User talk:Kuebi

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search

Hallo Kuebi,
Schuldigung wenn ich störe hab schon bei wikipedia meine frage reingestelt und weil ich glaube ich hier ist es besser und ich meine alte E-mail Adresse angegeben habe, schreibe ich sie hier nochmal rein.
Thema: ich wollte fragen ob ich handballbilder die du reingestellt hast für meine HTML Seite benutzen könnte natürlich mit lin zu deiner Seite und "Hersteller"
E-Mail: torben_b@t-online.de
mfg
Torben


Hallo Kuebi,

wir würden gern eines Ihrer Fotos in einem unserer Schulbücher verwenden. Würden Sie sich deswegen bitte einfach per Email bei mir melden? Nähere Informationen folgen natürlich dann gern!

Danke und viele Grüße Christin Sperling

christin.sperling@westermann.de 0531-708 349


Welcome to the Commons, Kuebi!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−
Crystal Clear app korganizer.png First steps tutorial

Our first steps help file and our FAQ will help you a lot after registration. They explain how to customize the interface (for example the language), how to upload files and our basic licensing policy. You don't need technical skills in order to contribute here. Be bold contributing here and assume good faith for the intentions of others. This is a wiki - it is really easy.

Icon apps query.svg Getting help

More information is available at the Community Portal. You may ask questions at the Help desk, Village Pump or on IRC channel #wikimedia-commons. You can also contact an administrator on their talk page. If you have a specific copyright question, ask at Commons talk:Licensing.

Transmission icon.png Goodies, tips and tricks
  • Put Babel boxes on your user page so others know what languages you can speak and indicate your Graphics abilities.
  • All your uploads are stored in your personal Gallery
  • Please sign your name on Talk pages by typing ~~~~
  • Use the CommonSense tool to find good categories for your files (then other people can find them too!)
  • To link to an image page, write this: [[:Image:Foo.jpg]], it makes this: Image:Foo.jpg
  • If you're copying files from another project, be sure to use the CommonsHelper
Nuvola filesystems trashcan full.png Made a mistake?
  • Did you want to rename or move a file? Simply upload the file again and mark the old one like this: {{bad name|Correct name}}
  • For more information read the full Deletion guidelines
(P.S. Would you like to provide feedback on this message?)

Yann 14:18, 27 January 2007 (UTC)

Contents

Image:Peter_Schoeffer_01.jpg[edit]

català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | français | galego | עברית | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | lietuvių | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | русский | slovenčina | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/− Hello, and thank your for sharing your files with Commons. There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. Please remember that all uploads require source, author and license information. Could you please resolve these problems, which are described on the page linked in above? Thank you. --Siebrand 12:48, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

Just forgot to add the GDFL license information.--Kuebi 12:53, 9 June 2007 (UTC)

www.best4sports.de[edit]

Hi, if this is your website, could you put a cc-by notice on the website? Otherwise, we can't establish that you are indeed the owner of this website and it's not a copyright violation. Thanks. Patstuart 18:30, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes, I'm the owner of the website. But why do I need to label a cc-by notice on my website? I already label the pictures here as my own work and select the right GDFL label for the pictures in the commons. --Kuebi 18:54, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Because we get a lot of people claiming to own a photograph that's not theirs. ;) Not that we don't believe you, but we need to go through with the procedure; it's important to establish coypright. Please see Template:Image permission for alternate methods of confirmation. Patstuart 19:05, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
You can already find my name at the homepage of this website http://www.best4sports.de/ which is the same name as I add it to the Author field in my uploaded images. Should I add a notice on this site like: Some of these pictures are also uploaded and published at http://commons.wikimedia.org. I confirm to be the author.--Kuebi 19:16, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Yes, that would work. Some of these pictures I have also uploaded and published at http://commons.wikimedia.org. I confirm to be the author.. Patstuart 21:13, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
O.k., I've added your text proposal to the website. Best regards --Kuebi 07:40, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Uups, just saw: It was my text proposal. --Kuebi 07:41, 21 October 2007 (UTC)
Thank you. That should be sufficient. Patstuart 18:49, 22 October 2007 (UTC)

