User talk:Kobac/Archive

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
This discussion of one or several categories is now closed. Please do not make any edits to this archive.

Contents

TUSC token 43efb5aed22fa2302aeba8ffc315946f[edit]

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!


File tagging File:Velered_kralja_Tomislava.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Velered_kralja_Tomislava.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Martin H. (talk) 13:18, 15 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Shitet.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Shitet.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--. . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talkcontribs) 16:42, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

File:Mitrovica Bridge 002.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Mitrovica Bridge 002.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added may soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a copyright violation, please explain why on the file's talk page.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--. . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talkcontribs) 16:47, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


File:Zahir Pajaziti monument in Pristina 002.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Zahir Pajaziti monument in Pristina 002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
--. . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talkcontribs) 17:09, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


File:Mother Teresa Monument in Pristina.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Mother Teresa Monument in Pristina.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
--. . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talkcontribs) 17:19, 21 April 2010 (UTC)

Comment[edit]

Please don't take the four potential deletions above as a personal attack -- I was just doing New Page Patrol and they came up. I approved quite a few other images that you found -- keep up the good work, but do keep the issues raised above -- signs and statues -- in mind.. . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talkcontribs) 17:19, 21 April 2010 (UTC)


File:Bill Clinton Boulevard in Pristina.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Bill Clinton Boulevard in Pristina.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
JuTa (talk) 23:29, 6 November 2010 (UTC)

File:2010-2011 Arab world protests.PNG[edit]

Hi. I see you have removed my addition of Lebanon, the West Bank and Kuwait from the image due to lack of sources. Please remember that I mentioned my intention to list sources, and they are available here, on the English Wikipedia file talk page. Also, my apologies for the image resize, since I edited using MS Paint, which may distort the parameters, although I may have produced some errors in my edit, such as in the rogue pixels showing colours different from the country they border, and some disparities on the size and shape of Bahrain, which I also added there. Thanks. AstroImager001 (talk) 20:36, 12 February 2011 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:The_old_Coombe_Hospital,_Dublin,_Ireland.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:The_old_Coombe_Hospital,_Dublin,_Ireland.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:The_old_Coombe_Hospital,_Dublin,_Ireland.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:07, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

File:ATI_Multi_System_Map.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:ATI_Multi_System_Map.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Magog the Ogre (talk) 22:25, 2 March 2011 (UTC)

Images I have uploaded[edit]

With regard to notification from you (and perhaps others) that images I have uploaded to Wikipedia may be deleted, because they have been transferred to Wikimedia Commons: I uploaded these images to Wikipedia in good faith, and as far as I am aware they satisfied the criteria of copyright, etc for Wikipedia - I have rarely had a problem with the many images I uploaded there. I didn't ask for them to be transferred to Wikimedia Commons, and no-one told me that this would happen. I work in a library which has many old books, and most of the older images have been scanned in from books out of copyright or from online books in public domain or personal family photos in my possession, taken by me or members of my family which I have inherited. It is quite difficult at the moment for me to research the exact origins of individual old images. I would suggest that before transferring any more of the images I uploaded to Commons, that you notify me in advance, so that I can be prepared to carry out the necessary research. Hohenloh (talk) 18:20, 8 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Bachir_Gemayel_(agitation)_003.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Bachir_Gemayel_(agitation)_003.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 20:19, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Bachir_Gemayel_(agitation)_001.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Bachir_Gemayel_(agitation)_001.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 20:19, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

File:Bachir_Gemayel_(agitation)_002.jpg[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:Bachir_Gemayel_(agitation)_002.jpg has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Luxembourgish | Македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FunkMonk (talk) 20:20, 16 March 2011 (UTC)

File:2nd_February_2011,_Cairo._Al-Azhar_Imams.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:2nd_February_2011,_Cairo._Al-Azhar_Imams.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Fut.Perf. 17:39, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Перемещение шаблона лицензии[edit]

