User talk:Kilom691/Archive 2009 2010

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search


Tact1.jpg[edit]

Ticherra acte Many thanks and best regards from Ireland Robert aka Notafly (talk) 19:45, 1 June 2009 (UTC)

TUSC token ba2d323512ded4b7915e4a580fde4d04[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Congratulations :-). Do you want to transfer 2 files from en? . For example
en:File:Head of Ana-Capri Girl.jpg with Category:Rosina Ferrara and Category:John Singer Sargent
and en:File:Rosina Ferrara Capri.jpg (same categories)
Might be better you change the file names as Sargent-Head of Ana-Capri Girl.jpg or Sargent-Rosina Ferrara Capri.jpg
I would do this by myself, but I am blocked by Herby. Regards Mutter Erde 78.49.25.46 20:22, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Butterflies and moth images from old book[edit]

Hello there, I stumbled on your contributions consisting of extracted images from old books about butterflies and moths (http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Papilio_machaon_by_Nemos.jpg for example). I found a book that might be interesting as well. I think there is no copyright problem, since the author died over 70 years ago. I was wondering if you would be interested in doing extractions for these species as well since I dont know how.. I'm making articles about Lepidoptera species at the english wiki and could use these images very well.. The book is located here: http://caliban.mpiz-koeln.mpg.de/spuler/raupen/index.html Cheers! Ruigeroeland (talk) 11:24, 20 August 2009 (UTC)

Hello ! Well, this sounds like a good idea, but also a heavy burden. I have many other things to do, alas. Maybe you should learn to use the GIMP program and do by yourself what you want. But first, you should take care of the copyright: it is written somewhere "© Kurt Stueber, 2003". At least, you may ask him if you can use these images. Another remark is that it is not obvious to find which caterpillar belongs to which species, as numbers in the picture are not matched with species in the caption. Yours, Frédéric (talk) 12:11, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Thanks, I'll try to contact him. If I do get a positive reply, could I ask you for some help with regards to the extraction process if this proves to be to difficult to figure out by myself? Ruigeroeland (talk) 15:09, 20 August 2009 (UTC)
Well, sure, I will be happy to help. Yours, Frédéric (talk) 09:02, 21 August 2009 (UTC)

Categories[edit]

[1]: I'm not sure I see how it's useful to add this sort of category to an image unless you are going to add the supercategories to hook it into the hierarchy. - Jmabel ! talk 20:07, 30 August 2009 (UTC)

Well, I can see the point, sure enough. Is it better like that ? Yours, Frédéric (talk) 20:09, 30 August 2009 (UTC)
  • Mostly. You also moved the source of the particular image, which I moved back. But that's more like how you should do these. - Jmabel ! talk 05:43, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Kilom691!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 17:29, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Mucha[edit]

Hello. Please do not upload European works by Alfons Mucha until 2010-01-01. PD soon, not yet. Thank you, Infrogmation (talk) 20:13, 2 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello! I understand and I will not upload anything more by Mucha. I did not know this "31 of december" rule.. Are you going to delete what I have uploaded ? Frédéric (talk) 08:48, 3 October 2009 (UTC)

Wrong categorization[edit]

Hi,
Be careful when you are categorizing : [2] and [3]. On theses two pictures, you can see the Canadian flag... It is obviously not the French town. — Riba (talk) 18:20, 26 October 2009 (UTC)

Errare humanum est, Mea culpa, mea maxima culpa, etc, etc.. Frédéric (talk) 20:36, 26 October 2009 (UTC)


File:Stuart_Merrill_par_Albert_Sterner.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Stuart_Merrill_par_Albert_Sterner.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:49, 6 November 2009 (UTC)


File:Georges_Seurat_par_Maximilien_Luce.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Georges_Seurat_par_Maximilien_Luce.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 22:52, 6 November 2009 (UTC)


File:Irdenware_von_Max_Laeuger_1900.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Irdenware_von_Max_Laeuger_1900.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:16, 6 November 2009 (UTC)


