User talk:Kolossos

Archive 1 2 3

(Feel free to reactivate conversations by pulling them from the archives)

TSD

Hi, von dir kommen die Fotos zu den Technischen Sammlungen Dresden. Ich habe den Artikel etwas um Erlebnisland Mathematik (http://www.math.tu-dresden.de/alg/erlebnisland/) erweitert. Nicht ganz ohne Eigennutz empfehle ich, Fotos von diesem Ausstellungsteil zu ergänzen. Ich weiß nicht, wie mit den Rechten verfahren wird, du scheinst da Erfahrungen zu haben. TSD hat in aktuell etwas(http://www.tsd.de/aktuell). Dresden Fernsehen hat ein Video anlässlich der Eröffnung des neuen Teiles Erlebnisland hoch zwei (ab 26.3.2010) online (http://www.dresden-fernsehen.de/default.aspx?ID=6090&showNews=672571#video). Videos aus der Rohbauphase kannst du interessehalber angucken (www.tronikdesign.de/moebius/videos/moebiusbahn_kamera_eilmitfahrt.mov und www.tronikdesign.de/moebius/videos/moebius_eilrunde.mov)

LG ulf (--Ulfbastel (talk) 19:42, 28 March 2010 (UTC))

Rechtlich ist das momentan etwas in der Grauzone. Richtig nachgefragt habe ich nicht, aber ich hatte mir eine Fotoerlaubnis für das Museum zugelegt und bei den historischen, technischen Gegenständen hatte ich auch wenig Bedenken, dass ich damit das Urheberrecht verletzen könnte. Im Gegensatz dazu gehören einige Objekte des Erlebnislandes für mich in den Bereich von Kunstobjekten, da wäre ich also schon mal vorsichtig.

Jedoch, wenn du Bilder von der Webseite nehmen willst, geht das für die Wikipedia garnicht, ohne beim Museum um Erlaubnis nachzufragen. Ich hatte mir sogar schon mal überlegt, mich im dortigen Förderverein zu engagieren weil mich das Museum fasziniert, allerdings fehlt mir auch aufgrund der Wikipedia komplett die Zeit dafür. Aber wenn du beim Museum mal nachfragst und vielleicht eine richtige Fotoerlaubniss für die Wikipedia bekämst, wäre ich gerne bereit mal mit richtiger Technik anzurücken und ordentliche Fotos zu machen. Eigentlich wäre es für ein Fotomuseum auch gut, mal den aktuellen Stand der Fototechnik z.B. mit Gigapan-Bilder zu zeigen, mit sowas könnte ich dienen und z.B. Mal ein Panorama oben vom Turm machen. Vielleicht gibt es auch noch andere Kooperationsmöglichkeiten zwischen der Wikipedia und dem Museum/dem Förderverein. --Kolossos (talk) 21:07, 28 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Dresden-Leonhardi-gp.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Very nice! --Dschwen 22:47, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Berlin-O2-night2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments A bit tilted to the left. --Dschwen 19:06, 24 April 2010 (UTC) I uploaded a new version I hope now it is ok.--Kolossos. Yes, ok now. --Dschwen 22:48, 24 April 2010 (UTC)

Business Week use of your image

An image which you uploaded to Wikimedia Commons of Florida was recently used by the magazine Bloomberg Businessweek in an article entitled 'Best Places to Raise Your Kids'. The image appeared without attribution and did not mention that it may be reproduced under a Creative Commons license. I thought it would be helpful to notify you of this fact. Contact information for Businessweek is available on its website. . . . . Jim . . . . Jameslwoodward (talk • contribs) 22:10, 3 May 2010 (UTC)

FP Promotion

The image has been promoted to Featured picture The image File:Dresden-Fuerstenzug4.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dresden-Fuerstenzug4.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 23:02, 4 May 2010 (UTC)

Lüneburg

Hallo Kolossos, File:Lueneburg-IHK2.jpg ist anscheinend defekt oder, falls nicht, jedenfalls kaum zu managen. IrfanView konnte es zwar gerade so öffnen, zeigte aber massive Bildfehler und eine (unkomprimierte) Dateigröße von 500 MB! --Túrelio (talk) 18:38, 8 June 2010 (UTC)