Gregor Gysi[edit]

Hello Kuebi, I just wanted to let you know that I am going to use your picture of GG for my next test in translation (Swedish/German) at Uppsala university where I teach. The test i about Doris Lessing, the Nobel Prize and the relationship between her and Gregor. Thank you for the picture! Normally I contribute to the German WP where I am Benutzer:Elchjagd. Best wishes from Petra, 217.208.28.40 07:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

Hello Petra, It's a pleasure form me, that you're using this picture. That's the reason why I provide such pictures to this community. Best regards from Germany --Kuebi 15:40, 21 November 2007 (UTC)


Photo der Churburg[edit]

Hallo Kuebi,

Du hast im Schlanders Artikel der enWP ein Photo der Churburg eiungestellt. Die Churburg ist aber nicht in Schlanders (die Burg dort heißt Schlandersburg) sondern in Schluderns, etwa 15 Kilometer Etschaufwärts. Ich habe mir daher erlaubt, das falsche Photo durch ein reales Schlandersphoto zu ersetzen.

Servus,

--Erwin Lindemann 16:57, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

Hallo Erwin,

Danke für den Hinweis und weiter viel Glück im Lotto ;-).

Mit weihnachtlichen Grüßen

--Kuebi 22:40, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

STOP![edit]

das scheint n Vorlagenfehler bei dir zu sein. __ ABF __ ϑ 19:14, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

Stimmt! Danke für den Hinweis, sonst hätte ich das 24x falsch kopiert! Gruß --Kuebi 19:16, 14 January 2008 (UTC)


Image:Karina Kuzumi 01.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Karina Kuzumi 01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!

Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--84.59.233.207 21:18, 13 May 2008 (UTC)

Hallo Armin! ich bin atsu. Ich weiss schon das Du schon die loeschantrag geschtellt hast, aber Frau Kuzumi hat mitgeteilt, dass einige image bleibt immer noch. Scheinber ist die Loeschantrag nicht vollstaendig. Koenntest Du darum nochmal kuemmern? Danke im Voraus wieder und Gruesse, Atsu.

Hallo Atsu, ich habe nochmals um die Löschung gebeten. Ich dachte eigentlich es wäre schon weg. Gruß --Kuebi 15:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC)

Mendelian genetics[edit]

Gutentag,

could you make English versions of your illustrations on dominant / recessive inheritance? I'd love to use them on the English Wikipedia. Alternatively, you could make language-neutral versions.

Vielen dank,

--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 21:12, 2 June 2008 (UTC)

Hello Steven, I'll try to do it until my summer vacation which will take place end of this month. Greetings --Kuebi 15:42, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Inheritance[edit]

Hi Kuebi,

Some changes and suggestions:

Image:Autorecessive en 01.png :

  • Title: autosomal recessive
  • Bottom: UnAffected son

Image:Autodominant en 01.png

  • UnAffected mother
  • UnAffected son and unaffected daughter
  • Probabilities: 1:2

cheers, --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 21:54, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for your feedback. I'll upload the corrected version soon. --Kuebi 05:55, 9 June 2008 (UTC)
Hi Steven, I just uploaded the corrected versions. --Kuebi (talk) 17:36, 12 June 2008 (UTC)


Image:Paul_Ehrlich_Arbeitszimmer.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Paul_Ehrlich_Arbeitszimmer.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

ChrisiPK (Talk|Contribs) 22:39, 16 September 2008 (UTC)


Image:Troll_01.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Troll_01.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 13:43, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


Image:Troll_02.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Troll_02.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 14:02, 26 October 2008 (UTC)


Image:Troll_03.jpg[edit]

Image deletion warning Image:Troll_03.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this image, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
In all cases, please do not take the deletion request personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Teofilo (talk) 14:07, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Comment to all three files:

No Freedom of Panorama (FoP) in Norway. Strange, but law. --Kuebi (talk) 15:32, 26 October 2008 (UTC)

Are you copyright holder of NudeMouse.JPG?[edit]