Здравствуйте. Когда информация о лицензии находится в общей таблице, это красиво и удобно. Однако я бы не стал перемещать её без необходимости, так как из‐за этого не так легко быстро определить по истории изменений, не была ли она изменена. Хотя это и не так важно, если речь идёт о коротком «{{PD-self}}». --AVRS (talk) 13:26, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Например (в данном случае шаблонов мало, правок мало, правивших мало, и изменения небольшие, но когда всего помногу, то затруднения возникают серьёзные):
http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Aminevo.jpg&action=history
Если сравнить первую и вторую версии, то сразу видно, что информация о лицензировании не изменялась.
Если сравнить первую или вторую и третью версии, то надо искать глазами шаблон.
Если правок много, то каждое перемещение и изменение шаблона немного усложнит поиск изменений (вдруг автор изменил, а кто‐то это неправомерно отменил?). Чем больше таких изменений, тем скорее сравнивать первую и последнюю версию станет бесполезно. Вот здесь это более заметно: http://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3APlena_Manlibro_de_Esperanta_Gramatiko.jpg&diff=22798046&oldid=3016311 . Отменять нет смысла: станет ещё хуже.
В Википедии, если изменить или соединить сразу несколько абзацев, может получиться такое сравнение, что для понимания изменений придётся перечитывать всю статью.
--AVRS (talk) 13:52, 6 April 2011 (UTC)


P.S.: Для ссылок на Википедию есть хороший шаблон: {{w}}. Например: «{{w|Аминьевское шоссе||ru}} в {{w|Москва|Москве|ru}}». --AVRS (talk) 13:29, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Встряну в монолог ;) Поясню своё мнение в поддержку переноса лицензий. При ручной правке категорий часто приходится убирать много хлама - {{Check categories}} на десять строк и пр. Не раз ловил и себя, и других на том, что при удалении этого хлама случайно стирается и "отдельно стоящая" лицензия. Инструментов контроля за этим никаких - стёр случайно и концы в воду, а потом файл идёт в топку. Поэтому желательно, чтобы лицензия (включая, если есть, {{permissionOTRS}} и {{flickrreview}}) как самые важные части описания жили "в крепости" - внутри {{information}}. NVO (talk) 15:30, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
Вот-вот, и я стремлюсь к тому же. )) Kobac (talk) 15:39, 6 April 2011 (UTC)
У нас, кстати, не монолог, просто я отвечал на СО AVRS. Kobac (talk) 16:19, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Про пассажи ;)[edit]

То, что Банные, Солянские и прочие "проезды" в двести метров стали "пассажами" (cf. Category:Passages in Prague) - это, может быть, и правильно. Но вот есть такой Шмитовский проезд - его-то как обозвать? Пассаж-переросток! Проезд Дежнёва, Библиотечный Шипиловский и Ореховый в ту же кучу. С ними-то что делать? // Может, всех их на транслит - никого же не смущают "штрассе" и "гатаны". NVO (talk) 10:27, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

A как вам 3rd Shchukinsky journey?))
Я употребил слово «Passage» не по своей инициативе: кто-то так обозвал два-три проезда — я и стал делать по аналогии.
Какое слова использовать для перевода — лично мне всё равно. Есть предложения — давайте посмотрим.
Единственное, на чём я настаиваю, так это на том, что раз Правительство Москвы их все (и маленькие и большие) рассматривает как нечто друг на друга похожее, и поэтому одинаково именует проездами, то и мы должны придерживаться того же правила. А то здесь уже была Sivtsev Vrazhek Street)).
Не гражданин России и вообще не говорящий по-русски читатель должен чётко понимать: знаешь как у москвичей называется тип дороги, которая Shmidtovsky, значит и Shokalskogo — это тот же тип. Иначе люди просто не смогут ничего найти на карте с кириллицей. Согласны? Kobac (talk) 11:02, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
Да, и если их — на транслит, то почему тогда только их, а не и переулки тоже? Kobac (talk) 11:04, 11 April 2011 (UTC)
journey ладно там, там места в самом деле приятные, а каков вам en:Bolshoy Kislovsky Drive ?
заодно совет - сносить категории лучше не через db-empty, a через badname - тогда после удаления в watchlist (в моём) будет прописано новое имя категории. NVO (talk) 17:47, 13 April 2011 (UTC)