War mir auch aufgefallen. Interessanterweise war es bei mir ok, aber selbst nachdem ich die Auflösung auf ein viertel runtergerechnet hatte war es auf dem Server kaputt. Naja nun geht es: File:Lueneburg-IHK.jpg. --Kolossos (talk) 17:03, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Gigapan vs Macro

I am impressed by this technology, my work is mostly macro. Have you tried the GigaPan for macro? Merci --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 06:08, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

Not jet, what size do have in mind. My camera has a nearest focus distance of 42 cm at f=120mm. So i could try a gigapan of 15x15cm or so. two problems could be: The nodal point must be more exactly and depth of field is more restricted. Do you have an idea for a motive? --Kolossos (talk) 11:19, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

I increase the sharpness in extreme circumstances as in: File:Heliophyllite3.jpg do you think this is possible with the Gigapan?--Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 15:52, 11 June 2010 (UTC)

I know this technic. It should be possible manually but I don't know a camera that make automatically a image series with various focus. After this I would say first it would be good to make focus stacking and than panorama stacking. Seems to be a lot work , perhaps it's easier to take a electron microscope [1] ;-). --Kolossos (talk) 20:00, 14 June 2010 (UTC)

Thank you for all this information, I will inquire about CombineZM. --Archaeodontosaurus (talk) 17:16, 15 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Lueneburg-Rathaus.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments QI With Gigapan--Archaeodontosaurus 20:15, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Lueneburg-IHK.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments QI With Gigapan --Archaeodontosaurus 20:22, 9 June 2010 (UTC)

Geocoding/Panorama project bug

Hi,

I was using your panorama script, nice idea btw., though I was unfortunately not successful. And found some issue with umlauts in the generated template. If you enter an image name containing umlauts for the GET-parameter in the address bar, they're double utf8-encoded. (At least in my browser:Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; de; rv:1.9.1.9) Gecko/20100317 SUSE/3.5.9-0.1.1 Firefox/3.5.9)

Here:

|image=".utf8_encode($image)."<br>

Oh, and how about giving the labels some transparency e.g.:

background-color:rgba(200, 200, 255, 0.3);

Thanks! --Burny (talk) 20:43, 17 June 2010 (UTC), edited --Burny (talk) 20:49, 17 June 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Lueneburg-Rathsapotheke.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎.

Gdańke

Hallo Kolossos, du hast nun das Verschieberecht, bitte mache dich mit den Regeln dazu vertraut. In deinem Briefkasten solltest du im Lauf des Tages noch einen kleinen Hinweis finden. --32X (talk) 08:47, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Wegen dir gibt es in Leutewitz keine Winkmühle mehr. Danke. --Kolossos (talk) 19:03, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Defekte Datei / "Virus" in File:Dresden-Fuerstenzug4.jpg

Hallo Kolossos. Im Support-team schlug grade eine Nachricht auf, dass besagte Datei einen Virus enthielte: "Es wurde eine Datei übertragen, die einen Virus enthält und daher von McAfee Web Gateway geblockt wird. Name des Virus: McAfeeGW: Exploit.MS04-028.JPEG.C" Ob der McAffee da nun richtig liegt oder nicht - ich kann auch nur das Thumbnail ansehen, die vollständige Datei wird von meinem Firefox als Fehlerhaft abgewiesen. Es wäre schön, wenn du dich darum kümmern könntest. Danke im Voraus --Guandalug (talk) 10:05, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Die Datei ist für manche Browser zu groß. Irfanview zeigt die hier (nach download) problemlos an, Microsoft Security Essentials zeigt keinen Exploit, Avira auch nicht. Dürfte ein Fehlalarm sein. -- smial (talk) 13:49, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Das Ding ist unter Linux mit Gimp runtergerechnet wurden, ein Virus demnach äußerst unwahrscheinlich. Avira schlug bei mir aber auch an, ich halte es aber auch für einen Fehlalarm. --Kolossos (talk) 16:48, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Okay, das mit dem Gimp überzeugt mich. Danke :D --Guandalug (talk) 17:19, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Dresden-canalettoblick-gp.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments gute Komposition und Detailauflösung --Mbdortmund 00:00, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Gdansk-greenBridge-gp.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments very good --Mbdortmund 00:02, 27 August 2010 (UTC)

Tip: Categorizing images

---

Hello, Kolossos!