File:Meine_Drei_Cousinen_von_Ignacio_Zuloaga.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Meine_Drei_Cousinen_von_Ignacio_Zuloaga.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Pieter Kuiper (talk) 23:22, 6 November 2009 (UTC)

Highly flammable[edit]

Hi Kilom. Can you please reply here. Thanks. --Leyo 09:24, 12 November 2009 (UTC)

Brockhaus and Efron Encyclopedic Dictionary[edit]

Hi Kilom - I took out some of the species categories, because those Brockhaus & Efron pics are so mind-numbingly, excruciatingly awful, that they don't serve any useful purpose on the species categories . . . to be honest, I don't think this poor-quality archaic stuff (almost as bad as that dreadful Pearson Scott Foresman junk!) should ever have been dumped on commons in the first place, but some people take the attitude, because it's PD and can be uploaded legally, it should be. At most, I'd have uploaded a tiny selection to show examples of bad work in the history of art; certainly not as useful illustrations of the species involved. But if it's all going to be on commons, at least let's leave it just in its own categories, rather than cluttering up categories of far better images ;-) But sorry if you feel I've undone your hard work - MPF (talk) 01:06, 4 December 2009 (UTC)

Open deletion requestions[edit]

You've opened quite a few deletion requests, but it seems that many of them never got transcluded onto Commons:Deletion requests/2009/12/05 or another current date page. Can you so transclude them onto the most recent page so they can get looked at and closed?--Prosfilaes (talk) 14:29, 5 December 2009 (UTC)

Hum, sure, but what precisely should I do ? I thought this was fully automatic.. Frédéric (talk) 16:50, 5 December 2009 (UTC)
Follow the instructions on the tag you put on the books.--Prosfilaes (talk) 15:14, 6 December 2009 (UTC)
Ok, but how can I find all the pages that I have nominated in the past ? Is there a way ? Frédéric (talk) 19:18, 6 December 2009 (UTC)

Images[edit]

Which images specifically? Those from Flickr all contain a link to the Flickr page, many of the black and white images are scans from a personal collection of books - so there is no "website" I can properly link to - instead the proper source is to give the name and publication details of the book. Was there something I was missing? Max Rebo Band (talk) 18:47, 23 December 2009 (UTC)

Ah, okay yeah some of those do come from Archive.org - I'll try to remember to include a link (though it's certainly not necessary by policy). Max Rebo Band (talk) 04:01, 24 December 2009 (UTC)
Thank you for all your categorization help, btw. Max Rebo Band (talk) 19:52, 4 January 2010 (UTC)

About template "author"[edit]

Happy new year and thank's for your edit about authot/creatot. It's a long time I have'nt understood why it not appears. There will be a big number of change to do. Can you explaim me how to use this template ? (I am french and not good english speaker). Fot "Barrias", he is not "painter" bur "sculptor". Next - Siren-Com (talk) 12:59, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Eh bien quelle réponse rapide ! Je vais pouvoir mieux m'expliquer en français : effectivement, quand je charge une photos d'oeuvre ancienne, il y a une ambiguîté entre le créateur de l'oeuvre elle même et le créateur du fichier. Par facilité sans doute j'ai interprèté que je suis le "créateur" du fichier. En logique, l'auteur de l'oeuvre doit être respecté. C'est pour ça que la nouvelle disposition genre "info box" est très bien. L'avez vous créer ? J'ai essayé de modifier "painter" en "sculpteur", mais c'est protègé. Donc : comment ça marche ? y-a-t-il un modèle pour chaque artiste ? comment utiliser cette fonction au moment de l'upload et comment créer des modèle pur d'autres artistes, car comme cela doit être nouveau (je le vois aujourd'hui pour la 1ère fois) il y a une somme impressionnante de travail à faire. Merci de m'expliquer ou de me diriger vers les pages d'aide (en français sinon...) - Siren-Com (talk) 13:22, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