You took image that I uploaded into en.Wiki, changed it licence and uploaded it under new name into commons claiming that you are copyright holder of the image. If you are truly copyright holder, that is not a problem and totally cool. But how come then you are not mentioned on "Authors" and not credited in original article that was a source for original upload? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Image:NudeMouse.JPG http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Image:NudeMouse.JPG TestPilot (talk) 15:28, 31 October 2008 (UTC)

Please read carefully the image´s description [1]: I'm not the author. The real authors are listed, as well as the source of the image. The image is published under Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0 which is the same license as the original publication. --Kuebi (talk) 15:53, 31 October 2008 (UTC)
The description say "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it". So you claiming that you are the "copyright holder". If you don't owe copyright for that image - then statement should be removed. Second, what was the reason you have changed PLoS ONE licence from "Creative Commons Attribution 2.5" into "Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike 3.0"? You can clearly see licence using doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0000093 and even in pubmedcentral copy they say nothing about ShareAlike. Why you claim that image under SA, and therefore could be freely modified/derivative works allowed? TestPilot (talk) 14:16, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
When I have to select the license type, I can just select Creative Commons CC-BY-SA-3.0 as the closest license to Creative Commons Attribution 2.5, which I can not select. And why does this strange Wikimedia system replace the selected license with a text I, the copyright holder of this work, which I've not selected? How can I upload a file in a way where I could select Creative Commons Attribution 2.5 without the wrong text replacement?
Meanwhile I found the solution with manual editing to the right license. I just did it for this file. --Kuebi (talk) 16:34, 1 November 2008 (UTC)
To remove copyright claim you need to remove self| from {{self|cc-by-sa-2.5}}. Furthermore, since PLoS license do not allow any image modifications, it should be {{cc-by-2.5}} instead of {{cc-by-sa-2.5}}. I have corrected that. Anyway, other images of nude mouse you have uploaded are way better than this one - and thank you for that. My point was more like we should be careful when citing license information - it could be very misleading and harmful to guys out there who want to reuse images. TestPilot (talk) 17:38, 3 November 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for your corrections. Any you are right, the newer pictures I made by myself, are better than this one. Also the mouse was alive... . Best regards --Kuebi (talk) 17:54, 3 November 2008 (UTC)

Please link images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello Kuebi!

Thank you for providing images to Wikimedia Commons. Please keep in mind that images uploaded to Commons should be useful to all users of Wikimedia projects. This is possible only if the images can be found by other people.

To allow others to find the images you uploaded here, the images should be in some place that can be found by navigating the category structure. This means that you should put the images into appropriate topic pages, categories, optionally galleries, or both of them (see Commons:Categories). To find good categories for your images, the CommonSense tool may help.

You can find a convenient overview of your uploaded files in this gallery.

The important point is that the images should be placed in the general structure somewhere. There are a large number of completely unsorted images on Commons right now. If you would like to help to place some of those images where they can be found, please do!

Thank you. BotMultichillT (talk) 06:07, 4 December 2008 (UTC)

File:Treis Johanneskirche 01.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | Magyar | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Українська | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


There seems to be a problem regarding the description and/or licensing of this particular file. It has been found that you've added in the image's description only a Template that's not a license and although it provides useful information about the image, it's not a valid license. Could you please resolve this problem, adding the license in the image linked above? You can edit the description page and change the text. Uploading a new version of the file does not change the description of the file. This page may give you more hints on which license to choose. Thank you.

