User talk:Killiondude

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository

Jump to: navigation, search

Contents

[edit] Deletion request

Good advice, thank you. I trust you will help in making the proper determination at Commons:Deletion requests/File:Darshan.jpg regarding who the photographer is and whether the photographer has released permission by a free-use license. Cirt (talk) 10:08, 3 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion request

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Corneliu-coposu-statue-revolution-square.jpg —Preceding unsigned comment added by 79.112.34.190 (talk • contribs) (UTC)

Done. :-) Killiondude (talk) 07:36, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

more than 20 photos of the http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:Palace_of_the_Parliament. 79.112.34.190 07:37, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Busuresti-Intercontinental.jpg

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/79.112.19.138

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/79.112.18.133

All these images violate the copyright law of Romania. 79.112.34.190 07:44, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

I'll have to do all that when I have a bit of free time. It looks like a lot of images. Killiondude (talk) 19:14, 4 December 2009 (UTC)
I think I got most of them. I left a note on your talk page. Killiondude (talk) 02:09, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

---

Hi.

I see you have closed Commons:Deletion requests/File:File-Erich Schenk erhält 1969 die Ehrendoktorwürde 2.jpg earlier today... But the image is still here? -- Jokes Free4Me (talk) 19:04, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, I must have stepped afk and forgot about it at the time. Done. Killiondude (talk) 19:14, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi.

Please, if you perform mass deletion requests such as the one on the rumanian parlament, it would be great if you stepped by the deletion log to comment and/or consider arguments there. Commons:Deletion requests/2009/12/04 has, at least for some entries, opposing arguments. --PaterMcFly (talk) 10:26, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] deletions & "closure" ;)

hi;

you deleted this:

Commons:Deletion requests/File:Palace of Parliament - Bucharest - Romania.jpg

but didn't close the "discussion"?

also; it appears now that proper procedures were not followed in the deletion nom...

Lx 121 (talk) 11:11, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Please see Commons:Undeletion requests/Current requests#File:Palace of Parliament - Bucharest - Romania.jpg as well thanks. IMO some of the deletions are questionable even if you take a strict line on FOP.--Nilfanion (talk) 14:18, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Commented there. Killiondude (talk) 17:51, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:TraianBasescu.jpg

Hello! Can you send an OTRS ticket for File:TraianBasescu.jpg image? Thanks.--Ionutzmovie (talk) 16:39, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi! I'm not sure what you're asking me to do. Do you want me to send the president a message asking him to release the photo in a free license? I'm not sure how much good that will do. Or are you asking me to check on an OTRS ticket? Sorry, I just don't understand. Killiondude (talk) 18:12, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion

Could you tell me why you delted File:Aussicht vom Schloss Dottenwil.jpg. Thank you --Nachcommonsverschieber (talk) 18:43, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi! It was because it didn't have a license for the file. We require all files to have a license. It was marked for over 7 days as needing a license before deletion, per Commons policy. Sorry for any confusion. Killiondude (talk) 18:50, 9 December 2009 (UTC)

Please, can you tell me what's happenned with this picture: File:EquipoOrkosCampeon2009.jpg. Its author is my friend, and also appears in the picture. We need this picture. Sincerely, --Cpjaimes (talk) 09:53, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi! It was deleted because there was no indication that your friend gave permission to license it freely. We need him or her to email OTRS at permissions-commons-at-wikimedia.org, saying that they own the copyright to the file and they agree to release it under a specific free license. They need to provide a link to the deleted file's URL in the email, and once it is processed it can be undeleted. Killiondude (talk) 17:05, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:FGCS computer-pim-m-1.jpg

File:FGCS computer-pim-m-1.jpg should probably be deleted. It seems to be a copy of en:File:FGCS computer-pim-m-1.jpg (CSD I4, Images with unknown source after seven days). -- Common Good (talk) 22:01, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

✓ Done Thanks for the heads up. Killiondude (talk) 22:03, 11 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Files still awaiting OTRS confirmation

Hello, Killiondude. The file(s) listed below have been marked with {{OTRS received}}, but there has been no complete confirmation of its permission status in the last 30 days. From what I'm able to tell, you were the person who added this template. Would you mind taking a look at this again? If confirmation cannot be found, this file should probably be marked for deletion. This should be the only notification you will receive regarding this image, so long as the comment I added to the image description page is not altered. Thanks! HersfoldOTRSBot(talk/opt out) 09:32, 12 December 2009 (UTC)

If you are not an OTRS volunteer or did not add the "received" template to this file, it's possible I made a mistake identifying the correct user. I look for the most recent diff where the template was added, so if you reverted an edit where this template was removed, I can't tell the difference. If this is the case, please let my operator know at w:en:User talk:Hersfold. Sorry for the inconvenience!

