User talk:Küñall

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
(Redirected from User talk:Lester Foster)
Jump to: navigation, search
For past discussions or threads, see my talk page archive

File:Aniversario IRFE 2013 IMG 0491 (10230841403).jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Aniversario IRFE 2013 IMG 0491 (10230841403).jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Wilfredor (talk) 19:28, 27 November 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Programa de Gobierno de Michelle Bachelet - 2013.pdf[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Programa de Gobierno de Michelle Bachelet - 2013.pdf. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:20, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Whoops! Just fixed the issue, I had not noticed it. Regards, küñall (nütramyen) 13:38, 10 December 2013 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Bachelet en su juventud, junto a su padre.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Bachelet en su juventud, junto a su padre.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

No required license templates were detected at this file page. Please correct it, or if you have any questions please contact me on my talk page. Yours sincerely, Jarekt (talk) 04:48, 17 December 2013 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Ximena Rincón González, ministra Segpres.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Ximena Rincón González, ministra Segpres.jpg, is missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. Please edit the file description and add the missing information, or the file may be deleted.

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

And also:

Fixed all (all have a common direct source: http://michellebachelet.cl/ministros/). License can be checked at the "Política de privacidad" section. küñall (nütramyen) 19:53, 5 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Pałacyk Rydla w Ostrowcu Świętokrzyskim.jpg[edit]

Hi, Why did you choose to move my picture to such indistinct name? Do you expect there ever will be only one picture of this building on commons? BR, -- Jakubhal 05:43, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi there. Of course there won't, but it's better that it does away with that numbering. Also, "Pałacyk Rydla w Ostrowcu Świętokrzyskim" is far better than "Ostrowiec palacykRydla". küñall (nütramyen) 05:48, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Hi, I appreciate your thought, but don't agree that name looking better should be a reason for moving files. The rules says, Files should NOT be renamed only because the new name looks a bit better.
The dates in my files names are for the reason, to distinguish them from other pictures depicting the same object. -- Jakubhal 05:58, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
It did not look just a bit better, it did change a lot from its first name. I understand your concern, however, and have changed again the name to point out the picture's date. Regards, küñall (nütramyen) 06:02, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
Ok, thank you very much. Regards, -- Jakubhal 06:06, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Unnecessarily File Rename[edit]

The style of my file naming very well acccepted [example] format that contains place, date and the camera generated serial number with a neutral, informative and good looking. Very recent (File:South City Mall - Anwar Shah Road - Kolkata 2013-02-08 4473.JPG) was renamed by you! Renaming in this case is very much unjustified. I do not like to change unnecessarily file name as you did. I request to revert the file name. Thanks. -- Biswarup Ganguly (talk) 06:27, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Gangulybiswarup. Perhaps the new name could do better with the date it was taken, but the serial number was unnecessary. That's why it was moved. Regards, küñall (nütramyen) 20:03, 12 April 2014 (UTC)
The camera generated serial number is extremely necessary to a large photograph handler, as thousands of photographs have to manage every day for different purpose by me, it keeps my track, otherwise the effort will be messed up. Thanks. -- Biswarup Ganguly (talk) 01:34, 13 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Demography graphic of Pichilemu.png[edit]

HI. Thx for great image and src code. What programming language it is ? Regards --Adam majewski (talk) 18:22, 24 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi there Adam. It is actually wiki-code, it works here in Wikimedia wikis because of an extension (I don't recall specifically its name, but it's on Special:Version). That's it! küñall (nütramyen) 02:51, 25 April 2014 (UTC)
EasyTimeline, OK , Thx. --Adam majewski (talk) 15:16, 25 April 2014 (UTC)

Fotos antiguas de Valparaíso (Old Valparaíso Pictures)[edit]

Amigo Diego, yo no soy el autor de esas fotos, ni tampoco busco atribuirme su autoría (sería demasiado idiota de mi parte atribuirme la autoría de una foto o un daguerrotipo tomado 80 o 150 años atrás, ¿no le parece a usted?). Creía que sería demasiado obvio para quienes vieran las imágenes entender ese hecho, por ello no las he editado, ademas de que como usted amigo Diego entenderá, saber quienes sacaron fotos tan antiguas es un proceso demasiado complejo, de hecho, en el mejor de los casos sabremos la autoría de una fracción de dichas imágenes (como las galerías en las que dejo claro quienes son los fotográfos en Valparaíso Old Pictures). Deje sin editar la autoría o fecha de gran mayoría de las imágenes para que alguien que sepa del tema haga las correcciones correspondientes, ademas de la obviedad anteriormente dicha. Saludos.--Alexxxos (talk) 14:49, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