Checking bot moves[edit]

Could you please be more careful when confirming bot-moved images with OTRS permission tags? Your edit here used the wrong template syntax, so you pointed it to a non-existant ticket. VernoWhitney (talk) 14:12, 14 April 2011 (UTC)

File:37_Leningradskoye_Highway,_Moscow,_Russia_-_001.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:37_Leningradskoye_Highway,_Moscow,_Russia_-_001.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Saibo (Δ) 00:22, 15 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Smolenskaya_(Arbatsko-Pokrovskaya_Line)_002.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Smolenskaya_(Arbatsko-Pokrovskaya_Line)_002.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
PereslavlFoto (talk) 19:58, 25 April 2011 (UTC)

Category:Backroads_of_Moscow[edit]

Category discussion notification Category:Backroads_of_Moscow has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category.
In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Deutsch | English | Español | Français | עברית | Magyar | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | Polski | Português | Русский | +/−
NVO 12:50, 29 April 2011 (UTC)

File:Jelena_Rozga.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Jelena_Rozga.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Edoderoo (talk) 14:10, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

File:Логотип World Organization of Creditors.png[edit]

Hi, please don't nominate a file for speedy deletion if {{PD-textlogo}} applies. Jcb (talk) 16:41, 24 August 2011 (UTC)

Different nomination process[edit]

Dear Kobac, in cases of missing permission, source or license information, it's not necessary to create a new subpage (such as this one). You may wish to tag these kind of uploads by using {{subst:npd}} or {{subst:nsd}} or {{subst:nld}} instead of {{delete}}. You can do this manually, or enable a useful gadget in your preferences (it's called "Quick Delete" and can be found under "Maintenance tools"). The nomination process for these cases is slightly different: you only have to tag the file and inform the uploader. The tagged files are then automatically categorized and will be deleted seven days later (see Commons:D#Overview of procedures). Please let me know if you have any questions. Good luck, Mathonius (talk) 08:09, 10 September 2011 (UTC)

File:GM_Heritage_Center_-_111_-_Motorama_Cars_-_Firebird_II.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:GM_Heritage_Center_-_111_-_Motorama_Cars_-_Firebird_II.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
80.187.106.102 17:01, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Category Unidentified[edit]

Hello Kobac, look to the Category:Unidentified trucks. Thank. FrankyLeRoutier (talk) 08:05, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Thanks, FrankyLeRoutier. But I use flickrripper.py so I can't use this category when I use "automobiles" already. But I'll try. Kobac (talk) 08:11, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, Kobac!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 12:08, 2 December 2011 (UTC)

Wrong Category - Неверная категория[edit]

Hello!

Please use Category:Trucks in New Zealand instead of the non-existing incorrect Category:New Zealand Trucks . Thank you! --High Contrast (talk) 09:38, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

  • It's TEMPORARY category!!! Please don't move!!! Kobac (talk) 09:40, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
    • This temporary category is nonsense, please don't use it and especially do not create it. --High Contrast (talk) 09:41, 13 December 2011 (UTC)
      • OK. Kobac (talk) 09:44, 13 December 2011 (UTC)

Thank you for your impressive upload efforts of these New Zealander trucks! Greetings, High Contrast (talk) 16:04, 14 December 2011 (UTC)

  • Thanks, High Contrast. Sorry for categories. )) Kobac (talk) 21:37, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
No problem. Happy editing! --High Contrast (talk) 15:24, 15 December 2011 (UTC)

Police motorcycles[edit]

Thanks for uploading the very good NZ police motorcycle photographs. I have identified and correctly tagged each of them. Feel free to ping me if you upload any more and need help. --Biker Biker (talk) 09:12, 17 December 2011 (UTC)


Images from NOAA[edit]

Hi Kobac,

Thanks for uploading all these images to Commons. I will try to help getting them categorized.

