User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2012/Q3

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Greensboro road signs.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Concurrency (road).
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Hetch Hetchy May 2011 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hetch Hetchy May 2011 001.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Bert Hubbard -- OTRS Ticket #2012081710000896[edit]

The images are (in the OTRS e-mail order):

  1. File:Hubbard Bert - Hubbard right - Lee Embrey left - 1949.jpg
  2. File:Hubbard Bert - Hubbard left - Joan Hinderstein middle - Richard Proctor right - in Othello 1960.jpg
  3. File:Hubbard Bert - The Prince - Machiavelli - 1962.jpg
  4. File:Hubbard Bert - Glitz - 1987.jpg

I was the deleting Admin and have discussed them on my talk page with the uploader at User_talk:Jameslwoodward#Deletion_requests_for_fotos_of_Bert_Hubbard.

I am not inclined to restore any of them. In each case, while Hubbard may own or have control over photographs and negatives, he does not mention a written transfer of copyright, so he does not own the copyright or have the right to license it.

  1. Unknown photographer, first published in the USA in 2002 -- copyright runs until 2097 -- publication date plus 95 years.
  2. Copyright belongs to the friend -- no written transfer, therefore no permission
  3. Copyright belongs to the photographer, John Karalis and runs until at least 1/1/2048.
  4. Copyright belongs to Wally Wengel and there is no written transfer.

.     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 11:35, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the links. Yeah, it appears that none of them are PD currently. Also, do you know how copyright expiry works for things that are improperly published? As in, they were published with the permission of Bert Hubbard, but not the copyright holder. -- King of ♠ 19:49, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
Interesting question. You're correct that my dates above are probably not correct. Carl Lindberg would my go to person to answer the question, but I'll say for #1 it's one of:
  • 120 years after the 1949 creation (most likely)
  • 95 years after the 2002 publication (not likely, as you say, the 2002 publication was without permission)
In the other cases, where the photographer is known, it will be the later of 70 PMA or 1/1/2048.
So, even granting that we take a very long view of things, the earliest undelete on any of them would be 1/1/2048. .     Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk to me) 23:06, 17 August 2012 (UTC)

TUSC token b60f3501c133737dcefc3fc419e432bb[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Stanford Memorial Church May 2011 HDR.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stanford Memorial Church May 2011 HDR.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Chris Rogers0055.jpg[edit]

Hi. Regarding Deletion requests/File:Chris Rogers0055.jpg, I didn't think of OTRS but will do in future. Thanks. -- Trevj (talk) 07:53, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

GE Building New York August 2012 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GE Building New York August 2012 001.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

GE Building New York August 2012 002.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! GE Building New York August 2012 002.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Marble Hill - 225th Street subway August 2012.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marble Hill - 225th Street subway August 2012.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Fußballländerspiel Österreich-Ukraine (01.06.2012) 43.jpg[edit]

Hi King of Hearts,

thank you for reviewing the picture. I have retouched the disturbing arm at the foreground. Maybe you like the picture now. Regards --Wladyslaw (talk) 18:15, 7 September 2012 (UTC)

Help[edit]

I moved here in the Commons but one image in category stands alone ??????????????? Do you know what's the problem? Greeting! --Kolega2357 (talk) 00:16, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you're trying to say. What image or category are you talking about? -- King of ♠ 00:18, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

This picture. I moved here but I intend to transferring files here. Greeting! --Kolega2357 (talk) 00:20, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Are you trying to add the picture to a category? -- King of ♠ 00:24, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

I try but I do not know what category to put the picture. Greeting! --Kolega2357 (talk) 00:26, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

I cannot tell what it is based on looking at it, and I also cannot understand Bolnice u Narodnooslobodilačkom ratu even with Google Translate. You should probably ask someone at Category:User sr to help you. -- King of ♠ 00:31, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Template:PD-Turkey-COA[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Template:PD-Turkey-COA has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Takabeg (talk) 10:58, 8 September 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Featured_picture_candidates/File:Noyabaad_Mosque_(5).jpg[edit]

