User talk:Andrey Korzun

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Kor!An)
Jump to: navigation, search

Archive 1

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rosa 'Bernstein Rose' 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Bernstein Rose' 04.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rosa 'Gelber Engel' 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Gelber Engel' 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rosa 'Manou Meilland' 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Manou Meilland' 02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rosa 'Pullman Orient Express' 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Pullman Orient Express' 02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rosa 'Hot Cocoa' 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Hot Cocoa' 02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rosa 'Golden Monica' 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Golden Monica' 02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rosa 'Belvedere' 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Belvedere' 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rosa 'Hansestadt Rostock' 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Hansestadt Rostock' 03.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Geranium magnificum 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geranium magnificum 04.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rosa 'Belvedere' 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Belvedere' 02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Syringa 'Ami Schott' 11.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Syringa 'Ami Schott' 11.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Syringa 'Gastello' 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Syringa 'Gastello' 03.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Anemone nemorosa cv. 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anemone nemorosa cv. 02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Inula magnifica 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Inula magnifica 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tulip double cv.02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulip double cv.02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Tulip cv. 34.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulip cv. 34.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Iris 'Superstition' 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iris 'Superstition' 04.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Iris 'Different World' 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iris 'Different World' 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Autopatrol given[edit]

Commons Autopatrolled.svg

Hello. I just wanted to let you know that I have granted autopatrol rights to your account; the reason for this is that I believe you are sufficiently trustworthy and experienced to have your contributions automatically sighted. This will have no effect on your editing, and is simply intended to help users watching Recent changes or Recent uploads to find unproductive edits amidst the productive ones. Thank you.--Steinsplitter (talk) 08:28, 19 June 2013 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lilium 'Trade Winds' 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lilium 'Trade Winds' 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Iris 'Songbird' 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iris 'Songbird' 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tulip cv. 04.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulip cv. 04.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Iris 'Vladimir Vysotsky' 02.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iris 'Vladimir Vysotsky' 02.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rosa 'Petit Trianon' 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Petit Trianon' 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Iris 'Filkina Gramota' 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iris 'Filkina Gramota' 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Lilium 'Faina' 05.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lilium 'Faina' 05.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Aquilegia cv. 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Aquilegia cv. 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Astilbe 'Rheinland' 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Astilbe 'Rheinland' 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Filipendula rubra 'Venusta' 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Filipendula rubra 'Venusta' 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Syringa 'Esther Staley' 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Syringa 'Esther Staley' 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Paeonia 'Voskhod' 11.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paeonia 'Voskhod' 11.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rosa 'Sunstar' 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Sunstar' 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rhododendron cv. 021.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhododendron cv. 021.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Anemone nemorosa cv. 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Anemone nemorosa cv. 03.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Iris 'Mesmerizer' 01.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iris 'Mesmerizer' 01.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Iris 'Celestial Flame' 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Iris 'Celestial Flame' 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rosa 'Esmeralda' 01.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Esmeralda' 01.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Lilium 'Nochka' 02.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lilium 'Nochka' 02.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Rosa 'Midsummer' 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rosa 'Midsummer' 03.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Tulip lily-flowered cv. 107.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tulip lily-flowered cv. 107.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Paeonia 'Eleanor' 11.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Paeonia 'Eleanor' 11.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Rhododendron 'Concina' 03.JPG
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhododendron 'Concina' 03.JPG, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Фото из Московского зоопарка[edit]

Здравствуйте, коллега! Возник не большой вопрос, точнее даже несколько. 1. Правильно ли я понял, что эта фотка жирафа со старой территории (Дом жирафа)? 2. Нет ли у вас еще фотографий этого жирафа (я создал для него отдельную категорию на складе)? 3. Нет ли у вас фотографий помоста, который сегодня обрушился, желательно с людьми на нем (обвалившийся я сегодня заснял)? --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 18:53, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Приветствую. Вынужден огорчить: 1. Фото сделано на новой территории. 2. Жирафа на старой территории мне не нравилось фотографировать. 3. О существовании помоста узнал от вас только что, естественно, я не мог его сфотографировать — в этом году мы ещё ни разу не выбирались в зоопарк. Сожалею, что ничем не могу помочь. --Kor!An (talk) 19:19, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
Спасибо за информацию! --Dmitry Rozhkov (talk) 19:24, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

категоризация[edit]

Внимательней, пожалуйста. Например, через Category:Portraits of Russia by model‎ казаки, крестьяне и купцы и так уже в "art" попадают. --Shakko (talk) 08:37, 24 October 2014 (UTC)