This message was added automatically by Nikbot, if you need some help about it, ask its master (Filnik) or go to the Commons:Help desk. --Filnik 10:01, 18 April 2009 (UTC)

Template {{Panoramafreiheit}} obsolet[edit]

Hallo Kuebi, Ich kategorisiere gerade Bilder von Bensheim und sehe, dass du Bilder von dir mit dem Template {{Panoramafreiheit}} versehen hast. Das ist in dem Fall von Photos von alten Gebäuden obsolet. Es gilt nur für abphotographierte Hinweistafeln im öffentlichen Raum und sowas. Gruss, --anro (talk) 21:45, 20 June 2009 (UTC)

Hallo anro, Danke für den Hinweis! Grruß --Kuebi (talk) 11:11, 21 June 2009 (UTC)

Postnatal GAD67 and EGAD[edit]

Hello! I've uploaded the image:

You seem to have cropped one picture from that earlier:

If yes, there are two little mistakes: the brain is not embryonic but postnatal (P1) and you seem to have retouched out the EGAD sign meaning that the marker is not for "full" GAD67 but for GAD25\GAD44 (embryonic forms). Best regards, --CopperKettle (talk) 09:27, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

Hello CopperKettle, Thank you for this remarks. I'll correct ist a.s.a.p.. Best regards --Kuebi (talk) 10:13, 24 August 2009 (UTC)

FYI[edit]

I posted a query about your tag here: Commons:Administrators' noticeboard#Copacetic.

Cheers Evrik (talk) 15:36, 24 September 2009 (UTC)

Datei:Kritische_Blende_01.png[edit]

Hallo, ich guck grad ein paar Fotoartikel durch. Eine Frage zu deinem Bild Datei:Kritische_Blende_01.png: Hast du für den Beugungsunschärfeverlauf irgend eine Quelle? Hängt diese nicht auch von der Lamellenanzahl ab? Und evtl. auch vom Verhältnis Objektabstand - Brennweite (davon hängt ja auch die Schärfentiefe ab)?

Das Bild Datei:Lwph_vers_f_number.png von Dir hat ne andere y-Skalierung. Unter LW/PH kann ich mir nix mehr vorstellen.--91.65.140.171 00:19, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Hi, die Grafik ist schon etwas älter. Vorlage war eine Abbildung aus einem Buch. Frag mich aber nicht welches. LW/PH bedeutet Line Widths/Picture Height (siehe auch [2]). Gruß --Kuebi (talk) 06:58, 23 November 2009 (UTC)

Mikropenis Diagramm.png[edit]

Hallo Kuebi, ich habe die Grafik leider eben erst endeckt. Herzlichen Dank für die investierte Arbeit, das Ergebnis kann sich wirklich sehen lassen! Viele Grüße, --Nemissimo (talk) 13:37, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Hi, Du bringst mich auf die Idee dieses Diagramm in den Artikel Penis einzubauen. Da dies einer der am häufigsten aufgerufenen Artikel ist, dürfte dies dann bald das am meisten aufgerufene Diagramm der Wikipedia werden... . Gruß --Kuebi (talk) 13:57, 27 January 2010 (UTC)
Habe gerade gesehen, dass Du schon diese gloreiche Idee hattest. Es passt aber noch besser in Penisverlänerung rein. Da ist es jetzt auch drin. --Kuebi (talk) 14:08, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

. ;-) --Nemissimo (talk) 19:52, 27 January 2010 (UTC)

Ruptur hinteres KB[edit]

Knoecherner Ausriss HKB CT sag.jpg

Hallo Kuebi, hab gesehen, dass Du die Kats bei den Bildern von den KB-Rissen bearbeitet hast. Danke! Aber die englische Bezeichnung sagt "Anterior cruciate ligament injury", was ja für das eine Bild nicht trifft, oder? Grüße --Hellerhoff (talk) 09:31, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Hallo Hellerhoff, ja, das Problem habe ich gesehen. Ich habe das Bild bei ACLI einsortiert, weil es im Artikel Kreuzbandriss mit drin ist. Im Englischen wird besser zwischen ACLI und PCLI getrennt, als im Deutschen (ist halt ein "Kreuzbandriss"), wobei im Englischen injury fast schon synonym mir rupture verwendet wird. Der deutsch Artikel Kreuzbandriss hat sein Pendant in englischsprachigen ACLI. Kannst die Einsortierung wieder rückgängig machen. War halt nur eine Gruppenbildung zum Artikel. Gruß --155.250.129.24 12:09, 9 March 2010 (UTC) Jetzt angemeldet: --Kuebi (talk) 12:10, 9 March 2010 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Energiesparlampe 01a.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Energiesparlampe 01a.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