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]

[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 20 October 2010 (UTC)

• Image:Wikipedia-OSM-Gadget-detail.png was uncategorized on 19 October 2010 CategorizationBot (talk) 10:45, 20 October 2010 (UTC)
• Image:Meissen-Fahrstuhl.jpg was uncategorized on 15 January 2012 CategorizationBot (talk) 12:34, 16 January 2012 (UTC)

Category:Lueger

Hi Kolossos! Ich hab den Vorschlag von User:ŠJů leicht modifiziert und die Kat. Lueger in Category:Lexikon der gesamten Technik by Otto Lueger umzubenennen angetragen. Diskussion war keine, bis jetzt, Servas Boerl2 (talk) 09:35, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Wenn Ihr so lange Kategorienamen mögt, dann macht ruhig. Zu der Zeit als die Kategorie entstand waren halt kurzen KAtegoriennamen wie Category:Viollet-le-Duc in. Ich gebe aber zu, dass die nicht unbedingt selbsterklärend sind. --Kolossos (talk) 17:41, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Yea stimmt eh, aber nur Lexikon der gesamten Technik ist auch verwirrend, oder Lueger's Lexikon ist auch naja. Wenns schon mal umbenannt wird. Die alte cat bleibt natürlich als redirect. --Boerl2 (talk) 21:42, 5 November 2010 (UTC)

Naja jetz ist es in Category:Images from Lexikon der gesamten Technik by Otto Lueger umbenannt worden, wie User:ŠJů es ursprünglich vorgeschlagen hat. Trotzdem, der Link auf der Seite user:Kolossos ist noch alt, weiss nicht warum, kommt vielleicht noch. Richtiger Redirekt geht offenbar nicht, nur -bad name-.. naja--Boerl2 (talk) 15:47, 8 November 2010 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

  — Jeff G. ツ 03:41, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:Dresden-Landtag-of-Saxony2.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments (de:) starke Helligkeitskontraste gut umgesetzt Google-Translation: strong brightness contrasts well implemented --Ralf Roletschek 23:18, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

File:Dresden-Freiberger-Arena.jpg

File:Dresden-Freiberger-Arena.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

SBB Dresden (talk) 12:26, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Manche Löschanträge sind einfach nur lächerlich. Aber sie bringen Schätzchen zu Tage :-) Kaum nominiert, schon "Promotion". Gratulation, saubere Arbeit! --Ralf Roletschek (talk) 20:49, 1 February 2011 (UTC)

Na solchen Anträgen kann man ja zumindest gelassen entgegen sehen. Wenigstens weiss ich jetzt, dass ich mal bei Gelegenheit ein aktuelles Bild machen kann. --Kolossos (talk) 22:50, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Suche in einer Kategorie unter Ausschluss einer anderen

Hallo Kolossos,

ich habe versucht Ausschnitte der Karte Petris von 1759 vollständig in Category:Map of Kurfüstentum Sachsen (Petri 1759) zu kategorisieren. Hier finden sich jetzt 47 Dateien wieder. Im SLUB-Katalog finden sich aber 49 Karten unter dem Namen "Petri". Ist es möglich die Category:Old maps of Germany from the Deutsche Fotothek unter Ausschluss der Dateien, die zudem in der Category:Map of Kurfüstentum Sachsen (Petri 1759) eingetragen sind nach "Petri" zu durchsuchen? Ich würde so gern sicher gehen, dass ich keine Datei in der Cat vergessen habe. Lieben Gruß, WikiAnika (talk) 10:56, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Sorry, aber da werd ich dir nicht weiter helfen können. LG --Kolossos (talk) 22:47, 3 February 2011 (UTC)