Но через эту надкатегорию они не попадают в Category:Russian people in art, и не могут попасть. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 12:04, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
Category:National costumes of Russia невозможно включить в Category:Russian folk art, поэтому категории друг друга не дублируют. И Category:Russian costumes in VMDPNI безусловно, нужна в Category:Russian costumes, если таковая не нарушает правил проекта. Спасибо за внимание к моим правкам. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 12:04, 24 October 2014 (UTC)
сейчас именно что дублируют по содержанию. Если вы имеете в виду, что на самом деле это - National costumes of Russian Federation, или Russian Empire - то нет, для них нужны отдельные категории. А это надо слить, и сделать редирект, потому что речь идет именно о конкретном этносе.
нарушает не правила, а систему. Потому что она часть National costumes of Russia in museums, и там в других музеях - тоже русские костюмы. Но это глобальный вопрос, см. п1.--Shakko (talk) 21:26, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
ОК, мне в общем-то безразлично, как именно будет называться категория для русских костюмов, главное, чтобы она могла быть включена в Category:Russian folk art, и ее название не стало бы тому помехой. А проблема понимания "National costumes of Russia" объективно существует, см. реплику на Category talk:Russian costumes. Вероятно, на странице категории Category:National costumes of Russia не обойтись без каких-то разъяснений, какие файлы следует включать в нее, а какие в Category:National costumes of nations of Russian Federation. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 21:51, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Картмаксимум - Боевые самолёты А.И. Покрышкина, МИГ-3, весна 1942 г.jpg[edit]

  • Не понимаю, что не так? Файл оформлен по аналогии с уже существующими аналогичными на странице Картмаксимум, например этим Файл:USSR._Kartmaximum.1982.jpg или этим File:Kartmaximum.jpg. Это отсканированная работа. Оригинал имеется. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Александр С. Басаргин (talk • contribs)
    К сожалению, скан картмаксимума не является свободным изображением. Картмаксимум состоит из 3-х элементов: марки, штемпеля и карточки. Если с первыми двумя вопросов нет - это знаки почтовой оплаты, которые по законам РФ не являются объектами авторских правв, то открытка - это художественная работа, защищённая авторским правом. Изображения, защищённые АП, на викискладе находиться не могут. КМ, на которые вы ссылаетесь, также следует удалить. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 20:40, 20 November 2014 (UTC)
    Приведите пожалуйста пруф линк, из которого следует, что вот это изображение (знак почтовой оплаты, дизайнер Поварихин А.) не является объектом авторских прав № 1891, а вот это изображение (конверт первого дня, дизайнер Поварихин А.) является объектом авторских прав № 1811, или же вот это изображение (художественная маркированная открытка, дизайнер Волкова Ю.) является объектом авторских прав № 2014-193/5. --Александр С. Басаргин (talk) 02:23, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
    Также поясните пожалуйста из чего следует, что вот этот файл Картмаксимум «Малый пёстрый дятел» должен быть удалён, а вот этот файл, использованный в той же самой статье о которой шла речь выше, не должен быть удалён USSR. Картмаксимум «Грузовой электровоз ВЛ80» --Александр С. Басаргин (talk)
    Я все свои аргументы изложил, повторяться не буду. Сканы картмаксимумов, КПД, немаркированных конвертов (даже с наклеенными марками) из викисклада, насколько я помню, уже удалялись неоднократно по причине нарушения копирайта (пример обсуждения). КМ с электровозом размещен в ру-вики, не на викискладе. Тем не менее отмечу, что у этого файла ошибочная лицензия и он не свободен. Если бы он был здесь на викискладе, я бы также его номинировал на удаление. Pictogram voting comment.svg Comment А было бы здорово: наклеил любую советскую/российскую марку на любую защищённую авторским правом открытку - и все: получилось свободное изображение. Вам не кажется такое предположение абсурдным? --Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:08, 25 November 2014 (UTC)
    Нет, не кажется. Мне необходимо знать подробности потому, как если вы поудаляете все изображения картмаксимумов, то русская Википедия останется без внятной демонстрации КМ. У меня есть изображения, которые я делал самостоятельно. Есть также изображения, основанные на репродукции картин. Соответственно хочется знать - могу ли я их разместить взамен удалённых? --Александр С. Басаргин (talk)
    Во-первых, удаляю не я а администраторы в соответствии с правилами. Во-вторых, внятная демонстрация КМ возможна на примере некоторых советских КМ. Навскидку, назову выпуски КМ к сериям марок с репродукциями картин Васильева (1975), Айвазовского (1974), Репина (1969), эрмитажные серии 1982-85 гг. и т.п. Все эти КМ есть у меня в коллекции, однако заниматься сканированием всего этого нет времени. То есть если на открытке репродукция произведения, на которое явно истек срок охраны авторских прав - тогда скан картмаксимума может быть загружен на викисклад без проблем. За другие КМ не поручусь. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 18:26, 26 November 2014 (UTC)
    Обнаружил в своих архивах сканы нескольких картмаксимумов, два из них точно соответствуют политике викисклада (т.е. они не защищены авторским правом). Может быть, пригодятся для иллюстрирования статей в википедии, пока не найдутся другие КМ. На первом - фото Ленина, сделанное в 1919 году; автор умер в 1920-е годы, т.е. со дня его смерти прошло более 70 лет. На втором воспроизведен проект первой российской почтовой марки (1856), а изображения марок Российской империи находятся в общественном достоянии.
    File:1968 USSR Maximum Card Lenin 1919 01front.jpg
    File:2008 Russia Maximum Card 150th anniversary of first Russian postal stamp.jpg --Andrey Korzun (talk) 23:17, 27 November 2014 (UTC)
    Здорово, спасибо! Я тоже на этих выходных собирался заняться приведением статьи в порядок, спасибо за фото. --Александр С. Басаргин (talk) 20:16, 28 November 2014 (UTC)
    Нашелся еще один подходящий File:2009 Russia Maximum Card Nikolai Gogol 01(front).jpg --Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:09, 28 November 2014 (UTC)

File:Пенязівка IMG 3866 01.jpg[edit]

Здравствуйте, Андрей!