Merci des explications, c'est plus simple que je le pensais. J'ai fait ça sur un tableau de Gauguin et du Douannier Rousseau, c'est réussi. Il faut rajouter "photo de" à la main ? et faire attention au nom de l'artiste, multiples prénoms etc.. c'est toujours l'intitulé retenu dans la catégorie qui prime ? Bon, je l'utiliserai désormais. J'ai vu la catégorie "creator" il y a énormément d'artistes de faits, alors que je viens de le voir seulement aujourd'hui ! Ne faudrait il pas préciser cette usage dans la page de "download" pour les novices ? - Siren-Com (talk) 13:54, 1 January 2010 (UTC)
Oui, j'avais corrigé mais c'était resté en "prévisualisation"... Voilà du pain sur la planche, je vais mettre à jour progressivement mes photos. Bonne continuation à vous. - Siren-Com (talk) 14:13, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

En fouinant, je trouve cette image File:Rousseau L'Enfant à la poupée Orangerie RF1963-29.jpg où la boite créateur est siruée en dehors du cadre. N'y aurait-il pas effectivement une confusion possible entre "auteur" du fichier et "auteur" de l'oeuvre ? Finalement j'ai un doute, y-a-t-il quelquepart une recommandation claire d'utilisation de cette procédure ? - Siren-Com (talk) 14:44, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

En effet, j'ai trouvé le modèle "painting" qui marche bien pour ces indications, comme par exemple sur File:Pierre-Auguste Renoir IMG 2123.JPG, j'aurai appris beaucoup de choses aujourd'hui. Finalement les pages vont se remplir de plus en plus ! faudra quand même s'arrêter un jour. - Siren-Com (talk) 14:58, 1 January 2010 (UTC)

FYI[edit]

I had File:Symphyotrichum depauperatum at Nottingham 1.JPG in Category:Serpentine because it's endemic to serpentine barrens. (Well, almost endemic; it also turns out to grow in two diabase glades in North Carolina.) Do you think it might be proper to restore the category or can you suggest another? Choess (talk) 01:50, 25 January 2010 (UTC)

New Wikiproject[edit]

Greetings, I know we've bumped into each other in the past - especially in conversations and work surrounding "erotic works" on Commons. To help us focus and keep others abreast of what we feel needs doing in the future - I was thinking we should form a Wikiproject:Erotica. I'd invite you to sign up, and take a leading role in building the project, and helping decide on the directions we should take to ensure that Commons can host historically important, simply beautiful, or otherwise notable pieces of erotic art - without extending ourselves to the level of "encouraging usres to grab a webcam and drop their trousers". Thanks! Max Rebo Band"almost suspiciously excellent" 15:43, 12 February 2010 (UTC)

Projet Monuments Historiques français[edit]

Dear Commons user,

We noticed you adopted {{Mérimée}}. Thanks for your work in the field of Monuments Historiques français !

In case you did not know about it, we invite you to take a look at the Projet Monuments Historiques français.

We hope to see you soon ! — Jean-Fred (talk) 00:04, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Pauk's Flickr uploads[edit]

Hi Kilom - nice that you're identifying and recategorising many of Pauk's flickr uploads of birds. One other problem with them, he is refusing (despite repeated requests) to add the location data which is often included on the flickr original; when recategorising them, it is also worth checking back to the original to see if this data exists and add it when it does (format flickr's "36.6996, -118.934" as {{Location dec|36.6996|-118.934|}}). Thanks! - MPF (talk) 09:52, 24 February 2010 (UTC)

Category:Sukawati[edit]

Could you explain the purpose of this category? Multichill (talk) 11:59, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Autopatrol[edit]

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have 2009 2010 granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no affect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching RecentChanges to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you. The Evil IP address (talk) 14:30, 21 March 2010 (UTC)

SVG[edit]

Thanks for your tip... the problem is I'm new in Wiki, and I must learn so many things... but SVG is the next step! BTW, could you kindly tell me which is your preferred SVG editor? --Aldoaldoz (talk) 20:01, 23 March 2010 (UTC)