The file(s) in question are:

I got the notice on these:

But it seems you looked at the permission :-) --MGA73 (talk) 11:10, 13 December 2009 (UTC)

Yes, I deleted those before because there was no permission for a long time, and you restored them shortly after. There hasn't been any OTRS activity for them since. Killiondude (talk) 20:18, 13 December 2009 (UTC)
Really? Hm.. Well if user did not answer then they should probably be deleted again. --MGA73 (talk) 21:46, 13 December 2009 (UTC)


[edit] Deletion of File:Fiberlines1 19991.pdf

On Nov 6th you deleted the PDF file ”Fiberlines, Kvaerner Pulping Publication” nr 1 1999. I DO have the permission to publish this one so please inform me then what is needed in order to keep it at wikipedia commons. Thought I did the right thing. Thanks. --Enricokamasa (talk) 07:03, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi! I think you're referring to File:Fiberlines1 19991.pdf. The copyright owner needs to email OTRS at permissions-commons-at-wikimedia.org, stating that they own the copyright to that file and agree to license it with a free license. More info about what needs to be done in said email is in the link to OTRS I provided in the last sentence. Once it is processed, the file can be undeleted. Let me know if you have any further questions. Killiondude (talk) 03:00, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of File:ChiaraLubich.jpg

Hi, just a quick question (no offense or anything, I wasn't the uploader of the file): what is the reason for the deletion of this file? Why did the permission expire? Thx, Sudika (talk) 06:15, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

The permission didn't "expire", really. :-) There was never any permission received for the file, which Tineye showed came from www.focolares.org.ar. Killiondude (talk) 06:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] deletion of File:ELG_webcam_daylight_capture_at_09-09-13_08-00-00-32.png

Hi, you have just deleted File:ELG_webcam_daylight_capture_at_09-09-13_08-00-00-32.png with the reason "No permission since 28 November 2009". That image required no permission and had the template

Public domain This file is in the public domain, because a "surveillance video lacks sufficient originality, it is not subject to copyright", see pages 4 and 5 from http://turtletalk.files.wordpress.com/2008/10/flyingman-motion-for-summary-judgment.pdf

In case this is not legally possible:
The right to use this work is granted to anyone for any purpose, without any conditions, unless such conditions are required by law.

Nuvola apps important.svg Please verify that the reason given above complies with Commons' licensing policy.


English | Español | Français | 日本語 | Македонски | Português | Русский | Svenska | +/−

Please undelete it and submit it for a formal deletion discussion by the Commons community. According to the discussion at the Village PumpCommons talk:Licensing, (see User talk:84user#File Tagging File:ELG webcam daylight capture at 09-09-13_08-00-00-32.png and Commons talk:Licensing/Archive 22#Live feeds and User talk:High Contrast#File Tagging File:ELG_webcam_daylight_capture_at_09-09-13_08-00-00-32.png) such files do not need permission because they are automatic reconnaissance video captures. -84user (talk) 06:16, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Undeleted. Please remove inaccurate speedy deletion templates from files in the future to avoid situations like these. Thanks. Killiondude (talk) 06:24, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Thank you, that was fast. I was waiting for a reply from the tagging user, and I guess I forgot about removing the speedy. -84user (talk) 06:29, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Several deletions

hello, you have just deleted File:Storfosna_i_Orland.JPG, File:Garten_i_Orland.JPG and File:Krakvag_i_Orland.JPG, with the given reason No permission since 21 November 2009. As far as i remember, all of these had fair licences, and furthermore, I was not given any notice about their possible fate.

Would you please undelete them, and give me an opportunity to submit a licence that could be acceptable to you. --Morten Haugen (talk) 06:36, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Sure, I just undeleted. I'm sorry that the person who added the "no permission" templates didn't warn you. Sometimes it is because popups are blocked in some browsers when tagging things through automated processes. I'll ask the user to be more wary. You might want to drop them a message, asking why they think the images need permission. Killiondude (talk) 06:46, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you so much. Have a nice day. It's breakfast time around here. --Morten Haugen (talk) 06:57, 15 December 2009 (UTC)
You're welcome! Have a nice day yourself. :-) I have to go to bed in a bit, it's getting late here. Killiondude (talk) 06:59, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of file Francisco_Azuela.jpg ,,, Why?

Dear Killiondude,

This is the second time that this image is deleted, I I don't know why. The foto of Francisco Azuela was made by myself. In the upload of the file I mentioned that.

Could you tell me why you have deleted this image from the biografy of this Mexican Poet and writer.