Bueno, en el caso de que no sepas quién fue el autor de las imágenes, debes usar "Unknown". Lo mismo para las fechas. Porque con tu nombre en las descripciones, das a entender aquello (aunque cualquier persona con dos dedos de frente se de cuenta de lo contrario). küñall (nütramyen) 14:53, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

¿que te pasa Diego?[edit]

Oye Diego, ¿para que vaciaste tantas categorías en las que yo había trabajado anteriormente?. Ni siquiera te diste el tiempo de discutir el terma en la pagina de DISCUSIÓN que tiene cada categoría, no olvides que no estas solo en el mundo y que debes tener un mínimo de respeto por el trabajo ajeno. Investigare como denunciarte por lo que deshiciste sin avisarle a nadie--Alexxxos (talk) 15:44, 14 May 2014 (UTC).

No era necesario avisarte. Creaste demasiadas categorías duplicadas, que cumplen la misma función que la categoría madre. (Ej. Calle Blanco (Fotos Antiguas) perfectamente debían estar en la categoría Calle Blanco). Si te fijas en la categorización que hay en Category:Valparaíso, está la tendalada. Yo solo organizé como se debía tus archivos. No lo tomes a mal. küñall (nütramyen) 15:48, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
Por cierto, no soy el único que te ha hecho saber la innecesariedad de las categorías que creaste, y que aparte, no tienen la capitalización correcta, de ser válidas (ej. "Fotos Antiguas" debió haber sido "fotos antiguas") küñall (nütramyen) 15:50, 14 May 2014 (UTC)
No puede llamarse "categoría duplicada" una que almacena fotos antiguas de una calle a una que alberga fotos actuales, aún siendo la misma calle, o una que tiene postales antiguas panorámicas a otra que tiene fotos panorámicas ¿como puede ser lo mismo? o, ¿para ti una postal y una foto son lo mismo?. Al crear las categorías buscaba ordenar, organizar la imágenes para tener un mejor acceso a las mismas, mientras que tu, sin aviso previo alguno te dedicaste a desordenar, destruir meses de trabajo solo por que se te dio la gana. Entiende que te equivocaste y lo mejor que puedes hacer es revertir tu error.--Alexxxos (talk) 16:39, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

File:Diario VI Región, 2 Septiembre 2009.jpg[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg File:Diario VI Región, 2 Septiembre 2009.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

Túrelio (talk) 07:38, 15 May 2014 (UTC)

Commons:Deletion requests/Files uploaded by User:Alexxxos[edit]

Hi,

I don't think this is useful. There may be some problem with some files, but nominating all files uploaded by a user is a bit abusive. Could you close this please and nominate files which have a problem, in specifying what is the problem? Thanks, Yann (talk) 21:58, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

Template:Diario VI Región[edit]

Commons-emblem-issue.svg Template:Diario VI Región has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.

If you created this template, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue.
Please remember to respond to and – if appropriate – contradict the arguments supporting deletion. Arguments which focus on the nominator will not affect the result of the nomination. Thank you!


Afrikaans | العربية | Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Čeština | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Zazaki | Ελληνικά | English | Esperanto | Español | Eesti | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Bahasa Indonesia | Íslenska | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk nynorsk | Norsk bokmål | Occitan | Polski | Português | Português do Brasil | Română | Русский | Slovenčina | Slovenščina | Српски / srpski | Svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文 | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−

FlávR (talk) 03:19, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Gangnam Style Roja CPS.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Gangnam Style Roja CPS.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Yours sincerely, FlávR (talk) 03:41, 18 May 2014 (UTC)

PD-Chile[edit]

Hi! The pics you tagged as (c)vios are PD-Chile. See here :) --Hedwig in Washington (mail?) 02:10, 23 May 2014 (UTC)

File source is not properly indicated: File:Retrato oficial Michelle Bachelet 2014-2018, segundo período.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Retrato oficial Michelle Bachelet 2014-2018, segundo período.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Retrato oficial Michelle Bachelet 2014-2018, segundo período.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

Ralgis (talk) 07:03, 26 May 2014 (UTC)


File source is not properly indicated: File:Retrato oficial Michelle Bachelet 2006-2010, primer período.jpg[edit]

العربية | asturianu | беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Ελληνικά | English | español | euskara | فارسی | suomi | français | עברית | magyar | italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | norsk nynorsk | norsk bokmål | polski | português | português do Brasil | русский | slovenčina | slovenščina | svenska | Türkçe | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media was probably deleted.
A file that you have uploaded to Wikimedia Commons, File:Retrato oficial Michelle Bachelet 2006-2010, primer período.jpg, was missing information about where it comes from or who created it, which is needed to verify its copyright status. The file probably has been deleted. If you've got all required information, request undeletion providing this information and the link to the concerned file ([[:File:Retrato oficial Michelle Bachelet 2006-2010, primer período.jpg]]).