File:Aristide_Maillol_Nu_assis.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aristide_Maillol_Nu_assis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 23:08, 9 April 2010 (UTC)


File:Georg_Kolbe_Tanzerin.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Georg_Kolbe_Tanzerin.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 13:08, 11 April 2010 (UTC)

Category:Tjokorda Gde Raka Sukawati[edit]

Hello, here is what the en wiki page (in the interwiki section of the category) says :

Tjokorda Gde Raka Soekawati (new spelling: Cokorda Gde Raka Sukawati), (born January 15, 1899 in Ubud, Gianyar, Bali) was the only President of the State of East Indonesia from 1946 to its disestablishment in 1950.

I do not know what has happened to this category since I made it. I understand that the current state of affair is bad. Sukawati seems to be the family name of several politicians of Indonesia, but I am quite confused about all this. My aim when I created this category was to give a home category for several images in the Tropenmuseum collection, depicting one and the same man. I do not know enough to be able to sort this mess up, sorry..

Yours, Frédéric (d) 19:06, 26 February 2010 (UTC)

Looks like someone fixed it for us :-) Multichill (talk) 18:04, 30 March 2010 (UTC)
Hello Frédéric and Multichill, I fixed it because it so happens that the Sukawati family is close to mine. They spell their name with a "u" instead of the original Dutch "oe" spelling, so it is their choice (our family sticks to the "oe"). The only famous Sukawati is Tjokorda Gde Raka (paradoxically, with regard to their princely title, the family still uses the Dutch "Tj", while most cokordas use the new "c" spelling). One of his sons, Wim, is a former diplomat, while another son is a former Garuda executive. Regards, Humboldt (talk) 15:43, 30 April 2010 (UTC)

Spelling mistake[edit]

Thanks for your help with Banksia sessilis - appreciate the correction SatuSuro (talk) 06:58, 13 May 2010 (UTC)

Category:Heinz Klein-Arendt[edit]

Hallo Kilom691,
here you have just inserted the note "NoUploads". The photographs were made by the son of the artist and made available. The respective OTRS tickets also include the release of the rights-holder of the artwork by the descendants of the artist.
I think that the note "NoUploads" therefore fails is in order and would ask that you remove this again. PLEASE help one, maybe you can insert an indication that the OTRS tickets also include the rights shares the artistic work?
Thanks + Regards, --Jocian (talk) 09:28, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Unfortunately, says the German text of the "NoUploads" note of something else. After an upload is possible only with Panoramafreiheit. Those users who are referred to as the de.WP "wikilaywer" are then removed in the near future images from the biographical article on H. Klein-Arendt, I'm afraid. Hmm, I'll think an explanatory note text and paste it in place of the "NoUpload" note. Ok?
Cheers, --Jocian (talk) 09:50, 23 May 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for suggestions[edit]

Thanks for your suggestions about binomial names and categories. It has jolted me out of my parochial English-only habits. Amaling (talk) 23:33, 10 August 2010 (UTC)

Extracted images from Meyers Konversationslexikon[edit]

Hi. I noticed that you have at least one image from the Meyers (with snails) cropped. Could you please ad the category:Images from Meyers Konversationslexikon to these new created pictures? So it would be much easier (= the only way to find them all...) for me to describe them and to ad the template "extracted images" at the original picture. Thank you, 85.216.100.168 12:23, 11 August 2010 (UTC)

Category:Ptychadena superciliaris[edit]

Bonjour Kilom691,
Je vois que tu as corrigé [[Category:Ptychadena|Superciliaris]] en [[Category:Ptychadena|superciliaris]]. De fait les premiers exemples sur lesquels je m'étais basé avaient un nom d'espèce commençant par une majuscule, et ce en totale contradiction avec la règle sur les noms scientifiques. A l'époque ça m'avait "choqué" mais je m'étais dis que ce devait être la syntaxe correcte pour les catégories. Au passage c'était un peu emm... car je devais taper la première lettre en majuscule au lieu de coller tout simplement le nom en entier. Pour autant... ça marchait et il n'y avait heureusement aucune incidence. Cela étant je vais suivre désormais ta correction pour les diverses raisons évoquées ci-dessus. Encore merci. Givet (talk) 06:07, 16 August 2010 (UTC) PS : il doit malheureusement y avoir une bonne centaine de category erronées...