If there is any way you could help me with this I will appreciated.

regards Tristan Azuela

I took a look at the logs. This is the second time it has been undeleted, and likely the last. Please add a license to the file or it will be deleted in 7 days' time. You can review your licensing choices at COM:TAG. I would recommend a Creative Commons license. Killiondude (talk) 18:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Причина удаления

Могу я узнать причину удаления файла P8250027.JPG? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Kei (talk • contribs) (UTC)

Я использую переводчика, пожалуйста, прости меня. Я удалил "обсуждение страница" файла. Файл был удален из-за этого. Свобода панорамы предел в Казахстане. Killiondude (talk) 17:51, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

Hola,me gustaria saber cual fue el motivo por el cual eliminiaste el archivo "Sighma_2.jpg".Ya que espicifique y aclare que pertenecia a MI coleccion personal. Gracias —Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.135.217.132 (talk • contribs) (UTC)

Hola! No tuvo una licensia. He restaurado el archivo y se puedes añadir una licencia. Killiondude (talk) 17:51, 16 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Files deleted

Killiondude, I'm gonna repeat in here what I´ve already wrote to Shizhao.

Two images of my property were deleted last week, fact that I don´t understand because I asked the author of the photographs to send the permission to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org and I know with certainty he did because he sent a copy of thay e-mail to me. It was not easy for me to contact the author, indeed he asked me why did I put his name in the first place instead of telling the pictures were mine in order to avoid all these procedures.

Files were http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:Lacri_12.jpg http://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Archivo:Lingerbliss_myt.jpg

Please, I need an explanation and a way to solution this. --Anemonefield (talk) 17:41, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry for the problems you had in getting this done. I located the OTRS ticket, undeleted the files and fixed them accordingly. Thanks for your patience and for bringing this matter to my attention. Killiondude (talk) 18:19, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Ok, Thanks a lot Killiondude!!! Have a nice day - --190.55.82.25 14:32, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Deletion of File:SigmaSigmaPhi_logo.JPG

You deleted "SigmaSigmaPhi_logo.JPG", it has been deleted from Commons by Killiondude because: No license since 5 December 2009.

My classmates and I created that image. How can I get it properly documented so that it can stay online? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Bouspret (talk • contribs) (UTC)

Hello! We need you to email permissions-commons-at-wikimedia.org to state that you and your classmates agree own the copyright to the file as the creator, and you agree to license it with a free license. Please see COM:OTRS for more info about what OTRS is, and feel free to ask if you have any further questions. Killiondude (talk) 20:09, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Mon.PNG deletion

There is a problem with this deletion, because also all Maltese coins are deleted by CommonsDelinker bot. See this for view the history. Bye :) --Francesco Betti Sorbelli (talk) 17:30, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

I'm not sure what you're saying.... Do you mind clarifying? I didn't delete the images that you are saying CommonsDelinker is deleting. Killiondude (talk) 20:10, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Cremation images

You were correct to remove these images. The uploader was not the copyright holder. I'm in contact with the copyright holder now, and she may upload these images herself, so if you see them re-appear, that's what's going on. Rklawton (talk) 19:07, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

Okay, thanks. Killiondude (talk) 20:09, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] File:Hurricane2.jpg

File:Hurricane2.jpg should probably be deleted. It is perhaps a copy of en:File:CanadianHawkerHurricane1.jpg (unsure license for more than 7 days). -- Common Good (talk) 20:56, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

People get really touchy about speedy deleting {{PD}} tags that were added before the 2008 cutoff date. Too bad I can't review what the enwiki picture was. The software at the time of upload (in 2002) didn't backup the images, so once those files are deleted, they're gone forever. Feel free to start a DR for the Commons image you linked. Killiondude (talk) 23:06, 18 December 2009 (UTC)

[edit] Again files deleted by mistake(((

Hallo, we talked already some time ago about file "Detinochi-chornarada_photoposter1.jpg" which was delted with by mistake with reason "No source since 11 November 2009" and you were so kind to recover it. I also written to you, that I do own rights for all the images on the page, because they all are made by our photographers, photographers of gothic.com.ua (some of them have it written on photo!). I sent email with license to permissions-commons@wikimedia.org. I wrote in email that I own all right for all images on the page http://ru.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=%D0%94%D0%B5%D1%82%D0%B8_%D0%BD%D0%BE%D1%87%D0%B8_(%D1%84%D0%B5%D1%81%D1%82%D0%B8%D0%B2%D0%B0%D0%BB%D1%8C) I also written to you at discussion about "Detinochi-chornarada_photoposter1.jpg": "Can you please confirm that these images don't need to be proved anymore? Because the notes to all the images say that license information is not confirmed and they can be deleted.. but i did sent email stating that I have the rights and got no answer. May be i do something wrong, I'm pretty new to Wiki. Thanks in advance. Svarog1 (talk) 22:57, 21 November 2009"

But now the images were deleted again... I'm so frustrated, because I did sent email with information about license and I did said to you, that I've done it before :(( I don't understand, why it's all so difficult in Wikipedia. I'm really loosing any wish do add any new photos in future :( Could you please recover these photos and don't delete them anymore please? Thank you in advance! In this Christimass 2009 I just want to have complete article with good photos, which are all ours :) (talk) 02:31, 24 December 2009 (UTC)