File:Melanoma SSM.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Melanoma SSM.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

--Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 20:39, 26 April 2010 (UTC)

File:ACLI 05.png[edit]

Pay attention to copyright
File:ACLI 05.png has been marked as a possible copyright violation. Wikimedia Commons only accepts free content—that is, images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Traditional copyright law does not grant these freedoms, and unless noted otherwise, everything you find on the web is copyrighted and not permitted here. For details on what is acceptable, please read Commons:Licensing. You may find Commons:Copyright rules useful. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.

The file you added has been deleted. If you believe that the deletion was not in accordance with policy, you may request undeletion.

Wikimedia Commons takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.


Afrikaans | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Malti | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Svenska | ไทย | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Content on MedlinePlus that is copyrighted includes: the A.D.A.M. Medical Encyclopedia: http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/copyright.html --Raymond 20:55, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Diese sind auch betroffen: File:Arthroscopy 01.png, File:ACLI 02.png, File:ACLI 01.png, File:Meniscus rupture 01.png, File:LCL 01.png, File:MCL 01.png, File:ACLI 07.png, File:ACLI 06.png Raymond 21:03, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

+2 sigma, but -3 sigma?[edit]

Please see File_talk:Mikropenis_Diagramm.png --85.180.140.8 10:37, 2 June 2010 (UTC)

File:Bregenz Festspiele 2009 01.jpg[edit]

{{Autotranslate|1=File:Bregenz Festspiele 2009 01.jpg|base=Copyvionote}}--[[User:Jappalang|Jappalang]] ([[User talk:Jappalang|<span class="signature-talk">talk</span>]]) 22:45, 13 July 2010 (UTC)

Sorry, I failed to note that the sets only exist for their two years at the Bregenz Festival and are in public display at all time in their "life". Jappalang (talk) 05:08, 14 July 2010 (UTC)

File:Jugendschutz Alkohol 01.jpg[edit]

We need a license for this image, in addition to your custom template. User:Zscout370 (Return fire) 05:59, 17 July 2010 (UTC)


Biodiversity Photo - Graphosoma lineatum Hello Mr. Armin Kübelbeck,

My name is Rita Neves.

I work in Câmara Municipal de Lisboa, that is a Public Organism in Portugal. Actually, we are working on a road book of Biodiversity of Lisbon, for which we are going to produce a panel and a brochure. We found your photos on Wikimedia Commons and liked specially one of them very much, so we would like to know if you could allow us to use your photos, for free, to publish on this project, knowing that the brochure of will be for free distribution to everyone.

The photo we would like to use are the following:

Graphosoma lineatum http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Streifenwanze_01.jpg

The brochure will have four brackets. - Broochura a pocket to take the route - A brochure to present the day of inauguration - Schedules for species identification - Panels that will be fixed in the Land As i said the Free Access will be everything :)

If you provide us that photo, we will refer your name in the bibliografy and we need to know what´s the name you want on the bibliography? Armin Kübelbeck ? If it´s possible please respond to rita.neves@cm-lisboa.pt Thank you very much. Our best regards

Rita Neves

Biodiversity Photo - Graphosoma lineatum[edit]

Hello Mr. Armin Kübelbeck,

My name is Rita Neves.

I work in Câmara Municipal de Lisboa, that is a Public Organism in Portugal. Actually, we are working on a road book of Biodiversity of Lisbon, for which we are going to produce a panel and a brochure. We found your photos on Wikimedia Commons and liked specially one of them very much, so we would like to know if you could allow us to use your photos, for free, to publish on this project, knowing that the brochure of will be for free distribution to everyone.