Oui, je n'avais pas vu cet angle "tri"... je vais tâcher désormais d'y faire attention. Encore merci. Givet (talk) 16:39, 16 August 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour[edit]

I just saw that you and I both seem to go through Archive.org's copies of books like the Catalogue Illustres du Salon to upload nice images...we should think of a way to cooperate so we don't do the same images and check the same books. :) Max Rebo Band"almost suspiciously excellent" 00:53, 13 September 2010 (UTC)

Well, I think we just have to put very precise categories for the artists, and everything will be fine. No need for more, in my humble opinion ! Yours, Frédéric (talk) 19:08, 14 September 2010 (UTC)

Kookherd birds[edit]

Hi Kilom - all these that you've started adding categories to, I suspect that many / most (maybe all?) are copyvios; I've raised the problem at COM:AN. Just thought you'd better know! - MPF (talk) 16:08, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Well, too bad... Some of them were rather nice. Thanks for the warning. Frédéric (talk) 16:56, 26 September 2010 (UTC)

Popular sciences images[edit]

Thanks for enhancing by adding the illustrator to File:PSM V22 D764 The first water fowl.jpg. This is one of the first signed illustrations. If you're interested in ornithology illustrations, there are numerous drawings in the volumes. — Category:Popular Science Monthly illustrations.Ineuw talk page on en.ws 18:16, 23 October 2010 (UTC)

Source/auteur[edit]

Bonjour ! Attention aux modifs pour ajouter l'auteur de l'œuvre originale avec le modèle {{Artwork}} : il distingue la source du fichier et l'auteur. Pour File:Christian art Chatrousse cour Carree Louvre.jpg par exemple, la source est bien moi et non Émile Chatrousse. En revanche, on peut mettre {{Creator:Émile Chatrousse}} dans le champ 'author'. Jastrow (Λέγετε) 20:27, 28 October 2010 (UTC)

Bonjour, merci pour cette remarque. Je découvre le modèle {{artwork}}, j'en etais resté au modèle {{painting}}. Cordialement, Frédéric (talk) 18:20, 31 October 2010 (UTC)

Danke[edit]

 :-) --4028mdk09 (talk) 20:27, 21 November 2010 (UTC)
Bitte Schön ! Frédéric (talk) 20:27, 21 November 2010 (UTC)

MiG-23[edit]

Gibt es einen Grund für diesen edit? --Markscheider (talk) 13:50, 23 November 2010 (UTC)

Well, this was a non-existing (red) category. I agree that this was not necessary. Entschuldigung. You could now create the category, maybe. Frédéric (talk) 19:29, 23 November 2010 (UTC)
Sorry, i thought you're german too. Now i see, it was my fault, 'cause i named it wrong (double "Category:"). I've corrected this by now and hopefully someone will delete this bad category. With kind regards, --Markscheider (talk) 17:17, 25 November 2010 (UTC)

Cat-egorising cat-s[edit]

Kilom691, you just put some purebred cats into the category "Domestic cats" which is for cats of mixed breed or no breed at all. IN case of doubt, please put cats into Category:Felis silvestris catus for further cat-egorisation. Yours virtually, 84.165.175.98 15:00, 12 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Bahram vi.jpg[edit]

Hi Kilom. Please fix the OTRS template. --Leyo 21:37, 21 December 2010 (UTC)

Well, I am not the one who broke it. And I do not know how to correct it. Sorry, Frédéric (talk) 19:13, 22 December 2010 (UTC)