User talk:KlaudiuMihaila

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Image:FHIA-17.jpg[edit]

Hi Klaudiu, please be aware that fair use images are not allowed at the Commons and will be deleted. Please check Commons:Criteria for inclusion. It's not enough to just say "it's from en.wikipedia". Thanks, pfctdayelise (translate?) 09:55, 9 March 2006 (UTC)


Image Tagging Image:Basalt_Formation_Frodba.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:Basalt_Formation_Frodba.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikimedia Commons (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. If the content is a derivative of a copyrighted work, you need to supply the names and a licence of the original authors as well.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag, then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multilicense GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find all your uploads using the Gallery tool. Thank you. OsamaK 13:23, 29 June 2008 (UTC)

The quality of the chemical structure Image:Hydroxybenzene.png is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:Hydroxybenzene.png you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Images in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Leyo 02:26, 6 February 2009 (UTC)



The factual accuracy of the chemical structure Image:Alkene5.png is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure Image:Alkene5.png you uploaded has been tagged as disputed and is now listed in Category:Disputed chemical diagrams. Images in this category are deleted after one month if there is no upload of a corrected version and if there is no objection from the uploader or other users. Please discuss on the image talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload a corrected version or simply allow the image to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Hystrix (talk) 17:38, 14 March 2009 (UTC)



File:Hexitol.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Hexitol.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Yikrazuul (talk) 13:58, 6 October 2009 (UTC)

File:Fructose_small.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fructose_small.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Yikrazuul (talk) 12:27, 9 April 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, KlaudiuMihaila!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 11:43, 29 December 2011 (UTC)

Commons:WikiProject Romania[edit]

Flag map of Romania.svg
Hi! I created the Commons:WikiProject Romania as a sister project to the multilingual WP:ROMANIA versions (currently en, fr, ro and ru) to better organize, categorize and improve the quality of media and galleries related to Romania and the Romanians. From your contributions, I think you might be interested and maybe you wish to join and support the project. Your input is welcomed! Thanks and best regards!

--Codrin.B (talk) 22:50, 3 February 2012 (UTC)

The quality of the chemical structure File:Alfa-naftilamina.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Alfa-naftilamina.svg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Files in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 20:23, 24 October 2012 (UTC)


File:Alfa-naftilamina.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Alfa-naftilamina.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 13:56, 20 November 2012 (UTC)

The quality of the chemical structure File:Ethyl methyl phenyl amine.svg is disputed[edit]

Dispute notification The chemical structure File:Ethyl methyl phenyl amine.svg you uploaded has been tagged as and is now listed in Category:Low quality chemical diagrams. Files in this category might be deleted after one month if there is no upload of an improved version, if there is no objection from the uploader or other users and if a better version exists. Please discuss on the file talk page if you feel that the dispute is inappropriate. If you agree with the dispute, you can either upload an improved version or simply allow the file to be deleted.

In all cases, please do not take the dispute personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! --Cwbm (commons) (talk) 12:26, 14 January 2013 (UTC)


File:Methyl aniline.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Methyl aniline.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 11:12, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Methylamine.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Methylamine.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 11:58, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

File:Dimethyl aniline.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Dimethyl aniline.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 11:59, 19 November 2013 (UTC)

Romanian pronunciation[edit]

Hey, I noticed you have uploaded some Romanian sound files. Currently the article w:en:Palatalization (phonetics) mentions ban, bani as an example. Would you be willing to record these words in a single sound file to provide an audio illustration? Erutuon (talk) 07:57, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi Erutuon! I now uploaded this, please let me know if it is what you needed. Best, KlaudiuMihaila (talk) 20:07, 16 February 2015 (UTC)
That's exactly what I was looking for. I've added it to the article. Thanks a ton! :-) — Erutuon (talk) 03:50, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Another set of requests! For w:en:Romanian phonology#Vowel alternations, could you record these words to illustrate Romanian vowel alternations? Each pair of words would go in a single sound file, for a total of 6 soundfiles. And they can be placed in the category Category:Minimal pairs as well as Category:Romanian pronunciation.

  • carte 'book', cărticică 'book' (diminutive)
  • casă 'house', căsuță 'house' (diminutive)
  • beat 'drunk', bețiv 'drunkard'
  • seară 'evening', înserat 'dusk'
  • poartă 'gate', portar 'gatekeeper'
  • coastă 'rib', costiță 'rib' (diminutive)

I may have other requests later. At any point, if you are tired of recording examples, let me know, and I will stop requesting more. Erutuon (talk) 22:42, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Done. KlaudiuMihaila (talk) 23:20, 17 February 2015 (UTC)
Cool; added to the article. I've been curious to hear the unique Romanian diphthongs. It seems you pronounce /oa/ in coastă like ua /wa/, which is different from what I expected. And Rom. beat sounds very much like how English bat would be pronounced in the Great Lakes region of the US, though the English word would typically be transcribed /bæt/. Erutuon (talk) 00:21, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
Now that you mentioned coastă and cuastă, I've been pronouncing them continuously trying to figure out whether they are the same or not. Still can't tell, so maybe they are the same in my case. KlaudiuMihaila (talk) 18:07, 18 February 2015 (UTC)
That would not be surprising. Across languages, diphthongs with [e] or [o] as less prominent components, as in Romanian, are rare; diphthongs with [i u] are more common. Sometimes in diphthongs with the mid vowels [e o] as less prominent components, mid [e o] change to the close vowels [i u], or the semivowels [j w]. This happened with Old French [o̯i], a very rare diphthong, which I think changed to [wi], [we], and then finally [wa] as in Modern French.
Thus maybe in your Romanian pronunciation, /oa/ changes to [wa] ua. It would be "symmetrical" if /ea/ changed to [ja] ia, but it doesn't sound like that's true of your pronunciation. If anything, it sounds like /ea/ has become similar to [æ] (English bat), a change that is called monophthongization or "smoothing". If /oa/ changed in a symmetrical way, or was monophthongized or "smoothed", it would change to [ɔ], a mid vowel close to a. But it doesn't, so your pronunciations of ea and oa are different, or "asymmetrical".
These are my guesses. Sorry if this is overly detailed, or hard to understand (not sure what your level of English or linguistic understanding is), but historical sound changes fascinate me. ;-) Erutuon (talk) 05:27, 19 February 2015 (UTC)