Wiki Loves Monuments 2011 has finished

Dear Kolossos, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments and sharing your pictures with the whole world. You are very welcome to keep uploading images, even though you can't win prizes any longer. To get started on editing relevant Wikipedia articles, click here for more information and help. You can find all uploaded pictures in our central media collection Wikimedia Commons. Many photos are already used in Wikipedia. The contest was very successful with more than 165,000 images submitted throughout Europe. To make future contests even more successful, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in this survey. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by Lucia Bot in 22:46, 17 October 2011 (UTC)

Removed coordinates in commons-on-osm

Hi, Kolossos. Thanks for http://toolserver.org/~kolossos/openlayers/commons-on-osm.php. Maybe it would be faster — or at least cleaner — if it didn’t store long‐ungeocoded objects, like File:WLANL - arts of akki - Zonnebloemen, Vincent van Gogh, 1889.jpg (ungeocoded in June 2010) and some others, which you can see when visiting the page without any coordinates (also for some reason that 0,0 point is called South Pole — old tiles, I guess). --AVRS (talk) 22:00, 19 November 2011 (UTC)

Please ask this question User:Para. He handle all the data at http://toolserver.org/~para/GeoCommons/ . I only include his layer on a OSM-map. --Kolossos (talk) 08:47, 20 November 2011 (UTC)

OSM relations, ways and so one

Hello, since the WMF have their own servers, do you think that it could be possible to get the link of the nodes, ways or relations ? Like this one in order to have the better view of the subject ? Could we also have a bot which search on the OSM servers (of WMF) the key wikipedia ? And compare the coordinates of the object with the GPS coordinates ? Thanks for your attention Otourly (talk) 18:24, 22 November 2011 (UTC)

I work together with User:Master to use the Wikipedia-Key to embed OSM-Objects in our OSM-map. This should work without any change in Wikipedia. See: Principle of work. I will keep you I mind and give you a message if first tests are available.

Links to an OSM-ID's seems not a good idea, because they are not stable.

I hope that the New Wikidata project will be successful so that we would have a central place to save links/queries to OSM. --Kolossos (talk) 18:30, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

I imagined that OSM-ID's could change (if someone destroy an element and re-create it after). But I didn't think that it could be really unstable. As I understand you will have the same result by parsing the OSM's tag called wikipedia than the idea I write. Ok that's seems great ! Otourly (talk) 17:07, 28 November 2011 (UTC)

The Problem is that you start with a simple street with one osm-ID. Later somebody detect that there is a little brigde on this street and he split the street so that you have 3 OSM-IDs. Also other edits makes it necessary to split ways e.g. different speed-limits / different surface on parts of the street. So it's not a good idea. --Kolossos (talk) 22:07, 29 November 2011 (UTC)

Ok I will follow your work with interest :) Otourly (talk) 18:43, 30 November 2011 (UTC)

For your information : Template_talk:Location#Add_an_optionnal_parameter_for_OpenStreetMap (it's currently based and ways nodes and so one, I know it's not the good way but it's a start. I assume a Bot could upgrate them all easily after. Otourly (talk) 20:04, 1 December 2011 (UTC)

Wikilovesmonuments and OSM

Hello Kolossos, I would like to know if you want give a hand for help chapter to get map of monuments ? The roblem is that in Italy, there is no free lists of monuments available... So WMit is thinking to use the informations on OSM. Otourly (talk) 17:35, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

Sorry, I'm too busy in the moment for that. --Kolossos (talk) 20:45, 13 March 2012 (UTC)

File:WIWOSM-screenshot2.png

---

There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it please read the text above again and follow the links in it, if you still need help ask at the ? → Commons:Help desk in any language you like to use. --Nikbot 20:39, 15 March 2012 (UTC)

Frage zu einem Bild

Hallo, ich möchte gerne ein Bild von Dir kommerziell nutzen. Die Nutzungsbedingungen, die Du eingestellt hast, sind sehr komplex für mich. Bitte melde Dich unter: gesa.groening@hwl-agentur.de

Vielen Dank!