The photo we would like to use are the following:

Graphosoma lineatum http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Streifenwanze_01.jpg

The brochure will have four brackets. - Broochura a pocket to take the route - A brochure to present the day of inauguration - Schedules for species identification - Panels that will be fixed in the Land As i said the Free Access will be everything :)

If you provide us that photo, we will refer your name in the bibliografy and we need to know what´s the name you want on the bibliography? Armin Kübelbeck ? If it´s possible please respond to rita.neves@cm-lisboa.pt Thank you very much. Our best regards

Rita Neves

Image:Vid_Kavticnik_08.jpg[edit]

Ich möchte dir mitteilen, dass dein Bild für "Slika tedna" (Bild der Woche on sl.wikipedia) gewählt wurde. --Miha (talk) 18:33, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

Cool! Danke für den Hinweis und Grüße nach Slowenien. --Kuebi (talk) 20:18, 11 December 2010 (UTC)

File:Gd-DOTA.svg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Gd-DOTA.svg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Leyo 17:34, 17 January 2011 (UTC)

Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie[edit]

Hallo. Ich spreche kein Deutsch. Ich hoffe, diese Übersetzung ist OK. Ich habe bei Kategorie: Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie" gesucht, und ich möchte Sie fragen, ob es möglich ist, ein Bild von dem Cover der ersten Ausgabe dieser Zeitschrift zu erhalten? (English: Hello. I do not speak German. I hope this translation is OK. I have been looking at "Category:Zeitschrift für Physikalische Chemie", and I want to ask you if it is possible to obtain an image of the cover of the first issue of that journal?). Dankeschön. Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 15:40, 13 February 2011 (UTC)

Dear Carcharoth (Commons), I´ve to check if the front page already exists. I´ve access to the first volume, but I´m not sure if the front page is in that hardcover. I´ll check it. Best regards --Kuebi (talk) 07:25, 18 February 2011 (UTC)
Thank-you! I hope you have success! Carcharoth (Commons) (talk) 03:03, 22 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Fractional_kill_02.svg[edit]

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Fractional_kill_02.svg Hallo Kübi, dieses Bild ist aus einem Lehrbuch, das könnte rechtlich schwierig sein, da das Bild bis auf den Farbgradient praktisch 100% dem Bild entspricht was im Lehrbuch abgebildet ist. dies ist allerdings ein Fehler der Quelle auf die du verweist. Du solltest vielleicht besser auf das Lehrbuch verweisen, dann ist es wahrscheinlich in ORdnung, kenne mich aber mit so rechtlichen Dingen nicht aus... Siehe: Aktories, Klaus; Ulrich Förstermann, Franz Hofmann, Klaus Starke () Allgemeine und spezielle Pharmakologie und Toxikologie (10th ed.), München ; Jena: Elsevier, Urban & Fischer ISBN: 978-3-437-42522-6. Seite 936. --Triple5 (talk) 09:39, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

Hallo Triple5, solch einfachen Diagramme haben keine schöpferische Höhe. Ich werde aber die Ergänzung mit der Quelle vornehmen. Gruß --Kuebi (talk) 16:47, 24 February 2011 (UTC)

File:Ramsauer, Merkel, von und zu Guttenberg.jpg[edit]

also zum Zeitpunkt des Fotos trug der den Titel, oder? -- 92.226.131.65 11:34, 26 February 2011 (UTC)

aber jetzt nicht mehr und bevor jemand den unrechtmäßig erworbenen akademischen Grad (nix Titel) versehentlich verwendet, bleibt er draußen. --Kuebi (talk) 14:13, 28 February 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wolfgang Schaeuble 07.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolfgang Schaeuble 07.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Wolfgang Schaeuble 06.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolfgang Schaeuble 06.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

Wolfgang Schaeuble 12.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wolfgang Schaeuble 12.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

A kitten for you![edit]

Cute grey kitten.jpg

Ich wollte nur mal diese Super-Funktion ausprobieren. ;-) Liebe Grüße

Drahreg01 (talk) 18:54, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Äh, welche? Gruß --Kuebi (talk) 18:58, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Die mit den Kätzchen. Guck mal das Herzchen am oberen Bildrand. LG, --Drahreg01 (talk) 19:01, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Ahh! Für solche Spielereien haben die Softwareentwickler Zeit. Sollten lieber mal einen besseren, anfängerfreundlichen Editor implementieren. --Kuebi (talk) 19:10, 3 January 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Bufo bufo 03-clean.jpg
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bufo bufo 03-clean.jpg, which was produced or nominated by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