Вот такая вот лилия. Сфотографирована в Черниговской области. Может поскажете, какой єто вид? Тут главное для меня - КУДА ее отнести? В какую категорию? У нас таких полно. Т.е., єто или дикий вид, или полудикий, или что-то одичавшее... Есть и в Черниговской, и в Киевской, у нас она растет повсеместно... Почти как трава - в Чернигове в нашем районе возле каждого подьезда! ;-0 А вот как она назьівается? К сожалению, не биолог и не ботаник, потому и такие трудности... Может, єто какой местньій сорт, продается в магазине... О! Надо сходить! :-) В любом случае буду рад ответу. С уважением, --Nickispeaki (talk) 01:11, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Похоже на Hemerocallis fulva. Оно? --Nickispeaki (talk) 01:26, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Приветствую! Безусловно, это не лилия, а лилейник (hemerocallis), скорее всего, вы правы, очень похож на Hemerocallis fulva. Я тоже не ботаник, поэтому не могу судить как эксперт. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 09:01, 12 January 2015 (UTC)

Редкие марки[edit]

Здравствуйтеǃ Как я понял, у вас есть коллекция советских марок. Я разыскиваю сканы очень редких марок СССР, которые не поступали в продажу, для размещения их на Складе. Вот пример такой марки со Складаː File:The Soviet Union 1937 CPA 550H Liapine H69 stamp (Embassy of the USA) imperf.jpg. Их описание я видел только в каталоге Ляпина, их номера начинаются с Н. Эта марка без зубцов и скан малого разрешения. Нет ли у вас подобных марок? --Matsievsky (talk) 23:02, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Сожалею, ничем не могу вам помочь. Хочу обратить ваше внимание на то, что не выпущенные в официальное почтовое обращение марки не могут считаться официальными знаками почтовой оплаты, и на них {{PD-RU-exempt}} не распространяется. Другими словами, рисунок таких марок может быть защищен авторским правом, и их сканы могут быть удалены. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 08:15, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Спасибо за информацию. А кому тогда может принадлежать авторское право на эти марки? Возможно, особенно старые марки уже имеют свободную лицензию. --Matsievsky (talk) 11:52, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
Видимо, наследникам авторов — художников проектов марок. В РФ, Евросоюзе, США и многих других странах мира имущественные авторские права действуют в течение жизни автора +70 лет после его смерти. После чего произведение переходит в общественное достояние. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 22:18, 21 January 2015 (UTC)
А в вашей коллекции марок нет марок с меловой сеткой? --Matsievsky (talk) 12:41, 24 January 2015 (UTC)
Нет. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 15:53, 24 January 2015 (UTC)

Category rename[edit]

You have renamed several postal cover categories to be now use a narrow term envelopes instead of the encompassing term covers. This is a highly controversial change and there should have been a discussion that specifically included philatelists. Unfortunately you don't seem to understand the philatelic term covers which includes postcards, postal stationery, wrappers, etc., not just envelopes. By making the change to envelopes you are excluding several covers which will now require new categories that the term covers would be entirely unnecessary. Please revert all these changes. Ww2censor (talk) 10:27, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you to pay attention. Maybe there is a problem. I do not want to argue or insist. I'm just presenting its case. I proceeded from the actual content categories. These categories contained only images of envelopes. There were no images of cards, postal stationery, postcards and more. For other objects there are other category. See for example the category Postal cards by subject. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 15:50, 4 May 2015 (UTC)

Anna Akhmatova[edit]

Добрый день. Благодарю за Ваше послание. Можете ли Вы объяснить, каким является мотив этой отмены? Спасибо заранее. Thomon 11:20 1 June 2015 (UTC)

File:Plaque Anna Akhmatova.JPG

Причину я указал Commons:Deletion requests/Files in Category:Anna Akhmatova Plaques in Saint Petersburg. Мемориальная доска является объектом авторского права, в России ограничена свобода панорамы (см. COM:FOP#Russia), поэтому для размещения фотографий нужно разрешение автора мемориальной доски. --Andrey Korzun (talk) 17:56, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Удаление фотографий[edit]

Felixgor[edit]

Зачем удалять всю фотографию (Felixgor 0001.jpg), если такие фото запрещены только в России? Почему нельзя оставить фотографию на страницах, созданных для других стран/на других языках ?