If you created the content yourself, enter {{own}} as the source. If you did not add a licensing template, you must add one. You may use, for example, {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} or {{Cc-zero}} to release certain rights to your work.

If someone else created the content, or if it is based on someone else's work, the source should be the address to the web page where you found it, the name and ISBN of the book you scanned it from, or similar. You should also name the author, provide verifiable information to show that the content is in the public domain or has been published under a free license by its author, and add an appropriate template identifying the public domain or licensing status, if you have not already done so.

Please add the required information for this and other files you have uploaded before adding more files. If you need assistance, please ask at the help desk. Thank you!

--Yakoo (talk) 03:22, 27 May 2014 (UTC)

Copyright status: File:Salvador Allende Gossens.jpg[edit]

български | català | čeština | dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | English | فارسی | suomi | français | magyar | italiano | македонски | മലയാളം | 日本語 | norsk bokmål | polski | português | română | slovenščina | svenska | +/−

Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Salvador Allende Gossens.jpg. I notice that the file page either doesn't contain enough information about the license or it contains contradictory information about the license, so the copyright status is unclear.

If you created this file yourself, then you must provide a valid copyright tag. For example, you can tag it with {{self|GFDL|cc-by-sa-all}} to release it under the multi-license GFDL plus Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike All-version license or you can tag it with {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain. (See Commons:Copyright tags for the full list of license tags that you can use.)

If you did not create the file yourself or if it is a derivative of another work that is possibly subject to copyright protection, then you must specify where you found it (e.g. usually a link to the web page where you got it), you must provide proof that it has a license that is acceptable for Commons (e.g. usually a link to the terms of use for content from that page), and you must add an appropriate license tag. If you did not create the file yourself and the specific source and license information is not available on the web, you must obtain permission through the OTRS system and follow the procedure described there.

Note that any unsourced or improperly licensed files will be deleted one week after they have been marked as lacking proper information, as described in criteria for speedy deletion. If you have uploaded other files, please confirm that you have provided the proper information for those files, too. (You can get a list of all your uploaded files using the Gallery tool.) Thank you.

LX (talk, contribs) 10:01, 29 May 2014 (UTC)

File tagging File:Rodrigo Peñailillo Briceño.jpg[edit]

Беларуская (тарашкевіца)‎ | Català | Česky | Dansk | Deutsch | Deutsch (Sie-Form)‎ | Ελληνικά | English | Español | فارسی | Suomi | Français | Galego | עברית | Magyar | Հայերեն | Italiano | 日本語 | 한국어 | Lietuvių | Македонски | മലയാളം | Plattdüütsch | Nederlands | Norsk bokmål | Polski | Português | Română | Русский | Slovenščina | Svenska | Türkçe | Українська | اردو | Tiếng Việt | 中文(简体)‎ | 中文(繁體)‎ | +/−
Warning sign
This media may be deleted.
Thanks for uploading File:Rodrigo Peñailillo Briceño.jpg. This media is missing permission information. A source is given, but there is no proof that the author or copyright holder agreed to license the file under the given license. Please provide a link to an appropriate webpage with license information, or send an email with copy of a written permission to OTRS (permissions-commons@wikimedia.org). This also applies if you are the author yourself.

Please see this page for more information on how to confirm permission, and Commons:Permission if you would like to understand why we ask for permission when uploading work that is not your own.

Unless the permission information is given, the image may be deleted after seven days. Thank you.

Vanjagenije (talk) 00:57, 16 July 2014 (UTC)

Cambio de nombre a categoría[edit]

Hola, te escribo para ver si puedes cambiarle el nombre a esta categoría sobre Valparaíso a Category:Valparaíso in Art, para hacerla mas general, específica e internacional. Saludos.--Alexxxos (talk) 05:24, 16 July 2014 (UTC)