Note that I moved some to a subcategory Category:Images from NOAA, as it seems preferable to use a source category. I will try to get reminder done later. --  Docu  at 14:33, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

File:1962_Deep_Sanderson_301_Coupe_-_Flickr_-_exfordy.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:1962_Deep_Sanderson_301_Coupe_-_Flickr_-_exfordy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Mr.choppers (talk) 18:15, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Goodwood_Festival_of_Speed_2007_-_-_-_Flickr_-_exfordy.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Goodwood_Festival_of_Speed_2007_-_-_-_Flickr_-_exfordy.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Mr.choppers (talk) 18:22, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

Look first, upload later[edit]

Hello Kobac, I apreciate all the work that goes into combing through flickr and uploading free-licensed pictures. However, a concern: Many of the pictures you are uploading have already been uploaded by others. Consider a quick search before uploading, thereby you can avoid unnecessary work. Thanks and cheers, Mr.choppers (talk) 18:25, 7 January 2012 (UTC)

  • Hmm. I think that 15-20 duplicates per 2000-3000 photos uploaded by me is not a big trouble, especially if they are not exact copies, but originals of cropped versions. Kobac (talk) 07:38, 8 January 2012 (UTC)
It's not a problem in any way - I am simply trying to help you save otherwise wasted effort. Cheers, Mr.choppers (talk) 11:24, 9 January 2012 (UTC)

Delete duplicates[edit]

Hello Kobac

I have deleted all the duplicates that you tagged here. I wonder why you have made so many duplicates just after 1-3 days after initial uploads. Regards!--Morning Sunshine (talk) 09:23, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

  • I wonder too. ))) Kobac (talk) 09:24, 10 January 2012 (UTC)
And some more. Please check whether you have uploaded an image before in order not to waste your efforts. Best regards (BTW, i don't think this and this are duplicates)--Morning Sunshine (talk) 10:01, 10 January 2012 (UTC)

File:High_Museum_of_Art_-_Atlanta,_GA_-_Flickr_-_hyku_(12).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:High_Museum_of_Art_-_Atlanta,_GA_-_Flickr_-_hyku_(12).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Túrelio (talk) 08:48, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Cramming_it_All_In_-_Flickr_-_hyku.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cramming_it_All_In_-_Flickr_-_hyku.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Túrelio (talk) 08:53, 18 January 2012 (UTC)

category:Unidentified trams[edit]

The files you've moved from category:Trams in Moscow seems mostly contain trams which are indeed in categories like KTM-19 and others. I'm going to revert. - A.Savin 15:13, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

  • Это, конечно же, была ошибка с моей стороны. Доверился, блин, катскану, а он не показал другие категории, вот я и проставил их автоматом. Только у меня просьба: не откатывайте, пожалуйста, в тех случаях, где эта категория нужна. Я сейчас сам всё перепроверю. Kobac (talk) 15:17, 22 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Codes for macedonian plates.svg.png[edit]

There is source on the file, MacedonianBoy is the creator and since the picture is under free licensing with possibility of changing, editing etc. i don't see the problem with the copyrights. Please remove the "deletion request". --AL3X TH3 GR8 (talk) 19:52, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

  • Well, and what is the source URL? Kobac (talk) 10:56, 25 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Anim1688_-_Flickr_-_NOAA_Photo_Library.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Anim1688_-_Flickr_-_NOAA_Photo_Library.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Jmabel ! talk 20:05, 23 January 2012 (UTC)

Photographs by John Fowler[edit]

Thanks for adding to this cat. He's an outstanding landscape photographer. I knew the search on Commons was wonky, but I was surprised it missed this many. Cheers, Tillman (talk) 15:16, 26 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Cool_Harley_Truck_-_Flickr_-_Supermac1961.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Cool_Harley_Truck_-_Flickr_-_Supermac1961.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Prof. Professorson (talk) 19:29, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

-- Saibo (Δ) 22:39, 28 January 2012 (UTC)

File:Fly01030_-_Flickr_-_NOAA_Photo_Library.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Fly01030_-_Flickr_-_NOAA_Photo_Library.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Amada44  talk to me 10:40, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Eleassar (t/p) 10:34, 31 January 2012 (UTC)

Identified[edit]

I appreciate your categorization, but you may want to pay attention to captions. For example, File:Pociag pancerny Dywizji Syberyjskiej mjr. W. Czumu 1918 r.JPG has English caption that pretty much identified the subjected. We may not have a specific category for it, but it is hardly unidentified. Ditto for few other edits of yours that popped up on my watchlist. Thanks for your efforts! --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 23:14, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop spamming deletion requests[edit]

Please stop spamming my page. Use one page to create a batch request, and then we can discuss the issue. I also see that you've ignored my comments on past deletions. This behavior is not helpful. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 01:33, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Spamming??? No out of scope photos - no deletion requests. Is this scheme will acceptable for you? Kobac (talk) 01:53, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
    • Photos contain information relevant to other images. They can be deleted after the information is transferred. That seems quite in-scope to me. And yes, posting 50 messages on my talkpage instaed of 1 batch is annoying spam. Please try to be more considerate in your actions. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 02:15, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
      • Sorry, but the Commons is not your personal computer, and I'm a volunteer like you and I have no time for making one page request when another user have no time for sorting images before uploading. Can you explain which information contains, for example, this photo? Kobac (talk) 02:30, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
        • Kobac, whilst it isn't "spam" to notify editors of DR nominations, as these are all essentially one batch, you may want to consider adding the code from User:Russavia/common.js to your own User:Kobac/common.js; this will allow you to easily do batch nominations in a single action. If they are all from a single person, they will still receive notification for all DR, except it will be as part of a single message. The batch nominator will appear in your toolbox on the left hand side of the page. russavia (talk) 06:24, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
          • Thanks, Russavia, I'll try. Cheers. ;)) Kobac (talk) 12:07, 7 February 2012 (UTC)
            • I think that's a good suggestion, a batch nomination would save us a lot of grief here. I'd appreciate it if you could merge those requests into one. The description you mention tells us that the figure on File:New York by Piotrus 097.JPG is Chinese, from 7th century, Tang Dynasty, and others may be able to discern even more info from it. When a volunteer decides they've extracted enough, we can delete it. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 21:17, 7 February 2012 (UTC)

Will you batch-group those requests?[edit]

I am still waiting for that. I don't have time to participate in ~50 separate discussions, I doubt you do, or most others, particularly when all the photos are almost identical. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 21:03, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Thank you. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus Talk 20:04, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

You're now a filemover[edit]

Welcome, Dear Filemover!

Commons File mover.svg

Hi Kobac/Archive, you're now a filemover. When moving files please respect the following advice:

  • Use the CommonsDelinker link in the {{rename}} template to order a bot to replace all ocurrences of the old title with the new one.
  • Please do not tag redirects as {{speedy}}. Other projects, like InstantCommons, might be using the file even though they don't show up in the global usage. Deleting the redirects would break their file references.
  • Please know and follow the file rename guidelines.

Morning Sunshine (talk) 04:41, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Thanks. Kobac (talk) 09:28, 9 February 2012 (UTC)

Please stop![edit]

Please do stop renaming files to "make the description more informative"! There is a separate description section which is intended to describe the file as precisely as possible. Or do you intend to add geocoding and licensing information to the file name also? Thank you for being reasonable.--Ondřej Žváček (talk) 00:27, 10 February 2012 (UTC)

  • What file are you talking about? Kobac (talk) 00:35, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
    • This one: File:Autoškola.jpg. In my view a simple, short name has been replaced by an extremely long, unpractical, sentence-like one.--Ondřej Žváček (talk) 00:42, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
      • Well, but where can we see a Driving School? There is a car on the photo. Kobac (talk) 00:49, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
        • Yes, there is a driving school car on the picture. But the question is different - should or should not a file name contain exact description of the file? In my view the answer is NO, file name does not substitute description section of the file. It is unreasonable and unpractical. Therefore I believe your file move was wrong and should be undone. If you could please undo the move that would be greatly appreciated. Thank you.--Ondřej Žváček (talk) 01:03, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
          • No problem. You can put the {{rename}} template and give a link to this discussion for another file mover. Kobac (talk) 01:10, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
            • I must say that I sort of agree with the original uploader here: the main topic of this image is a driving school vehicle, not the make (nor location or its colour or whathaveyou). But at the same time, the namechange is not false nor misleading, and therefore also not worth arguing about. I would advise a bit more finesse in Kobac's future renamings (while not wrong, it might just be a tiny bit less than superbly mannered) but also I don't think that it is really problematic. Best regards to all, Mr.choppers (talk) 05:14, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
              • I think that when you'll look to the simple file list (without images, of course) you'll not understood that there is a car on the "Autoškola.jpg". I'm not even talking about the place or the car's mark. It was a main argument for the express renaming. Kobac (talk) 10:49, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
                • Just to explain an aspect here which is apparently misunderstood by the name mover (perhaps you could have asked if not a native speaker of the language the file was originally named in?). The original name is in Czech. In Czech, the word "autoškola" is commonly used also for referring to a driving school car. A Czech sentence "Podívej, kolem jede autoškola!" is to be translated into English as "Look, a driving school car is passing by!", not "Look, a driving school is passing by!". I agree that this is not worth arguing about any further if an isolated case. But I still have a strong opinion that files should not be renamed simply because the original name does not capture the exact description of the file in the renamer's view (e.g. moving "Driving school car.jpg" to "Driving school car Toyota XDT-259 on Waterloo Street in Washington, D.C., United States of America, on Friday 14, 2002.jpg"). Thank you and best regards to all!--Ondřej Žváček (talk) 01:01, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
                  • Can you explain me the difference between "Autoškola" and "Vůz autoškoly"? As possible, with link to dictionary article, please. Kobac ([`User talk:Kobac#top|talk]]) 01:34, 11 February 2012 (UTC)
                    • Sure. "Vůz autoškoly" in a literal translation means "driving school car". "Autoškola" in a literal translation means "driving school". However, the word "autoškola" is commonly used also for referring to a driving school car (so there may be no difference as a result of this). An example of this usage is here ("V centru Prahy se srazila autoškola s osobním autem"). Could you, please, explain to me why you have expressly and with no discussion whatsoever (despite of the fact that you are not the speaker of the language the file was originally named in) renamed the file "Autoškola.jpg" to a sentence-like "Driving school's VAZ-2106 in Komsomolsk-on-Amur, Russia.jpg" and, more importantly, what nonnegligible benefit this has created to the Wikimedia Commons project? Thank you.--Ondřej Žváček (talk) 02:16, 16 February 2012 (UTC)

Your uploads on February 11, 2012, referring to India : Categorisation[edit]

Hi Kobac, as pointed by you before, please use useful categories and don't over-categorize your images, i.e. please do not categorize your uploads (an example of your recent activity):

Category:India +
Category:Horasis Global India Business Meeting 2011

You'll help to save time and capacity on commons by categorizing:

Category:Politicians of India or Category:Businesspeople of India

Please use as far as possible the category of the regarding city/town/village or district (if there's no category) etc., or, a localized better 'fitting' i.e. the 'most fitting"' category(ies). Do not add - in addition - the categories of the "parent category", among them cities, states and countries etc.

For further information on categories please read Commons:Categories referring to an accurate categorisation, simplifying your further uploads and categorisation in general. If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the commons:help desk.

Thank you for your assistance, Roland 10:53, 12 February 2012 (UTC)