Hi, I applied for this image, and today i got a reply that the image is not featured. As you have confirmed the decision, i would like to request the reason. Because i believe this will help me to improve my future submission quality. Thanks -- -- Nasir Khan Saikat (Talk|Contributions) 06:43, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Just to let you know, confirming the decision does not involve doing anything substantial, it's simply a step to check that the bot counted the votes correctly. But anyways, the reason your image did not pass is because it did not get 7 support votes in 9 days. The requirements for passing are a support-to-oppose ratio of at least 2:1, and 7 support votes. I've had this happen to me as well; I think in general it's because people are indifferent to your nomination but don't want to oppose, or simply bad luck. You can nominate it after a few months if you want. -- King of ♠ 17:10, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for the information. in future i will be careful about these points. i have an another question that, is there any fixed rule to renominate a image? -- -- Nasir Khan Saikat (Talk|Contributions) 17:58, 9 September 2012 (UTC)
No. But it is generally seen as poor taste if you renominate it too soon. In the case that the failure is due to a low support-to-oppose ratio (rather than too few supports as this one), you should also fix the problems mentioned by the opposers before renominating. -- King of ♠ 18:07, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion[edit]

Stanford Memorial Church May 2011 HDR.jpg
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:Stanford Memorial Church May 2011 HDR.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stanford Memorial Church May 2011 HDR.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

Cscr-featured.svg

/FPCBot (talk) 13:04, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Solow Building New York August 2012.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
Solow building.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Off-center[edit]

Thanks for your review and comment on composition. You suggested very off-center as an alternative. Is this a good "off-center" composition? Regards--ArildV (talk) 13:26, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Yes, this is sufficiently off-center for me. However, I think the framing is unbalanced. -- King of ♠ 16:06, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Fremont Central Park April 2011 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fremont Central Park April 2011 001.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Fremont Central Park April 2011 002.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fremont Central Park April 2011 002.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quarry Lakes April 2011 panorama.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Quarry Lakes April 2011 panorama.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Yacht against Jersey City skyline August 2012.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Yacht against Jersey City skyline August 2012.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Geese[edit]

Great! Thank you.
You are not only the king of hearts, but the king of noble behaviour too.--Jebulon (talk) 20:48, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
Hi
Blank lines: No need for a tool, IMO, we just have to take care by ourselves, as stated in the guidelines. Moreover, Dschwenn does a great job indeed, but he is not the "Grand-Master" of QIC page...--Jebulon (talk) 09:18, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Thanks[edit]

File:Elymnias_hypermnestra_female_2_by_kadavoor_edit.jpg was promoted. Thanks, again. -- Jkadavoor (Jee) (talk) 09:02, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

No problem. -- King of ♠ 15:26, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Central Park New York August 2012 007.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Park New York August 2012 007.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Branta canadensis Redwood Shores May 2011 011.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branta canadensis Redwood Shores May 2011 011.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Branta canadensis Redwood Shores May 2011 012.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branta canadensis Redwood Shores May 2011 012.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Branta canadensis Redwood Shores May 2011 013.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branta canadensis Redwood Shores May 2011 013.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Gunn High School May 2011.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gunn High School May 2011.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Branta canadensis Redwood Shores May 2011 005.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branta canadensis Redwood Shores May 2011 005.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Branta canadensis Redwood Shores May 2011 006.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Branta canadensis Redwood Shores May 2011 006.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Otospermophilus beecheyi Stanford April 2011 002.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Otospermophilus beecheyi Stanford April 2011 002.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Nycticorax nycticorax Newark April 2011.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nycticorax nycticorax Newark April 2011.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

I-580 Castro Valley May 2011 001.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
BART Dublin/Pleasanton–Daly City line.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Belmont May 2011 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Belmont May 2011 001.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Seal Slough May 2011 003.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seal Slough May 2011 003.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Central Park New York August 2012 003.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Central Park New York August 2012 003.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

2010 FIFA Fan Fest Paris.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2010 FIFA Fan Fest Paris.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

I-880 Hayward May 2011 002.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! I-880 Hayward May 2011 002.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Seal Slough May 2011 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seal Slough May 2011 001.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Valued Image Promotion[edit]

Big Sur McWay Falls May 2011.jpg
Your nomination has been reviewed and promoted
Congratulations! The image you nominated was reviewed and has now been promoted as a valued image. It is considered to be the most valued image on Commons within the scope:
McWay Falls.
If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Valued images candidates‎.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Mission San Jose April 2011 001.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mission San Jose April 2011 001.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Seal Slough May 2011 005.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seal Slough May 2011 005.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Seal Slough May 2011 004.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Seal Slough May 2011 004.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.