que la discutas. Proponelo a mas gente. El sol ese NO ES prehispanico, porque si bien esta BASADO en un sol inca, su realizacion es de alrededor de 1813, mas o menos la epoca del escudo. De hecho, el sol uruguayo no es incaico, porque el sol de 16 rayos es la representacion tradicional heraldica. Si no lo borras, podemos incluir en tu queja a más gente, ya avise a usuarios bibliotecarios, Barcex, y Galio, para que ellos opinen. Me parece bien que se discuta el tema. Estuve buscando representaciones INCAICAS del sol, no hay, por lo menos, con el diseño del argentino o del uruguayo. Se llama "sol de mayo" en ambos paises, y si bien la IDEA vino del sol incaico (parte del rio de la plata era el alto peru) no es asi con su representacion. Me parece bien discutirlo. Habri una discusion al respecto.--Pruxo (talk) 23:45, 18 November 2009 (UTC)

Mira, hagamos una cosa. Edita una NUEVA bandera, sin el sol, con OTRO nombre, y expone tus argumentos y los mios, a mi, el hecho de que el sol pueda tener, en su nombre, o referencia, origen incaico, no lo inhabilita. Para vos, si. Perfecto, pongamos a discusion el tema, con las 2 banderas, y los usuarios que ya usan esa bandera con sol, a ver que les parece tu idea.--Pruxo (talk) 00:01, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
Agree... AnonMoos (talk) 12:57, 19 November 2009 (UTC)
No son amigos, solo uno lo es, los otros, por ejemplo, uno, habia hecho el sol de mayo, sabe del tema. Los invite a opinar. Tu opinion la valoro, voy a hacer OTRA bandera que no necesariamente REEMPLACE a la que te molesta, OTRA, sin el sol, con color azul, y no quiero que haya competencias entre las 2 o 3 banderas, solo el que le gusta, que elija, hay MUCHAS banderas de idioma español, hay una con cruces catolicas, etc, Hare una siguiendo tus ideas, y me decis. La que hice yo trato de usar el rojo abajo, que unia a españa, mexico, y la ex gran colombia, y solo cambiaba de color arriba, sin el sol, y cambiano los colores de lugar, el diseño se pierde, por eso sera mejor que se hagan muchas banderas, y la gente que opine de una u otra manera vaya eligiendo, no? un abrazo.--Pruxo (talk) 20:24, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

Argentina[edit]

Hello. I think you not read legend of the map. It is legend:


{{legend-shell|lang=en|title=Laws regarding same-sex sexuality|

   No information

Homosexuality legal

   Same-sex marriage1
   Other type of partnership (or unregistered cohabitation)1
   Foreign same-sex marriages recognized1
   No recognition of same-sex couples

Homosexuality illegal

   Minimal penalty
   Large penalty
   Life in prison
   Death penalty


Extending pensions rights means that federal law regognize same-sex unions as unregistered cohabitations. That legend including unregistered cohabitation. Ron 1987 (talk) 02:46, 29 November 2009 (UTC)

Own work ?[edit]

Do you make images like File:Antilles (orthographic projection).svg yourself or did you take an excisting image and changed a little? It looks a lot like File:Antillas (orthographic projection).svg. --MGA73 (talk) 17:45, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

(Copied from my talk page - please continue where talk started) I did all my orthographic projections myself, I try to vectorize them with 550×550 pixels. Why?. --Keepscases (talk) 21:17, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
Because it looked very much like an other file. If you had modified an excisting file you should tell that on the page. Normally users do not start all over creating a whole new map when there is excisting you can modify. --MGA73 (talk) 21:20, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
This file has a wrong title in English, "Antillas" is in Spanish and all orthographic projections have titles in English. That's why Antillas has a badname, the correct name is "Antilles". --Keepscases (talk) 21:24, 17 December 2009 (UTC)
I agree. But if you just made a copy you should not stand as author. Then the original file should just be moved. You should only be the author if you draw everything yourself. --MGA73 (talk) 21:30, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

File:Evolución territorial de México (1821-1981).gif[edit]

Hola,

quisiera saber porque en ese gif animado Panamá está representada como territorio dependiente (en color verde). Lo comento ya que el sumario define que un Territorio Dependiente es un territorio que por diversas razones no goza de los privilegios de total independencia o soberanía, ni hace parte integral del Estado que lo gobierna. Muchos de esos territorios pueden ser considerados como colonias o territorios de ultramar y otros se encuentran deshabitados; sin embargo considero que aplicar dicho termino a Panamá es un error, ya que esta hizo parte de las divisiones administrativas de Colombia desde 1819 hasta 1903 (e incluso antes, durante la epoca colonial), tal como se puede ver en este gif File:Evolución territorial de Colombia.gif y en estos artículos de la wikipedia en español: es:Provincia del Istmo y es:Estado Soberano de Panamá.