:File:Kanalprotein 01.png[edit]

could you change the copyright of this image to have the same as the original one(public domain) since it seems to be just a cut out seccion without further changes? i would really apreciate it if you did. or if you dont i would like to know your reasons. -LadyofHats (talk) 18:35, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

Hi, That wasn´t my intention. I changed to PD. Best regards --Kuebi (talk) 19:06, 10 April 2012 (UTC)
thankyou :D -LadyofHats (talk) 21:01, 10 April 2012 (UTC)

File:Budapest timewheel 03.jpg[edit]

Hi. The license of your image File:Budapest timewheel 03.jpg says you would like to receive a copy of the url where this image is being used. I am not sure whether that also includes use on the English Wikipedia or not. Anyway, I am using your image at http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Toshio_Yamaguchi/List_of_largest_hourglasses_in_the_world, which is supposed to be moved into article space on EN Wikipedia in the future. Please let me know whether the attribution I provided for this image in my draft is satisfactory. I am willing to correct any possible shortcomings. Regards.

PS: If you reply, please drop me a short reminder onto my talkpage over at EN Wikipedia, as otherwise I might not see your reply here.

Best. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 14:05, 21 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi, That's o.k. for that purpose. Best regards --Kuebi (talk) 16:25, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
Cool, thanks. All the best. Toshio Yamaguchi (talk) 21:37, 21 February 2013 (UTC)


File:INNO-406.png[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:INNO-406.png has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Ed (Edgar181) 16:10, 12 March 2013 (UTC)

File usage[edit]

Hi! I posted your picture File:Nacktmaus 01.jpg here. Have a nice day. --79.17.4.103 13:13, 23 April 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Xeroderma pigmentosum 03.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Xeroderma pigmentosum 03.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

JuTa 12:28, 2 June 2013 (UTC)

File:Handball.ogg[edit]

Thanks for spotting and tagging File:Handball.ogg. --KTo288 (talk) 21:22, 25 August 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Kai Feldmann 01.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Kai Feldmann 01.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

Ww2censor (talk) 13:09, 28 December 2013 (UTC)

File:Marian Cozma 04.jpg[edit]

Hello, I would like to inform you that I have made a cropped file from your photo in order to use it on the Main Page of huwiki at 8th February (the day of murder of Marian Cozma). --Rlevente (talk) 12:49, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi Kuebi

I'm a radiologist specializing in MRI. I wanted to let you know that the MRI image for Graves opthalmopathy is incorrect: The source of the image, paper by Huy A Tran and Glenn EM Reeves, is incorrect. The arrows are pointing to intraorbital fat. The muscles are the thin gray structures along the lateral aspects of the fat. In this case the muscles are normal in thickness. If you look at other articles, the mistake will be obvious. The authors used an incorrect image. Best Regards

Thank you for this information. I will check and correct it, if I find the time. Best regards --Kuebi (talk) 15:58, 22 April 2014 (UTC)

Lizenz und Erläuterungstext passen mMn nicht zusammen[edit]

Hallo Armin, könntest du auf diesem Bild mal schauen ob die CC-BY-Lizenz und dein Erläuterungstext zusammenpassen? MMn beschreibst du im Erläuterungstext eine CC-BY-SA-Lizenz und eben nicht die im Bild genannte CC-BY. Viele Grüße --Pustekuchen2014 (talk) 12:14, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also:

Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 15:29, 26 June 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Mittelheim St Aegidius 81-005.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | Bahasa Melayu | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Mittelheim St Aegidius 81-005.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 11:41, 2 July 2014 (UTC)

Du erhältst einen Orden![edit]

Photographer Barnstar.png Der Fotografenorden
Für das gelungene Bild der Nibelungenbrücke in Worms Aarp65 (talk) 11:48, 17 July 2014 (UTC)

Notification about possible deletion[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.

If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | বাংলা | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Affected:

And also: