User talk:L736E

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to: navigation, search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, L736E!
Afrikaans | Alemannisch | العربية | Asturianu | Azərbaycanca | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Български | বাংলা | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Euskara | Estremeñu | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Frysk | Galego | עברית | हिन्दी | Hrvatski | Magyar | Հայերեն | Interlingua | Bahasa Indonesia | Italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | Latina | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | मराठी | Bahasa Melayu | Plattdüütsch | नेपाली | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Scots | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Shqip | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Kiswahili | தமிழ் | ไทย | Türkçe | Українська | Vèneto | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | 中文(台灣)‎ | +/−

Tip: Categorizing images[edit]

Afrikaans | العربية | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | español | فارسی | suomi | français | galego | עברית | magyar | íslenska | italiano | 日本語 | ქართული | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | română | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | српски / srpski | svenska | українська | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−


Hello, L736E!

Tip: Add categories to your images

Thanks a lot for contributing to the Wikimedia Commons! Here's a tip to make your uploads more useful: Why not add some categories to describe them? This will help more people to find and use them.

Here's how:

1) If you're using the UploadWizard, you can add categories to each file when you describe it. Just click "more options" for the file and add the categories which make sense:

Uploadwizard-categories.png

2) You can also pick the file from your list of uploads, edit the file description page, and manually add the category code at the end of the page.

[[Category:Category name]]

For example, if you are uploading a diagram showing the orbits of comets, you add the following code:

[[Category:Astronomical diagrams]]
[[Category:Comets]]

This will make the diagram show up in the categories "Astronomical diagrams" and "Comets".

When picking categories, try to choose a specific category ("Astronomical diagrams") over a generic one ("Illustrations"). Pro-tip: The CommonSense tool can help you find the best category for your image.

Thanks again for your uploads! More information about categorization can be found in Commons:Categories, and don't hesitate to leave a note on the help desk.

CategorizationBot (talk) 10:53, 19 November 2009 (UTC)

User monotematici[edit]

Ghe pensi mi. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 22:38, 28 August 2012 (UTC)

Puppets[edit]

If there are accounts I've missed blocking do let me know :) Thanks for the help --Herby talk thyme 13:46, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Ah - then I find out a little more about you :) This user is not SUL but was on the same IP as a number of other accounts. Regards --Herby talk thyme 14:00, 18 January 2013 (UTC)
Yes I saw you had the rights :) Feel free to let me know if you find others or want Commons data - mail if you want to share CU stuff. Regards --Herby talk thyme 14:44, 18 January 2013 (UTC)

Lucerapedia[edit]

Bloccato infinito ed edit cancellati per copyvio -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 10:30, 16 March 2013 (UTC)

Eh, come gli dice male all'amico di Lucera... -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 16:43, 28 April 2013 (UTC)
Certo che è proprio sfortunato, il ragazzo. Però bisogna dire che è tenace, un altro al posto suo già avrebbe gettato la spugna, meno male che io ho pazienza... -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 14:08, 22 May 2013 (UTC)

Nicolaccio[edit]

Sic transit gloria mundi... -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 21:21, 1 July 2013 (UTC)

Ducanerofficial[edit]

Ripulito e avvisato. Anche se ho l'impressione che questa sia un'utenza a zero valore aggiunto. Se poi su it.wiki qualcuno potesse fare qualcosa per farmi uscire dalla situazione grottesca della quale sono vittima... -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 08:30, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

Foto[edit]

Ci può stare. Prodotta nel 1970, in PD negli USA prima del 1996. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 10:55, 17 March 2014 (UTC)

Foto[edit]

Problema risolto in maniera politically correct. -- SERGIO (aka the Blackcat) 10:00, 3 April 2014 (UTC)

Counter-campaigning[edit]

Are you sure you really want to go around making edits like this?

Peter Isotalo 10:24, 12 August 2014 (UTC)

And this edit at English Wiktionary is especially bad. I've been contributing to English Wiktionary for several years now. It is not considered appropriate to fill up entries with images, and especially not images like this. As far as I know, the removal has support (at least one editor thanked me). What you're doing isn't relevant to article improvement, but is against me personally.
Peter Isotalo 10:38, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
from my talkpage; keeping the discussion together:
This is the story. It's not up to you to force something against WP:CONSENSUS. Until this consensus will not change, please respect the decisions of the community and don't start edit wars. --L736E (talk) 13:14, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[1]
Good! Now we're discussing the actual matter. Let's stick to that.
Maybe you have a guideline or established at Italian Wikipedia that says anything kept on Commons can't be removed from an article for any reason. I've never seen anything like it before, though. The contents of articles is up to the individual projects to decide. That means those who edit them, and the policies that are written by them. This is relevan to both text and images. There are obvious limits on the number and type of images that can be included, though this varies greatly depending on the situation, and perhaps according to project. If you know of a policy or guideline that effectively says "not deleted on Commons = can't be removed from an article", please quote it. Otherwise I'll assume you're no more neutral than I am.
Now, I don't dislike this image per se. I just don't see it as very useful. It's high-quality, unique and highly amusing picture, but it has severe limitations as an encyclopedic illustration, especially when it comes to the animal species. And selfies to a great degree (not representative in any way). I think it's a wonderful photograph, but I am strongly opposed to more or less automatic inclusion anywhere we can. Cramming it into image galleries conveys no useful information and using it as the main (or even only) image in an article about the black crested macaque is simply not justifiable; it shows almost nothing of the animal and what it shows is extremely rare behavior. On top of this, I am opposed to overuse because of the copyright dispute. In my view, the argument for being restrictive outweighs to include a high-profile pic that happens to be in the media right now. And that just happens to concern Wikimedia. It's very obviously self-referential. None of these reasons, either seperate or in combination, mean that I want to exclude any of the selfies altogether. But the overall case for restrictiveness is much stronger for me, especially in articles that are mere stubs.
Peter Isotalo 15:30, 12 August 2014 (UTC)