User talk:Kirtap

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Tableau d'Appiani[edit]

Je pense qu'il s'agit d'une collection permanente. Je te suggère de contacter le Stanford Museum, qu'en penses-tu? David.Monniaux 22:25, 15 February 2007 (UTC)

Image:Disk_2-Desktop_Folder-Robert_Gould_Shaw_Memorial.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Orgullomoore 17:49, 15 March 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:CarloB.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:CarloB.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|cc-by-sa-3.0}} to release it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 10:27, 14 October 2007 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:CarloB.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:CarloB.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 22:21, 25 December 2007 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Kirtap!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

BotMultichillT 17:33, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

Capone[edit]

Bonjour,

Je peux renommer File:Capone Teenager.jpg (j'ai le bouton magique pour Clin) mais il faudrait que tu m'indique un nom. File:Capone in jail.jpg ? Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 15:35, 19 January 2010 (UTC)

PS: j'ai catégoriser les images ci-dessus. Vu que ce livre est dans le domaine public, on pourrait le mettre en entier sur la Wikisource (ce serait plus simple et plus propre).

Renommage effectué.
Et pour mon PS ?
Cdlt, VIGNERON * discut. 19:13, 23 January 2010 (UTC)


File:Grautoff_Poussin_04.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Grautoff_Poussin_04.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Jarekt (talk) 18:19, 28 January 2010 (UTC)

File:David François Mellinet MRAHM.jpg[edit]

Bonjour. J'ai vu que tu avais indiqué que ce tableau n'était pas de David. C'est moi qui ai uploadé ce fichier et d'après mes souvenirs je l'ai trouvé dans la collection en ligne du musée de l'armée, qui malheureusement n'est plus en ligne. Je suppose que ce tableau y était attribué à David. À la même époque, j'avais également trouvé ce tableau, également attribué à David, mais comme la source m'avait l'air moins fiable que le site du musée de l'armée, j'avais préféré ne pas l'utiliser pour illustrer Wikipédia. Bref, si tu as des sources fiables à propos de ces deux tableaux (auteur, lieu de conservation, date, etc.), cela m'intéresse. Cordialement, BrightRaven (talk) 09:41, 19 February 2014 (UTC)

Dans cet ouvrage, je vois que le tableau en question est dit « attribué à David » (et je suppose qu'il doit en être de même dans le catalogue du musée de l'armée). Est-ce que ça te convient si je l'indique comme tel ? Par ailleurs, j'ai trouvé des infos sur l'autre portrait : il est bien de David, mais il s'agit d'un portrait du père du général Mellinet. BrightRaven (talk) 14:49, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
J'ai aussi trouvé cet article. BrightRaven (talk) 15:33, 19 February 2014 (UTC)
L'article du Soir signale que dans le musée, ce tableau est renseigné comme un tableau de David. Et je crois que c'est effectivement le cas, car je ne crois pas avoir inventé cette attribution quand j'ai uploadé le fichier. Il était probablement indiqué comme un tableau de David dans le catalogue en ligne. Je pense qu'il est effectivement possible que cette attribution soit erronée, mais elle est faite par l'institution qui possède le tableau et je pense donc qu'il faut la mentionner dans la description du fichier. (Note : j'ai modifié les articles de WP où cette image apparaît pour indiquer que cette oeuvre était "attribuée à David" et non "de David"). BrightRaven (talk) 12:15, 20 February 2014 (UTC)
L'attribution est douteuse j'en conviens, mais il n'est pas question de discuter ici du fait que ce tableau soit ou non de la main de David, mais uniquement de savoir comment présenter les informations sur Commons. Pour ma part, je pense qu'il faut mentionner que ce tableau est attribué à David par l'institution qui le possède. Occulter complètement cette information ne me paraît pas adapté. BrightRaven (talk) 16:09, 20 February 2014 (UTC)