Shadowxfox (talk) 10:57, 24 December 2009 (UTC)

Deletion[edit]

Message tied up in Ribbon.jpg Hello, Keepscases. You have new messages at MGA73's talk page.
You may remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Asturianu | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | Español | Suomi | Français | Galego | हिन्दी | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | +/−

Quebec (orthographic projection)[edit]

Hello Sémhur, I want to ask you something. Did you made this file File:Quebec (North America orthographic projection).svg using this File:Anglo America (orthographic projection).svg, right?. Also I remember a previous file with the name as Quebec (orthographic projection).--Keepscases (talk) 23:35, 2 January 2010 (UTC)

Hello Keepscases,
No, as it's written in the file description, I used File:Canada (orthographic projection).svg and NGDC World Data Bank II for Quebec borders. I havn't seen that File:Anglo America (orthographic projection).svg existed Face-blush.svg.
I also did this for the French graphic lab, but the wanter hasn't choose this version.
Sémhur (talk) 10:46, 3 January 2010 (UTC)

Orthographic Map Request[edit]

Can you make an orthographic map of the Aztec empire? Use this for guidance. File:Aztecempirelocation.png Thanks. Connormah (talk) 06:43, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

✓ Done - Aztec Empire (orthographic projection). --Keepscases (talk) 20:33, 10 January 2010 (UTC)
Could you also make 2 more, from File:LocationWHNorthernAmerica.png, and File:LocationWHMiddleAmerica.png? Thanks. Connormah (talk) 02:24, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
✓ Done. --Keepscases (talk) 09:34, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Excellent! Thanks! Connormah (talk) 23:23, 15 January 2010 (UTC)
Would it be possible to make one from this, and this? I know one already exists for New Spain, but it only shows the territories in the Americas. Thanks! Connormah (talk) 00:24, 16 January 2010 (UTC)
No problem. Thanks! Connormah (talk)
Also, I apologize for all of the requests, but can you do one for the Viceroyalty of Rio de la Plata, and the Viceroyalty of Peru (with the original colors from the original map)? Thank you so much in advance. Connormah (talk) 20:48, 16 January 2010 (UTC)

Aztec sun stone[edit]

Hello. Could you please explain on the image page or its talk page what changes and added original work you made to modify the famous "Aztec Sun Stone" into File:Aztec calendar.svg allowing you to claim it as your own work and having a personal copyright on it? Thanks much. -- Infrogmation (talk) 23:58, 10 January 2010 (UTC)

As you have replied at User_talk:Infrogmation#Aztec_sun_stone on my user page, I have continued the discussion there. Cheers, -- Infrogmation (talk) 02:29, 11 January 2010 (UTC)

Same-sex marriage in Portugal[edit]

It was only first reading, not final vote.

You should read carefully http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/europe/8448640.stm

quotation:

"The bill will now be reviewed in committee before coming back for a final vote in parliament". See also [3] Ron 1987 (talk) 15:08, 13 January 2010 (UTC)

The Committe will consider governmental bill, not propositions additionally adoption rights for same-sex couples. That issue is finally dead. Next, the bill will be voted again by parliament. Previous vote was only preliminary. Same-sex marriage isn't legal yet. The bill must be passed twice. See Constitution of Portugal article 171. I think we should wait, because President can veto the bill. Parliament can override veto by absolute majority of votes. Rejecting of veto by parliament is very likely but not clear in 100%. President can also challenge the law to the Constitutional Court. Ron 1987 (talk)

Image uploaded at File:USA Gay flag.svg[edit]

Your upload wasn't really a correction or slight improvement of the previous image version (and also not an SVG conversion of Image:Gay_flag.JPG), but rather a completely separate image, so I reverted and reuploaded your image at File:United States Gay flag.svg. AnonMoos (talk) 15:09, 23 January 2010 (UTC)

File:Great Colombia (orthographic projection).svg[edit]

Hello... could you fix the parallels and meridians of the map? for example, the equator is much further south from where it should be, thanks 190.28.105.100 22:59, 2 February 2010 (UTC)


Unblock request declined

This blocked user asked to be unblocked, but one or more administrators has reviewed and declined this request. Other administrators can also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason.

Request reason: "I've been autoblocked --Keepscases (talk) 07:55, 20 March 2010 (UTC)"
Decline reason: "This account has been globaly locked for abuse and sockpuppetry. --Martin H. (talk) 22:35, 22 March 2010 (UTC)"

Administrators: This template should be removed when the block has expired.

(Block log)
(unblock)
(Change local status for a global block)
(contribs)

Deutsch | English | Suomi | Français | हिन्दी | Magyar | Македонски | Plattdüütsch | Português | Русский | Simple English | Svenska | +/−

.

Martin H. (talk) 22:35, 22 March 2010 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Anastasio_Bustamante.png[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Anastasio_Bustamante.png, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Anastasio_Bustamante.png]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Kam Solusar (talk) 17:45, 30 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Coat of arms of Mexico (1864-1867).svg[edit]

Hola. Actualmente estoy discutiendo con el usuario Koyak en la Wikipedia francesa a propósito del escudo del II Imperio Mexicano (1864-1867). Y como parece que eres el autor de dicho escudo (en Inkscape, supongo), quisiera saber cuáles son tus fuentes. En efecto, el sitio no oficial http://www.casaimperial.org/ presenta un modelo con una corona sustancialmente distinta de la que dibujaste. Así que me gustaría saber cuál es la forma correcta de representarla y si existe un sitio oficial de la Casa Imperial. Gracias. --Cyril-83 (talk) 18:57, 4 March 2011 (UTC)

File:World_homosexuality_laws.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:World_homosexuality_laws.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Damiens.rf 15:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Flag of San Marino.svg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Flag of San Marino.svg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Lokal_Profil 15:18, 16 August 2011 (UTC)