Notification about possible deletion

Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry. If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

House (talk) 04:22, 22 April 2012 (UTC)

Permission request to use one of your pictures in a textbook

I would like to include your picture of the Zwinger tower in a textbook.This would be printed at about 5 cm high and credited to your name or any other information (location, URL, whatever) you would like to add in the legend immediately below. I can also be contacted at thechabon AxT hotmail DxOxT com.

Iiiiaaaa (talk) 16:19, 14 May 2012 (UTC)

Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Dresden-Jordanstraße-gp.jpg

Hello,

I nominated yor picture. An English description might be useful. Regards, Yann (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

PS: I am trying to understand File:WIWOSM-map-12,30,50,65.png, but there is not much description. Could you add more? Thanks, Yann (talk) 10:10, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

For the WIWOSM Project I hope to present in near future a zoomable map layer to show all WIWOSM objects, it seeems useful to get an overview about the project activities in different countries and find missing objects. The map should also document the porject growth over the years. --Kolossos (talk) 08:14, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

---

Thank you for participating in Wiki Loves Monuments 2012! Dear Kolossos, Thank you for contributing to Wiki Loves Monuments 2012, and for sharing your pictures with the whole world! Thanks to the participation of people like you, the contest gathered more than 350,000 pictures of cultural heritage objects from 36 countries around the world, becoming the largest photography competition to have ever taken place. You can find all your pictures in your upload log, and are of course very welcome to keep uploading images and help develop Wikimedia Commons, even though you will not be able to win more prizes (just yet). If you'd like to start editing relevant Wikipedia articles and share your knowledge with other people, please go to the Wikipedia Welcome page for more information, guidance, and help. To make future contests even more successful than this year, we would like to invite you to share your experiences with us in a short survey. Please fill in this short survey in your own language, and help us learn what you liked and didn't like about Wiki Loves Monuments 2012. Kind regards, the Wiki Loves Monuments team

Message delivered by the Wiki Loves Monuments 2012 notification system on 12:58, 27 October 2012 (UTC)

File:Krefeld Wappen.svg

File:Krefeld Wappen.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!

-- ΠЄΡΉΛΙΟ 00:20, 13 December 2012 (UTC)

My camera is now a Sony SLT-A55V

Wann beginnt now ?. Kanns'de das mal mit hinschreim ? Wäre nett, Vielen Dank. SabS 92.225.77.105 01:01, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

File:Ebstorfer-stich2.jpg is in public domain

Hello,

A public domain review of File:Ebstorfer-stich2.jpg showed this file is a scan of a document in public domain.

The technical operation to merge pictures is a technical operation not opening new copyrights.

New licensing information tags:

This is a faithful photographic reproduction of an original two-dimensional work of art. The work of art itself is in the public domain for the following reason: This work is in the public domain in the United States, and those countries with a copyright term of life of the author plus 100 years or less. This file has been identified as being free of known restrictions under copyright law, including all related and neighboring rights. The official position taken by the Wikimedia Foundation is that "faithful reproductions of two-dimensional public domain works of art are public domain, and that claims to the contrary represent an assault on the very concept of a public domain". For details, see Commons:When to use the PD-Art tag. This photographic reproduction is therefore also considered to be in the public domain. Please be aware that depending on local laws, re-use of this content may be prohibited or restricted in your jurisdiction. See Commons:Reuse of PD-Art photographs.

(diff)

Note: someone already previously replaced the original open sources licenses by a {{PD-Old}}. --Dereckson (talk) 19:25, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Sharemap reponse

Answer on the discussion page

--Jkan997 (talk) 16:08, 1 June 2013 (UTC)

ShareMap update

Next answer on the discussion page

--Jkan997 (talk) 14:19, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! File:ILA-Pitotrohr.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates‎. Comments Good quality. --Dirtsc 21:20, 5 June 2013 (UTC)

ShareMap answer 3

Next answer on the discussion page

--Jkan997 (talk) 12:42, 10 June 2013 (UTC)